David Cameron, Libya and Disaster


David Cameron, Libya and Disaster

By Dr. Binoy Kampmark

The UK Foreign Affairs Committee was a long time coming with this judgment, but when it came, it provided a firm reminder about how far the 2011 intervention against the Gaddafi regime was not merely flawed but calamitous in its consequences. There had been no coherent strategy on the part of the Cameron government; the campaign had not been “informed by accurate intelligence.”

For members of the committee, it was clear that the then UK prime minister, David Cameron, had to carry a rather large can on the issue. “Through his decision-making in the National Security Council, former prime minister David Cameron was ultimately responsible for the failure to develop a coherent Libya strategy.”

The consequential nature of this bloody and ultimately catastrophic blunder of international relations triggered continental instability, with a foul global aftertaste. The collapse of Libya into territories battled over with sectarian fury and the death of Muammar Gaddafi unsettled the ground in Mali. It also propelled violence through North African and the Middle East.

It is hard to rank the levels of severity in what went wrong in the aftermath of the Libyan collapse. Could a finger be pointed at the militia hothouse that was created within the state? (Tripoli alone currently hosts somewhere up to 150.) What of the external outrage stemming from it?

Near the top must be the conflict in northern Mali, precipitated by members of the Tuareg ethnic group who had long supplied Gaddafi with soldiers. Armed to the teeth, the MNLA, with the assistance of such Islamist groups as Ansar Dine, commenced a separatist action that in turn encouraged interventions by al-Qaeda sponsored Islamist groups.

Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb eventually became one of the big and most menacing players, busying itself with operations beyond Mali, including Algeria, Niger, Mauritania, Tunisia and Morocco.

Meshed between these skirmishing groups were a French-led intervention in 2013 that petered out, followed by a continuing peace keeping operation which has long since ditched the word “peace” in its equation.

Not even the presence of 12,000 UN soldiers under the mission known as MINUSMA has done much to prevent the fraying of that land, despite the June 2015 peace deal. Since 2013, the mission has taken over a hundred casualties, a deal of it occasioned by the ubiquitous landmine and roadside bomb.

While Mali burned with fury, other African states felt the aftershocks, notably through a huge, easily accessible arms market that was not brought under control after Gaddafi’s fall. Marty Reardon, Senior Vice President of The Soufran Group, a US-based security consultancy, surprised no one in telling The Independent that Libya’s implosion led to the arming of “well-armed and militant groups” in Tunisia, Algeria, Niger, Chad, Sudan and Egypt.[1]

In this belligerent free for all, jihadi groups jostle and scratch for gains, creating a further pool of radicalised fighters who will, in time, find nowhere else to go. The Libyan collapse, in other words, has created a certain type of roving tourist jihadi, notching up points with each campaign.

Crispin Blunt, who chaired the committee, scoldingly suggested that the 2011 intervention was based on “erroneous assumptions and an incomplete understanding of the country.” This kindergarten world view did not stop there.

Having made a right royal mess, it was incumbent on France and the UK to right the ship, with a “responsibility to support Libyan economic and political reconstruction.” This responsibility was also a muddled one, with British and French institution builders profoundly ignorant about local matters. Having pushed Humpty Dumpty over, they showed scant knowledge on how to put him back together.

The sense of culpability for Cameron is further compounded by the nonsense the intervention made of such international humanitarian doctrines as the responsibility to protect. There was always a sense that the French-UK led mission was struggling for a plausible alibi, but recourse to the nonsensical notion of civilian protection reared its head.

That door was opened by the hoovering effect of UN Security Council Resolution 1973, which authorised “all necessary means” to protect that most wonderful contrivance, irrespective of what those in the host state thought.[2] Find the civilians and save the day.

While it remains the most insidious of contrivances at international law, that responsibility to protect could be said to have been discharged rapidly – after the initial round of strikes. In the words of the MPs, “If the primary object of the coalition intervention was the urgent need to protect civilians in Benghazi, then this objective was achieved in March 2011 in less than 24 hours.”

This was not to be. Instead, the intervention ballooned into a monstrous matter of regime change, with no attempt made to “pause military action” when Benghazi was being secured. “This meant that a limited intervention to protect civilians drifted into an opportunist policy of regime change by military means.” Docks in international criminal courts should be warmed by such adventurous men.

Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge. He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com

Notes

[1] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/libya-report-britain-uk-gaddafi-civil-war-david-cameron-responsible-terrorism-isis-al-qaeda-mali-a7309821.html

[2] http://www.elac.ox.ac.uk/downloads/Welsh%20Civilian%20Protection%20in%20Libya.pdf

The original source of this article is Global Research

Advertisements

Libyan Daash consists of three thousand fighters from 31 countries


Libyan Daash consists of three thousand fighters from 31 countries

تقارير: داعش الليبي يتكون من ثلاثة آلاف مقاتل من 31 دولة

(Reuters) – A report by the Algerian daily sunrise Wednesday, that Daash in Libya, based on the current success, to adopt the Iraqi scenario in its smallest details, taking advantage of the retreat of the state, in an attempt to repeat the experience in Libya and its environs after Iraq and Syria.

The newspaper said, citing identical reports, that the organization in Libya includes about three thousand gunmen descended from 31 different countries.

Occupies Tunisians and Egyptians in the ranks of the forefront of the multinational organization about equally thousand fighters, in front of Sudan and Morocco with 300 each, Algeria and Saudi Arabia, with 200 by 100 and between 80 and 100 French gunmen.

According to newspaper reports monitored the presence of Arab and Gulf nationalities, Jordan and Yemen and Africa from Niger and Mali as well as  from Italy, Greece, Germany European nationalities, and Asia through the Chinese presence.

The newspaper said the organization, based in the city of Derna major stronghold in the east is, under the authority orders of a former Iraqi officer, was sent by al-Baghdadi to Libya to organize the military side****(Reuters is wrong its a Yemeni and not Iraqi… just to show you that you can not trust Reuters)

Eshrouk Algerian a Libyan expert quoted, as saying that the rapid expansion of the organization in Libya, mainly due to exhaustion suffered by militias dawn of Libya on the one hand, and the fatigue that gripped the legitimate Libyan army after years of wars and fighting since the fall of the state, and in the light of the ban on the weaponization, rather than because of enrollment Libyan military leaders earlier Daash.

So my question to UN, F.UK.US. and EU how did they miss them???? Or they didn’t???? I think it’s the second they did not miss them actually they INSTALLED them and they are still giving them a free passage… as they want to DISMANTLE the whole of Africa, starting from the richest country Libya and moving along to all neighboring countries. Already there are rumors about an unrest in Algeria which is next to be brought down as the French will not forgive them for taking their own country back…. When will you civilians in the West wake up???? Are you so comfortable and so involved in your own little world that you do not care what’s going on with your neighbor????? Have you lost every inch of HUMANITY? 

Islamic State is the Cancer of Modern Capitalism


Islamic State is the Cancer of Modern Capitalism

By Nafeez Ahmed
Islamic State is the Cancer of Modern Capitalism

The brutal ‘Islamic State’ is a symptom of a deepening crisis of civilisation premised on fossil fuel addiction, which is undermining Western hegemony and unravelling state power across the Muslim world

Debate about the origins of the Islamic State (IS) has largely oscillated between two extreme perspectives. One blames the West. IS is nothing more than a predictable reaction to the occupation of Iraq, yet another result of Western foreign policy blowback. The other attributes IS’s emergence purely to the historic or cultural barbarism of the Muslim world, whose backward medieval beliefs and values are a natural incubator for such violent extremism.

The biggest elephant in the room as this banal debate drones on is material infrastructure. Anyone can have bad, horrific, disgusting ideas. But they can only be fantasies unless we find a way to manifest them materially in the world around us.

So to understand how the ideology that animates IS has managed to garner the material resources to conquer an area bigger than the United Kingdom, we need to inspect its material context more closely.

Follow the money

The foundations for al-Qaeda’s ideology were born in the 1970s. Abdullah Azzam, Osama bin Laden‘s Palestinian mentor, formulated a new theory justifying continuous, low-intensity war by dispersed mujahideen cells for a pan-Islamist state. Azzam’s violent Islamist doctrines were popularised in the context of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

As is well-known, the Afghan mujahideen networks were trained and financed under the supervision of the CIA, MI6 and the Pentagon. The Gulf states provided huge sums of money, while Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) liaised on the ground with the militant networks being coordinated by Azzam, bin Laden, and others.

The Reagan administration, for instance, provided $2 billion to the Afghan mujahideen, which was matched by another $2 billion from Saudi Arabia.

In Afghanistan, USAID invested millions of dollars to supply schoolchildren with “textbooks filled with violent images and militant Islamic teachings”, according to the Washington Post. Theology justifying violent jihad was interspersed with “drawings of guns, bullets, soldiers and mines”. The textbooks even extolled the heavenly rewards if children were to “pluck out the eyes of the Soviet enemy and cut off his legs”.

The conventional wisdom is that this disastrous configuration of Western-Muslim world collaboration in financing Islamist extremists ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union. As I said in Congressional testimony a year after the release of the 9/11 Commission Report, the conventional wisdom is false.

Protection racket

A classified US intelligence report revealed by journalist Gerald Posner confirmed that the US was fully aware of a secret deal struck in April 1991 between Saudi Arabia and bin Laden, then under house arrest. Under the deal, bin Laden could leave the kingdom with his funding and supporters, and continue to receive financial support from the Saudi royal family, on one condition: that he refrain from targeting and destabilising the Saudi kingdom itself.

Far from being a distant observer of this covert agreement, the US and Britain were active participants.

Saudi Arabia’s massive oil supply underpins the health and growth of the global economy. We could not afford it to be destabilised. It was pro quid pro: to protect the kingdom, allow it to fund bin Laden outside the kingdom.

As British historian Mark Curtis documents meticulously in his sensational book, Secret Affairs: Britain’s Collusion with Radical Islam, the US and UK government continued to covertly support al-Qaeda-affiliated networks in Central Asia and the Balkans after the Cold War, for much the same reasons as before – countering Russian, and now Chinese, influence to extend US hegemony over the global capitalist economy. Saudi Arabia, the world’s leading oil hub, remained the conduit for this short-sighted Anglo-American strategy.

Bosnia

A year after the 1993 World Trade Center (WTC) bombing, Curtis reports, Osama bin Laden opened an office in Wembley, London, under the name of the Advice and Reformation Committee, from which he coordinated worldwide extremist activity.

Around the same time, the Pentagon was airlifting thousands of al-Qaeda mujahideen from Central Asia into Bosnia, in violation of the UN’s arms embargo, according to Dutch intelligence files. They were accompanied by US special forces. The “Blind Sheikh”, convicted of the WTC bombing, had been deeply involved in recruiting and dispatching al-Qaeda fighters into Bosnia.

Afghanistan

From around 1994, all the way until 9/11, US military intelligence along with Britain, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, covertly supplied arms and funds to the al-Qaeda-harbouring Taliban.

In 1997, Amnesty International complained about “close political links” between the incumbent Taliban militia, who had recently conquered Kabul, and the US. The human rights group referred to credible “accounts of the madrasas (religious schools) which the Taleban attended in Pakistan,” indicating that “these links may have been established at the very inception of the Taleban movement.”

One such account, reported Amnesty, came from the late Benazir Bhutto – then Pakistan’s Prime Minister – who “affirmed that the madrasas had been set up by Britain, the United States, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan during the Jihad, the Islamic resistance against Soviet occupation of Afghanistan”. Under US tutelage, Saudi Arabia was still funding those madrasas.

US government-drafted textbooks designed to indoctrinate Afghan children into violent jihad during the Cold War, now approved by the Taliban, became part of the Afghan school system’s core curriculum, and were used extensively in militant madrasas in Pakistan being funded by Saudi Arabia and the Pakistani ISI with US support.

Both the Clinton and Bush administrations were hoping to use the Taliban to establish a proxy client regime in the country similar to its Saudi benefactor. The vain hope, clearly ill-conceived, was that a Taliban government would provide the stability necessary to install a Trans-Afghan pipeline (TAPI) supplying Central Asian gas to South Asia, while side-lining Russia, China and Iran.

Those hopes were dashed three months before 9/11 when the Taliban rejected US proposals. The TAPI project was subsequently stalled due to the Taliban’s intransigent control of Kandahar and Quetta, but has been shepherded along by the Obama administration and is now being finalised.

Kosovo

NATO continued to sponsor al-Qaeda-affiliated networks in Kosovo by the late 1990s, reports Mark Curtis, when US and British special forces supplied arms and training to Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) rebels who included mujahideen recruits. Among them was a rebel cell headed by Muhammad al-Zawahiri, the brother of bin Laden’s deputy, Ayman, who now leads al-Qaeda.

In the same period, Osama and Ayman coordinated the 1998 US embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania from bin Laden’s office in London.

There was some good news, though: NATO’s interventions in the Balkans, accompanied by the disintegration of socialist Yugoslavia, paved the way to integrate the region into Western Europe, privatise local markets, and establish new regimes supportive of the Trans-Balkan pipeline to transport oil and gas from Central Asia to the West.

The Middle East redirection

Even after 9/11 and 7/7, US and British addiction to cheap fossil fuels to sustain global capitalist expansion led us to deepen our alliance with extremists.

Around the middle of the last decade, Anglo-American military intelligence began supervising Gulf state financing, once again led by Saudi Arabia, to Islamist extremist networks across the Middle East and Central Asia, to counter Iranian Shiite influence in the region. Beneficiaries of this enterprise included al-Qaeda-affiliated militant and extremist groups from Iraq to Syria to Lebanon – a veritable arc of Islamist terror.

Once again, Islamist militants would be unwittingly fostered as an agent of US hegemony in the face of rising geopolitical rivals.

As Seymour Hersh revealed in the New Yorker in 2007, this “redirection” of policy was about weakening not just Iran, but also Syria – where US and Saudi largess went to support the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, among other opposition groups. Both Iran and Syria, of course, were closely aligned with Russia and China.

Libya

In 2011, NATO’s military intervention to topple the Gaddafi regime followed hot on the heels of extensive support to Libyan mercenaries who were, in fact, members of al-Qaeda’s official branch in Libya. France had been reportedly offered 35 percent control of Libya’s oil in exchange for French support to insurgents.

After the intervention, European, British and American oil giants were “perfectly poised to take advantage” of “commercial opportunities”, according to Professor David Anderson of Oxford University. Lucrative deals with NATO members could “release Western Europe from the stranglehold of high-pricing Russia producers who currently dominate their gas supply”.

Secret intelligence reports showed that NATO-backed rebels had strong ties to al-Qaeda. The CIA also used Libya’s Islamists militants to funnel heavy weapons to rebels in Syria.

A Canadian intelligence report from 2009 described the rebel stronghold of eastern Libya as an “epicentre of Islamist extremism”, from which “extremist cells” operated in the region – the same region, according to David Pugliese in the Ottawa Citizen, that was being “defended by a Canadian-led NATO coalition”. Pugliese reported that the intelligence report confirmed “several Islamist insurgent groups” were based in eastern Libya, many of whom were also “urging followers to fight in Iraq”. Canadian pilots even joked privately that they were part of al-Qaeda’s air force, “since their bombing runs helped to pave the way for rebels aligned with the terrorist group”.

According to Pugliese, Canadian intelligence specialists sent a prescient briefing report dated 15 March 2011 to NATO senior officers just days before the intervention began. “There is the increasing possibility that the situation in Libya will transform into a long-term tribal/civil war,” they wrote. “This is particularly probable if opposition forces receive military assistance from foreign militaries.”

As we know, the intervention went ahead regardless.

Syria

For nearly the last half-decade at least, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the UAE, Jordan and Turkey have all provided extensive financial and military support primarily to al-Qaeda-linked Islamist militant networks that spawned today’s “Islamic State”. This support has been provided in the context of an accelerating anti-Assad strategy led by the United States.

Competition to dominate potential regional pipeline routes involving Syria, as well as untapped fossil fuel resources in Syria and the eastern Mediterranean – at the expense of Russia and China – have played a central role in motivating this strategy.

Former French foreign minister Roland Dumas revealed that in 2009, British Foreign Office officials told him that UK forces were already active in Syria attempting to foment rebellion.

The ongoing operation has been closely supervised under an on-going covert programme coordinated jointly by American, British, French and Israeli military intelligence. Evidence in the public record confirms that US support alone to anti-Assad fighters totalled about $2 billion as of the end of 2014.

While the conventional wisdom insists that this support to Islamist extremists was mistaken, the facts speak for themselves. Classified CIA assessments showed that US intelligence knew how US-led support to anti-Assad rebels through its Middle East allies consistently ended up in the hands of the most virulent extremists. But it continued.

Pentagon officials were also aware in the year before IS launched its campaign of conquest inside Iraq, that the vast majority of “moderate” Free Syrian Army (FSA) rebels were, in fact, Islamist militants. It was, officials admitted, increasingly impossible to draw fixed lines between “moderate” rebels and extremists linked to al-Qaeda or IS, due to the fluid interactions between them.

Increasingly, frustrated FSA fighters have joined the ranks of Islamist militants in Syria, not for ideological reasons, but simply due to their superior military capabilities. So far, almost all “moderate” rebel groups recently trained and armed by the US are disbanding and continuously defecting to al-Qaeda and IS to fight Assad.

Turkey

The US is now coordinating the continued supply of military aid to “moderate” rebels to fight IS, through a new arrangement with Turkey. Yet it is an open secret that Turkey, throughout this entire period, has been directly sponsoring al-Qaeda and IS as part of a geopolitical gambit to crush Kurdish opposition groups and bring down Assad.

Much has been made of Turkey’s “lax” efforts to curb foreign fighters crossing its territory to join IS in Syria. Turkey has recently responded by announcing that it has stopped thousands.

Both claims are mythical: Turkey has deliberately harboured and funnelled support to IS and al-Qaeda in Syria.

Last summer, Turkish journalist Denis Kahraman interviewed an IS fighter receiving medical treatment in Turkey, who told him: “Turkey paved the way for us. Had Turkey not shown such understanding for us, the Islamic State would not be in its current place. It [Turkey] showed us affection. Large number of our mujahedeen [jihadis] received medical treatment in Turkey.”

Earlier this year, authenticated official documents of the Turkish military (the Gendarmerie General Command) were leaked online, showing that Turkey’s intelligence services (MIT) had been caught in Adana by military officers transporting missiles, mortars and anti-aircraft ammunition via truck “to the al-Qaeda terror organisation” in Syria.

“Moderate” FSA rebels are involved in the MIT-sponsored Turkish-Islamist support network. One told the Telegraph that he “now runs safe houses in Turkey for foreign fighters looking to join Jabhat al-Nusra and Isil [Islamic State].”

Some officials have spoken up about this, but to no avail. Last year, Claudia Roth, deputy speaker of the German parliament, expressed shock that NATO is allowing Turkey to harbour an IS camp in Istanbul, facilitate weapons transfers to Islamist militants through its borders, and tacitly support IS oil sales. Nothing happened.

The US-led anti-IS coalition is funding IS 

The US and Britain have not only remained strangely silent about the complicity of their coalition partner in sponsoring the enemy. They have tightened up the partnership with Turkey, and are working avidly with the same state-sponsor of IS to train “moderate” rebels to fight IS.

It is not just Turkey. Last year, US Vice President Joe Biden told a White House press conference that Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Turkey among others, were pouring “hundreds of millions of dollars and tens, thousands of tons, of weapons” into “al-Nusra and al-Qaeda and the extremist elements of jihadis” as part of a “proxy Sunni-Shia war”. He added that, for all intents and purposes, it is not possible to identify “moderate” rebels in Syria.

There is no indication that this funding has dried up. As late as September 2014, even as the US began coordinating airstrikes against IS, Pentagon officials revealed that they knew their own coalition allies were still funding IS.

That month, Gen. Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was asked by Senator Lindsay Graham during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing whether he knew of “any major Arab ally that embraces Isil [IS]?” He said: “I know major Arab allies who fund them.”

Despite this knowledge, the US government has not merely refused to sanction these allies, but rewarded them by including them in the coalition that is supposed to fight the very extremist entity they are funding. Worse, the same allies continue to be granted ample leeway to select fighters to receive training.

Key members of our anti-IS coalition are bombing IS from the air while sponsoring them behind the scenes – with the knowledge of the Pentagon.

The arc of Muslim state-failure

In Iraq and Syria, where IS was born, the devastation of society due to prolonged conflict cannot be underestimated. Western military invasion and occupation of Iraq, replete with torture and indiscriminate violence, played an undeniable role in paving the way for the emergence of extreme reactionary politics. Before Western intervention, al-Qaeda was nowhere to be seen in the country.

The continual input of vast quantities of money to Islamist extremist networks, hundreds of billions of dollars worth of material resources that no one has yet been able to quantify in its totality – coordinated by the same nexus of Western and Muslim governments – has over the last half century had a deeply destabilising impact. IS is the surreal, post-modern culmination of this sordid history.

The West’s anti-IS coalition in the Muslim world consists of repressive regimes whose domestic policies have widened inequalities, crushed legitimate dissent, tortured peaceful political activists, and stoked deep-seated resentments. They are the same allies that have, and are continuing to fund IS, with the knowledge of Western intelligence agencies.

Yet they are doing so in regional circumstances that can only be described as undergoing, in the last decade, escalating converging crises. As Princeton’s Professor Bernard Haykel said: “I see ISIS as a symptom of a much deeper structural set of problems in the Sunni Arab world… [It has] to do with politics. With education, and the lack thereof. With authoritarianism. With foreign intervention. With the curse of oil … I think that even if ISIS were to disappear, the underlying causes that produce ISIS would not disappear. And those would have to be addressed with decades of policy and reforms and changes – not just by the West, but also by Arab societies as well.”

Yet as we saw with the Arab Spring, these structural problems have been exacerbated by a perfect storm of interlinked political, economic, energy and environmental crises, all of which are being incubated by a deepening crisis of global capitalism.

With the region suffering from prolonged droughts, failing agriculture, decline in oil revenues due to domestic peak oil, economic corruption and mismanagement compounded by neoliberal austerity, and so on, local states have begun to collapse. From Iraq to Syria, from Egypt to Yemen, the same nexus of climate, energy and economic crises are unravelling incumbent governments.

Alienation in the West

Although the West is far more resilient to these interconnected global crises, entrenched inequalities in the US, Britain and Western Europe – which have a disproportionate effect on ethnic minorities, women and children – are worsening.

In Britain, nearly 70 percent of ethnically South Asian Muslims, and two-thirds of their children, live in poverty. Just under 30 percent of British Muslim young people aged from 16-24 years are unemployed. According to Minority Rights Group International, conditions for British Muslims in terms of “access to education, employment and housing” have deteriorated in recent years, rather than improving. This has been accompanied by a “worrying rise in open hostility” from non-Muslim communities, and a growing propensity for police and security services to target Muslims disproportionately under anti-terror powers. Consistently negative reporting on Muslims by the media, coupled with grievances over justifiable perceptions of an aggressive and deceptive foreign policy in the Muslim world, compound the latter to create a prevailing sense of social exclusion associated with British Muslim identity.

It is the toxic contribution of these factors to general identity formation that is the issue – not each of the factors by themselves. Poverty alone, or discrimination alone, or anti-Muslim reporting alone, and so on, do not necessarily make a person vulnerable to radicalisation. But together these can forge an attachment to an identity that sees itself as alienated, frustrated and locked in a cycle of failure.

The prolongation and interaction of these problems can contribute to the way Muslims in Britain from various walks of life begin to view themselves as a whole. In some cases, it can generate an entrenched sense of separation and alienation from, and disillusionment with wider society. This exclusionary identity, and where it takes a person, will depend on that person’s specific environment, experiences and choices.
Prolonged social crises can lay the groundwork for the rise of toxic, xenophobic ideologies on all sides. Such crises undermine conventional mores of certainty and stability rooted in established notions of identity and belonging.

While vulnerable Muslims might turn to gang culture, or worse, Islamist extremism, vulnerable non-Muslims might adopt their own exclusionary identities linked with extremist groups like the English Defence League, or other far-right extremist networks.

For more powerful elite groups, their sense of crisis may inflame militaristic neoconservative ideologies that sanitise incumbent power structures, justify the status quo, whitewash the broken system that sustains their power, and demonise progressive and minority movements.

In this maelstrom, the supply of countless billions of dollars to Islamist extremist networks in the Middle East with a penchant for violence, empowers groups that previously lacked any local constituency.

As multiple crises converge and intensify, undermining state stability and inflaming grievances, this massive input of resources to Islamist ideologues can pull angry, alienated, vulnerable individuals into their vortex of xenophobic extremism. The end-point of that process is the creation of monsters.

Dehumanisation

While these factors escalated regional vulnerability to crisis levels, the US and Britain’s lead role after 9/11 in coordinating covert Gulf state financing of extremist Islamist militants across the region has poured gasoline on the flames.

The links these Islamist networks have in the West meant that domestic intelligence agencies have periodically turned blind eyes to their followers and infiltrators at home, allowing them to fester, recruit and send would-be fighters abroad.

This is why the Western component of IS, though much smaller than the number of fighters joining from neighbouring countries, remains largely impervious to meaningful theological debate. They are not driven by theology, but by the insecurity of a fractured identity and psychology.

It is here, in the meticulously calibrated recruitment methods used by IS and its supporting networks in the West, that we can see the role of psychological indoctrination processes fine-tuned through years of training under Western intelligence agencies. These agencies have always been intimately involved in the crafting of violent Islamist indoctrination tools.

In most cases, recruitment into IS is achieved by being exposed to carefully crafted propaganda videos, developed using advanced production methods, the most effective of which are replete with real images of bloodshed inflicted on Iraqi, Afghan and Palestinian civilians by Western firepower, or on Syrian civilians by Assad.

The constant exposure to such horrifying scenes of Western and Syrian atrocities can often have an effect similar to what might happen if these scenes had been experienced directly: that is, a form of psychological trauma that can even result in post-traumatic stress.

Such cult-like propaganda techniques help to invoke overwhelming emotions of shock and anger, which in turn serve to shut down reason and dehumanise the “Other”. The dehumanisation process is brought to fruition using twisted Islamist theology. What matters with this theology is not its authenticity, but its simplicity. This can work wonders on a psyche traumatised by visions of mass death, whose capacity for reason is immobilised with rage.

This is why the reliance on extreme literalism and complete decontextualisation is such a common feature of Islamist extremist teachings: because it seems, to someone credulous and unfamiliar with Islamic scholarship, to be literally true at first glance.

Building on decades of selective misinterpretation of Islamic texts by militant ideologues, sources are carefully mined and cherry-picked to justify the political agenda of the movement: tyrannical rule, arbitrary mass murder, subjugation and enslavement of women, and so on, all of which become integral to the very survival and expansion of the “state”.

As the main function of introducing extreme Islamist theological reasoning is to legitimise violence and sanction war, it is combined with propaganda videos that promise what the vulnerable recruit appears to be missing: glory, brotherhood, honour, and the promise of eternal salvation – no matter what crimes or misdemeanours one may have committed in the past.

Couple this with the promise of power – power over one’s enemies, power over Western institutions that have purportedly suppressed one’s Muslim brothers and sisters, power over women – and the appeal of IS, if its religious garb and claims of Godliness can be made convincing enough, can be irresistible.

What this means is that IS’s ideology, while important to understand and refute, is not the driving factor in its origins, existence and expansion. It is merely the opium of the people that it feeds to itself, and its prospective followers.

Ultimately, IS is a cancer of modern industrial capitalism in meltdown, a fatal by-product of our unwavering addiction to black gold, a parasitical symptom of escalating civilisational crises across both the Muslim and Western worlds. Until the roots of these crises are addressed, IS and its ilk are here to stay.

 

NEWS FROM OCCUPIED LIBYA


NEWS FROM OCCUPIED LIBYA

Editor’s note: First let me wish you a Peaceful New Year. 

I wish to everybody a Happy New Year,
and as I am dreamer I want to believe that all of us can make a difference either by whistle blowers or by simple people state the injustice done to the world may that be Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bahrain, Somalia, Libya and other African states. Stating all criminal acts done to children, homeless, AfroAmericans and any defenceless person, same thing goes for all animals. So please join me and keep fighting to make this earth that we live in a better place for humanity. Lets leave our egos aside and instead of saying I lets say WE. In these cold days lets help as much as we can the homeless, and the homeless animals. Lets try to stop all the wars and aggression against humanity, if we do it together I am sure we could win.

2015 FORECASTING FOR LIBYA: Libya in 2015 .. .. ..
We have been for years to develop outlines expectations for the looming of the events during the year and then march from touching to detail the extent of the rest of the year, the day after we say the name of God Knowing the unseen?.. .. ..
– Despite signs of division and even division in Libya, but we see Libya unified one.
– Battles will move from place to place and from region to region and not an actual deduction or where serious.
– Crises after crises pursuing government bending and bending the governments will come out and Hassi of the Libyan scene altogether.
– See Algerian dialogue initiative looming skyline and failure sued.
– Despite the arrival of the economy to the brink of collapse, but the Libyan dinar will survive and regain its value quickly.
– The emergence of facts about the last days in Sirte battles in 2011 and these facts will increase no more questions.
– Will face Misurata ultimately an inevitable, and will be the city of death and destruction and will be repeated phrase killed identity much.
– The disappearance of a number of characters multiple Militia incidents and the extinction of some of the names and political entities and the military and even religious.
– Focus of many events and news about the Amazigh and Qziahm and their demands and you will hear for the first time the state is a major Amazigh.
– France will have an active role in the large and upcoming events.
– Egypt’s preoccupation with security Coupling and will reduce the significant economic role in Libya.
– News of the death of the Liberal figure in February prisons would be an event of great echoes.
– New old Libyan military forces we will see them extended its control over the whole of Libya cities of conflict enters a new phase.
– February Nakba actually ended and the biggest victory of Independents and only science and did not remain commend them will disappear as well, the next battle will be between Al Nakba battles in preparation for the extension of the control of the people the right to their homeland.
– Will not be for the House of Representatives, and it is a real actor before his election we will come out of the womb of the Nakba dead.
– The emergence of a leaked video of a Libyan influential figures will have a significant impact on a lot of Al Wahemoon reawakening.
– Some of the Libyan border will see a long-term lock-related incidents at airports and filled the horizon.
Astronomical spiritual Libyan

So lets go to the news:

Just came in:

The Supreme Council of the Libyan tribes and cities to announce to all members to attend the meeting which will be held in # Ben Walid City
on Sunday, 04.01.2015 at exactly ten o’clock in the morning of the importance of asking the audience.

supreme council of Libyan tribes._n

Urgent
Misurata
Bombardment by air now on the Misrata port complex of iron and steel.

03/01/2015

Detention of a Syrian intelligence officer in the city of Ajdabiya  Police arrested a former officer in the Syrian intelligence services in the city of Ajdabiya, and was among a group of detainees caught by the security forces entering the Libyan territory illegally from the Sudanese territory said Libyan security sources. According to the same source in Ajdabiya they arrested 51 people from different Arab Nationalities and they were on their way to Benghazi, the interesting point of these arrests is in their capturing these illegals there was a Former Syrian intelligence officer who seems to be working with the militia of Derna

Illegal Arab Nationalities trying to enter from Sudan and make their way to Fight in Benghazi

Illegal Arab Nationalities trying to enter from Sudan and make their way to Fight in Benghazi

Here is the New Year’s Joke:

The Abolition of the House of Representatives in Tobruk, is Libya’s requirement of “Muslim Brotherhood” for dialogue showed Justice and Construction Party of the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya, while they have the desire to participate in political dialogue under certain conditions.
Said Mohammed Sawan Chairman Justice and Construction Party that “the party does not mind to take part in any political dialogue between the Libyan parties, and that it adheres to several principles of dialogue, which sees them as the basis for any successful dialogue, and most importantly respect for the political process and the Constitutional Declaration and the judgment of the Court judge nullified the election of the House of Representatives, according to the quoted by the state news agency solidarity. *****(The MB did not come up with it on their own accord but with the assistance of the UN and the Zionist Levi the godfather of the Arab spring, they know they are losing so they are doing everything they can to stay in a puppet power so that they will be controlled by the WEST) 

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD BANNER

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD BANNER

The United Nations Libyan conflicting parties last September in an attempt to find a political solution may be collected, but the meeting was postponed more than once, until the announcement of the UN envoy fifth of January date for the start of the talks. ****(To conclude the losing party wants, NO! it demands that the House of Representatives which resides in Tobruk to be abolished and dissolved even though its Internationally recognized; this reminds me at the time of 2011 when the Jamahiryia was winning and NATO/USA/FRANCE/UK was in stalemate it demanded that the Jamahiryia government should surrender… this is a travesty in my opinion never heard in my life when someone is losing the fight to have demands. This is the WEST meddling in my country funding the losers and telling them that they have the right to DEMAND.)

Firefighters in Libya, put out a massive fire, broke out last week in tanks of crude oil, at the port of Sidra east of the country, as much as a researcher at the strategic oil affairs, Fire losses estimated at $ 210 million.

Tariq Ibrahim, a researcher at the strategic oil in the international affairs of Orientalism Institute in Moscow, said that the financial losses due to the outbreak of the fire in the oil tanker port of Sidra oil, estimated at about $ 210 million.

Ibrahim added that “oil tanker port of Sidra was completely burned and destroyed a great loss,” adding that re-work and the creation of “those tanks affected the Libyan state would cost roughly about $ 120 million.”

And inside the burning tanks of crude oil, the strategic researcher said that “the loss of about 1.8 million barrels of crude oil, was in those reservoirs that were burned.”

fire depot in sidra

According to the Libyan researcher, “the loss of truth in this disaster is to stop Sacrifice oil from the fields to the oil port of Sidra, which means stop the export of oil from the largest oil port of Libya, and the loss of what was earned by this port of revenues to the treasury of the Libyan state, in addition to punitive conditions Libya paid by customers contractors; to buy crude oil through the port. “

Erupted on 13 December last year gun battles near the oil Crescent in eastern Libya, after the forces, “the dawn of Libya” an attack on Crescent oil region; to try to control it, in a process dubbed “Sunrise Libya”, and met with those forces resistance of oil installations and al-Guard the other belonging to the Army Chief of Staff appointed by the Parliament. ***(Its evident enough to everybody that the Muslim Brotherhood with its minions which are behind this attack;  causing wide world environmental hazard to the earth and people who live in Libya from its toxic fumes.)

So here we have a statement from the youth of Benghazi; the question is who benefits from this statement?

youthofbenghazi statement

 

Pool “youth Lethy” Benghazi calling for a comprehensive reconciliation in Libya called 201 young people gathered Lethy Benghazi rejection of the “dignity”, a comprehensive reconciliation, to maintain the social fabric of the city.
The statement, which was posted on the social networking site “Facebook” on Friday, that this call is the last chance to stop the bloodshed and save the property, and to ensure ease of movement between citizens.
The statement continued, saying, “Those who are inspiring with the youth program and areas which used to be named as” the Awakening “, civilians who have no blood on their hands”.
It is noteworthy that the clashes are still continuing between the “Shura Benghazi rebels” and the forces of the Libyan army troops Council Lethy area and other areas in Benghazi. *****(We will have to wait and see what comes of this statement and how many will follow suit with it. It’s a bold statement but I am a little wary as I am wondering “who” put them up to it? I sincerely hope that they came up with this idea all on their own, but there is so much at stake which makes me wonder why now? why not at the end of the war of 2011? You can call me paranoid and maybe you would be right, but since 2011 everything changed; the people I thought were my friends became the betrayers of my country having a placard of Democracy but in reality the only thing they wanted is to sell my country to highest bidder and for themselves to have power and money.)

Libya next theater of international military intervention?

The President of Niger, Mahamadou Issoufou, said it was “essential” an international response in the country affected by violence. “One outcome is not possible without international intervention in Libya (…) [It] is essential to the reconciliation of all Libyans, including Gaddafi,” he told the press, after an interview with the french Minister of Defence, Jean-Yves Le Drian, on tour in the region.

“I do not see how the terrorists are armed militias that will create the conditions for reconciliation among Libyans. Also I do not see how they can create the conditions for the organization of free and transparent elections in Libya.” *****(To conclude he and the rest of the Western allegiance want to intervene one more time in Libya (so that they can DIVIDE IT INTO THREE PIECES JUST AS THEY DID WITH SUDAN), as they have not caused enough damage in the first place, its their mess we the Green Resistance and the Honourable Tribes try to clean with no assistance whatsoever from the West or East.)

116 violation between the kidnapping and murder and assault against journalists in Libya in 2014 01/03/2015

A recent report on journalists and media workers in Libya, for serious violations occurred in 2014, where he highlighted the annual report of the center “fortress” to defend the freedom of journalists who take from the Libyan capital based, what he described as the great decline in the areas of freedoms and an increase in cases of serious violation among journalists and bloggers as a result of the escalation of the ongoing armed conflict in Libya.

Kidnapping and murder, the report said that 2014 is the fiercest and bloodiest regarding the safety of journalists in Libya, where the center scored 10 deaths and more than 100 cases of kidnapping and torture by armed groups to infringe beaten and expelled journalists while carrying out their work and also the attack on the headquarters of the media institutions and media houses themselves or their families.

He said that this year has seen a surge noticeable in cases of repression and intimidation to affect bloggers and opinion writers on the Internet, pointing to the most prominent cases of bloggers who were kidnapped and threatened their activist Abdel Moez Bannon from the city of Tripoli, which still his whereabouts are unknown for the moment the issue of the assassination of Tawfiq bin Saud and his colleague Sami Alkuafa of the city of Benghazi, where the outcome of the investigation is still unknown, as well as the assassination of journalist Bouzid editor of hippopotamus key in Benghazi.

 

 

WHAT A HYPOCRISY FROM THE BIGGEST TRAITOR OF THE NATIONS THE U.N. “UN warns of war crimes as hundreds die in Libya”


WHAT A HYPOCRISY FROM THE BIGGEST TRAITOR OF THE NATIONS THE U.N. “UN warns of war crimes as hundreds die in Libya”

Editor’s Note: Lets take a look at what the UN’s role is; I looked it up in wikipedia so here is the first paragraph –The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization established 24 October 1945, to promote international co-operation *****(of the United States and Israeli interests). A replacement for the ineffective League of Nations, the organization was created following the Second World War to prevent another such conflict ****(I doubt they are trying to prevent anything). At its founding, the UN had 51 member states; there are now 193. The headquarters of the United Nations is situated in Manhattan,New York City, and enjoys extraterritoriality. Further main offices are situated in Geneva, Nairobi and Vienna. The organization is financed ****(by corporations and lobbyists) by assessed and voluntary contributions from its member states. Its objectives include maintaining international peace and security ***(yes lets see how they have tried to keep international peace and security since 1945; Since the end of the Second World War in 1945 there have been over 250 major wars in which over 23 million people have been killed, tens of millions made homeless, and countless millions injured and bereaved. In the history of warfare the twentieth century stands out as the bloodiest and most brutal – three times more people have been killed in wars in the last ninety years than in all the previous five hundred and here is another site taking you step by step to see all the wars; Major Episodes of Political Violence
1946-2013), promoting human rights, fostering social and economic development, protecting the environment, and providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster, and armed conflict ****(Apparently the UN has nothing to do (with promoting human rights or fostering social and economic development or providing humanitarian aid in cases of famine, natural disaster and armed conflict) because the UN IS THE PRIMARY WHO HAS CAUSED ALL THESE DISASTERS by allowing the EVIL axis to make more wars for their own interest here is what someone else wrote);. all in a day’s work Since the beginning of history people have got angry, had disagreements and punch-ups, and even killed each other. This we have in common with a few other animal species. But it’s very different from war.
War is an activity that needs preparation, organisation, planning and calculation, like farming, or education, or building. It has little to do with aggressive moods or eruptions of anger. There is no baring of teeth in the chemical weapons laboratory. Designing a nuclear bomb that can kill millions of people is a long-term project, requiring skill, imagination, quiet concentration, and a lot of taxpayers’ MONEY. The hundreds of thousands of people employed in armaments factories in Britain alone don’t go to work in the morning red with fury and ready to slay ‘the enemy’. Most of them are loving parents who take care of their children, seldom considering that the weapons they help to make might one day kill some other parent’s children somewhere else.
Murder, the world over, is a crime punishable by long prison sentences (in some countries by execution). Yet hundreds of thousands of people in the world’s armed forces are trained to murder – and murder people they do not even know. Whatever words we use to disguise the fact, war is essentially about murder. To drop bombs on a city, for example, is to murder ordinary citizens, many of them children; the pilot has no personal quarrel with them, but drops the bomb in the name of war – and thereby commits a mass murder. But ‘murder’ is not a word used when talking about war. That would clearly make war a bad thing – something we should avoid at all cost, ready to lock up anyone who tries it. You can see the problem – ‘British soldiers murder 150 Iraqi women and children in liberation of Kuwait’ would make a very unusual headline in the daily paper. War transforms murder not only into something acceptable but highly commendable, for which, if you survive, you may receive praise, promotion, and even a medal.”

The third paragraph goes to explain how it functions: The UN has six principal organs: the General Assembly (the main deliberative assembly); the Security Council (for deciding certain resolutions for peace and security); the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) (for promoting international economic and social co-operation and development); the Secretariat (for providing studies, information, and facilities needed by the UN); the International Court of Justice (the primary judicial organ); and the United Nations Trusteeship Council (inactive since 1994). UN System agencies include the World Bank Group, the World Health Organization, the World Food Programme, UNESCO, and UNICEF. The UN’s most prominent officer is the Secretary-General, an office held by South Korean Ban Ki-moon since 2007. Non-governmental organizations may be granted consultative status with ECOSOC and other agencies to participate in the UN’s work.

The last paragraph is the truth:The organization won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, and a number of its officers and agencies have also been awarded the PRIZE. Other evaluations of the UN’s effectiveness have been mixed. Some commentators believe the organization to be an important force for peace and human development, while others have called the organization ineffective, corrupt, or biased.

So to conclude that the UN is helping nations is a farce to say the least, all money sent in by charities or by any other contributions which nobody knows who the contributors are! We do know that Soros is one of them but we also know that he does not give his money to save his soul from when he dies but to earn more profits. It’s a known fact that money given to the UN and its branches for the World food programme does not go to the people in need but into their (organizers) pockets, never arrives to destination I should know they did it also in Libya with expired food etc and only the half of it ever arrived to destination, same happened to the Balkans, Africa the list is long to put in detail.

The Security council if it was doing its job really Palestine would have been recognized since 1945 but NO it was under the British rule and it could do whatever it wanted sell the country, destroyed whatever the Queen desired and this is only one of the countries till to date has not be recognized or given a voice to complain about the massacres and murders are done by the Israelis to the Palestinian people. So when I read an article like the one I am going to post to you about Libya its no wonder I am fuming with anger, because had it not been for the UN and the Axis of Evil we wouldn’t be in this mess. So enough with my rumbling and here is the article for you to read.

middleast26

GENEVA: Recent fighting in Libya has killed hundreds of civilians and forced hundreds of thousands to flee their homes, the UN said yesterday, demanding justice for serious rights violations and possible “war crimes”. In a joint report, the UN human rights office and the UN Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) warned of surging violence across the country since May and widespread human rights violations, including abductions of civilians, torture and executions. “Violations are continuing with impunity. There has been no effort to stop them,” Ravina Shamdasani, spokeswoman for the UN human rights agency, told reporters in Geneva. *****(Well Ms. Shamdasani, this has been going on from the start of the illegal war in 2011, the only thing you and your colleagues did is hide it under the table, only to come now to tell us the ugly truth. Why didn’t the UN STOP IT AT THE BEGINNING? Is it that the Axis of Evil want to divide the country into 3 pieces? Or that Soros together with Levi are profiting, I am aware there are other people who are profiting from this mess but if I start mentioning their names I am liable to sued and unfortunately I do not have the financing to go to court.)

She warned that many of the abuses being committed across Libya “may amount to war crimes”. Three years after dictator Moamer Kadhafi was toppled and killed ****(HE WAS NOT KILLED HE WAS COLDBLOOD MURDERED AND SODOMIZED) in a NATO-backed *****( ILLEGAL DONE BY CIA, MOSSAD, MI6, DGSE a so-called) revolt, Libya is awash with weapons and powerful militias, and run by rival governments and parliaments.  Yesterday’s report pointed to an escalation in fighting since mid-October in Benghazi, where forces loyal to General Khalifa Haftar ****(he is CIA/DGSE asset does that say something to you?) have been battling Islamist militiamen who have taken control of much of Libya’s second city.

Some 450 people were killed there in the two months leading up to mid-December, and some 90,000 people had fled, including more than 9,000 seeking shelter in schools, unfinished buildings and open spaces like parking lots, the report said. Clashes in Benghazi on Monday meanwhile killed another 16 people and wounded dozens, security sources and medics said. ****(What they do not tell you that from the beginning of the war till to date, we have over 70,000 prisoners of war who no one knows their whereabouts, we only know of the very important people who are in the Tripoli prisons. They do not tell you that during the bombing in 2011 by NATO we lost over 500,000 civilians from both sides. They do not tell you that over 3 million Libyans have been displaced or gone to exile. They do not tell you of how many mass murderers from torture, rape and mutilation has been going on from the end of the illegal war till to date. They do not tell you who finances them world-wide to spread Ebola, Cholera and other deadly diseases who the UN supports to eliminate million of people, these philanthropists who we are in their mercy through the UN. THE UN IS JUST ANOTHER BUSINESS CORPORATION LEAD BY THE NWO.)

Humanitarian Crisis
In the western Warshafana area, fighting between rival armed groups ****(the rival armed groups they mean the upgraded LIBYAN DAWN from Misurata, yes the same militia who displaced Tawergha neighbouring village just because they were blacks and rumoured that they were mercenaries helping the previous government. Warshafana tribe try to protect itself from LIBYAN DAWN), the same had killed some 100 people and injured 500 others between mid-August and mid-October, the report found. It warned of “a humanitarian crisis” with at least 120,000 people displaced in the area facing “severe shortages of food and medical supplies”. Fighting in the neighbouring Nafusa mountains had also left a reported 170 people dead, and displaced around 5,700 families, it said.

People displaced by the fighting had told UNSMIL that hundreds of houses, farms and businesses had been looted, shelled, burned down, or destroyed by bulldozers *****(Again they do not tell you that all the displacement and fighting it’s not done by the militias but by LIBYAN DAWN WHO IS OWNED BY THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD, while they are having heavy losses they retaliated by bombing, looting, kidnapping, rapping, burning and destroying everything on site). In the capital Tripoli the humanitarian situation had improved since late August, but activists, journalists and public figures continued to be abducted and threatened, the report found. “One prominent human rights defender received text messages from armed groups warning him to stop his advocacy work or else his children would be abducted and killed,” it said. *****(Again in this article they do not mention that GNC in Tripoli, Hassi – Muslim Brotherhood -Al Sharia – Al Qaeda- Isis- LIFG-  Libyan Dawn and Libyan Dignity with Hafter are the ones who are causing all this travesty of destruction which the UN BROUGHT THEM TO LIBYA TO TOPPLE THE PREVIOUS GOVERNMENT.)

Several journalists had been killed, including the October 5 killing of al-Tayeb Isa, the founder of Tuareg Tumsat television, whose body was found riddled with bullets and his car set on fire. The report painted a horrifying picture of widespread abductions, torture and abuse, as well as reports of summary executions, including beheadings.  A father and son detained at a checkpoint in al-Maya said they had been severely beaten before their captors poured petrol over them and threatened to burn them alive. *****(What is here described it’s an everyday thing since the end of the illegal war in 2011 – It’s the UN fault together with the Axis of Evil WHO want to divide LIBYA INTO 3 STATES and the only way to do it is to cause this havoc of destruction.)

In a statement, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein cautioned commanders and high-ranking officials that they were “criminally liable under international law” for any human rights abuses they commit or order. They could also be held ACCOUNTABLE if they “fail to take reasonable and necessary measures to prevent or punish” war crimes or human rights violations taking place, he said *****(Mr. Al Huseein knows very well they will never be prosecuted because they are financed, trained by the same people who installed them in Libya which is the UN, FUKUS & NATO so no high-ranking officials take any notice of his statements, if they were liable to prosecution they should have done so from the first instant which was the cold-blooded murder of the Late Qaddafi and his son, but did anyone do something about it? No, on the contrary they had the video shown widely for over a week and some scenes of this cold-blooded murder has been put on TV series and films. So allow me to say THAT THE HYPOCRISY OF THEIR STATEMENT OF THE UNITED NATIONS IS ONLY FOR INNER CIRCULATIONS WHILE ALL COUNTRIES WHO REALLY NEEDED THEIR SUPPORT ARE DYING. THE UN, BAN KI MOON AND ASSOCIATES ARE JUST PUPPETS TO THE ELITES AND DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING BUT COLLECTING MONEY FROM THE WORKING PEOPLE AND WITH THESE STATEMENTS THEY JUST WANT TO SHOW TO US THAT THEY ARE WORTH THEIR SALARIES. ALL OF THE UNITED NATION SHOULD BE DISMANTLED BECAUSE THEY HAVE F@@@ED UP NATIONS INSTEAD OF REALLY ASSISTING THEM JUST TAKE A LOOK TO LATIN AMERICA, MIDDLE EAST LIKE SYRIA, IRAQ, LEBANON, PALESTINE, YEMEN, AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN, AFRICA if you take a look at the nations of Africa you will understand that the UN has done nothing whatsoever to help they only brought more disaster and famine to them). – AFP