EURONEWS & GUARDIAN ADVERTISE TERRORISTS OF AL QAEDA ABDULHAKIM BELHAJ AS GOOD POLITICIAN SHAME ON YOU!


EURONEWS & GUARDIAN ADVERTISE TERRORISTS OF AL QAEDAABDULHAKIMBELHAJ AS GOOD POLITICIAN SHAME ON YOU!

I never thought it will come a day that I would see all Western News Media GROOMING a terrorist as a good man and politician for Libya. It seems to me that the west are copying the policy of Israel when after 1945 they went to Palestine, with the blessings of the English and the Zionists to thank them blew up the Hotel David and blamed it onto the Palestinians. On July 22, 1946, the southwestern corner of the hotel was bombed in a terrorist attack by the militant Zionist group the Irgun. 91 people died and 45 people were injured. An earlier attempt by the Irgun to attack the hotel was foiled when the Haganah learned of it and warned the British authorities.[2] On May 4, 1948, when the British flag was lowered, the building became a Jewish stronghold. At the end of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, the hotel found itself overlooking “no-man’s land” on the armistice line that divided Jerusalem into Israeli and Jordanian territory. It was purchased by the Dan Hotels chain in 1958. The film Exodus was shot at the hotel in 1960. When East Jerusalem was annexed by Israel following the 1967 Six-Day War, the hotel was expanded, with two additional floors.

Here is one of those terrorists:  Menakhem Vol’fovich Begin; 16 August 1913 – 9 March 1992) he was the leader of the Zionist militant group Irgun, the Revisionist breakaway from the larger Jewish paramilitary organization Haganah. He proclaimed a revolt, on 1 February 1944, against the British mandatory government, which was opposed by the Jewish Agency. As head of the Irgun, he targeted the British in Palestine.[1] During his leadership Irgun targeted the Arabs in the Deir Yassin massacre and in 1977 he was elected prime minister.

So now the Zionist propaganda internet newspapers are doing the same thing again in Libya, Let me remind you who ABDELHAKIM BELHAJ IS: Abdul Hakim Alkhoal de Belhaj graduate of civil engineering and after graduating immediately traveled to Afghanistan for jihad in 1988 participants in the Afghan jihad at the time and remained there for several years he joined the group the Libyan Islamic Fighting since the beginning of its establishment (any of the founders) at the beginning of the nineties, but After opening the cable left Afghanistan and traveled to twenty-two States, notably or rather most stay: Afghanistan, Pakistan, Turkey, Sudan. He returned to Libya in 1994 and began to rearrange the group and trained mountain green for processing for jihad against the system, but the system is pre-empted the group multiplying training centers in 1995 and killed her prince Abdul Rahman Hattab and could Abdelhakim Belhadj to leave Libya and return to Afghanistan, known Abdul Hakim Belhaj Throughout his jihadist as ( Abdullah Sadiq). Was chosen Abdel Hakim Belhaj (Abdullah Sadiq) emir of the Libyan Fighting Group in the rearrangement of the ranks of the group in Afghanistan, and Abu Hazim was chosen as his deputy, Abu Mundhir al-Saadi as a legitimate administrator, Khalid Al-Sharif as a security administrator.Belhadj now occupies a large role in Libya’s new leadership in Tripoli Military Council which is fully controlled at Mitiga airport, where they are on the way import and export of arms and the entry of a large group of al-Qaeda members and leaders of his colleagues in Afghanistan.

And his close friends are: Abdul Hakim al Haseidi a member of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, one of the city of Derna, too, has left Libya in 1995 to settle its place in Afghanistan, before returning to stability in Libya, al Haseidi battalion commander «Martyrs of Abu Salim» Battalion, the largest in  Derna east of the country, and was seen as one of the most prominent leaders in the field. Despite his background and demanding permanent jihadist b «Arbitration Sharia» stepping cautiously al Haseidi the work towards closer political Mahmoud Jibril, one of the symbols of the liberal trend in the country. The former leader of the Libyan group condemns the attack on the U.S. embassy, ​​and says that «the American ambassador helped us during and after the revolution, and  this act must be punished. Mustafa Khalifa al-Saadi, who holds a master’s degree in Islamic Studies from Pakistan in 1999 and a member of Scholars Libya, collaborator and member of the Fatwa and preacher in several mosques in Tripoli and the throwing many seminars inflammatory and lessons, and accused of involvement with al-Qaeda, and that the latter Abu Salim prison from 2004 to 2010, until he was released on August 20, 2011, to take over now as Minister of the so-called care of the families of martyrs and missing persons. And last but not least is: friend Ghaithi was a cadre of Al Qaeda in Afghanistan and confidant of bin Laden and a friend of Abdul Hakim Belhadj, was commissioned by the government functions to secure the border have been given large sums of money to spend to establish a private army, and therefore outside the scope of the General Staff and outside the budget of the Ministry of Defense and outside the control of the ministries of defense and interior, He accused by the defense minister of trying to assassinate the minister on the grounds that the Minister issued a decree for his dismissal from office.
Some Libyans living in the eastern regions The punitive ideas in fact spread over a wider range of that only Nhzareth between radical Islamic groups, regarding them as the fact that the United States failed in recognizing the wake attack Benghazi in September of the past, stressing not all extremists belonging to particular groups, which may create an opportunity for recruitment. On February 15 last, Dr. Awad Barasi Vice Chairman Minister said that after the appointment of the Minister of Awqaf government will open the door to dialogue with militants in Libya by clerics and imams inside and outside the country, there is no way to resolve only peaceful means and dialogue.

