Advertisements

Who is at Fault for the Manchester Tragedy?


Who is at Fault for the Manchester Tragedy?

When I started this blog I promised that I will always write the truth. Looking the Internet newspapers although they try to write the truth some covered some saying the plain truth but only the half of it not the whole truth.

Adam Garrie he writes at the Duran electronic newspaper an analysis about how the British deep state turned Manchester into al Qaeda Town UK. He explains that the savage terrorist atrocity in Manchester was a classic case of terrorist blowback, phenomenon describing how Western governments fund, arm and aid terrorists, they often come back to commit (sic) horrific crimes against the citizens of the countries which funded and aided them.

In my opinion these terrorists where under the payroll of the deep state. These terrorists have one thing in common which all shadowy governments want; when suited to destroy another sovereign country to steal resources or to commit a false flag they are hired. It’s not an easy task to sacrifice their own people in the name of freedom but if you want a NWO that is what you have to do. Bringing such terror to its population makes it easier for the shadowy government to take away their freedom. I know it is hard to accept this reality, it took me years to accept it. Once you see the big picture then you can understand how the system works.

Let’s get back to the Manchester tragedy which I condemn full heartedly. Worst tragedies from the same shadowy governments suffer the consequences of their actions (Syria, Yemen, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan,, Pakistan, Sudan these are only a few that I have in mind). Britain has been funding the Libyan Islamic fighting group(LIFG) since the mid 80s they helped them by organising the group, funding them, arming them and training so that they could topple Qaddafi. The Libyan Islamic fighting Group was affiliated to Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and till today they still have ties to this terrorist group and other groups like them. Here is a link that you can read for yourself to understand all the connections of LIFG with other terrorist organisations.

Here is another link that proves my point.

Rebels ‘Went to Libya With MI5 Blessing’ Amid Abedi Probe

So Salman Obeidi’s father was a police officer in Tripoli till 1991 when for his own reasons he joined the radical group called L.I.F.G <= Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Qaddafi had banned it for its Islamic radicalism aka the reason for escaping the same year and asking for asylum in Britain. The father Ramadan Abdulgassem Obeidi never stopped his affiliation with the group and continued to work with the leaders of LIFG who are Belhaz who has a British passport & one of the worst terrorist known, the other is Abdul Basset Gweli from Zliten and has Caribbean passport. I’m sure the above information is already known to you. What isn’t mention is Faousi Camoucha who is more dangerous than Belhaz & Gweli put together is a diplomat in the LIBYAN embassy in Britain and was in an everyday contact with Salman Obeidi which is believed that CAMOUCHA gave the order. Please do not forget that all the above people were working with MI5/6 and the deep state of Britain.

Now Belhadj was made commander of the Tripoli Military Council since the illegal war finished. For the sake of diplomacy towards Britain, someone gave the order in Tripoli to have the father Ramadan Abdulgassem Obeidi and one of his sons arrested. You realize that Belhaj who belongs to LIFG has the upper hand in Tripoli, you think they will stay arrested for long?

This just came in:

A Notorious terrorist Abdel Raouf Kara takes the family of the terrorist Salman al-Obeidi into Hiding although Kara was put under pressure from some of the leaders for their release Kara enabled them to escape and disappear in an unknown place. So as you can see no arrests are done.

Further more I read that the British Prime Minister raised the country’s terror threat level to critical, the first time it has been raised to that level since 2007. But she still sells arms to Saudi Arabia and still wants a Regime change in Syria…. Instead of backing out of these things and doing the bidding of the United States she continues to ruin lives in Yemen by the Saudis and in Syria telling a sovereign country it needs to change as they did in Libya and you see the outcome.

It’s about time the English people wake up before it’s too late.

Advertisements

Impact of the slaughter of Brak, Wadi Shati, Fezzan, Libya


Impact of the slaughter of Brak, Wadi Shati, Fezzan, Libya

The murder of 143 people at the base of Brak in Wadi Shati about 750 km south of Libya in the desert by the armed bands of Misratah, supported by the West, it’s a crime atrocious war and the worst in this small city ​​and area in the desert. People were celebrating because they had signed a cease-fire with all the armed bands of Misratah by the proximity of the start of Ramadan. The killing has no justification nor forgiveness, and even less knowing the anger of psychopaths who have used after shooting people, they passed them over with the car and / or slaughtered and / or burned.

