Editors note: The article admits that the Illegal war in Libya was a false flag, its what we have been saying since 2011 finally the truth is coming out and going into the mainstream. We the simple people have been writing about it from the beginning and the Mainstream was calling us conspirators, Qaddafi loyalists are some of the names that I can remember. Thanks to all the activists and bloggers who spent hours on end with no financial back up. We have been for the last three years laughed at, condemned at, some were prosecuted, some lost their lives and some are still in hiding as the Libyan Militias have put a price on our heads. I would like to thank the author and his colleagues who took the time to read our articles, videos etc and to decide to write an article about the truth. We still have a long way to go, but its a start.
More than three years after the US and its NATO allies unleashed an “intervention” and regime change in Libya, the US establishment admits they maybe have “got it wrong.” Naturally, there were many of us who were demonized endlessly for speaking out against that war, and against all those politicians, analysts, and “activists” on the left and right, who championed the “humanitarianism” of waging war on Libya. We were attacked as “soft on dictators,” “conspiracy theorists,” and “anti-Americans.” And yet, today it is our voices that still proclaim loudly the immorality and illegality of that war. Thankfully, it seems the establishment is beginning to hear us.
One of the most highly regarded politico-academic institutions in the US – the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University – has issued areport which undermines the established narrative of the war in Libya, laying bare the cold, hard reality of what Libya was at the outset of the war, what really happened in the early days, and what Libya has become today. Of course, responsibility for the tragic and lasting effects of that war should be laid at the feet of Obama, Cameron, Sarkozy, and the other participants,in addition to those media outlets and NGOs that deliberately spread lies about the reality on the ground in Libya. All must be held accountable.
Finally Seeing the Light?
The recent report, which is actually almost a year old, was written by Dr. Alan Kuperman, Associate Professor of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin. Dr. Kuperman attempts to shed light on some of the key aspects of disinformation before and during the war in Libya. These important findings contradict every single justification for that war, from the lies and distortions of Samantha Power, Susan Rice, and Hillary Clinton, to the deluge of propaganda from so-called NGOs such as Human rights Watch and Amnesty International. By examining the obfuscations and outright lies told by these individuals and organs of soft power, Dr. Kuperman makes it quite clear that, just as with Iraq, the people of the United States (and much of the world) have been lied into yet another war.
One of the principal lies told about Libya and Gaddafi was the totally unsubstantiated claim of “massacres” by Gaddafi forces in Benghazi and a few other cities. This claim, perpetrated by Human Rights Watch among others, was repeated ad nauseam by every major media outlet. As Dr. Kuperman writes:
Contrary to Western media reports, Qaddafi did not initiate Libya’s violence by targeting peaceful protesters. The United Nations and Amnesty International have documented that in all four Libyan cities initially consumed by civil conflict in mid-February 2011—Benghazi, Al Bayda, Tripoli, and Misurata—violence was actually initiated by the protesters. The government responded to the rebels militarilybut never intentionally targeted civilians or resorted to “indiscriminate” force, as Western media clai med. Early press accounts exaggerated the death toll by a factor of ten, citing “more than 2,000 deaths” in Benghazi during the initial days of the uprising, whereas Human Rights Watch (HRW) later documented only 233 deaths across all of Libyain that period.
These are indeed significant facts that merit further examination as they completely contradict the standard narrative of the war in Libya and, most importantly, the justifications for it. First and foremost is the question of who initiated violence. The talking points in Western media all through early 2011 held that Gaddafi was “murdering his own people,” and that this justified a humanitarian intervention, to “help the people of Benghazi.” However, the hitherto suppressed truth is that it was the violent “protesters” (who should rightly be referred to as terrorists within the protests) who actually initiated the violence, using protesters as human shields.
Secondly, the notion that Gaddafi’s forces intentionally targeted civilians has been thoroughly debunked. Quite the contrary, the evidence now shows that Gaddafi went to great lengths to make sure that no civilians were harmed in the counter-terrorism operation as can be evidenced by the fact that “Qaddafi avoided targeting civilians…HRW reports that of the 949 people wounded [in Misrata] in the rebellion’s initial seven weeks, only 30 were women or children, meaning that Qaddafi’s forces focused narrowly on combatants.” Rather than ordering the wanton killing of civilians, Gaddafi attempted to maintain discipline among his forces such that they could stamp out insurgency with as little collateral damage as possible.
Third is the simple fact that all death tolls reported by the media leading up to the war were not only inaccurate, but wildly exaggerated beyond the parameters of “margin of error.” In fact, by overestimating the death toll by a factor of ten, Human Rights Watch consciously played the part of public relations clearinghouse for US-NATO. Of course, Human Rights Watch, long since understood to be very cozy with the State Department, Pentagon and CIA, has become increasingly discredited in the eyes of serious human rights investigators and activists. The role of HRW in Libya exposed the organization in ways it had never been exposed before – as an organ of US soft power projection, working tirelessly to justify on humanitarian grounds what is undoubtedly a nakedly imperialist war.
Dr. Kuperman also points out another key aspect of the Western narrative which is a complete fiction, namely that US-NATO’s goal in waging the war was not regime change, but the protecting of civilians. As Kuperman writes:
The conventional wisdom is also wrong in asserting that NATO’s main goal in Libya was to protect civilians. Evidence reveals that NATO’s primary aim was to overthrow Qaddafi’s regime, even at the expense of increasing the harm to Libyans.NATO attacked Libyan forces indiscriminately, including some in retreat and others in Qaddafi’s hometown of Sirte, where they posed no threat to civilians. Moreover, NATO continued to aid the rebels even when they repeatedly rejected government cease-fireoffers that could have ended the violence and spared civilians.Such military assistance included weapons, training, and covert deployment of hundreds of troops from Qatar, eventually enabling the rebels to capture and summarily execute Qaddafi and seize power in October 2011.
Indeed, the US and its allies abandoned the “protection of civilians” justification almost as soon as UNSC Resolution 1973was passed, authorizing merely a No Fly Zone in Libya which the NATO forces took as a de facto authorization for total war. As Dr. Kuperman describes, NATO forces were clearly engaged in an air war to destroy the military and political institutions of the Gaddafi government, rather than simply protecting civilians and providing support to rebels. Indeed, the NATO forces became the primary driver of the campaign against Gaddafi,allowing the rebels to take territory and, I might add, carry out their massacres of civilians.
Even Human Rights Watch, which vigorously suppressed the truth about ethnic cleansing carried out against black Libyans while it was happening, was forced to admit crimes against humanity in Libya, specifically the forced displacement of the Tawerghaethnic group. Naturally, these revelations came much too late to save the many innocent black Libyans, particularly in the Fezzan province, who were slaughtered by the rebels backed by US-NATO.
Kuperman’s report also highlights a number of other disastrous effects of the US-NATO war on Libya, including the civil war in Mali, the proliferation of weapons to terrorist groups throughout North Africa, and the general chaos and breakdown of all political, economic, and social institutions in Libya. Additionally, Kuperman notes that the US-NATO war prolonged significantly the war. He writes:
When NATO intervenedin mid-March 2011, Qaddafi already had regained control of most of Libya, while the rebels were retreating rapidly toward Egypt.Thus, the conflict was about to end, barely six weeks after it started, at a toll of about 1,000 dead, including soldiers, rebels, and civilians caught in the crossfire. By intervening, NATO enabled the rebels to resume their attack, which prolonged the war for another seven months and caused at least 7,000 more deaths. ****(unfortunately it was not 7,000 deaths the number is a lot bigger to even for someone to grasp it. In these eight months the death toll arrived over 100 thousand people including women and children.)
This is a critical point to highlight. Even by the western investigation number of 7,000 – a gross underestimation in my view, the death toll is likely much higher – the US-NATO war led directly to at least 6,000 additional deaths in Libya. Far from “protecting civilians,” it seems US-NATO was too busy killing them.
While noting some of the critical points, Kuperman’s report also leaves out a number of other shameful outcomes of the war including the deliberate destruction of critical infrastructure (including the Great Man Made River Project), the oppression of women whose rights were protected under Gaddafi, the displacement of many black Libyans and Africans from other neighboring countries who had taken refuge and found employment in Gaddafi’s Libya, and many other deeply troubling developments.
Who Should Pay?
Because the entire narrative of the Libya war has been shown to be a fabrication of the State Department, CIA,International Criminal Court, NGOs and other appendages of US hard and soft power,the question of guilt and culpability comes into play. The United States, along with its allies, has been howling for Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, held illegally by the Zintan militia since 2011, to be taken to the International Criminal Court to be tried for war crimes. Now that both mainstream and non-mainstream, western and non-western sources have emerged to challenge this narrative, it’s time we start asking who in the West should be held to account.
First among the criminals must be high-ranking officials in the Obama administration, including former Secretary of State Hillary “We Came, We Saw, He Died” Clinton, and President Obama himself. Not only have they, and their subordinates, blatantly fabricated intelligence leading to an aggressive war(a crime against peace, the most serious of the Nuremburg charges), they deliberately misled the world as to the nature of their operation in Libya. Russia and China certainly feel betrayed by the US and its lies in the UN Security Council. But this is merely the tip of the iceberg.
What price should be paid by media organizations and NGOs deliberately spreading misinformation? Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International should face serious investigations intocriminal negligence, or at least gross misconduct, in terms of their dissemination of lies – lies which were used as the prime justification for the war in terms of how it was sold to the people. Is it a crime to inflate by 1000% casualty figures, the end result of which is a justification for war? If not, it should be, as without such propaganda, the war could never have been sold to the public.
Media organizations, especially some ostensibly on the Left, should also be held to account for their misinformation and disinformation.Democracy Now is at the top of the list of guilty organizations. As Bruce Dixon, Managing Editor of Black Agenda Report, wrote at the height of the war:
So like every other Western reporter, Anjali Kamat [Democracy Now’s Libya correspondent] never sawany “mercenaries,” just their oversized bullets. She never saw any mass graves of the hundreds or thousandsallegedly killed by Qaddafi’s “heavy machine gun fire” either, or that would be on Democracy Now too. It’s not. Nobody’s located the thousands of wounded survivors either, that must have been the result of shooting into crowds killing hundreds of people, and none of this has stoppedDemocracy Now from carrying the story just like Fox News or CNN or MSNBC…Something is really wrong with this picture. We have to wonder whether, at least as far as the war in Libya goes, whether Democracy Now is simply feeding us the line of corporate media, the Pentagon and the State Department rather than fulfilling the role of unembedded, independent journalists.
As Dixon points out, Democracy Now exhibited at the very least poor journalistic practice, and at worst, served as the left flank of the imperial propaganda machine. By faithfully reporting the “facts”, which have now been utterly discredited,Kamat and Democracy Now primed the pump of left progressive support for “humanitarian” war.
Of course, Democracy Now is not the only outlet that should be held responsible. All major media in the US obviously toed the US line on Libya. So too did Al Jazeera, the Qatari-owned news outlet which gained notoriety during the Bush years as a news outlet hostile to US policy in Iraq. However, by the time of the war in Libya, Al Jazeera had purged its staff of anyone truly critical of US foreign policy, particularly as it pertained to the “Arab Spring” narrative. In fact, insiders have told me that a wave of resignations, forced resignations, and firings at Al Jazeera coincided with the refusal by some of the more principled journalists to suppress the truth of what was happening in Libya. It would seem then that, rather than reporting the news, Al Jazeera, like its western counterparts, was more interested in serving powerthan challenging it.
In fact, Al Jazeera was the first news organization to report, and repeat ad nauseam, the liethat Gaddafi’s soldiers were systematically raping women in Benghazi, and that they had been issued Viagra by their commanding officers. This claim, repeated by Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay, and many others has since been debunked, with absolutely zero evidenceever surfacing to substantiate the allegation. And yet, it was one of the principal claims used to justify the indictment issued by Luis Moreno-Ocampo as head of the International Criminal Court. This fact, among many others, shows how the irresponsibility of Al Jazeera, and nearly every other journalistic and human rights organization, led directly to the war in Libya.
Sadly, it is unlikely that any of the parties responsible for the criminal and shameful war on Libya will ever be held to account for their crimes in a courtroom. However, they can be held to account in the court of public opinion.Their institutions must be discredited. Their names and faces must be known and repeated the world over. They all share responsibility for the misery inflicted on the innocent people of Libya. And we who have stood against this war from the beginning, we have been vindicated. Unfortunately, there is no solace to be found in a Libyan graveyard.
BASIT IGTET AND WIFE – THE ZIONIST AGENDA FOR LIBYA
WHAT EVERY LIBYAN NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT THE COUPLE WHO WANT TO BE THE NEW LEADERS OF LIBYA
ILLICIT ALCOHOL, MAFIA EMPIRES, MONEY LAUNDERING, EMBEZZLING, EXTREMISM, LEGAL BATTLES, CULTISM AND MURDERS -THE EXTRAORDINARY STORIES OF THE FAMILY BEHIND IGTET – PLUS THE BANK OF ISRAEL – AND THE REAL REASON WHY JOHN MCCAIN SUPPORTS IGTET
BY LADY KHAMIS
In recent times a new figure has appeared from almost nowhere as the self-proclaimed potential savior of war-ravaged Libya.
Basit Igtet, a former Libyan exile, has announced his intention to run for the top job – with his American Jewish wife as the ‘First Lady’ of Libya.
The smooth talking and debonair former fashion designer has been waxing lyrical about how he wants to unite the people. His wife has explained her desire to “help” the Libyans and make the world “a better place”. She and her family describe themselves as “philanthropists”.
But just like Nato’s “humanitarian intervention”, this is all merely a façade. For behind the show lies an extraordinary morass of scandal, horror, illegality, greed and Zionist plotting – and a family that over the past century has stopped at nothing to get what it wants, using its vast and ill-gotten fortune to do so.
Let us start by taking a closer look at Basit Igtet.
Igtet is a native of Benghazi, east Libya, born into a tribe of around just ten people- hardly a base of support for him! East Libya is a region of many Libyans of Egyptian, Greek or Turkish descent. Some of these Easterners supported the foreign invasion and war on Libya in 2011, causing Libyan patriots to regard these particular easterners as being from another planet. They certainly do not wish to be ruled by them or their foreign masters.
Igtet’s late father was a radical leader of Islamic extremists– although Basit denies this. But his father’s extremist activities soon caught the attention of Libya’s then leader, Muammar Gaddafi, and his Jamahiriyah government – which always took a zero-tolerance stance to any kind of internal terrorism. Particularly when those trying to subvert the Libyan state were doing so on behalf of foreign and Zionist agendas. Igtet Sr embezzled millions of dollars from the Gaddafi government and was sent to prison for doing so.
Basit Igtet ran off to Switzerland. He lived in exile for over 20 years – but he chose Switzerland for a very specific reason. For it was here that Igtet found his fathers’ embezzled millions. This is how Basit Igtet built his company and became a multi-millionaire by the age of 45 – although he would have you believe a quite different story.
Now he is using that same money to self-promote and buy himself a ticket to the ballot box – despite being a long-time ex-patriate with a complete lack of any national security experience. He is little known inside of Libya itself and, indeed, few people have heard of him outside of Libya either!
Whilst in Switzerland, he joined with the wealthy Zionists and become a devout worker for Zionism. He seized his opportunity, when it came, to make the Jewess Sara Bronfman his girlfriend and later his wife. She is a daughter of a man who – until his death - was one of the world’s richest and most powerful Zionists, thanks to an empire based on trading in booze…
Once he has cemented his position as leader of Libya, Igtet intends to announce Libya’s full recognition of the ‘state of israel’ – and to allow ‘israel’ to set up a military base in the Green Mountain region of Libya… He strongly espouses the Western and Zionist agenda of capitalism and free markets.
He has acquired the services of the law firm of Barack Obama’s notorious foreign policysidekick and former US Senator Joe Lieberman.
Lieberman is an agent of ‘israel’ and works for the Muslim Brotherhood.He lobbies to Washington on behalf of Igtet and for enslaving Libya to Qatar – via his aforementioned law firm… Indeed, Igtet has overseen real estate projects in Qatar – one of Libya’s most fierce enemies.
Igtet has crazily stated that Libya needs a Rudy Giuliani-type figure – (former New York Mayor and a gangster, if ever there was one).
Keen to get the top job, Igtet ruthlessly plotted post-war against the former Libyan ‘prime minister’ Ali Zeidan. No problem with that, but he claimed that Zeidan was all about ego, yet Igtet himself is on one massive ego trip.
But he has one huge problem…My Libyan sources inform me that none of the tribal leaders will meet with Igtet or accept him – because of his Zionism, his marriage to a Jew and her families’ dealings in alcohol.
One of Igtet’s top backers though is John McCain– a man who has been photographed shaking hands with almost every extremist in Libya and who was a major figure in the plot of the invasion and destruction of the country in 2011. (There is a particular reason why Igtet and McCain are so chummy and this will be explained here further on)!
Igtet, himself, was also a major plotter, lobbying in 2011 on behalf of the so-called ‘Transitional National Council’ (‘TNC’ – later the ‘NTC’) – the illegal, alternative ‘government’ that was foreign-installed and outside of Libya itself.
Igtet is also friendly with the odious John Kerry.
Igtet denies he is an Islamist– yet he has courted support from some of the most extreme Islamist figures. He has met with Ahmed Abu Khattala – charged with the 2012 attack on the US embassy in Libya that killed four Americans – including its ambassador, the gunrunning Christopher Stevens.
Igtet has known a senior Libyan Muslim Brotherhood leader, Emad Elbannani – since they both lived as businessmen in Switzerland. The latter introduced Igtet to Islamist politician Rachid Ghannouchi– leader of Tunisia’s controversialEnnahda party.
Tellingly, Igtet is also an oilman – he founded an oil and gas exploration entity called Athal Energy in 2011. No coincidence that 2011 was also the year of Nato’s war on Libya and it is clear who Igtet intends to give the oil profits of Libya to – and it will not be the Libyan people.
One of Igtet’s and Sara Bronfman’s business partners is a man named Richard Griffiths – who has considerable connectionsto American and Canadian intelligence agencies – including the CIA. Griffiths is also a director of public relations for Scaix – a company heavily involved with the CIA and the US military…
Igtet, Bronfman and Griffiths all plan to profit from Libya via any future Libyan regime that has Igtet as leader. This will be done via a web of enterprises that they are involved with.
Igtet has a ‘charity’ titled the ‘Independent Libya Foundation’ (INLIFO). Founded in New York in 2011, this organisation has never been registered as a charity – despite being required to do so by US law. Nor has it registered to operate as a non-profit making organisation anywhere else in America! INLIFO has a financial affiliation with the American Chamber of Commerce – whose executive director just happens to be Richard Griffiths!
Evidence – obtained by Friends of Libya – shows that, rather than being a “philanthropic” enterprise, as claimed, the real agenda is that the INLIFO will be used as a platform for Igtet’s political ambitions, influence peddling and business interests in Libya.
As Igtet is owner of a number of business chambers, the situation that he and his INLIFO founding members have manufactured will be one where access to him and his ministries would be by direct payment to their chambers. This could be seen as corruption. If Igtet becomes ‘PM’ of Libya, he, his wife and their business partners will be raking in yet more money.
When asked how he will try to solve the massive security issues currently beleaguering his country, Igtet bizarrely replied that solving the four problems of “fear, greed, love and sex” was the formula. One can only imagine what ordinary Libyans and Muslims make of this ridiculous statement.
Then there is the mystery of Igtet’s young daughter. For a while, he and his wife tried to hide the existence of this child from the Libyan people by keeping mention and photos of her off their online biographies.
The couple were married on 15th July 2012. Their daughter has been described in the media as being four months old in early May 2013. This means, by my calculations, that this child was conceived out of wedlock.
This kind of immorality is endemic in the West,where it is promoted as both acceptable and normal and, I would go as far as to say, encouraged. Libya is a Muslim country and we do not want this kind of behaviour here.
If all this does not disturb you enough about little Basit Igtet – then let us take a deeper look at the Igtet wifelet…
American Jew, Sara Igtet – nee Bronfman– is the daughter of the recently deceased and massively wealthy Seagram alcohol magnate Edgar Bronfman Sr. He was a former chairman of Seagram.
Edgar Bronfman Sr was also for almost three decades the President of the World Jewish Congress. He was forced to retire from this position in 2007 – after evidence came to light that his trusted deputy had embezzled over $1 million.
The Bronfmans are one of New York’s most prominent and social dynasties. They have sunk a large portion of their money into US entertainment and communications entities – meaning mainstream media rarely dare to criticise them. (Further on here, there will be more about both the Zionist connection and where the Bronfman family fortune came from).
Sara Bronfman, 38, and her sister Clare Bronfman, 35, became heiresses to the multi-billion dollar Seagram alcohol fortune – estimated to be $2.5 billion. Edgar Bronfman Jr is their half-brother and is a former chairman of Warner Music Group. Their mother divorced their father and then married the popular British actor Nigel Havers.
Sara has been described as an “airhead” and a party girl- and is already a divorcee- her marriage to Irish horse racing jockey Ronan Clarke hit the rocks after only four months.
Multiple lawsuits have been filed that involve both sisters. The allegations involved how they were using their family trust’s money as well as allegations that involve possible blackmail, perjury, theft, and conspiracy to forge documents – as well as other potential illegal activities.
In 2009, Clare received what she called an “extortion” letter – intended for Sara – in which several women, including the sisters’ then financial planner, demanded money – or they would go to the press with highly damaging information connected to the sisters. But allegations have been made that Clare Bronfman lied to the court about this letter…
Court records state that the blackmail letter Clare claimed to have received was, in fact, not addressed to her at all – but to a man named Keith Raniere and a woman named Nancy Salzman. It was signed by nine senior members of a group called NXIVM – (pronounced ‘nex-ee-um’) – announcing their resignation from the group and a demand that they be paid money that they are owed. Salzman was NXIVM’s president.
What we do know is that Clare and Sara have been heavily involved in this very secretive and dangerous NXIVM organisation – a group the sisters’ own father had referred to as “a cult”…
Court papers have revealed that the sisters had siphoned off colossal amounts of money from their own family trust funds – to finance NXIVM and its nefarious activities.
Around $150 million had been taken out of the trusts and bank accounts. It was allegedly used to buy real estate amounting to over a dozen properties for NXIVM’s activities, as well as a private jet to fly around NXIVM’s leader – the aforementioned Keith Raniere; a svengali David Koresh-type figure who likes to be called ‘Vanguard’.
In 2009, Raniere made a disturbing video, in which he boasted to having had a number of people murdered – because their beliefs conflicted with his own…Raniere’s friends in high places are clearly high enough to give him the confidence that he will not be investigated by the Feds any time soon…
The sisters also used their trust money to finance Raniere’s investment schemes – as well as to cover his failed bets in the commodities market. Even more disturbingly, millions were spent by the sisters to support a flood of lawsuits filed across the United States against - what they see as – NXIVM’s enemies.
According to court filings, much of the money was spent by the sisters allegedly working to conceal the full extent of their spending from their father and the family trustees…
Many former members of NXIVM are afraid to speak out against the cult. Those who have been brave enough tell of stories of the cult’s use of private detectives, allegedly obtaining bank and phone records of those trying to expose NXIVM, people being threatened and stalked – including one being ran off the road by a mysterious black car.
NXIVM claims to be merely an organisation that conducts self-improvement workshops and life-coaching classes. Or as I prefer to say, social-engineering exercises preying on those feeling weak and vulnerable and needing to find solace in their empty lives. Disturbingly, NXIVM’s techniques include hypnosis, paramilitary exercises and controversial behavioural-modification regimes…
The Bronfman sisters were easily drawn to NXIVM; allegedly having had a poor relationship with their father and feeling alienated. Sara felt she lacked a purpose in life – while sister Clare was described as angry – a competitive showjumper and trainer of horses, she preferred the company of equines instead of humans. (Yes, I can sympathise with that)! How ironic that Seagram is also known in the UK for their past long-time sponsorship of the Grand National – the world’s most cruel horse race.
It is said that Keith Raniere had his sights on the girls’ father from the very start.
Eager to improve his relationship with his daughters, and after Sara had completed her course, Edgar Bronfman Sr soon signed up to one of NXIVM’s VIP workshops. Ran by Salzman, the course was designed to draw in the rich and famous that Raniere was keen to have patronise his group.
But Bronfman Sr soon cut all ties to NXIVM – after Clare revealed to him that the group had borrowed $2 million from her…
Although Raniere’s group was raking in millions of dollars, a 2003 article in Forbes magazine blew the lid off NXIVM and portrayed him and his organisation as dark and “manipulative’ – and he mysteriously had no bank accounts in his name… His previous business venture had also been investigated by regulators in 23 US states and he was sued by New York’s attorney general for it being nothing more than a “ pyramid scheme”, according to court files. Some of his courses’ participants revealed they had suffered near-psychotic breakdowns after going through Raniere’s programmes; classic brainwashing techniques – separating people from their families and steadily breaking them down psychologically… It is also in this article that Bronfman Sr described NXIVM as “a cult” – and admitted that he had not spoken to his daughters for months.
It was after this article appeared that Bronfman Sr received a phone call from a woman named Toni Natalie – warning him that he had now become NXIVM’s enemy.
Natalie had been Raniere’s girlfriend for eight years and a business partner with him. She had even given up her marriage and caring for her child because Raniere had encouraged her to do so. He had also told her that she would father his child and that this child would save the world.
After they split, she endured a nine-year nightmare. According to court files, her home was broken into, her electricity cut off and her family threatened. She was crippled with debts – from her business with Raniere after it collapsed – put into her name, and had to file for bankruptcy. Case after case was filed against Natalie by Raniere and two henchwomen – one of whom was Salzman – and which the judge described as nothing more than an act of a “jilted” man’s “revenge”.
Even worse, Natalie also learnt that NXIVM had hired the hugely controversial Israeli private investigator Juval Aviv to spy on her home, her private life and her business dealings.
Aviv, himself, is a self-confessed former agent of Mossad and claims the actor Eric Bana portrayed him as the character ‘Avner’ in the hit Spielberg film ‘Munich’.
Ironically, Aviv was also brought in as an investigator into the Lockerbie plane bombing– but his findings certainly upset the CIA…
Natalie by now was terrified and already broken psychologically by her time with NXIVM –– where she was told that she was “the chosen one”. She warned Bronfman Sr to get his daughters out of the cult – and that if he did not, then Raniere would use up all the girls’ money – and would sleep with both sisters.
When Natalie was with Raniere, he also lived with two other women. He is also alleged to be a paedophile. He still lives in a neighbourhood that locals refer to as “the compound’ – because most of the people living in the houses there are NXIVM members – most of them females…When Raniere is seen out walking, he is often surrounded by women…Witnesses describe him as obsessed with controlling his world and everyone around him – and fascinated by power, money and the workings of the mind. Natalie describes him as a man who finds and preys on peoples’ vulnerabilities.
In 2003, a 35-year-old woman, Kristin Snyder, a confident and seemingly well-adjusted environmental consultant disappeared after attending a NXIVM class in Alaska. Her body was never found – only a note in which she wrote about how she was “brainwashed” by NXIVM and her emotion killed or turned off – and that she had not known that she was “already dead”.
Today, NXIVM’s sessions are described as more sinister than ever.
Participants describe that they are brainwashed by the group’s ‘therapy’ sessions into thinking they are reincarnated Nazi’s, responsible for 9/11, or responsible for the Columbia space shuttle disaster!
In 2007, desperate for yet more money to sink into NXIVM, Sara and Clare Bronfman were working to change the trustees that were overseeing their portion of the master trust – in order to gain access to another $200 million. At his wits end, Bronfman Sr reportedly then considered having his daughters both declared to be incompetent,by the courts.
Both girls were now firmly under Raniere’s influence – Sara, was put on the board of NXIVM – and made responsible for organising all the group’s events, despite knowing nothing about how to run a business. While Clare turned her back on horses and threw herself into the running – and financing – of a string of Raniere’s projects.
The courts became filled with claim and counter claim as the sisters said that they were the victims of the squandering of the Bronfman fortune. While others claimed contents of 17 mysterious bankers’ boxes of document copies about the sisters financial dealings – which the two women had desperately failed to retrieve – would show how the Bronfman sisters allegedly engaged in a conspiracy to forge documents.
NXIVM is alleged to have been involved with various illegal activities – such as money laundering, immigration violations and tax evasion – although evidence of this had yet to be provided.
The sisters’ legal bills and fighting NXIVM’s ‘enemies’ were said to have run up to $2million a month – and their private jet has had to go…
Raniere filed court claims that Edgar Bronfman Sr was responsible for his daughters’ financial losses – saying their father conspired against him and “rigged the market” because he did not want his girls involved with Raniere.
Despite their protestations, Sara is still involved with NXIVM – while Clare went onto the company’s executive board – and their spending continues…
The sisters are still financing NXIVM projects– including retaining the services of highly unsavoury people and organisations, funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars to politicians like Mike Huckerbe – and, very disturbingly, the murderess Hillary Clinton…As well as hiring aggressive private investigators to carry out acts, such as the – subsequently abandoned – plot to murder the anti-cult activist, Rick Ross.
Ross, Aviv and NXIVM also became mired in legal battles of claim and counter claim against each other.
It was also alleged that the Bronfman sisters wired $500,000 on behalf of Raniere to two ex-CIA agents in an attempt to smear a NXIVM member who had committed suicide. (I assume this refers to poor Kristin Snyder).
Libyans thinking of voting for Basit Igtet, need to seriously question if they really want someone with the judgement of Sara Bronfman to be their ‘First Lady’ of Libya….
Trouble clearly runs in the Bronfman family. Three decades ago, on the eve of the wedding of the sisters’ mother and father, their half-brother, Samuel II, was ‘kidnapped’ and held for a $4.6 million ransom. But a year later the jury acquitted the abductors – on suspicion that Samuel II had been trying to extort money from his father, Edgar Bronfman Sr, in revenge for the anointing of Edgar Jr as heir to the Seagram throne.
In 1977, Ira Einhorn, a close friend of Edgar Bronfman Sr’s sister-in-law, Barbara Bronfman – murderedhis then girlfriend Holly Maddux, 32.
Einhorn was a svengali-type figure with huge influence over Barbara (yes, sounds familiar doesn’t it)! Holly Maddox was breaking up with Einhorn – who had a history of violence against his women and enjoyed hearing the screaming of animals that he tortured. Holly’s skull was smashed in and Einhorn – in absentia – was found guilty of her murder. But Einhorn evaded justice after the Bronfmans allowed him to hide out in the family mansion.They had even paid for Einhorn’s bail. After fleeing the country, Einhorn continued to receive money – allegedly from Barbara Bronfman.
But lets now look at just where the vast Bronfman fortune came from…
In the 1920’s, alcohol was banned in America in an era known as the Prohibition. Over the border in Canada, an ambitious and ruthless family decided to take advantage of this situation.
Canadian, Samuel Bronfman became a producer of oceans of alcohol and formed a racket of smuggling it from Canada into America. As it began to cross the border, this became illegal activity. In an industry already awash with shady characters and deals, Samuel Bronfman used a string of well-known gangsters to aid him. These included, none other, than Al Capone!
Samuel Bronfman also dabbled in the oil business…
Eventually the Bronfmans became Canada’s richest family – and Samuel’s son Edgar Bronfman Sr, who took American citizenship in 1959 – soon believed, in the words of his own daughters, that he could buy anyone he wanted.
A web of Swiss bank accounts were opened. Some suggested this activity – as well as the Bronfman-controlled Bank of Montreal having had their bank account for the Prohibition Era alcohol put under a false name – led to suspicions of money laundering.
And is it merely coincidence that Basit Igtet ended up in Switzerland with his father’s ill-gotten gains already there?
And now we come back to the subject of John McCain…
The Bronfman family was the king behind the throne of the organised crime empire in Arizona – a crime empire that spawned the political career of John McCain.
A man named Jim Hensley was well known in mob circles as a gangster in Arizona and was exposed in the seventies – by a man who was then killed in a car bombing in 1976. Hensley’s daughter married John McCain and the Hensley family was a key sponsor of McCain’s political career. Like the Bronfmans, Hensley was also involved with alcohol – as owner of the biggest beer distributor in Arizona. But what the media never mention isthat the Hensley gangster fortune that backs McCain is, in fact, a branch of the same bootlegging and racketeering fortune of the Bronfman dynasty of Canada…
Next time you see Basit Igtet and John McCain – an agent of ‘israel’ – shaking hands as they plot for the new Libya, you can remember this important connection…No wonder they are such pals!
And now we come to another ultimate Zionist connection of the Bronfman family…
My Libyan sources have sent me a copy of a document of the ‘Israel Discount Bank LTD’,dated February 10th 2014. It is an Amendment to a Bank Holding Permit – for the means of a control of the Bank by individuals from the Bronfman Group.
The Bronfman Group had received an Amendment to the Holding Permit (following the death of Edgar Bronfman Sr on December 21st, 2013), as defined in the Amendment to the Holding Permit – issued by the Governor of the ‘Bank of Israel’…
Appendix three of the addendum to permit to hold means of control of ‘Israel Discount Bank LTD’, contains the names of the beneficiaries of the trusts. The list contains more than 30 members of the Bronfman family – including Sara Igtet.
Basit Igtet is the Zionists weapon of choice for Libya.
It is now up to the Libyan people to decide whether they wish to be ruled by a family that are hardly the sort of people to be getting into bed with.
Libyan Tribes Respond to US Ambassador Deborah Jones
Open Letter to The Shameful US Ambassador Deborah Jones from the 5 million Legitimate Libyan Citizens! In rebuttal to her deplorable statements made today May 21, 2014, at the Stimson Center in Washington DC.
The Us continues to move forward with its plan to own the World. Libya has been the biggest foreign policy disaster in the history of the World.
According to you, the current US Ambassador to Libya; “Libya is a strategic goldmine. Rich in natural resources and only a few million Libyans to deal with, who are incapable of running their own country, only simple tasks can be completed by the Libyans”. Our Libya is the number 1 African prize for this Monster USA plan for One World Dominance.
You, Ambassador Jones, dare to act like you know Libya when do not even mention the great Tribes of Libya. The great Tribes of Libya are the shadow government of Libya; they have been for thousands of years. Many of the tribes including Werfalla the largest tribe have refused to meet with you because of your ties to extremists terrorists groups in our country. You said we as a people do not need or want a great leader, who are you to speak for us? We will have a great leader again, Libyan people love their leaders and obviously you have not met any real Libyans if you can make such a false statement.
You dare to suggest that the people of Libya and the Great Tribes of Libya should work with radical Islamists. These terrorists that were not allowed in Libya under the past government. Why do you think the radical Islamic Libyans lived outside Libya before the false revolution in 2011? The 4% who were radicals were not welcome in Libya. You dare suggest that we, the Libyan tribes would ever agree to work or live with these psychopaths? Belhaj was in Guantanamo, Ali Zeidan (your great friend) is a German Spy and favors the Muslim Brotherhood. Magarief the CIA puppet put in place by your government was a thief and a spy. You dare speak of a constitution in progress. Every Libyan knows that there will never be a constitution under extremists.
The great Tribes of Libya have a fully written Constitution that was finished in August of 2011. This is a constitution for the people of Libya and has nothing to do with you, your country or your extremist allies.
Libya has been a thorn in the side of the One World Order devils since the “bloodless coup’ de etat” which ousted the US/FRANCE/BRITISH installed; pedophile sham of a despot; King Idris, in September 1, 1969. Since that time until February of 2011, the Libyan People flourished. From the poorest and least developed country in Africa to the most developed and highest standard of living in all of Africa and envied by most countries because Libya had no debt and more than 500 billions of dollars of reserves in cash and precious metals.
The USA planned to overthrow the Legitimate Libya government in 1980 and hired a traitor Libyan military officer named Khalifa Hefter, trained him and several thousand mercenaries to destroy the Qaddafi government. The change of government in Chad made the USA stop that planned overthrow. Hafter and his band of traitors were moved to the USA near Langley Virginia where Hafter et. al. worked for the CIA for 20 years.
Again in February 2011 the USA using 250,000 Al Qaeda mercenaries and about 30,000 radical Islamists from Libya and the bombing force of NATO, put their new-plan to overthrow Libya into effect. They planned and executed the theft of Libyan riches and strategic ownership of Libya from the few million Legitimate Libya citizens.
False statements were presented to the UN and NATO and immediately accepted as factual. Resolutions were passed which guaranteed the destruction of our beloved Libya. You should know that by a great majority perhaps 85% the Libyan people were against the false revolution, if you don’t know that then you don’t know Libya.
Now 3 years later. Libya is a failed state. No rule of law and no hope in sight. The US mercenaries have been unable to break the will of the Libyan people because of our 8000 year old Tribal Culture. You meet only with your paid mercenaries Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to determine the future of Libya. You talk about the million Libyans “living” in Egypt as if they are there by choice; the one million in Egypt are in EXILE madam and you know that fact. There is another 1 million in Tunisia, Algeria and other countries.
How can the USA think it has the right to take our country from us? Send in its spies and unlimited arms and air support to bomb and destroy our country. How dare you say that Libya had no government before the US invaded our beautiful homeland? You madam are a sham of a stateswoman; you meet with Al Qaeda and every other terrorist entity in Libya. You are not an ambassador for the good people of the USA. You talk as if you do not know General Hafter, when in fact h is the selected military front for the USA-CIA military division in Libya. He receives all his orders from Langley Virginia as do you. Hafter took refuge in the US Embassy in February of this year when his first coup attempt failed.
Has the USA not done enough damage to our country? Know this fact Deborah, we will never allow you or any other foreign entity to own our precious land. We suffered under the rule of foreigners for thousands of years. Our best days were the 42 years under Qaddafi. We all pray that we again will be able to prosper as we did then. Yes we had political troubles! Thieves and criminals in our government. BUT THE USA IS SO FULL OF CRIMINALS IN THEIR GOVERNMENT THAT HARDLY AN HONEST MAN CAN BE FOUND IN ANY GOVERNMENT OFFICE IN YOUR COUNTRY. Your government approval ratings are 7%. Qaddafi was always at 85% or better. There was corruption; but this is OUR LIBYA! OUR BIRTHRIGHT not yours!
Take your phony generals; your political lies and deceptions and go back to your broken country. We will clean our country of all the radical Islamists in our way. We will heal our people. We will rebuild our country without your phony help.
We are the Proud and Brave People of Libya, and we want nothing from you and your Kind.
The Tribes of Libya who represent 98% of all the Libyans Worldwide.
OBAMA GAVE $500 MILLION IN WEAPONS TO AL-QAEDA TERRORISTS IN BENGHAZI
The Citizens Committee on Benghazi, an independent group of former top military officers and CIA members stated on Tuesday that if the U.S. hadn’t been arming al-Qaeda militias the Benghazi attack that killed 4 Americans could have been prevented.
‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ stated Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez also claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
‘Some look at it as treason,’ stated former CIA officer Wayne Simmons.
Basically,Obama armed al-Qaeda to topple Gaddafi, WHILE Gaddafi was verifiable succumbing to US demands.Obama preferred to give arms to his terrorist buddies, which they used to kill Americans, rather than allowing for a peaceful resolution that was already in progress.
Benghazi attack could have been preventedif US hadn’t ‘switched sides in the War on Terror’ and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report.
Citizens Committee on Benghazi claims the US government allowed arms to flow to al-Qaeda-linked militants who opposed Muammar Gaddafi
Their rise to power, the group says, led to the Benghazi attack in 2012
The group claims the strongman Gaddafi offered to abdicate his presidency, but the US refused to broker his peaceful exit
The commission, part of the center-right Accuracy In Media group, concluded that the Benghazi attack was a failed kidnapping plot
US Ambassador Chris Stevens was to be captured and traded for ‘blind sheikh’Omar Abdel-Rahman, who hatched the 1993 WTC bombing plot
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn’t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier.
‘The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,’ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline.
She blamed the Obama administration for failing to stop half of a $1 billion United Arab Emirates arms shipment from reaching al-Qaeda-linked militants.
‘Remember, these weapons that came into Benghazi were permitted to enter by our armed forces who were blockading the approaches from air and sea,’ Lopez claimed. ‘They were permitted to come in. … [They] knew these weapons were coming in, and that was allowed..
‘The intelligence community was part of that, the Department of State was part of that, and certainly that means that the top leadership of the United States, our national security leadership, and potentially Congress – if they were briefed on this – also knew about this.’
The weapons were intended for Gaddafi but allowed by the U.S. to flow to his Islamist opposition.
The White House and senior Congressional members,’ the group wrote in an interim report released Tuesday, ‘deliberately and knowingly pursued a policy that provided material support to terrorist organizations in order to topple a ruler [Muammar Gaddafi] who had been working closely with the West actively to suppress al-Qaeda.’
‘Some look at it as treason,’said Wayne Simmons, a former CIA officer who participated in the commission’s research.
Retired Rear Admiral Chuck Kubic, another commission member, told reporters Tuesday that those weapons are now ‘all in Syria.’
‘Gaddafi wasn’t a good guy, but he was being marginalized,’ Kubic recalled. ‘Gaddafi actually offered to abdicate’ shortly after the beginning of a 2011 rebellion.
‘But the U.S. ignored his calls for a truce,’ the commission wrote, ultimately backing the horse that would later help kill a U.S. ambassador.
Kubic said that the effort at truce talks fell apart when the White House declined to let the Pentagon pursue it seriously.
‘We had a leader who had won the Nobel Peace Prize,’ Kubic said, ‘but who was unwilling to give peace a chance for 72 hours.’
In March 2011, Kubic said, U.S. Army Africa Commander General Carter told NBC News that the U.S. military was not actively targeting Muammar Gaddafi. That,Kubic revealed, was a signal to the Libyan dictator that there was a chance for a deal.
Gaddafi responded by ‘verifiable … pull[ing] his forces backfrom key rebel-held cities such as Benghazi and Misrata.’
Gaddafi wanted only two conditions to step down:permission to keep fighting al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), and the lifting of sanctionsagainst him, his family, and those loyal to him.
The Obama administration’s unwillingness to help broker a peaceful exit for the Libyan strongman, ‘led to extensive loss of life (including four Americans)’ when al-Qaeda-linked militants attacked U.S. diplomatic facilities in the city of Benghazi,’ the commission told reporters.
The White House and the National Security Staff did not immediately respond to questions about the group’s findings.
‘We don’t claim to have all the answers here,’ said Roger Aronoff, whose center-right group Accuracy in Media sponsored the group and its work.
On A Constitutionalist Note....“The time is now near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves.” Father of Our Country - George Washington 1776..............................................................................In Memoriam: "War" - Andrew Breitbart - Father of Our New Media (1969-2012)
End Times Bible Prophecy and News, End Times Deception, Societal Collapse, Apostasy, False Teachers, whore of Babylon Church, Demonic Attacks, War, Rumors of War, Famine, Pestilence, Salvation in Jesus Christ, NWO, UFOs, Earthquakes, IHOP, False Christs, All Roads Lead to Rome, New World Order, Conspiracies, Nephilim, Giants, New Apostolic Reformation, heresies, Signs and Lying Wonders
Turning and turning in the widening gyre | The falcon cannot hear the falconer | Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold | Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world | The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere | The ceremony of innocence is drowned | The best lack all conviction, while the worst | Are full of passionate intensity. -- W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming