Massive Obama Killing Operation Unmasked By Russian “Spies”
By: Sorcha Faal
A truly astonishing report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) states that a “massive killing operation” organized and funded by the Obama regime has been uncovered and is responsible for the deaths of at least 45 people, including a top US movie director and his family, numerous bankers and nearly the entire family of a top American computer expert.
According to this report, the SVR first became aware of this Obama killing operation when two of its financial analysts, Victor Podobnyy and Igor Sporyshev, were contacted by a senior Vnesheconombank (VEB) computer technician named Evgeny Buryakov in New York City this past month.
The VEB is a Russian state corporation (a non-profit) that is a former Soviet bank and has no Russian banking license (i.e. Vnesheconombank is not a bank) and is not subject to the law on banks and banking activities.
Translated to the English language, its name means “Bank of Foreign Economic Activity”, though it is commonly called the “Russian Development Bank”, and it refers to itself as “the state corporation Bank for Development and Foreign Economic Affairs”.
The Russian government uses VEB to support and develop the Russian economy and to manage Russian state debts and pension funds. It is a part in the government’s plan to diversify the Russian economy, and to do so it receives funds directly from the state budget. The bank was instituted in 1922.
One of the main programs of the VEB is to include procedures which would enable it, under applicable legislation, to identify customers, customers’ representatives, beneficiaries and beneficial owners, assess customers’ risks, as well as risks of using VEB’s services in order to legalize (launder) illicit gains and finance terrorism, and timely detect customers’ transactions that are subject to mandatory control, as well as spot unusual transactions, document and store information about customers and their transactions, as well as take measures to counteract legalization of illicit gains and terrorism financing.
Raising the concerns of VEB computer technician Buryakov, this report continues, was a “buried algorithm” within the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial (SWIFT) that linked to the Central Intelligence Agency’s (CIA) National Clandestine Service (NCS) director Frank Archibald, and which over the course of this past year alone had dispersed nearly $100 million. [Note: SWIFT provides a network that enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive information about financial transactions in a secure, standardized and reliable environment.]
Under established VEB procedures (i.e. Russian law), this report continues, computer technician Buryakov contacted the SVR at the Russian New York City embassy where he turned over the evidence he had accumulated and his assessment of same.
The SVR then, following accepted international criminal procedures, this report says, then contacted their American counterparts requesting further substantiation from both the CIA and the US State Department on the information discovered by the VEB.
Since August 2014, the US Air Force with the support of a coalition of 19 countries has relentlessly waged an intensified air campaign against Syria and Iraq allegedly targeting the Islamic State brigades.
According to Defense News, over 16,000 airstrikes were carried out from August 2014 to mid January 2015. Sixty percent of the air strikes were conducted by the US Air Force using advanced jet fighter and bombing capabilities (Aaron Mehta, “A-10 Performing 11 Percent of Anti-ISIS Sorties”. Defense News, January 19, 2015.)
The airstrikes have been casually described by the media as part of a “soft” counter-terrorism operation, rather than an act of all out war directed against Syria and Iraq.
This large scale air campaign which has resulted in countless civilian casualties has been routinely misreported by the mainstream media. According to Max Boot, senior fellow in national security at the Council on Foreign Relations. ”Obama’s strategy in Syria and Iraq is not working… [because] the U.S. bombing campaign against ISIS has been remarkably restrained”. (Newsweek, February 17, 2015, emphasis added)
Americans are led to believe that the Islamic State constitutes a formidable force confronting the US military and threatening Western Civilization. The thrust of media reporting is that the US Air Force has failed and that “Obama should get his act together” in effectively confronting this ”Outside Enemy” of America.
According to CFR Max Boot, military escalation is the answer: what is required is for the president “to dispatch more aircraft, military advisers, and special operations forces, while loosening the restrictions under which they operate.” (Ibid)
What kind of aircraft are involved in the air campaign? The F-16 Fighting Falcon (above), The F-15E Strike Eagle (image below), The A-10 Warthog, not to mention Lockheed Martin’s F-22 Raptor stealth tactical fighter aircraft.
Question for Our Readers
Why has the US Air Force not been able to wipe out the Islamic State which at the outset was largely equipped with conventional small arms not to mention state of the art Toyota pickup trucks?
From the very outset, this air campaign has NOT been directed against ISIS. The evidence confirms that the Islamic State is not the target. Quite the opposite.
The air raids are intended to destroy the economic infrastructure of Iraq and Syria.
The USAF-15E Strike Eagle
We call on our readers to carefully reflect on the following image, which describes the Islamic State convoy of pickup trucks entering Iraq and crossing a 200 km span of open desert which separates the two countries.
This convoy entered Iraq in June 2014.
What would have been required from a military standpoint to wipe out an ISIS convoy with no effective anti-aircraft capabilities?
Without an understanding of military issues, common sense prevails.
If they had wanted to eliminate the Islamic State brigades, they could have “carpet” bombed their convoys of Toyota pickup trucks when they crossed the desert from Syria into Iraq in June.
The answer is pretty obvious, yet not a single mainstream media has acknowledged it.
The Syro-Arabian Desert is open territory (see map right). With state of the art jet fighter aircraft (F15, F22 Raptor, F16) it would have been –from a military standpoint– ”a piece of cake”, a rapid and expedient surgical operation, which would have decimated the Islamic State convoys in a matter of hours.
Instead what we have witnessed is an ongoing drawn out six months of relentless air raids and bombings, and the terrorist enemy is apparently still intact.
(In comparison,the NATO bombing raids of Yugoslavia in 1999 lasted about three months (March 24-June 10, 1999).
And we are led to believe that the Islamic State cannot be defeated by a powerful US-led military coalition of 19 countries.
The air campaign was not intended to decimate the Islamic State.
The counter-terrorism mandate is a fiction. America is the Number One “State Sponsor of Terrorism”.
The Islamic State is not only protected by the US and its allies, it is trained and financed by US-NATO, with the support of Israel and Washington’s Persian Gulf allies.
While no one should take ISIS to be any less of a threat than it is, we might take some small consolation from the possibility that some of the sculptures the militants smashed on video this week at the Nineveh Museum in Mosul, Iraq, were replicas. While an Assyrian stone lion smashed in the videos is indisputably a terrible loss,the destruction of replicas in this particular case may soften the blow.
“According to archaeologists, most if not all the statues in the Mosul museum are replicas not originals,” reports Channel 4 News, London. “The reason they crumble so easily is that they’re made of plaster. ‘You can see iron bars inside,” pointed out Mark Altaweel of the Institute of Archaeology at University College, London, as we watched the video together. ‘The originals don’t have iron bars.’”
“According to the British Institute,” adds Channel 4, “the originals were taken to Baghdad for safekeeping. ISIS probably wouldn’t care about the distinction. One false idol is the same as another.”
Why are the militants so bent on destruction of the region’s cultural heritage? Amr al-Azm, a Syrian anthropologist and historian, told the New York Times that the destruction of artworks, and the slaughter and capture of Assyrians and others in the area that it accompanied, are strategic. While the militants claim that they are smashing the sculptures because they are idols forbidden by Islam, he posits that “It’s all a provocation” aimed to lure U.S. and Iraqi forces to try to retake Mosul. “They want a fight with the West because that’s how they gain credibility and recruits,” Azm said.
ISIS has “repeatedly threatened to destroy [the museum’s] collection,” according to the Times, since they took the city in June.
CNN gets international ridicule after fake ISIS report
Back in 2012, CNN dismantled their investigative reporting department. They laid off many people, including their most high profile investigative reporters.
There had a been a number of scandals where CNN employees were ordered to change their stories for political reasons. The most famous incident involved former CNN investigative reporter Amber Lyons. She recorded evidence that the government of Bahrain was violently suppressing dissidents. CNN censored her report on behalf of the government of Bahrain. The Bahrain Economic Development Board paid CNN to control how the country is portrayed.
After being fired Lyons told the public that CNN also took money from Kazakhstan and the Republic of Georgia in exchange for positive media coverage.
Since then, it is becoming increasingly apparent to everyone that CNN has no value as a media outlet. The routinely make up elements of stories.
CNN’s latest fake claim is being ridiculed all over the world. This is an entire five minute segment of total nonsense.
ISIS is not luring women with kittens and nutella. ISIS does not have a brigade of female fighters. More on female fighters below.*
The Kurdish Peshmerga has a female regiment that is trained in combat. Because they are desperate for more fighters, members of the female regiment are allowed to volunteer to go to the frontlines. Most of the female fighters you have seen on tv are from the Kurdish HPG. This is the military wing of the Worker’s Party of Kurdistan [PKK]. This is a pro-Communist Kurdish separatist group in Turkey. HPG believes in using women in combat as part of their Marxist ideology. HPG fighters are actively fighting ISIS in both Syria and Iraq. The Peshmerga is sponsored by the Iraqi government. The HPG has no state sponsors. In fact the PKK/HPG are a banned “terrorist organization” in Turkey.
Kurdistan was a short lived Soviet Satellite state after WWII. Many Kurds have remained hard-line Communists every since. The second largest party in Iraqi Kurdistan is the Socialist PUK, which is allied with the PKK in Turkey. In 1996, the PUK and PKK fought a civil war against the centrist Kurdistan Democratic Party [KDP]. Both the United States and Iran sponsored the Communist/Socialist side. The centrist Kurds, who presently are part of the Iraqi ruling coalition today, begged Saddam Hussein for help when Iranian troops started launching attacks from across the border.
Hussein defeated the Kurdish communists, and the US accused Hussein of war crimes.
The Fake Beheadings
Steven Sotloff appears in two different videos: the first time in the video “Message to America” where is beheaded the poor freelance American James Foley, in the second video, “A second message to America” in which the journalist from his message against Obama, forced by jihadists Isis. Many have speculated that both videos were not truthful.
As for the video on the beheading of James Foley has spoken about Christopher Davidson, a Middle East expert, noted the “windy”on the orange jumpsuit of the reporter, that you can not see the grass instead. Moreover, the “pixelated on the neck” of the journalist and “the absence of tension” are additional elements that raise doubts. Even the American media have expressed perlessità as pointed out by the nineteenth century. The Russians however have thought the video was mounted in a manner not used dalll’Isis. It ‘s true, but to a certain point: the ISIS fact, in addition to being well financed and armed, has a health professional communication, the “Al Hayat Media center” of which you can see the logo that appears in other Isis video.The Russians say the video is fake and is a ploy to create the casus belli and invade Syria. What, if anything, could generate suspicion is precisely the sudden piety militia that if yesterday turned bloody video, slamming the horror in the face to the world, sowing the streets the deaths of hundreds of innocent people in shock, in the video anti-American omit the act of decapitation and show, in the case of Foley, the headless body, in the case of Sotloff rather not show it the act of decapitation or the headless body. Why?
But this is not the only false note in that diabolical construction Isis, there is more. As it was easy to see for all the person identified as the two Sotloff video seems to be different. One has the long face, while the other has a more round face shape. You could think of a difference of perspectives of the cameraman, but on closer inspection it is not exactly so. The video of the “second Sotloff” in fact, offers a greater variety of perspectives inquadrazione of the subject and it is easy to compare them with those of the “first Sotloff”. The nose is similar but not identical (but that should not change too much with the different facial grimacing). Eyebrows are similar, but the first Sotloff the corruccia differently from the second Sotloff yet both have the sun in his eyes. The ears are the same as the shape of the mouth seems apparently almost the same. The shape of the face really. And, to put it all, do not even like to Sotloff of which were circulated photos from the family. What’s more, while the journalist James Foley had been kidnapped for some time and his abduction had been made known in America, for Sotloff the story is, again, different: he was kidnapped by the time yes, but the family did not want to disclose the affair. Had Israeli citizenship, but this is a fact to be kept secret. And yet, perhaps to divert attention of Sotloff, his facebook profile does not seem to exist while there to Foley. Sotloff only has a twitter profile that is stopped by August 3, 2013.
Some people then assume that, at least in the case of Sotloff, was used an actor (in the first video). In the second video may be the same but nobody Sotloff sure it is dead anyway since it is not shown in the video at the full act of the slaughter. In the video of Foley instead the act of sticking is displayed but the sound emitted by the victim appears to have been installed at a later date as reported by forensic analyzes. In the case of short Foley is not excluded that the death by decapitation really occurred and that the head is his and not that of a victim or a puppet, but occurred after and perhaps not for the hand of the Executioner that, for the services secrets is an English rapper.
By those who are used to the doubles? Who is really Steven Sotloff? We can not know for sure. The only thing certain is that they remain strong doubt that the people who appear in the two videos are the same person. Until now only the great leaders of the secret services, heads of state, they used to do double the operations, but in the case of Sotloff the resemblance is so fine as to not even be noticed.
After Rita’s fake James Foley “beheading,” CNN interviewed a young woman who claimed to be James Foley’s sister, in order to create human interest in the hoax. This is how she looks the day after that his brother was beheaded:
THE FOLEY’S SISTER THE DAY AFTER THAT HIS BROTHER WAS BEHEADED ON CAMERA, YEAH RIGHT!!!!
In Rita Katz Prankster Zionist Mossad’s 22-minute video, Mr Al-Kasasbeh wears an orange tee-shirt and pants, and is professionally videotaped from various angles making a confession, just like CIA employee James Foley, Stephen Sotloff, David Haines, Alan Henning, Peter Kassig, and so on. All those videos came from Ritz Katz.
But instead of “beheading,” this time Rita had ISIS(i.e. Jordanian army guys posing as ISIS) supposedly burn Al-Kasasbeh alive in a cage on 3 Jan 2015, or maybe it was 3 Feb 2015. (Different media outlets give different dates.)
Anyway, Rita had the ISIS video before ISIS did, as always.
The only corporate media outlet willing to pay for her latest video was Fox Jews.The other outlets merely mention it, claiming that it further justifies the “war on terror,” plus the war on Syria. And Iraq. And Yemen. And Somalia. And Pakistan. And Afghanistan. And so on.
And it further vindicates Chris Kyle too.
Rita’s latest fake involved a Jordanian. That’s because King Abdullah II is now helping in the war on Syria, and he wants the support of the Jordanian Arabs to slaughter their fellow Arabs next door. News of Rita Katz’ latest farce was released as King Abdullah visited Obama at the White House.
Japanese Prime Minister Shizo Abe wants to start bombing Syria too. Therefore Rita did fake videos for him that supposedly show Haruna Yukawa and Kenji Gotō being “beheaded” by ISIS.
In Rita’s video (link below) the “ISIS” terrorists are actually members of the Jordanian army. Their fatigues are in perfect condition, and everything between the men is identical. Beneath their helmets are balaclavas identical to those in Rita’s hoax.
Effective hoaxes are those that people wantto believe.If one of the Jordanian army guys who posed as “ISIS” members came forward and publicly explained that it was a hoax that he took part in, no one would believe him, because no one would wantto.Everyone would call him a liar; an agent of “ISIS.” Even if the guy had a behind-the-scenes video of the making of the video hoax, people would call his real video a hoax, and the hoax video “real.”
You can see Rita’s 22-minute video at Fox Jews. It’s incredibly fake, but the actual burning is not bad, although it doesn’t come until the 18-minute mark.
Libya Lies – Rape as a Weapon of War – Made in the USA?
By Felicity Arbuthnot | Dissident Voice
It’s really 19th century behavior in the 21st century, you just don’t invade another country on phony pretexts in order to assert your interests.
— Secretary of State, John Kerry, “Meet the Press”, March 2, 2014
Various professional psychology sites state succinctly: “Projection is a defense mechanism which involves taking our own unacceptable qualities or feelings and ascribing them to other people.”
With that in mind it is worth returning to the assault on Libya and the allegation by Susan Rice, then US Ambassador to the UN, in April 2011, that the Libyan government was issuing Viagra to its troops, instructing them to use rape as a weapon of terror.
However, reportedAntiwar.com, MSNBC was told “by US military and intelligence officials that there is no basis for Rice’s claims. While rape has been reported as a ‘weapon’ in many conflicts, the US officials (said) they’ve seen no such reports out of Libya.”
Several diplomats also questioned Rice’s lack of evidence, suspecting she was attempting “to persuade doubters the conflict in Libya was not just a standard civil war but a much nastier fight in which Gaddafi is not afraid to order his troops to commit heinous acts.” ***(here is were everybody is making the same fatal mistake there was no civil war, there was a protest march were the protesters had guns killed 4 police officers and 2 soldiers, question to you readers what would your government do if your protesters had killed police officers?)
The story was reminiscent of the pack of lies which arguably sealed the 1991 US-led Iraq onslaught — of Iraqi troops leaving premature babies to die after stealing their incubators. The story, of course, was dreamt up by global public relations company, Hill and Knowlton Strategies, Inc., then described as the world’s largest PR company which had been retained by the Kuwait government.
A tearful hospital “volunteer”, Nayirah, gave “testimony” which reverberated around an appalled world. It transpired she was the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to Washington and was neither a “volunteer”, “witness”, nor in Kuwait. Amnesty International obligingly backed up the fictional nonsense suffering lasting credibility damage. However, as with Libya two decades later, Iraq’s fate was sealed.
The US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice and Foreign Affairs advisor, Samantha Power are credited with helping persuade President Obama to intervene in Libya. By the end of April 2011, Rice was also pushing for intervention in Syria, claiming that President Assad was “seeking Iranian assistance in repressing Syria’s citizens …” In the light of all, she vowed: “The United States will continue to stand up for democracy and respect for human rights, the universal rights that all human beings deserve in Syria and around the world.” (Guardian, April 29, 2011)
Looking across the world at the apocalyptic ruins of lives and nations resultant from America’s continuance in uninvited “standing up” for “democracy”, “human rights” and “universal rights” there are surely few who could not only silently weep.
Amnesty, perhaps “once bitten” not only questioned the Libya Viagra nonsense but denied it in categorical terms. According to Donatella Rovera, their Senior Crisis Response Advisor, who spent three months in Libya from the start of the crisis: “We have not found any evidence or a single victim of rape or a doctor who knew about somebody being raped.”
Liesel Gerntholtz, heading Womens Rights at Human Rights Watch, which also investigated the mass rape allegations, stated: “We have not been able to find evidence.”
The then Secretary of State, Hillary “We came, we saw, he died” Clinton, was “deeply concerned” stating that: “Rape, physical intimidation, sexual harassment and even so-called ‘virginity tests’ “were taking place not only in Libya, but “throughout the region.” Presumably leaving the way open for further plundering throughout Africa in the guise of bestowing “democracy”, “human rights” etc.
Luis Moreno-Ocampo, Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court obediently weighed in, telling a Press Conference of: “ … information that there was a policy to rape in Libya those that were against the government. Apparently (Colonel Gaddafi) used it to punish people.” A bit of a blow for the impartiality and meticulous evidence of the ICC it might be thought.
A week after the bombing of Libya started in March 2011, Eman al-Obeidy burst in to a Tripoli hotel telling the international journalists there she had been raped. She was removed by Libyan security. Government spokespeople claimed she had mental health problems, was drunk, a thief, a prostitute and would be charged with slander. The world sneered.
By June 2011 Ms al-Obeidy had ended up in Boulder, Colorado, US, granted asylum with remarkable speed, with the help of Hillary Clinton, according to US news outlets.
In November 2014 al-Obeidy, now known as Eman Ali, was arrested for “violating conditions of her bail bond and probation.” It was her third arrest. Prosecutors allege that she tested positive for opiates and alcohol. The probation and bail bond relate to an alleged assault case in a Boulder bar with Ms al-Obeidy-Ali accused of pouring drink over a customer and then lobbing a glass at her. The trial is scheduled for 17th February with the possibility of her asylum status being rescinded.
However, back to projection. It transpires that the Pentagonhas been supplying Viagra to US troops since 1998. That year it spent $50 million to keep troops, well, stiffened up. “The cost, roughly, of two Marine Corps Harrier jets or forty five Tomahawk cruise missiles …”
By 2014 the costof extra-curricular military forces’ frolics had risen to an astonishing $504,816 of taxpayers money. An additional $17,000-plus was spent on two further erectile enhancing magic potions.
The Washington Free Beacon helpfully estimated: “that the amount of Viagra bought by the Pentagon last year could have supplied 80,770 hours, 33 minutes, and 36 seconds of sexual enhancement, assuming that erections don’t last longer than the 4 hourmaximum advised by doctors.”
Surely coincidentally on February 14,St Valentine’s Day, Joachim Hagopian released an article: “Sexual Assault in the US Military – More Rapists Attend the Air Force Academy Than Any Other College in America.”
In a survey taken in 2012 “an unprecedented number” of over “26,000 incidents of unwanted sexual contact was reported by service men and women.” Further, weekly: “another high profile officer often in charge of reducing assaults was being investigated and charged himself.”
The US Air Force at Colorado Springs, writes Hagopian “has more rapists on Campus than any other college in the country.”
But then the US military planners would seem to be sex and bodily function obsessed.In 1994 they contemplated releasing pheromones (a hormonal stimulus) against enemy troops “to turn enemy soldiers into flaming love puppets whose objects of affection would be each other.”
“While enemy troops were preoccupied with making love instead of war …” America’s finest could blow them to bits. This bit of military dementia was dubbed the “gay bomb.”
Also dreamed up have been halitosis, flatulence and vomit-inducing chemicals to unleash on foes. Body function obsession clearly rules in the armed forces, officially and unofficially.
Projection: “ … is more commonly found … in personalities functioning at a primitive level.” Indeed. And to think both Saddam Hussein and Colonel Gaddafi were labeled mad by such as these.
Today, I am publishing photographs passed to me by the intelligence inside the Egyptian tribes. These are snipets from Google earth and the bottom photo contains latitude and longitude. The Tribes of Egypt and Libya (working together) have provided the exact place of the main ISIS camp in Libya. I would not normally publish this information but I have found that passing it to the intelligence people in this country is not only a complete waste of time but it is the same as passing intel to the enemy. I do not say this lightly, I say this from direct experience.
I have had this intel for some days now but waited for a heads up to publish. You can verify the bombing that has been done by Egypt and the Libyan army against ISIS in Libya and see that they are bombing this exact area.
In May of 2013 the Defense Intelligence Agency sent one of their top interrogators to our home in Texas, he was there to debrief us on our capture by Al Qaeda in Tripoli in the summer of 2011 and he was there because we were being passed on the ground real time intelligence from inside Libya by the Libyan Tribes. Both the Libyans and ourselves were living under the delusion that we were fighting a common enemy with our country (radical Islam). We were proven wrong in so many ways. The DIA agent spoke with Libyan intel on the ground in Libya via the tribes at our home. They passed coordinates on many things, tank locations, weapon stores, locations of leaders, etc.. The most important piece of intel was the location of the largest Al Qaeda/Ansar Al Sharia camp in Libya near Derna. Of course, we and Libyans assumed this information would result in some actions by the US. What happened next was shocking… we got a call from our Libyans and they said that the Al Qaeda camp near Derna had been given emergency orders to evacuate, liquidate their small arms, take the rest and head toward the Algerian border. That happened within 3 days of us supplying this information to the DIA (Defense Intelligence Agency).
Well you can certainly figure out what happened. We spoke with the DIA agent about this on his next visit and he was noticeably upset by this, he said do you think this came from our side? We did not have to answer that question. He had previously revealed to us that the Muslim Brotherhood acts as translators for the US intelligence agencies. SHOCK!! There you have it, we were not fighting a common enemy, we were the enemy. Not too long after our lives were threatened by the CIA who told us to forget about Libya or we would have no lives. We had been targeted, lost all our resources, our home was being taken all we had left was to go public and we did.
We are the ONLY AMERICANS that were eyes on the ground in Libya in 2011 that were not 3 letter guys, black-water contractors or western media. We are the only voice for the Libyan Tribes in this country’
Fidel Castro is calling out US President Barack Obama for his words before world leaders last week at the United Nations in New York City.
According to Castro, Obama misrepresented the wars America has involved itself in, calling his speech before the United Nations last week gibberish and blaming the US and NATO for the mass murders of the Libyan people.
“In spite of the shameful monopoly of the mass information media and the fascist methods of the United States and its allies to confuse and deceive world opinion, the resistance of the people grows, and that can be appreciated in the debates being produced in the United Nations,” Castro wrote over the weekend on the cubadebate.cu website.
Speaking before the UN’s General Assembly last week, President Obama called the dictatorship of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi a “mass atrocity” that went unchallenged throughout his rule, but said that the United Nation was able to bring to help bring it to a halt.
“The Security Council authorized all necessary measures to prevent a massacre,” said Obama. “The Arab League called for this effort; Arab nations joined a NATO-led coalition that halted Qaddafi’s forces in their tracks.”
Castro, however, believes that Obama and NATO orchestrated an assault on the Libyan that is being skewed through the commander-in-chief’s own explanation. “Who understands this gibberish of the President of the United States in front of the General Assembly?” the former Cuban leader asks in an editorial published to the governmental website. “What position to adopt about the genocide of NATO in Libya? Does anyone wish it recorded that under their direction, the government of their country supported the monstrous crimes by the United States and its NATO allies?”
Castro isn’t the only one to question America’s intentions, too. The United State Congress has previously attacked Obama over his insistence on going to Libya. Earlier this summer, lawmaker Dennis Kucinich called out the president for heading overseas without congressional approval. “Since when does NATO trump the Constitution of the United States?” asked Kucinich. Rep. Jerrold Nadler of New York similarly proposed “Shall the president, like the King of England, be a dictator on foreign policy?”