The repercussions of the massacre Sands Brak Wadi Shati:

The House of Representatives condemned the operation and declares 3 days of mourning

The interim government condemned the operation

The Libyan army commander threatens a quick response.

The Council of State has not shown any reaction

Members of the third force (Misratah) threaten to show recorded audios showing Barghouthi Defense Minister and President Al-Sarraj and KAGMAN (member of the presidency), giving instructions for carrying out the slaughter of Brak.

People’s Libyan National Movement condemns the slaughter.

The elders and sages of Southern Libya have declared that give two days a third force (Misratah armed bands) to abandon southern Libya without restrictions or conditions.

International reactions

  1. The British ambassador to Libya condemned the operation and called WAR CRIME
  2. The UN envoy in Libya, M. Kobler, condemned the operation and called for calm.
  3. The Egyptian government condemns the operation.
  4. The Italian newspaper “La Republica” published today that the slaughter in the sands of Brak was made by Mhadi Barghoudi without having thought that the impact would be very serious.

    We can see clear absences international recognition of this terrible war crime and psychopaths sent to carry it out. We must never forget that the mercenaries trained to kill and turned into psychopaths are just the tool for the real culprits who are not in Libya, do not speak and if they do is to lie. 

    It is also very important to check the media repercussions against a single death from Western aggressors against the killing of 143 Libyans.  

Al-Siraj has decided to suspend from office Al-Mahdi Al-Barghouthi and Jamal-Triki to be subjected to an investigation into the causes of the slaughter of Brak.

The president of the Council urged the suspension from office Colonel Mahdi Albergta as defense minister for a thorough investigation on the slaughter of Brak

 Weapons and ammunition armed gangs attacked Brak. Found in a building in Brak

                       Armed bands from Misratah way to Brak

information received Directly from eyewitnesses
Leonor Massanet

There was once a country called Yemen On the occasion of ” Manchester ”


There was once a country called Yemen On the occasion of ” Manchester ”

Following the nomination of a US-based president, who was the only candidate in the elections, the residents rose and began to protest. And then began a devastating imperialist intervention, which the people of the Western world barely know.

Massacre Yemen in numbers

At the southernmost end of the Arabian Peninsula, there was once a country called Yemen. Its inhabitants did not live as richly as the rest of the peninsula, since they did not have the same stocks of oil and so this country was described as the poorest in the region. Beyond poverty, however, the people who lived in that country were forced to learn to live with the daily presence of American drones that bombed them for years to bring them democracy. Despite the adversity, the inhabitants of that country were trying to live their lives. Make family, children, work and eat.

One day, elections were held and a US favorite was elected president. The inhabitants were disturbed, not so much because their chairman was the surge of those who were blowing them. They were accustomed to this. But mainly because in the elections from which the new president was elected, only one candidate came down. That’s who won. So the residents rose up and began to protest.

And then, this:

8 Saudi-led countries have begun to bomb Yemen. Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, Sudan (?!), The United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar and Bahrain.

2 were the different operations carried out by Saudi Arabia and its partners in Yemen. The first was called the Decisive Storm and because it was not so decisive, the second called it Restoring Hope (Restoring Hope).

0 (zero) was almost the condemnation of the invasion by the world community, while the surrogates in Syria, who somewhat said, “Serves them right. Let’s them come over here. ”

3.3 billion in weapons sold to Saudi Arabians by the British

130 billion in weapons sold to Saudi Arabia by the United States

 40 billion  of weapons were sold by the US to Qatar, a country involved in the bombing, making it the largest arms deal for 2015. Well done Obama.

70 air raids were made against Yemen by the United States only in the first three months of 2017. Well done Tramp.

10,000 people have lost their lives.

40,000 have been injured

39 hospitals and clinics have been bombed by the Saudi Arabian coalition

0 inhabitants of Yemen have managed to flee the country as refugees, since Saudi Arabia has imposed a complete isolation of the country, by land and sea.

0 are the imports and exports authorized in Yemen from Saudi coalition, condemning the people to famine, pestilence and death.

90% of food and medicines needed by Yemen imported them from abroad before the start of the Saudi invasion.

3,300,000 children and pregnant women are at risk of famine which has arisen as a result

7 million people in total do not have stable access to food, with famine expected to soon reach “biblical dimensions”.

1  position was given to Saudi Arabia, the UN Commission on Human Rights, and apparently was entitled more.

1  UN Secretary-General is reportedly threatened by Saudi Arabia to be excluded from the list of war crimes.

0 are the campaigns we’ve seen to be conducted on social media to inform and sensitize the world, say #prayForAden, the capital of Yemen.

X people know that in fact the capital of Yemen is Sanaa

Editor’s Note: This article I found it in a Greek blog called “katiousa.gr” translated it in English.

 

QADDAFI WAS A ‘HERO,’ SAYS AFRICA’S LONGEST-SERVING PRESIDENT


QADDAFI WAS A ‘HERO,’ SAYS AFRICA’S LONGEST-SERVING PRESIDENT

The late Libyan strongman Muammar el-Qaddafi was a “hero” for promoting solidarity among African countries, according to the continent’s longest-serving president.

Qaddafi, who was killed (assassinated)  in an uprising (after stale mate with NATO)in the North African country in 2011, was a strong advocate of creating a “United States of Africa” and supported the philosophy of pan-Africanism, which promotes the political union of African countries.

The president of Equatorial Guinea, a small oil-rich country in Central Africa, said the failure to realize Qaddafi’s vision was to blame for poverty and conflict in parts of the continent.

Qaddafi at U.N.

Libyan leader Muammar el-Qaddafi delivers an address to the United Nations General Assembly at U.N. headquarters in New York City on September 23, 2009. Qaddafi was a strong advocate of greater unity between African nations. MARIO TAMA/GETTY

 

“I recall our hero Qaddafi who used to promote this African solidarity, but sadly most countries would not still agree with him,” said President Teodoro Obiang Nguema Mbasogo, who has been in power since 1979. Obiang made the comments during a visit to Uganda, where he met his counterpart President Yoweri Museveni, according to Ugandan newspaper the Daily Monitor. “The instability Africa is suffering due to the egoism of each country.”

The world’s ten-poorest countries by GDP per capita are all in sub-Saharan Africa. The continent has also witnessed major conflicts in recent years, including the Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria and its neighboring countries and the civil war in Congo.

The African Union (AU), a continental institution that holds semi-annual assemblies and promotes socioeconomic and political integration, is pursuing a version of Qaddafi’s dream. In its Agenda 2063 policy document, published in 2013, the AU proposed creating a continent-wide free trade area, similar to the European Union’s single market, which ensures the free movement of goods, capital and people within member states.

While Africa already has some regional economic communities that promote trade, African countries on the whole do not trade with each other very much. A 2015 U.N. report found that intra-African trade made up just 14 percent of the continent’s total trade; in the EU, the equivalent figure was 61 percent.

The AU also wants to remove visa restrictions and eventually issue an African passport to citizens of AU member states.

Qaddafi ruled Libya for more than four decades before his demise, which followed a NATO military intervention led by the U.S. and the U.K. Since Qaddafi’s death, Libya has been mired in chaos, with multiple governments competing for legitimacy and jihadi groups, including the Islamic State militant group (ISIS), establishing bases in the country.

Human rights groups have accused Obiang of widespread human rights violations and rampant corruption. Equatorial Guinea has a higher GDP per capita than Russia or Turkey, but a large proportion of the country’s population remains in poverty.

Swiss prosecutors recently opened criminal proceedings against Obiang’s son, who also serves as a vice-president of the country, after accusing him of money laundering and seizing 11 luxury cars belonging to him, including a Bugatti Veyron.

Libya – Why Was Muammar Gaddafi Killed – May We Never Forget Based on a Skype interview with Alex Knyazev, Russia TV24


Libya – Why Was Muammar Gaddafi Killed – May We Never Forget

Based on a Skype interview with Alex Knyazev, Russia TV24

Global Research, May 18, 2017
Russia TV24

The Text below is the transcript of the interview between Alex Knyazevof Russia TV24 and Peter Koenig.  