This is a quote of these terrorists who were brought by NATO, F.U.K.U.S AND ISRAEL and now they are trying to polish them into politicians: “Libya is a nation of Islam and Jihad. The light of Islam will shine forth from it despite the noses of everyone. The weapons are here and the Mujahideen from every corner of the earth are here with us and we have all the weaponry – that was prohibited before – with us now. We will not hesitate to use it against anyone who touches the land of Libya and that is the end of this discussion.”

GIF - 67.5 kb

Abdul Hakim Alkhoal de Belhaj

Historical leader of Al Qaeda in Libya, Abdel Hakim Belhadj, is now the military governor of “liberated” Tripoli and in charge of organizing the army of the “new Libya”. In the 80s, the CIA instigated Awatha al-Zuwawi to create an agency in Libya to recruit mercenaries for the jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan. As from 1986, recruits were trained in the Salman al-Farisi Libyan camp in Pakistan, under the authority of anti-Communist billionaire Osama bin Laden. When bin Laden moved to Sudan, the Libyan jihadists followed him there, and regrouped in a compound of their own. In 1994, Osama bin Laden dispatched Libyan jihadists back to their country to kill Muammar Gaddafi and reverse the Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. All across “liberated” Cyrenaica, Al-Qaeda men have been spreading terror, resorting to massacre and torture; they have specialized in slitting the throats of Gaddafi sympathizers, eye-plucking and cutting off the breasts of immodest women. The lawyer for the Libyan Jamahiriya, Marcel Ceccaldi, has accused NATO of “complicity in war crimes.”

Belhaj and his gangs did this to the Libyans: While Belhaj claims that now he is a politician and does not give orders to massacres or the killing, beheading, kidnapping and rapping, here are some horrific Videos and  Pictures of his gang affiliates from 2011 till today:

Libya’s Abdulhakim Belhadj: “We are working to find a solution to end this crisis”

Four years of revolution have not left Libya the way its people were expecting. Huge political division and armed conflict are tearing the country apart. Lives have been lost and Libya’s resources wasted. It’s a situation that’s worrying the international community, particularly Libya’s neighbouring North African countries.

We discussed the goings-on in Libya with politician, military leader and president of the nationalist Islamist Al-Watan (‘Homeland’) Party, Abdulhakim Belhadj.

Belhadj’s backround lies in Salafi-Jihadism. He fought in Afghanistan and was later imprisoned in the US and Libya for establishing the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. Belhadj also participated in the downfall of the capital Tripoli during the 2011 uprising.

He now introduces himself as a politician and a moderate Islamist, calling for discussion and rejecting terrorism.

Mohammed Shaikhibrahim, euronews: “First of all, what is the current situation in Libya?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “The problem right now in Libya is totally political. This issue has resulted in Libya being divided into two parliaments: the ‘Libyan Parliament’ and the ‘National Congress’. This means there are two legislative bodies, two governments and even two armies.

“But, the reality we are witnessing on the ground plays the main role in what is happening in Libya these days.”

euronews: “So, you’re saying this conflict began as a political struggle, but turned into an armed conflict? Who started the battle? And how did it begin?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “It started when the retired General Khalifa Haftar came back onto the scene. He took part in a military coup on the ruling General National Congress (GNC), before forming the current parliament in Tobruk.

“So, General Haftar is the person who sparked this war. He contended that he was against terrorist organisations and groups working outside the boundaries of the law. But I would describe this general as an outlaw, because he began this war and failed to find a solution to the Libyan crisis.”

euronews: “Some reports say forces loyal to you started a war in the streets after you extended your control over Tripoli airport. They suggest you are the cause of this internal fighting. So, are you part of this armed conflict?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj “No, of course this is not true. And people observing the situation in Libya know who Abdulhakim Belhadj is. I resigned the presidency of the Tripoli Military Council, which comprised more than 23,000 fighters and my goal is not to cling on to this scene or position. Neither did I order any fighter to do so.

“I now lead a political party – the Al-Watan Party – and our main loyalty lies with the nation. We want to address the Libya question and put the interests of the country and its citizens first. This affiliation is now leading us to gather for discussion with all the Libyan factions.” ****(Here is how he created his political party: “In Tripoli, the military governor of Tripoli, the member of the Al Qaeda(= It’s Parent’s are CIA + MOSSAD) Abdelhakim Belhadj has funded the party ‘Hizb El Watan “with money from the Libyan people. It uses its influence to support this party. It uses the meeting rooms and hotels for meetings and gain the confidence of the Libyans.” So by stealing the money of the Libyan people he has changed his ways? really? Does a leopard changes his spots?)

euronews: “Do you accuse certain countries of being behind General Khalifa Haftar?”

Abdelhakim Belhadj: “Yes, certainly. And they don’t deny that. The United Arab Emirates, for example. We hoped they would offer support for the stability of Libya, that they would help to restore security and establish Libyan institutions. But we notice now that the UAE sends aircraft, weapons, ammunition and armour to those who are killing the Libyan people.” ***(Both Belhaj and Haftar are fighting for power plus they are financed by the same players the only difference Haftar is not that of a fanatic and UAE decided to bet on him. But all players meaning FUKUS, QATAR, TURKEY, UAE, SAUDI ARABIA are financing both.)

euronews: “If these countries are, as you say, supporting General Khalifa Haftar, which nations are supporting you?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “I want to reiterate that I am not one of those people who is armed, who is walking around with weapons. But, I can say that those who are leading the scene now and are carrying out the orders of the GNC are those who have had legitimacy from the beginning.

“For example, the military forces operating under the name of Fajr Libya – or Libyan Dawn – are valid. It has been in operation since the era of former Defence Minister Abdullah al-Thani, who gave the group authority. It took orders from Chief of Staff Abdul Salam Jadallah.” ****(They stopped being valid after the election of June 2014 when they lost the elections and now they are illegitimate and not internationally recognized, Lets not forget that Hassi is also a terrorist belongs to the HMS terrorist group and he presents himself as the prime minister of Tripoli…..)

euronews: “What is preventing you from meeting your opponents to negotiate an end to the crisis?”

Abdelhakim Belhadj: “We support this and we are calling for talks. We have sat down several times with international organisations, such as the United Nations, and we have introduced many initiatives to try to reach a solution. But, we don’t think that what the UN did recently at the conference in Geneva was effective.

“With due respect to all the international organisations supporting a resolution to this conflict, I would like to say: some of those who are invited to conferences such as the one in Geneva are far removed from what is influencing politics in Libya, especially the current ground operations.”

euronews: “As we understand, you are saying that you are just a political man, but what we do know is that you are in fact now ruling the city of Tripoli.”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “That’s not completely true. Our only comment on the confusing scene in Libya is as follows: due to a series of weak governments in our country following the uprising of February 17, 2011, plans to develop security and military institutions have not been carried out. So, Libya is awash with militia groups and armed entities, which do not have the official support needed to legitimise them.

“So, the scene remains as it is now. Divisions and conflicts have occurred because some political groups have allowed armed entities to increase their control on state institutions in Tripoli.”

euronews: “Are you now a fighter under the guise of a politician?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “I stand with my brothers, who are seeking to find a solution to the Libyan crisis regardless of their political affiliation. Because, democracy means accepting the principle that people have different points of view. We have taken this on board.

“But, what I would like to confirm here is this: today we are working to find a solution to end this crisis – a crisis we do not want to continue or to be repeated.”

euronews: “Your background lies in salafi-jihadism. You fought in Afghanistan and were imprisoned in the US, then in Libyan jails because you established the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group. You also participated in the downfall of Tripoli during the 2011 uprising. But now you introduce yourself as a politician and a moderate Islamist, calling for discussion and rejecting terrorism. What is the secret behind this drastic change?”

Abdulhakim Belhadj: “You are going back to our roots and the war we fought against the Muammar Gaddafi dictatorship. That battle was linked to the spatial and temporal conditions at the time.

“Because we were fighting a dictatorial regime in Libya, it was necessary for us to use weapons in order to save the Libyan people from Gaddafi’s rule.

“This was the role of the Group in the past, but I would like to clearly affirm that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group has been terminated. It ceased to exist at the downfall of the Gaddafi regime.”

euronews: “You accused the British government of involvement in the torture you were subjected to at the hands of Libyan intelligence officials. Are you still filing legal action against them?”

Abdelhakim Belhadj: “Yes. I was tortured in Libyan prisons by Libyan intelligence officials, with the help of British intelligence. We discovered evidence of this after entering the security headquarters in Tripoli during the revolution. We found documents proving that the British Intelligence Agency MI-6 were involved, as well as some other people who handed me over to the Gaddafi regime.

“They put me at the mercy of a regime that does not respect human rights, and I would ask the British government to acknowledge this. It is proved by letters, which are signed by British agents. I ask them simply for an apology, then I will drop the matter.”

Copyright © 2015 euronews

If you want to find out more about who is Abdulhakim Belhaj is and who he works for, please read these links:

Al-Qaeda in Libya … documentary film ,

Al-Qaeda in Libya: Al-Qaeda in Libya to find a new home

How Al Qaeda men came to power in Libya,

Abdelhakim Belhadj finance his party with the Libyan people’s money! 

Al Ahram Al Arabi reveals the most dangerous of al Qaeda network in Libya,

U.S. CREATED a Terrorist Safe Haven In Libya

Libya is controlled by Al-Qaeda(/U.S.A)

Libyan Leaks: More Secret Documents Reveal Obama’s failure in Libya,

Intel shows Libyans feared Al-Qaeda fighters were armed by NATO in Gaddafi ouster

Al Qaeda Heads the General National Congress in Libya,

Al Qaeda Terrorists Live 5 Star Lifestyle while Libyans Suffer,

UPDATE LIBYA 2015 Legitimate Tribes winning, Belhaj / McCain Corruption Continues John McCain: Founding Father of the Terrorist Emirate of Benghazi,

Britain denies supporting any party in Libya confirms lack of recognition of the government of Hassi

MI5 TOPS ALL THE EXCUSES FOR THEIR FINANCING RADICALS LIKE ABDULHAKIM BELHAJ

 

Advertisements

14 African Countries Forced by France to Pay Colonial Tax


14 African Countries Forced by France to Pay Colonial Tax

By: 

syscap363

Did you know many African countries continue to pay colonial tax to France since their independence till today!

When Sékou Touré of Guinea decided in 1958 to get out of french colonial empire, and opted for the country independence, the french colonial elite in Paris got so furious, and in a historic act of fury the french administration in Guinea destroyed everything in the country which represented what they called the benefits from french colonization.

Three thousand French left the country, taking all their property and destroying anything that which could not be moved: schools, nurseries, public administration buildings were crumbled; cars, books, medicine, research institute instruments, tractors were crushed and sabotaged; horses, cows in the farms were killed, and food in warehouses were burned or poisoned.

The purpose of this outrageous act was to send a clear message to all other colonies that the consequences for rejecting France would be very high.

Slowly fear spread trough the african elite, and none after the Guinea events ever found the courage to follow the example of Sékou Touré, whose slogan was “We prefer freedom in poverty to opulence in slavery.”

Sylvanus Olympio, the first president of the Republic of Togo, a tiny country in west Africa, found a middle ground solution with the French. He didn’t want his country to continue to be a french dominion, therefore he refused to sign the colonisation continuation pactDe Gaule proposed, but agree to pay an annual debt to France for the so called benefits Togo got from french colonization.It was the only conditions for the French not to destroy the country before leaving. However, the amount estimated by France was so big that the reimbursement of the so called “colonial debt” was close to 40% of the country budget in 1963.The financial situation of the newly independent Togo was very unstable, so in order to get out the situation, Olympio decided to get out the french colonial money FCFA (the franc for french african colonies), and issue the country own currency. On January 13, 1963, three days after he started printing his country own currency, a squad of illiterate soldiers backed by France killed the first elected president of newly independent Africa. Olympio was killed by an ex French Foreign Legionnaire army sergeant called Etienne Gnassingbe who supposedly received a bounty of $612 from the local French embassy for the hit man job. Olympio’s dream was to build an independent and self-sufficient and self-reliant country. But the French didn’t like the idea.On June 30, 1962, Modiba Keita , the first president of the Republic of Mali, decided to withdraw from the  french colonial currency FCFA which was imposed on 12 newly independent African countries. For the Malian president, who was leaning more to a socialist economy, it was clear that colonisation continuation pact with France was a trap, a burden for the country development. On November 19, 1968, like, Olympio, Keita will be the victim of a coup carried out by another ex French Foreign legionnaire, the Lieutenant Moussa Traoré.

In fact during that turbulent period of African fighting to liberate themselves from European colonization, France would repeatedly use many ex Foreign legionnaires to carry out coups against elected presidents:

  • – On January 1st, 1966, Jean-Bédel Bokassa, an ex french foreign legionnaire, carried a coup against David Dacko, the first President of the Central African Republic.
  • – On January 3, 1966, Maurice Yaméogo, the first President of the Republic of Upper Volta, now called Burkina Faso, was victim of a coup carried by Aboubacar Sangoulé Lamizana, an ex French legionnaire who fought with french troops in Indonesia and Algeria against these countries independence.
  • – on 26 October 1972, Mathieu Kérékou who was a security guard to President Hubert Maga, the first President of the Republic of Benin, carried a coup against the president, after he attended French military schools from 1968 to 1970.

In fact, during the last 50 years, a total of 67 coups happened in 26 countries in Africa, 16 of those countries are french ex-colonies, which means 61% of the coups happened in Francophone Africa.

Number of Coups in Africa by country

Ex French colonies  Other African countries
Country  Number of coup Country number of coup
Togo 1 Egypte 1
Tunisia 1 Libye 1
Cote d’Ivoire 1 Equatorial Guinea 1
Madagascar 1 Guinea Bissau 2
Rwanda 1 Liberia 2
Algeria 2 Nigeria 3
Congo – RDC 2 Ethiopia 3
Mali 2 Ouganda 4
Guinea Conakry 2 Soudan 5
SUB-TOTAL 1 13
Congo 3
Tchad 3
Burundi 4
Central Africa 4
Niger 4
Mauritania 4
Burkina Faso 5
Comores 5
SUB-TOTAL 2 32
TOTAL (1 + 2) 45 TOTAL 22

As these numbers demonstrate, France is quite desperate but active to keep a strong hold on his colonies what ever the cost, no matter what.

In March 2008, former French President Jacques Chirac said:

“Without Africa, France will slide down into the rank of a third [world] power”

Chirac’s predecessor François Mitterand already prophesied in 1957 that:

 ”Without Africa, France will have no history in the 21st century”

At this very moment I’m writing this article, 14 African countries are obliged by France, trough a colonial pact, to put 85% of their foreign reserve into France central bank under French minister of Finance control. Until now, 2014, Togo and about 13 other african countries still have to pay colonial debt to France. African leaders who refuse are killed or victim of coup. Those who obey are supported and rewarded by France with lavish lifestyle while their people endure extreme poverty, and desperation.

It’s such an evil system even denounced by the European Union, but France is not ready to move from that colonial system which puts about 500 billions dollars from Africa to its treasury year in year out.

We often accuse African leaders of corruption and serving western nations interests instead, but there is a clear explanation for that behavior. They behave so because they are afraid the be killed or victim of a coup. They want a powerful nation to back them in case of aggression or trouble. But, contrary to a friendly nation protection, the western protection is often offered in exchange of these leaders renouncing to serve their own people or nations’ interests.

African leaders would work in the interest of their people if they were not constantly stalked and bullied by colonial countries.

In 1958, scared about the consequence of choosing independence from France, Leopold Sédar Senghor declared: “The choice of the Senegalese people is independence; they want it to take place only in friendship with France, not in dispute.”

From then on France accepted only an “independence on paper” for his colonies, but signed binding “Cooperation Accords”, detailing the nature of their relations with France, in particular ties to France colonial currency (the Franc), France educational system, military and commercial preferences.

Below are the 11 main components of the Colonisation continuation pact since 1950s:

#1.  Colonial Debt for the benefits of France colonization

The newly “independent” countries  should pay for the infrastructure built by France in the country during colonization.

I still have to find out the complete details about the amounts, the evaluation of the colonial benefits and the terms of payment imposed on the African countries, but we are working on that (help us with info).

#2. Automatic confiscation of national reserves

The African countries should deposit their national monetary reserves into France Central bank.

France has been holding the national reserves of fourteen african countries since 1961: Benin, Burkina Faso, Guinea-Bissau, Ivory Coast, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Togo, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea and Gabon.

“The monetary policy governing such a diverse aggregation of countries is uncomplicated because it is, in fact, operated by the French Treasury, without reference to the central fiscal authorities of any of the WAEMU or the CEMAC. Under the terms of the agreement which set up these banks and the CFA the Central Bank of each African country is obliged to keep at least 65% of its foreign exchange reserves in an “operations account held at the French Treasury, as well as another 20% to cover financial liabilities.

The CFA central banks also impose a cap on credit extended to each member country equivalent to 20% of that country’s public revenue in the preceding year. Even though the BEAC and the BCEAO have an overdraft facility with the French Treasury, the drawdowns on those overdraft facilities are subject to the consent of the French Treasury. The final say is that of the French Treasury which has invested the foreign reserves of the African countries in its own name on the Paris Bourse.

In short, more than 80% of the foreign reserves of these African countries are deposited in the “operations accounts” controlled by the French Treasury. The two CFA banks are African in name, but have no monetary policies of their own. The countries themselves do not know, nor are they told, how much of the pool of foreign reserves held by the French Treasury belongs to them as a group or individually.

The earnings of the investment of these funds in the French Treasury pool are supposed to be added to the pool but no accounting is given to either the banks or the countries of the details of any such changes. The limited group of high officials in the French Treasury who have knowledge of the amounts in the “operations accounts”, where these funds are invested; whether there is a profit on these investments; are prohibited from disclosing any of this information to the CFA banks or the central banks of the African states .” Wrote Dr. Gary K. Busch

It’s now estimated that France is holding close to 500 billions African countries money in its treasury, and would do anything to fight anyone who want to shed a light on this dark side of the old empire.

The African countries don’t have access to that money.

France allows them to access only 15% of the money in any given year. If they need more than that, they have to borrow the extra money from their own 65% from the French Treasury at commercial rates.

To make things more tragic, France impose a cap on the amount of money the countries could borrow from the reserve. The cap is fixed at 20% of their public revenue in the preceding year. If the countries need to borrow more than 20% of their own money, France has a veto.

Former French President Jacques Chirac recently spoke about the African nations money in France banks. Here is a video of  him speaking about the french exploitation scheme. He is speaking in French, but here is a short excerpt transcript: “We have to be honest, and acknowledge that a big part of the money in our banks come precisely from the exploitation of the African continent.”

#3.  Right of first refusal on any raw or natural resource discovered in the country

France has the first right to buy any natural resources found in the land of its ex-colonies. It’s only after France would say, “I’m not interested”, that the African countries are allowed to seek other partners.

#4. Priority to French interests and companies in public procurement and public biding

In the award of government contracts, French companies must be considered first, and only after that these countries  could look elsewhere. It doesn’t matter if the African countries can obtain better value for money elsewhere.

As consequence, in many of the french ex-colonies, all the majors economical assets of the countries are in the hand of french expatriates. In Côte d’Ivoire, for example, french companies own and control all the major utilities – water, electricity, telephone, transport, ports and major banks. The same in commerce, construction, and agriculture.

In the end, as I’ve written in a previous article, Africans now Live On A Continent Owned by Europeans!

#5. Exclusive right to supply military equipment and Train the country military officers

Through a sophisticated scheme of scholarships, grants, and “Defense Agreements” attached to the Colonial Pact, the Africans should send their senior military officers for training in France or French ran-training facilities.

The situation on the continent now is that France has trained hundreds, even thousands of traitors and nourish them. They are dormant when they are not needed, and activated when needed for a coup or any other purpose!

#6. Right for France to pre-deploy troops and  intervene military in the country to defend its interests

Under something called “Defence Agreements” attached to the Colonial Pact, France had the legal right to intervene militarily in the African countries, and also to station troops permanently in bases and military facilities in those countries, run entirely by the French.

French military bases in Africa

French-military-bases-in-africa

When President Laurent Gbagbo of Côte d’Ivoire tried to end the French exploitation of the country, France organized a coup. During the long process to oust Gbagbo, France tanks, helicopter gunships and Special Forces intervened directly in the conflict, fired on civilians and killed many.

To add insult to injury, France estimated that the French business community had lost several millions of dollars when in the rush to leave Abidjan in 2006 the French Army massacred 65 unarmed civilians and wounded 1,200 others.

After France succeeded the coup, and transferred power to Alassane Outtara, France requested Ouattara government to pay compensation to French business community for the losses during the civil war.

Indeed the Ouattara government paid them twice what they said they had lost in leaving.

#7. Obligation to make French the official language of the country and the language for education

Oui, Monsieur. Vous devez parlez français, la langue de Molière!

A French language and culture dissemination organization has been created called “Francophonie” with several satellites and affiliates organizations supervised by the French Minister of Foreign Affairs.

As demonstrated in this article, if French is the only language you speak, you’d have access to less than 4% of humanity knowledge and ideas. That’s very limiting.

#8. Obligation to use France colonial money FCFA

That’s the real milk cow for France, but it’s such an evil system even denounced by the European Union, but France is not ready to move from that colonial system which puts about 500 billions dollars from Africa to its treasury.

During the introduction of Euro currency in Europe, other European countries discovered the french exploitation  scheme. Many, specially the Nordic countries, were appalled and suggested France get rid of the system, but unsuccessfully.

#9.  Obligation to send France annual balance and reserve report.

Without the report, no money.

Anyway the secretary of the Central banks of the ex-colonies, and the secretary of the bi-annual meeting of the Ministers of Finance of the ex-colonies is carried out by France Central bank / Treasury.

#10. Renonciation to enter into military alliance with any other country unless authorized by France

African countries in general are the ones with will less regional military alliances. Most of the countries have only military alliances with their ex-colonisers! (funny, but you can’t do better!).

In the case France ex-colonies, France forbid them to seek other military alliance except the one it offered them.

#11. Obligation to ally with France in situation of war or global crisis

Over one million Africans soldiers fought for the defeat of Nazism and fascism during the second world war.

Their contribution is often ignored or minimized, but when you think that it took only 6 weeks for Germany to defeat France in 1940, France knows that Africans could be useful for fighting for la “Grandeur de la France” in the future.

There is something almost psychopathic in the relation of France with Africa.

First,  France is severely addicted to looting and exploitation of Africa  since the time of slavery. Then there is this complete lack of creativity and imagination of french elite to think beyond the past and tradition.

Finally, France has 2 institutions which are completely frozen into the past, inhabited by paranoid and psychopath “haut fonctionnaires” who spread fear of apocalypse if France would change, and whose ideological reference still comes from the 19th century romanticism: they are the Minister of Finance and Budget of France and the Minister of Foreign affairs of France.

These 2 institutions are not only a threat to Africa, but to the French themselves.

It’s up to us as African to free ourselves, without asking for permission, because I still can’t understand for examplehow 450 french soldiers in Côte d’Ivoire could control a population of 20 millions people!? 

People first reaction when they learn about the french colonial tax is often a question: “Until when?”

For historical comparison, France made Haiti to pay the modern equivalent of $21 billion from 1804 till 1947 (almost one century and half) for the losses caused to french slave traders by the abolition of slavery and the liberation of the Haitian slaves.

African countries are paying the colonial tax only for the last 50 years, so I think one century of payment might be left!

****Editors note: Now I understand why Sarkozy wanted Libya.

MORE…

http://www.afrika.no/Detailed/24741.html

Lavrov: We are waiting for information on entering Turkey sarin gas in the possession of armed persons Front Nosra


Lavrov: We are waiting for information on entering Turkey Sarin gas in the possession of armed persons Front Nosra

Source: SANA

Lavrov: We are waiting for information on entering Turkey sarin gas in the possession of armed persons Front Nosra

Moscow / Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said his country is waiting for clarification of Turkey entering the Sarin gas in the possession of people armed / Front Nosra /.

In a press conference held today, Friday, Lavrov expressed deep disappointment at the manipulation of the United Nations concerning the request to conduct an investigation on the use of chemical weapons in the area of ​​Khan al-Assel in the suburbs Aleppo.

He said that Moscow has warned repeatedly, the use of poisonous weapons in Syria, and insisted on opening an investigation into the use of chemicals or toxic substances in the said area.

Note that the Syrian Foreign Ministry had asked, in two identical messages sent to the Security Council and the Secretary General of the UN to send a technical mission neutral and honest in the village of Khan al-Assel was the object of an attack rocket containing chemicals.

Yesterday and in the same context, the spokesman of the Russian Foreign Minister, Alexander Lukashevich, expressed concern Russian news on the arrest, Turkey, extremists who wore “Sarin” gas.

In a statement today, Lukashevich called for an investigation to find out all the details of this incident and prevent terrorists from using these dangerous substances in Syria to train foreign intervention against it.

He described as “unacceptable” use of chemical weapons, saying Moscow had drawn attention to the dangerous provocations of extremists and terrorists as weapons of mass destruction groups, including chemicals, to open the door to a military intervention in Syria.

Note that the Turkish media had claimed that the Turkish intelligence services had seized in Adana in southern Turkey, 2 kg of Sarin gas, ammunition, documents and digital information in possession of 12 items related Front Nosra al-Qaeda.

Ushakov: Russia has agreed to apply the weapons contracts with Syria under the fixed schedule.

Yuri Ushakov, deputy of the Russian President for International Affairs, said that the implementation of arms contracts between Russia and Syria is realized according to the schedule already set.

In a statement given today Ushakov insisted that Russia does not provide Syria banned weapons.

It welcomed the intention of Syria to participate in the international conference on Syria to achieve a political solution to the Syrian crisis.

For his part, Sergei Kortokov, CEO of the Russian aircraft construction company / MIG / said his country could deliver to Syria ten fighter MIG-29 MM2.

Ushakov: The EU-Russia summit will focus primarily on the crisis in Syria

Similarly, Ushakov, said the crisis in Syria will lead to the agenda of the EU-Russia summit to be held next month in the Russian city Yekaterinburg.

Re-transmitted by the site Russia Today, Ushakov said in a press briefing that the summit will be held on 3 and 4 June to discuss all urgent international issues, particularly the crisis in Syria.

It was noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin will announce when the evocation by the European side of the issue of resignation of Syrian president, the position of his country who think it is the Syrian people alone to decide this case.

Lukashevich: The demand for Syria to lead a UN investigation into the link Qatar with the removal of elements of UNDOF is interesting

The spokesman of the Russian Foreign Ministry Alexander Lukashevich said that the demand for Syria to lead a UN investigation into the link Qatar with the removal of elements of UNDOF is interesting, suggesting the important role of these forces since the year 1974.

In a press briefing, Lukashevich did note that UNDOF in the Golan Mount played and still plays an important role in the stability, “which is why the attacks by the opposition Syrian army against the UN forces had created strong condemnation by the Security Council, “he said.

“We agree on the opening of an independent investigation by the United Nations on these incidents to allow elements of the Force to perform their missions, especially in the shadow of serious circumstances,” he added .

Chizhov: EU decision on the lifting of the embargo on the export of weapons to Syria, disrupts efforts for a political solution to the crisis and the holding of an international conference in Geneva

The permanent representative of Russia to the EU, Vladimir Chizhov, warned against the decision of the EU to lift the embargo on the export of arms to the opposition in Syria, which disrupts efforts to reach a political solution to the crisis and hold an international conference on Syria in Geneva.

Chizhov told the Novosti that the EU decision is a direct indication of the flow of arms to the opposition.

Note that the European Union has approved on Monday the lifting of the embargo on arms to armed terrorist groups in Syria under the name of “the armed opposition.”

 

Qatar has spent more than $ 3 billion in the recruitment of terrorists, said the Syrian ambassador


Qatar has spent more than $ 3 billion in the recruitment of terrorists, said the Syrian ambassador

Source: New Republic

Qatar has spent more than $ 3 billion in the recruitment of terrorists, said the Syrian ambassador

Speaking at the meeting of the Council for Human Rights in Geneva, the Syrian ambassador said that Qatar has so far spent more than $ 3 billion for recruiting “jihadists” and prostitutes to fight in Syria.

At the request of Qatar, Turkey and the United States, members of the Council for Human Rights in Geneva met urgently to pass a resolution condemning the intervention of foreign fighters in Syria.

The three countries directly target combatants “Hezbollah” who fight alongside the Syrian armed particular area Qousseir forces. The text calls on Syrian authorities to allow free and unimpeded access to UN and humanitarian agencies that they can rescue the civilians.

Speaking, the representative of Syria in Geneva denounced the interference of the three countries that have introduced this resolution before drawing a red ball of Qatar. “Did you ladies and gentlemen that Qatar today condemned the intervention of foreign fighters in Syria has so far spent more than $ 3 billion in recruiting” jihadists. ” The leaders of Qatar fetched thousands of “mercenaries” in nearly 40 countries, said the representative of Syria.

This fact is not a surprise since terrorism experts said that the Syrians have left the country leaving room for thousands of “jihadists” coming mainly from Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bosnia, Yemen, Afghanistan, Iraq, Jordan, Great Britain, Belgium, France, Italy, Switzerland, Finland, Sweden, Netherlands, Denmark, etc.. 

These “fighters” were recruited by Qatar and Saudi Arabia according to the same experts. According to Mr. Aron Zilin, a researcher at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the number of young Islamists indoctrinated and sent to Syria exceeds 20,000 Tunisians. 

These young people mainly members of Ennahda movement and Salafists in Tunisia. The irony is that 80% of foreigners who joined the opposition in Syria chose to fight under the banner of Al-Nosra Front, an ally of the nebula terrorist organization “Al Qaeda.”Tunisian media have not only confirmed the presence of thousands of “jihadists” Tunisian Syria but also young Tunisian women, some of which did not exceed 17 years.

According to several TV channels and private Tunisian newspapers, dozens of girls were also sent to Syria for another “jihad” namely the “nikah” or sex. 

Hundreds of Tunisian families mourned by demonstrating outside the Tunisian institutions demanding the authorities to find a solution to their son and daughters who are in Syria. “Our offspring was misled and sent to hell in Syria,” said a mother of a micro television station.

In the absence of a Tunisian representative in Syria, some Tunisian families have even asked the humanitarian intervention of the Algerian state to help repatriate their son and daughters surrounded several fronts fighting in Syria. In sum, the urgent meeting of the Council of Human Rights at the request of Qatar, Turkey and the United States has puzzled international opinion and especially politicians who question the double standards of the thing. “Why the Council of Human Rights in Geneva has not he met when thousands of mercenaries and” jihadists “invaded Syria, they concluded.

Moncef Rédha

source: algeria-isp.com/actualites/politique-syrie

Syria – Lavrov: the number of fighters from North Africa and Europe to Syria increases


Syria – Lavrov: the number of fighters from North Africa and Europe to Syria increases

Source: SANA

Syria - Lavrov: the number of fighters from North Africa and Europe to Syria increases

Moscow / Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the Syrian opposition abroad n is not sensitive to the suffering of the Syrian people, and most of them live abroad.

In a press conference in Moscow, Lavrov stressed that the number of fighters from Syria to North Africa and Europe increases.

He did note that the holding of an international conference on the crisis in Syria is the only way to resolve the crisis, warning that the developments of the crisis in Syria threatens the stability of the entire Regin and contribute to the deepening differences in the Islamic world.

He said, on the other hand, the need to move away from unilateral solutions and dual criteria to invite all parties, including Iran, to the negotiating table of the international conference in Geneva.

Turning to the EU decision to not extend the embargo on arms exports to Syria, he said it stands obstacles on the way to the Geneva Conference 2.

He strongly criticized the draft agreement supported by the United States, the board of Human Rights intends to review today, saying it undermines efforts to end the crisis in Syria and undermines efforts Common made to hold the conference on Syria.

Tchourkin: the provision of S300 missiles to Syria help them face any military intervention

The permanent delegate of Syria to the UN Vitaly Tchourkin focused on the need to fix attention on a political settlement of the crisis in Syria, affirming his country’s refusal of any foreign intervention in Syrian affairs.

In an interview with CNN, Tchourkin stressed that the supply system S300 missiles to Syria to help confront any foreign military intervention in that country.

“Russia supplies Syria with weapons that help the consolidation of regional stability, according to contracts signed before the crisis, while others provide armed with weapons that help increase violence groups”, has noted Tchourkin adding that the S300 missiles are used against aircraft and not the country.

 

source: algeria-isp.com/actualites/politique-syrie