BBC documentary 2005
Why We Fight describes the rise and maintenance of the United States military–industrial complex and its 50-year involvement with the wars led by the United States to date, especially its 2003 Invasion of Iraq. The documentary asserts that in every decade since World War II, the American public was misled so that the government (incumbent Administration) could take them to war and fuel the military-industrial economy maintaining American political dominance in the world. Interviewed about this matter, are politician John McCain,****(the idiot who’s in bed with Al Qaeda and all the extremists, low life scums) political scientist and former CIA analyst Chalmers Johnson, politician Richard Perle, neoconservative commentator William Kristol, writer Gore Vidal, and public policy expert Joseph Cirincione. Why We Fight documents the consequences of said foreign policy with the stories of a Vietnam War veteran whose son was killed in the September 11, 2001 attacks, and who then asked the military to write the name of his dead son on any bomb to be dropped in Iraq; and that of a 23-year-old New Yorker who enlists in the United States Army because he was poor and in debt, his decision impelled by his mother’s death; and a female military explosives scientist (Anh Duong) who arrived in the U.S. as a refugee child from Vietnam in 1975.
Director: Eugene Jarecki
Writer: Eugene Jarecki
Stars: Gore Vidal, John McCain, Ken Adelman | See full cast and crew
Geneva 2 | In the current international negotiations over the Syrian conflict, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said that current Syrian President Bashar al-Assad will not have a role in any new transitional government. President Assad’s media advisor Bouthaina Shaaban appeared on CNN and asked where John Kerry gets the right to tell the Syrian people who can and cannot be their leader.
She suggested the shoe would never be on the other foot, called the U.S.’ stance “colonial,” and asked, “Do you think there’s real democracy in the United States when they deal with countries like this?”
Wolf Blitzer brought up some graphic pictures that appear to depict victims of the Syrain Government, pictures obtained by CNN’s Christiane Amanpour. ***(another Jew/Zionist she did the same with Libya) Shaaban fired back that “you really have to be in Syria to know who’s doing what,” not judging from a distance like, she said, Amanpour was doing. She called the accusations a huge lie meant to create conflict and undermine the Syriangovernment.
Shaaban called out “one man in the United States who’s misleading” about Syria, but when pressed by Blitzer, she said, “I’m not going to name him, everybody knows him.”
She encouraged the media to come to Syria so “you will find out for yourself who is the criminal; who is kidnapping people, who is raping people.”She said that “most of what’s circulated in the media has nothing to do with what’s in Syria.”
The man in the attached photo with the beard (slight beard, small man in every photo) is called Abd Albaset Gteet. This man is being backed by the US to be the Prime Minister of Libya. This man lived outside of Libya for some time and he is married to a Jewish girl that he met in Switzerland. He is 10 times worse than the current criminal prime minister Ali Zeidan. This man is a BIG Zionist buddy of Bernard Levy. John McCain was in Tripoli to meet with this man early this week and support him for PM. The Libyans hate this man, but this all makes sense that the US / CIA is inside Libya trying to implement another puppet government. The tribes and the good Libyans have effectively shut off the flow of oil out of Libya. Now there are European countries absolutely in trouble because Libyan Bonney Light oil is the only oil they can refine due of their EPA regulations. So, the squeeze is on and the Libyan people are doing what they need to do to rid their country of these criminals. Obviously, McCain is in the middle of the mess as he was in Egypt with Lindsey Graham trying to push the Muslim Brotherhood after Morsi was ousted.
The single teaser photo is of Abd Albaset Gteet with Congressman Peter King and the other photo below is with other dignitaries from the US, one is Joe Lieberman. The One World Order Zionists Rothchild / Bilderberg groups are working hard to put their boy in charge of Libya.
As a new era in history has begun to dawn on humanity, new doors are being opened in both opportunities and also in the realms of potential threats and conflagrations. This reality has been noted most clearly in the developing affairs of Africa,a continent that is on the verge of transformation through both technology and evolving international interactions. In the face of potential progress driven by Africa’s lucrative natural resources and economic potential, an ominous threat looms above Africa,the threat of the neo-imperialist, globalist agendawhich has scarred the face of humanity with its continual drive of global hegemony. This “globalist agenda” is a militarized corporatismin a neo-imperialist systemoperating from all sides of the western political spectrum and representingthe corporate elite of Wall Street and London; no clearer was the nefarious nature of these interests shown than in the subversion of Libya two years ago in 2011.
Before delving into the demise of Libya, it is necessary to understandneo-imperialisms’ ambitions for Africa; its goal is the subjection of Africa into its orbit in order to serve as a critical lynchpin in the establishment of a unipolar world order (including ousting potential Chinese competition). The unipolar world order is the creating of a single center of global economic, political, and military power coupled with the control of international trade and the distribution of resources as is admittedly the agenda noted by Dr. Carroll Quigley in his “Tragedy and Hope” among various other publications from western corporate-financier think tanks ranging from the Council on Foreign Relations to the Brookings Institute. Russian President Vladimir Putinhas also spoken of hegemonic ambitions on the part of the west to establish a unipolar order at a 2007 Munich conference.
As Libya again takes prominence again in the media with the increasing unrest even provoking amobilization of U.S. Marines from Spain to Italy, across from Libya, hinting a potential military involvement in the already decimated state, it is important to review the foundational history of the current Libyan dilemma before the “disinfo” echo chamber of the mainstream media begins a new full-throttle propaganda blitz. The increasing urgency for this review is news headlines even alleging a“new war” in Libya because of militia rivalries.
Libya has recently been ravished by increasing internal strife and ethno-tribal divisions that was the continuation of NATO’s systematic destruction of the nation-state in 2011. In Dr. Webster Tarpley’s “Al Qaeda: Pawns of CIA Insurrection from Libya to Yemen”, it was explained that four primary factors contributed to the Libyan “revolution” in 2011 with the primary one being racist and monarchist elements among the eastern Libyan Harabi and Obeidat tribes found in the Benghazi-Darna-Tobruk corridor who had historically resented Gaddafi for toppling the western-backed King Idris which hailed from that region. This would explain why many of the protestors in eastern Libya were photographed carrying pictures of King Idris. That is not to say that all participants in the opposition were negative elements but it cannot be denied that negative elements had been pervasive as pawns of the western subversion and even culminated in the wide presence of Al Qaeda flags in Benghazi, even atop the Benghazi courthouse, reflecting the prominent role of radical Islamist militias that will be discussed below. It is not to be forgotten that insurrectionary activity is not new in this region as Gaddafi had witnessed continuous waves of strifeand militarized opposition, often propped up by the west for geopolitical purposes, and this was reflected during an Islamist insurgency in the 1990s, often with racial overtones. Tony Cartalucci in “Libya at Any Cost” documented the censored history of unrest in Libya driven by western interests:
This tribally-based resentment that categorized much of the violence in 2011 contributed toracially-driven atrocitiescommitted against Libyan blacks that make up a third of the Libyan population and inhabit the western regions including the Fezzan tribesof the Libyan southwest. Dr. Webster Tarpley also documented the prominent role of Al Qaeda mercenaries in the Libyan conflict whose nest in eastern Libya had been a world-leading nurturing ground for extremism according to the US Military Academy at West Point’s “Combating Terrorism Center” (CTC) 2007 reports on foreign fighters in Iraq. The key rebel city of Darna, for example, was commandeered by a rebel terrorist triumvirate featuring Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, formerly of the Al Qaeda-tied “Libyan Islamic Fighting Group” (LIFG), who fought against NATO forces in Afghanistan. At his side were Sufian bin-Kumu, Osama bin Laden’s former chauffeur and an inmate at Guantánamo Bay for six years, as well as al-Barrani who is also a devoted member of LIFG.
Tarpley does an excellent job in demonstrating how such figures were not atypical but were the norm in a region that was the world’s “terrorist capital” according to the CTC. It is also disturbing to note the desperate attempts at damage control by the CTC in the wake of NATO’s disastrous intervention where previously documented facts were purposefully obscured and spun to cover NATO’s illegitimacy.Tarpley also documented the role of western assets such as the Libyan National Salvation Front as well as the French-assisted defection of top-Qaddafi associate Nouri Mesmari in 2010 who would later collaborate with the west in fomenting military mutinies against Gaddafi in northeast Libya.
Being the only African nation to rank as “high” on the Human Development Index and boasting a highly developed infrastructure, Libya under Gaddafi has become the globalists’ geopolitical gateway into Africa. To the detriment of all free humanity, this gateway has been trampled down by the illegal NATO war on Libya which revolved around verified propaganda regardingLibya leader Muammar Gaddafi’s alleged atrocities, a misrepresentation of the Libyan rebels, and a complete media blackout regarding geopolitical forces at play.These claims would culminate in international myths spun around Gaddafi who was claimed to be bombing his people, hiring African mercenaries, and staging mass rapes to terrorize opposition as the official dogmas justifying NATO’s aggression.
Integral to the narrative justifying NATO’s intervention revolved around painting Gaddafi as a brutal tyranny launching a bloody crackdown against a “peaceful” movement with a host other atrocities ranging from hiring African mercenaries, using the air force against protestors, staging mass rapes, and threatening “genocide” against Benghazi.The NATO narrative of the revolution being the noble Libyan masses rising up against Gaddafi and his mercenaries was painted most clearly in the early March 14, 2011 Reuters article titled, “Libyan jets bomb rebels, France pushes for no-fly zone.” In this typical mainstream media report, rhetorical justification is given for the “Responsibility to Protect”doctrine in sanctioning a no-fly zone in Libya based on the tired narrative of Gaddafi using air power to brutally suppress what is seen as an indigenous uprising, seeming to be heading down the pathos becoming a “tragedy for Libya.” A warning for an upcoming bloodbath against Gaddafi was sounded. Interestingly, even the “Independent” would later publish an article debunking this,pointing out the unreliability and factually-depraved basis for this propaganda among other accusations levied against Gaddafi. This baseless propaganda, already having poisoned western perception of what happened in Libya, would later be supplemented with reports involving the role of alleged mercenaries and mass rapes to whip up justification for intervention.
In reality, such a narrative was factually bankrupt as masterfully documentedby Maximillain Forte in his “Top Ten Myths in the War Against Libya” which directly nails the illegitimacy of the NATO campaign. While Gaddafi is certainly no saint and while many groups did have legitimate grievances against him, he nonetheless had a solid support base in Libyawhile the rebels were overall lacking legitimacy and were being driven by Islamist radicals, exiled politicians with globalist ties, and decades of ethnically-based tension.Gaddafi had invested heavily into the infrastructure and the social structure of his country, bringing the country to nearly eradicating illiteracy and also combating homelessness which had previously been a constant problem. Women rights were also championed as women in Libya were allowed to study and work where they desired as even BBC noted.
While Gaddafi had invested in infrastructure, the globalists sought to offset this by asserting their presence in Libya through both the destruction of its infrastructure and seeking to bring Libya into their economic orbit. There was a concerted effort to undermine Gaddafi’s agenda of building a united, strong, and self-sufficient African community and strengthening African multilateral institutions. Furthermore, Libya provided a gateway into Africa for the Pentagon’s “AFRICOM” to undermine and oust Chinese economic interests on the African continent which were a major challenge for western corporate interests’ access to resources and economic hegemony. Another key point wasGaddafi’s goal of creating a single, gold-based, African currency called the “gold dinar”with which he planned to trade African oil for.This would have conflicted directly with western corporate and banking interests and their international fiat monetary system upon which the IMF and their “casino economy” is built. Countries’ purchasing power would be determined by the amount of gold they had as opposed to fiat paper currency that made no substantial backing.
Regarding the specific claims of Gaddafi’s atrocities as parroted by the mainstream media, Forte gives many insights that help dismantle the myths behind the “humanitarian” war. For example, the claims of air strikes by Gaddafi are noted to have been a fabrication peddled by the BBC and Al Jazeera.The claims were completely unfounded and based on fake claims. U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates and Admiral Mullen would admit during a Pentagon press conference that they had seen no confirmation of such reports.David Kirpatrick of the New York Times would be cited by Forte as admitting that, “the rebels feel no loyalty to the truth in shaping their propaganda, claiming nonexistent battlefield victories…and making vastly inflated claims about his [Gaddafi’s] behavior”.
The claims of African mercenaries, integral to portraying Gaddafi as being on one side against Libya as a whole, were perhaps the most atrocious and racist of the myths, sprung from the rebels’ own tribal animosities towards indigenous Africans in Libya and migrant African workers that were common throughout the country. Human Rights Watch would claim that it found no evidence at all of African mercenaries in eastern Libya where the rebellion and fighting were centered and even noted that Gaddafi had attempted to end discrimination against these people, contradicting,as Forte noted, the rabid claims made throughout the mainstream press including Time Magazine, The Telegraph, Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya. The Los Angeles Times also found no evidence of such mercenarieswith the New York Times even pointing out the “racist overtones” involved in the conflict and the disinformation they helped spread.Amnesty Internationalwould later confirm that “mercenaries” put on display by the rebels had been undocumented African migrant workers and noted things like rampant discrimination and disproportionate detention of black Libyans in Az-Zawiya. Mainstream media and Al Jazeera would attempt to cover its crimes by pointing out, though briefly, the reality that Africans in Libya were being subjected to lootings, abduction, and killing bythe rebels. All of this, of course, in light of the fact that Africans were an integral part of Libyan society, making up 33% of the population. A severe crime never to be forgotten is the ethnic cleansing of the beautiful black Libyan town of Tawargha, previously inhabited by 35,000 people, expelled by racist militants calling themselves,“the brigade for purging slaves, black skin.”Another crime was thesystemic slaughter of blacks in western Libyaby the eastern rebels advancing on Tripoli (see here as well).
Another hysteria peddled by the media revolved around Gaddafi’s alleged planning of mass rapes, often blamed on nonexistent“mercenaries, which was then used by the media to help garner sympathy to the rebels.The source for these claims, also adequately exposed by Forte, began with Al Jazeera, a propaganda outlet for the Wall Street-London backed Qatari regime, claimingthat Gaddafi had distributed Viagra to his troops and ordered them to use rape against those who opposed him. These claims were then redistributed throughout the media and found their way to the International Criminal Court (ICC). The chief prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo would later fraudulently claimthat Gaddafi had ordered the rape of hundreds of women and that Gaddafi had personally ordered Viagra to be distributed. U.S. ambassador Susan Rice and Hillary Clinton would also make these allegations(see Forte’s article).
In reality, a UN rights inquiry in Libya headed by Cherif Bassiouni would find these claims a baseless “mass hysteria.” Bassiouni told of a woman to “claimed to have sent out over 70,000 questionnaires and received 60,000 responses, of which 259 reported sexual abuse.”Bassiouni would ask to see these questionnaires, but never receive them,casting doubt on the narrative. It was pointed out that it seems improbable that 70,000 questionnaires were sent out in March considering the fact that the postal service wasn’t working. Bassiouni whose team would uncover only 4 cases of sexual abuse in their study. The boxes of Viagra that Gaddafi supposedly distributed were found fully intact right next to burnt-out tanks, indicating staged propaganda(Forte). Further confirming this is Amnesty International and who further shamed the imperialist establishment and thoroughly shattered this lie. According to the “Independent”, “Donatella Rovera, senior crisis response adviser for Amnesty, who was in Libya for three months after the start of the uprising, says that “we have not found any evidence or a single victim of rape or a doctor who knew about somebody being raped”.
The most disingenuous claim peddled by the media to justify the Libyan war was the “save Benghazi”crusade. While it is true that Gaddafi had employed “overblown” rhetoric threatening to fight from house to house and “squash the cockroaches”, the media emphasizing these claims admits the radical-extremists nature of the hordes fighting among the rebels. The same media would also disregard Gaddafi’s “overblown” rhetoric when it was convenient to do so but attached to the Benghazi narrative as it seemingly gave justification for NATO to intervene.There is no evidence that Gaddafi had genocide planned as he only made the charges to the armed groups causing upheaval in the east of the country and even offered them amnesty and an open passage into Egypt across the border to avoid bloodshed.Professor Alan J. Kupermanexposed the propaganda talking-points of this argument, citing as evidence for the fact that Gaddafi had no genocide planned the reality that he did not perpetuate it in areas that he had captured fully or partially from the rebels including Zawiya, Mistrata, and Ajdabiya.
The very actions of NATO itself would discredit the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine employed to justify NATO’s intervention as NATO would be directly responsible for the deaths of countless civilians.NATO would gun down civilians in the central square of Zawiya and “taking a fairly liberal definition of command and control” facilities by targeting a residential district, killing some of Gaddafi’s family members and three of his grandchildren. NATO was also responsible for targeting Libya’s state television, killing three civilian journalists and earning condemnation by international journalist federations(see Forte’s article).
NATO oversaw the death of 1,500 refugees fleeing Libya by sea, mostly sub-Saharan Africans, the same people who were baselessly demonized as mercenaries.NATO would ignore their distress calls even though refugees would make contact with vessels belonging to NATO members. NATO also would launch numerous unjustifiable strikes against Libya furthering the damage toll. Above all, NATO was giving cover to rebels who were perpetuating verifiable genocide against cities, such as Sirte, withNATO backing and airstrikes to order,cutting off electricity, food, and water and using bombardment against civilians. Under this blueprint of destruction, scores of people would die in multiples of what was happening initially in Benghazi against armed rebel gangswhich Gaddafi was fighting making a mockery out of the pre-text used to justify their globalist, faux-humanitarian war in the first place (Forte).
NATO and the globalist war on Libyawas one bankrupt of any moral grounding or political justification.It was a war born of compromised interests that sought not the liberation of an oppressed people but rather the pillages of Libya which would later serve as a gateway into the heart of Africa. While the globalists attempt to sell their wars as moral and for the betterment of the world, they are at heart driven only by a desire to spread hegemony and consolidate control, with the ultimate goal being global hegemony. Any attempt to invoke a moral cover should be shunned in light of the barrage of fake atrocities attributed to Gaddafi and complementing crimes by NATO, best captured in the lies regarding Gaddafi massacring his people, hiring mercenaries, and staging mass rapes among other echo chamber distortions. Only when we tear down the media’s curtain of deception can we better understand the events at play and position ourselves intellectually to combat globalist imperialism which seeks to subvert us all.
Sam Muhho is a student of history and a devoted anti-imperialist and anti-globalist advocate devoted to the work of Tony Cartalucci of the Land Destroyer Report and similar geopolitical analysts. He runs the Facebook page “Globalist Watch” at facebook.com/gwatch1776 in order to awaken people to the current state of world affairs.
I wrote the following article on 19 March 2011. This is the first time it has been published here. I hope people find it interesting to read it retrospectively…
As I write it is the exact day of the eighth anniversary of the atrocity of the Iraq war – and, incredibly, rabid rogue terror states Britain and America – this time joined by France – have now started another genocidal war on another Arab Muslim country.
Under the guise of ‘humanitarian intervention’ the real aim in Libya is to cause mass bloodshed, re-ignite a full-scale civil war and place into power a regime that will serve only the interests of the West.
Complicit in this outrage has been the equally rabid anti-Gaddafi Western media. For the past few weeks we have witnessed the following brainwashing of the public in a number of disturbing ways.
The constant stream of Libyan exiles trotted out to tell their unverifiable stories – accepted with no cross-questioning by presenters. It is virtually unheard of for any Gaddafi supporter to be allowed to express their side of the story or tell of the crimes against humanity committed against them by rebel forces.
Endless unsubstantiated ‘eye-witness’ reports from rebels and their supporters – many of which subsequently turned out to be lies – again accepted as fact by TV presenters.
The constant rubbishing of Gaddafi’s claims of drugged youths and al-Qaida being involved in the uprising. Yet it is not uncommon for fighters to be on drugs – it blunts fear – and these rebels have been described by one British journalist as “wild” and “crazy”. But the real scandal has been the suppression of the fact that one of the rebel leaders in east Libya is a former driver* for Osama Bin Laden!
Nineteen percent of foreign (al-Qaida linked) occupation fighters in Iraq came from Libya.Now I would never condemn these particular fighters – they are heroes and I salute them – but all the elements involved in the uprising in Libya are armed militias that Colonel Gaddafi has every right to deal with. The rebels have already used at least one suicide bomber. The hypocrisy is that no other country would tolerate such internal terrorism either.
There is also the constant focus on hysterical journalists bleating about hospitals and ambulances allegedly being attacked by Gaddafi forces – but it is routine policy for US and Israeli soldiers to attack hospitals and ambulances. All three maternity clinics in Iraq were targeted and destroyed by US forces. British soldiers in Afghanistan even destroyed hospital windows to burn the window frames to make themselves a nice little cup of tea. The US also cut electricity and water when it sent in ground forces to lay waste to cities and towns across Iraq. (Watch how they will bleat when someone else does it). But western media spends only seconds dwelling on these events – if at all.
On February 22nd 2011, both the BBC and al-Jazeera reported that on this day Gaddafi forces carried out airstrikes on Libya’s people. But it transpired days later that the Russian military’s own sat-intel pictures showed that no air strikes whatsoever were carried out in Libya on that day. Just what other lies are we being told?
In the build up to Iraq we were told of President Saddam’s WMD, his ability to attack all of us in the UK within forty-five minutes, his son Qusay is a rapist etc. All lies, lies, and more lies…
As for Gaddafi soldiers attacking civilians – this is a very clever lie from the media. The rebels are ‘civilians’ who have taken up arms.If they are attacked – particularly when concealing their weapons– the media resorts to moaning about civilians being targeted. They are not civilians. Sure, genuine civilians will get caught in the crossfire – but that cannot be avoided. This is now a war zone for God’s sake – which these rebels have made and now coalition forces are exacerbating. Gaddafi forces would never attack their own people – why would they? The idea is positively ridiculous. In fact he used great restraint for too long in order to avoid casualties.
The biggest lie about Libya comes again from the politicians; their pretence that they care one iota about civilian death. David Cameron grandstands about it – but Cameron is an actor. He cares nothing about the deaths of civilians. He and his ilk are only interested in whining about it when it is done by someone that they do not like.
Yes, protesters have been shot at in Libya – some were carrying concealed weapons - but currently dozens and dozens of anti-government protesters are being shot dead in Yemen, Bahrain, Oman, Saudi Arabia and Iraq.Like Cameron, the US is utterly disinterested in military action in these places. The reason is that these countries are ruled by puppets that serve America’s
interests. In Iraq, of course, the people now suffer under a ‘government’ imposed by the West under illegal occupation.
But the real hypocrisy and outrage is the current deliberate mass murder of dozens and dozens of civiliansby NATO (the evil true face of British and American soldiers) in Afghanistan, and by the US in Pakistan. This includes scores of women and children killed in one attack, and nine boys, all under twelve years of age, blown to pieces in another attack while collecting firewood in Afghanistan, and scores of people attending an innocent meeting of tribal elders in Pakistan in yet another outrage. This to add to the thousands of innocents they have already killed in these two countries alone in recent years.
‘President’ Karzai of Afghanistan recently had a particularly vociferous go at the US for killing civilians - American soldiers then promptly shot dead his cousin in yet another “mistake”. Oh dear – the US is nothing if not vindictive…
Morally bankrupt Cameron and his coalition terrorists are strangely silent about all this. Not a word from their duplicitous mouths. So is the western media, which chooses to devote almost no airtime to these events.
Instead we get unjustified blanket coverage of Libya.
The real reason Colonel Gaddafi is hated by the West is because he is an Arab nationalist – a man who has refused to ever sell-out his country and its people to the West. A man who rightly believes that the West has no right to interfere in the affairs of Arabs. A man who has protected Libya’s oil, gold and uranium. A man that has never legitimized the so-called ‘state of Israel’.
America now sees the chance to fulfill their real agenda of installing their agents into power and seizing its assets. Already the US has positioned BP and Chevron (Texaco) to get the oil before Russia and China in any Gaddafi-free Libya. (BP already has huge assets in Libya).
Some of the rebels are working for the biggest terror organisation in the world – the CIA. We also know that the British SAS/SBS have been found covertly crawling around Libya – with an MI6 agent pretending to be a diplomat! At the start of the uprising the US asked Saudi Arabia to flood the east with weapons for the rebels. (Remember that it was the Saudis whom America told to goad Saddam into attacking Iran – oh yes, geopolitics is a filthy business).
Worse still, rebel leaders have met with two of the most evil people in the world, John ‘bomb, bomb, bomb Iran’ McCain and Hillary ‘carry on bombing Lebanon’ Clinton – to plot their takeover of Libya. Clinton has also goaded Obama into it. These rebel leaders are linked to the despised regime that Gaddafi overthrew to the delight of the Libyan people forty-two years ago – in a bloodless coup – so they have their own dodgy agenda.
Libya is accused of breaking the terms of the UN resolution – but the coalition itself has already broken the rules. There is a part that demands a weapons embargo – but the West is now already flooding weapons and ammunition into east Libya via Egypt!
The West also makes much of the Arab League backing the military action – but the latter expressly only backed a no-fly zone and not any attacks whatsoever on ground forces. Someone should have told these traitorous Arabs that if you give Britain and America one inch they would instead take miles. How long before we see the coalition use depleted – or even undepleted – uranium on the good people of Libya – or the use of the chemical weapon white phosphorous. This is what war really means.
Do not be fooled by America pretending it is taking a back seat either – everything is controlled from US central command. And Atlanticists such as Cameron and Sarkozy cannot wipe their backsides without the say-so of the Yanks. If they eventually ‘hand over’ to NATO it will really be America handing over to America…
But another smoke screen is the mantra of ‘freedom and democracy’. These things do not really exist – they are a Utopian fallacy. America loves democracy (sic) – because it is their route to funding any servant of theirs into power into any country they wish to control. Thankfully, this does not always work. For instance, Hugo Chavez has somehow overcome repeated attempted CIA-sponsored coupsin Venezuela.
If ‘democracy’ does not go America’s way then they oddly denounce it– a perfect example being Hamas’s legitimate election win in Palestine.
People think that they are lucky to have ‘freedom of speech’ in Britain. Few people realise that British police officers read through newspapers’ letters pages then covertly track down and question the writers of those letters. Why? Because the British authorities are compiling data on all its citizens who fail to adhere to any government line. Do not believe that you have ‘freedom of speech’ in this country – you do not.
Whatever you think of Gaddafi remember that you are being lied to and brainwashed, and that this is now a war between a sovereign state and the West (by proxy; it always was). He did not ask for the rebel uprising, he did not want it, and he did not cause it. It is impossible to know the true level of support he has in Libya but it could be half the entire country.
But it is a fact of life that Western countries hate their leaders! In the US, only a quarter vote for their winning president. In Britain, only a small minority of people vote the ruling party into power. To military commit regime change in another country is illegalbut to also officially do it because a country’s leader is perceived as unpopular is ridiculous in the extreme.
However much support there is for Gaddafi, there is no doubt that he is hugely supported and deeply loved in the western half of Libya – yet the wishes and emotions of these people are totally ignored as if, for some reason, they do not matter one iota. Where is their justice? He has brought them peace, security and prosperity and a united Libya for forty-two years.That is why they support him. The east has never been a haven of support for him because they are connected to the old regime. The rebels though are an armed minority group which, if that popular, would not need outside help.
In the east, there are two tribes that actually do support Gaddafi and they are screaming for help now – afraid for their lives at the hands of these rebels. If these armed rebels took power – as America intends – it will be as a result of mass bloodshed and all-out civil war.
There would be no democracy for Gaddafi’s ordinary civilian supporters – they simply would be hunted down and executed, or taken away never to be seen again – and Cameron, and his psychopathic British and coalition cohorts will all say nothing.
All Arab states are ruled in a way that can be brutal at times – but that will never change – it is also a tribal system and NOTHING to do with western countries.
I wish Colonel Gaddafi good luck in dealing with the internal terrorism in his country and I hope that Libya, like Iraq, will become a graveyard for coalition forces. Most of all I pray that the beautiful land of Libya can somehow be saved from becoming yet another rape victim of the filthy, lying, greedy West.
This article is written in memory of the four martyrs of Mosul, Iraq, July 22nd 2003 – and for all the brave, true Libyans who have given, and will give, their many lives for freedom from the terror of America and its allies.
2013: *Refers to Abdelhakim Belhadj – after the war he became the overall commander for the Libyan ‘Government’ ‘Army’ forces of Tripoli. He is now a political party leader. He is said to be the main man behind the Madrid train bombings…. (This is what Gaddafi was removed for?Well, how very ‘humanitarian’ of the West)!.…