Questions Russia TV24: What were the reasons Mr. Gaddafi was killed and NATO invaded Libya?

PK: Mr. Muammar Gaddafi was certainly not killed for humanitarian reasons.

Mr. Gaddafi wanted to empower Africa. He had a plan to create a new African Union, based on a new African economic system. He had a plan to introduce the ‘Gold Dinar’ as backing for African currencies, so they could become free from the dollar dominated western monetary system, that kept and keeps usurping Africa; Africa’s vast natural resources, especially oil and minerals. As a first step, he offered this lucrative and very beneficial alternative to other Muslim African states, but leaving it open for any other African countries to join.

At the time of Gaddafi’s atrocious murdering by Hillary Clinton, then Obama’s Secretary of State, and the French President Sarkozy, driven by NATO forces, on 20 October 2011 – Libya’s gold reserves were estimated at close to 150 tons, and about the same amount of silver. The estimated value at that time was US$ 7billion.

Image result for libya gold reserve

It’s your guess who may have stolen this enormous treasure from the people of Libya. As of this date, it is nowhere to be found.

Gaddafi also wanted to detach his oil sales from the dollar, i.e. no longer trading hydrocarbons in US dollars, as was the US / OPEC imposed rule since the early 1970s. Other African and Middle Eastern oil and gas producers would have followed. In fact, Iran had already in 2007, a plan to introduce the Tehran Oil Bourse, where anyone could trade hydrocarbons in currencies other than the US dollar. That idea came to a sudden halt, when Bush (George W) started accusing Iran of planning to build a nuclear bomb which was, of course a fabricated lie, confirmed by the 16most prominent US security agencies- and later also by the UN body for nuclear safety – the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), in Vienna. Washington needed a pretext to stop the Tehran Oil Bourse which would have decimated the need for dollars, and thereby most probably would have meant the end of the dollar hegemony.

Saddam Hussein had the same idea. He promised as soon as the murderous and criminal embargo imposed by the UN – of course dictated by Washington – would end in 2000, he would sell his petrol in euros. He was killed.

Gaddafi’s new plan for Africa would have meant an entirely new banking system for Africa, away from the now western (mainly France and UK) central banks dominated African currencies. -It could have meant the collapse of the US dollar -or at least an enormous blow to this fake dollar based western monetary system.

So, the Gold Dinar was not to happen. Anybody – to this day- who threatens the dollar hegemony will have to die. That means anybody other than China and Russia, because they have already a few years ago largely detached their economy from the dollar, by implementing hydrocarbons as well as other international contracts in gold or the respective local currencies. That alone has already helped reducing dollar holdings in international reserve coffers from almost 90% some 20 years ago to a rate fluctuating between 50% and 60% today.

Related imageThe also Washington / CIA induced “Arab Spring” was to turn the entire Middle East into one huge chaos zone- which today of course, it is. And there are no plans to secure it and to return it to normalcy, to what it was before. To the contrary, chaos allows to divide and conquer – to Balkanize, as is the plan for Syria and Iraq. One of the Washington led western goals of this chaos of constant conflict is to eventually install a system of private central banks in the Middle Eastern / North African countries controlled by Washington – privately owned central banks, à la Federal Reserve (FED), where the neocons, the Rothschilds and freemasonry would call the shots. That is expected to help stabilize the US dollar hegemony, as the hydrocarbons produced in this region generate trillions of dollars in trading per year.

Gaddafi also wanted to introduce, or had already started introducing into Africa a wireless telephone system that would do away with the US / European monopolies, with the Alcatels and AT and T’s of this world, which dominate and usurp the African market without scruples.

Gaddafi was not only the leader of Libya, he had ambitions to free Africa from the nefarious fangs of the west. Despite being called a dictator and despot by the west – they do that to anyone who doesn’t submit to Washington’s rules – he was very much liked by Libyans, by his people. He had a more than 80% approvalrate by the Libyan people. Libya’s oil fortune has allowed him to create a social system in his country where everybody would benefit from their land’s riches – free health care, free education, including scholarships abroad, modern infrastructure, top-notch technology in medicine, and more.

Russia TV24: Why the gold dinar would be unacceptable for the western leaders? Or not?

PK: Yes, the gold Dinar was totally unacceptable for western leaders. It might have devastated the US dollar hegemony, as well as Europe’s control over the African economy – which is nothing less than neo-colonization of Africa – in many ways worse than what happened for the past 400 or 800 years of murderous military colonization and oppression -which is by the way still ongoing, just more discretely.

Image result for Alassane Ouattara

Look at the Ivory Coast 2010 presidential elections. Theirarguably ‘unelected’ President, Alassane Ouattara (picture on the right), was in a tie with the people’s candidate, Laurent Gbagbo. Gbagbo said he won the election and asked for a recount which was denied. Ouattara, a former IMF staff, was pushed in, basically by ‘recommendation’ of the IMF. He is the darling of the neoliberal international financial institutions – and is leading a neocon government – an economy at the service of western corporations. That’s what they wanted. That’s what they got. Modern colonization is well alive and thriving. I call this a financial coup, instigated by foreign financial institutions.

Image result for laurent gbagboMr. Laurent Gbagbo was accused of rape, murder and other atrocities and immediately transferred to the International Criminal Court (sic-sic) – what justice? – in The Hague, where he was waiting five years for a trial which started on 28 January 2016 and is ongoing. On 15 May 2017, it was extended at the Prosecutor’s request to collect further evidence. This by all likelihood is just a farce to dupe the public into believing that he is getting a fair trial. Already in hearings in 2014, Gbagbo was found guilty of all charges, including murder, rape and other crimes against humanity. Like Slobodan Milošević, he is an inconvenient prisoner, or worse would he be as a free man. So, he will most likely be locked away – and one day commit ‘suicide’ or die from a ‘heart attack’.  The classic. That’s how the west does away with potential witnesses of their atrocious crimes. End of story. Nobody barks, because the ‘free world’has been made believe by the western presstitute media that these people are inhuman tyrants. That’s precisely what the western media’s headlines proclaimed about Muammar Gaddafi: Death of a Tyrant.

On the other hand, in 2015, Ouattara was “reelected by a landslide”. That’s what western media say. Colonization under African ‘leadership’. He is protected by the French army.

Back to Libya: Take the specific case of France and West and Central Africa. The French Central Bank, the Banque de France, backs the West and Central African Monetary Union’s currency, the CFA franc. The West African Central Bank, for example, is covered, i.e. controlled, by about 70% of the Banque de France. Banque de France has an almost total control over the economy of its former West African colonies. No wonder, Sarkozy, a murderer and war criminal – sorry, it must be said, backed Hillary’s – also a murderer and war criminal, push for NATO to destroy the country and kill thousands of Libyans, including Libya’s leader, Muammar Gaddafi. Hillary’s infamous words: ‘We came we saw he died’. And that she said shamelessly, jokingly, laughing. Would the term human being still apply to such a monster?

Russia TV24: What countries are mostly interested in the Libyan recovery and why? What are the chances for the economy of Libya to be repaired?

PK: Well, if anybody should be interested in Libya’s recovery it would be first the Libyans who are still living in Libya, because they are now living in a Libya of chaos and high crime, of mafia-economics, of tyranny by gang leadership. They certainly have an interest to return to normalcy. North African neighboring countries should also be interested in restoring order and rebuilding Libya’s infrastructure and economy, stopping the spill-over of high crime and terrorism. They have lost an important trading partner.

Of course, the rest of Africa, who have suffered from continuous colonization of the west, after Gaddafi’s demise, should also be interested in reestablishing Libya. They know,it will never be the same Libya that was there to help their economy, to help them prying loose from the western boots and fangs of exploitation.

And Europe -should be most interested in reestablishing order and a real economy in Libya- cleaning it from a murderous Mafia that promotes drugs and slave trade ending up in Europe. Libya today is one of the key hubs for the boat refugees from Africa to Europe.Instead of helping Libyans to come to peace within its borders and to rebuild their country, the European Commission launched in 2015 a new European Border and Coast Guard Agency, targeting specifically Libya – destroying refugee boats, if they cannot stop them from leaving Tripoli, Benghazi and other Libyan Sea ports.

Of course, spineless Europe doesn’t dare saying they would like to remake Libya into a functional state.Libya is Washington’s territory – and Washington wants chaos to continue in Libya.As such Libya is a formidable ground for training and recruitment of terrorists, drug and slave trading; a country where crime prospers and the CIA takes their cut, as these criminal activities are directed by the CIA and their affiliates. The rest of the world doesn’t see that. For them it’s all the fault of the dictator Gaddafi, who thanks goodness was eliminated by the western powers, lords of money and greed.

Russia TV24: Decades ago Libya was very successful from an economic point of view. What main things could you remember?

PK: Libya was economically and socially a successful country, arguably the most successful of Africa. Prosperity from oil was largely shared by Gaddafi with his countrymen. Libya had a first-class social safety net, an excellent transportation infrastructure, free medical services, and modern hospitals,equipped with latest technology medical equipment, free education for everyone – and students could even receive scholarships to study abroad.

Image result for libya gaddafi

Under President Gaddafi, Libya built friendly relations based on solidarity with other African States and was always ready to help if a ‘brother nation’ was in trouble. Gaddafi was a bit like Hugo Chavez in South America. He had a large heart and charisma, maybe not so much for western leaders, but certainly for Libya’s own population. Yet, he is accused of tyranny by the West, and is said to having financially supported Sarkozy’s Presidential campaign – Sarkozy, the very ‘leader’ (sic-sic),who then helped Hillary lynch Gaddafi. If that doesn’t say a lot about Europe’s criminal leaders – what will?

Muammar Gaddafi was accused by Washington – an accusation immediately repeated by the spineless European puppets, of being responsible for the December 1988 PanAm Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie, Scotland. More than 240 people perished in the crash. Not a shred of evidence was discovered that Libya was behind the plot. But it was a good reason to start a program of sanctions against Gaddafi’s regime. It was most likely a false flag. What interest would anybody have to bring down that flight, other than clamping down on an oil-rich country.

Russia TV24: Now we see oil production has grown to at least 50% of the 2011 level. Can we expect it to continue growing and affecting the oil market?

PK: Yes, Libyan oil production has increased to about 50% of its 2011 level. Libya is known for her high premium light petrol, commanding premium prices. It is a market niche which might well be affected by Libya’s stepped up production. But who really benefits from this production increase? – Most likely not the Libyans, but the international corporations, mostly American and French oil giants. They call the shots on the production levels. They are part of the international cartel of oil price manipulators, as are the Wall Street banksters,predominantly Goldman Sachs.

Russia TV24: The sanctions against Libya are lifted and all barriers for foreign investments have disappeared as well. Does it mean the county will face recovery soon?

PK: Sanctions may be lifted, but that does not mean that foreign investments will now flow to Libya. The country is still under chaos and disarray – and in my opinion will stay so in the foreseeable future. That’s in Washington’s interest.Investors are reluctant to put their money into a crime nest and a terrorist breeding ground which is working closely with Washington and its secret services – to provide terrorists to fight US-proxy wars around the Middle East, for example in Syria and Iraq – and now even in Afghanistan – and who knows where else.

Russia TV24:How do you assess the political situation in the country today?

PK: As much as I would like to end on a positive note, it is difficult. As long as the CIA, chief instigator of all wars in the Middle East, is using the purposefully created Libyan chaos to train and recruit Islamic State fighters, Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups which vary only in name but have the same objective – namely regime change in Syria – prospects for a foreseeable bright future are dim.

Of course, a lot depends on the unpredictable Trump Presidency. Will he seek peace in the Middle East? – That would be the surprise of the Century – or will he continue on the track dictated by the Deep State (not least to save his skin) – continue destruction of the Middle East, Balkanization of Syria – all as a stepping stone to Full Spectrum Dominance – as is written in the American Bible – the PNAC – Plan for a New American Century – which outlines the ‘American Pax Romana’. They were the bloodiest 200 – 300 years of the Roman Empire. Here comes the positive note: It is unlikely that the American empire will last that long. It’s on its last legs.When it finally falters, Libya may recover, and so may the rest of the world.

%d bloggers like this: