WARNING: Video leaked from inside the detention of Misratah where Humanity does not exist. PLEASE MAKE IT VIRAL WE NEED YOUR HELP TO STOP THE TORTURES AND DEATHS OF POW’s


WARNING: Video leaked from inside the detention of Misratah where Humanity does not exist.

PLEASE MAKE IT VIRAL WE NEED YOUR HELP TO STOP THE TORTURES AND DEATHS OF POW’s

When I was sent this video, I did not know how to react, I have seen so many videos where humanity does not exist. I am wondering with these people how much they enjoy to torture prisoners who cannot defend themselves and endure the torture. What does it say for the torturer’s? They are not brave they are cowards, hiding behind a mask. 

Now back to the Video its vulgar but what do you expect from a tribe which is a mix breed of Turks-mongols and Jews, Misuratah people for a long time they where jews who converted to Islam by the Ottoman Empire so this breed now is trying to control Libya whatever the cost to humanity. They have been trained well by the CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 agents on how to torture they have been trained by the best PSYCHOPATHS. America/Israel with its compatriots the Misurati are trying its damnedest to INSTALL ISIL/MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN LIBYA, just to prove my point yesterday a Turkish ship docked at the port of Misuratah on board was over 1000 mercenaries, guns and ammunition, helicopters and lets not forget money to pay all these mercenaries who do the fighting for America/Israel.

No one not even the governments or the secret agencies have the right to treat so inhumane prisoners what ever their crime. I am sick to my stomach with stories that I have been told about the tortures some detainees that succeeded to escape from their captures, I could not believe my ears what they went through and what it has done to them not only on their bodies but also to their souls. Many times I have lost my faith to God for allowing the destruction of countries, killing innocent children, women and old men. Allowing hunger to half of the world but then I come to my senses and say this is not the work of God but of 10 families who believe they are GOD and we are just worms on the ground causing them a problem to their lifestyle. These families who reproduce like rabbits need more space on earth so that they can live in it and they must extinguish the worms because we steal their oxygen, food and resources. I apologise for my rumbling but enough is enough, PEOPLE must WAKE UP from this lethargic sleep, WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO PUT ASIDE OUR DIFFERENCES AND JOIN FORCES to get rid of these cowards who hide behind the scenes, or they cover their faces for fear of recognition. WE HAVE THE POWER BUT HAVE NOT REALISED THAT WE HAVE, WE ARE STRONGER THAN THE 10 FAMILIES, IF WE JOIN ALL TOGETHER WE CAN GET RID OF THEM ONCE AND FOR ALL.

 

 

About these ads

People Wake Up! Psywar : Full Documentary HQ


People Wake Up! Psywar : Full Documentary HQ

This film explores the evolution of propaganda and public relations in the United States, with an emphasis on the elitist theory of democracy and the relationship between war, propaganda and class.

Includes original interviews with a number of dissident scholars including Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Michael Parenti, Peter Phillips (Project Censored), John Stauber (PR Watch), Christopher Simpson (The Science of Coercion) and others.

A deep, richly illustrated study of the nature and history of propaganda, featuring some of the world’s most insightful critics, Psywar exposes the propaganda system, providing crucial background and insight into the control of information and thought.

Foreseeing Their Demise; Misurata Islamist Mafia Relocates Weapons


Foreseeing Their Demise; Misurata Islamist Mafia Relocates Weapons

by JoanneM

The US started the false flag revolution in Libya by importing several hundred thousand US armed and trained mercenaries, some of them coming directly from fighting US forces in Afghanistan. The USA has never stopped it’s support of these criminals known as Libya Dawn based in Misurata.

Libyan patriots continue working to clean their country of the rubbish Islamist Mafia known as “Libya Dawn”. Libya Dawn is a mix of all radical groups, Muslim Brotherhood, Al Qaeda, Ansar Al Sharia, ISIS, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group and others. Their group is made up mostly of mercenaries from foreign countries. This gang of criminals headquarter themselves in the Libyan city of Misurata. They are supported by Qatar and Turkey with weapons and money and many of the Misurata leaders are working with stolen money from Libya. Misurata is also the home of hundreds of hidden prisons illegally holding thousands of Libyans, many have been tortured to death. Their only crime being that they did not support these criminals. Misurata and their criminal militias (Libya Dawn) have managed to make themselves the most hated city and people in all of Libya thanks to their continued acts of evil, theft, and destruction, yet the US Ambassador, Deborah Jones continues her support of Misurata.

The Libyan national army attacked the Libya Dawn mafia in Zuwara a port city west of Tripoli. They are moving towards Tripoli and Misurata. The Misurata Libya Dawn are now very scared as they see their coming retribution and demise. They have begun to move their large stored weapons from the South of Libya near Sabah to Misurata. I have posted a photo of a truck with some large missiles. The blame for these criminals having these weapons falls directly on the US and NATO et.al.

The Libyan national army, the great tribes of Libya and the legitimate government of Libya in Tobruk are working together to cleanse the country of the Libya Dawn virus. They are having some success but they are strapped because all of the Libyan money and weapons were stolen by these illegal occupants of their country. (Strange that in 2011, NATO, UN, US and other countries had no problem supplying arms, money and help to these same extremists criminals and yet not one penny comes forward to help the people of Libya fight radical Islam and their psychopaths) Even still the Libyans are managing to clean areas of their country. Benghazi for example is about 80% cleaned.

Khalifa Haftar should be mentioned here as he is touted for working to clean Libya from these criminal Islamist gangs. The truth is that Haftar is CIA and has been CIA since he joined forces with the US during the Chad wars in the 1970’s. He lived in the US near Langley, VA (home of the CIA) for over 30 years. He had been hoping to take Libya from the Libyan people and their chosen government for years. When the false flag phoney revolution raised it’s ugly head he immediately raised his hand. Haftar was dropped into Libya in February of 2011 by the CIA as the the titular head of the so called rebel army. The Libyan people know him as a traitor and a liar, they do not trust him. Haftar is attempting to be a loyal Libyan and fight the criminals that he helped hand the Libyan country to. The Libyans stand back and let him fight the militias, they do not interfere and they do not join him, he is literally fighting his own little war. Do not believe the smoke that is printed in the media about Haftar, the CIA is very good at manufacturing news to manipulate whatever agenda they are working to complete.

It is time for the world to understand the truth about Libya, what an atrocity was committed by the west against this sovereign nation. The Libyan people are literally fighting to reclaim their right as owners of their own country taken from them by lies and force. The great leader of Egypt, Abdel Fattah el-Sisi has stated many times that he stands with the legitimate elected government of Libya in Tobruk and he stands with and supports the Libyan National Army in its fight to clean their country of criminal militant Islamist mercenaries. It is time for more countries to step up and back the Libyan patriots in their fight against the evil that is threatening the entire world.

 

Misurata moving weapons

Misurata moving weapons

Obama’s Gun-running Operation


Obama’s Gun-running Operation

If you thought the Isis war couldn’t get any worse, just wait for more of the CIA
Even America’s top spies know that arming rebels is ‘doomed to failure’ – but that can’t stop Obama’s gun-running operation

By Trevor Timm

Information on secret weapons already flowing into Syria has been kept in hiding from most of the people who approved paying for them. Photograph: Aris Messinis/AFP/Getty

Information on secret weapons already flowing into Syria has been kept in hiding from most of the people who approved paying for them. Photograph: Aris Messinis/AFP/Getty

As the war against the Islamic State in Syria has fallen into even more chaospartially due to the United States government’s increasing involvement there – the White House’s bright new idea seems to be to ramping up the involvement of the intelligence agency that is notorious for making bad situations worse. As the Washington Post reported late Friday, “The Obama administration has been weighing plans to escalate the CIA’s role in arming and training fighters in Syria, a move aimed at accelerating covert U.S. support to moderate rebel factions while the Pentagon is preparing to establish its own training bases.”

Put aside for a minute that the Central Intelligence Agency has been secretly arming Syrian rebels with automatic rifles, rocket-propelled grenades, ammunition and antitank weapons since at least 2012 – and with almost nothing to show for it. Somehow the Post neglected to cite a front-page New York Times article from just one month ago alerting the public to the existence of a still-classified internal CIA study admitting that arming rebels with weapons has rarely – if ever – worked:

As the Times’ Mark Mazzetti reported:

‘One of the things that Obama wanted to know was: Did this ever work?’ said one former senior administration official who participated in the debate and spoke anonymously because he was discussing a classified report. The C.I.A. report, he said, ‘was pretty dour in its conclusions.’

The Times cited the most well-known of CIA failures, including the botched Bay of Pigs invasion and the arming of the Nicaraguan contra rebels that led to the disastrous Iran-Contra scandal. Even the agency’s most successful mission – slowly bleeding out the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s by arming the mujahideen – paved the way for the worst terrorist attack on the US in its history.

But as anyone who has read journalist Tim Weiner’s comprehensive and engrossing history of the CIA knows, the agency’s past is a graveyard rife with literally dozens of catastrophic failures involving covert weapons deals to countless war criminals and con artists in an attempt to overthrow governments all over the world. Not only has the CIA failed repeatedly, but oftentimes its plan has completely backfired, solidifying the very power of the actor it sought to remove and leaving the people the agency claimed to be helping in a much, much worse-off spot than before the CIA gun-running mission began.

We’ve already seen Syrian fortunes turn for the worse as the US has stepped up involvement in the past few months, as Bashar al-Assad has gone on the offensive against the US-backed rebels, and as the US airstrikes have reportedly led to Isis and al-Qaida reuniting, after being sworn enemies for more than a year. The two terrorist groups then proceeded to route the “moderate” rebels in combat and are currently in possession of many of the US-made weapons previously owned by the rebels.

Two months ago, the US Congress voted to send hundreds of millions of dollars in more arms to Syria. Even the politicians voting on sending countless more US weapons into the middle of a civil war were kept in the dark about the CIA’s internal report. That should be a scandal, right up there with the torture report the CIA is trying to keep secret, too.

But at least a few in-the-know elected officials were aware of the dangers of insanity of Congress’ Syria vote. The Huffington Post’s Ryan Grim and Sam Stein quoted an unnamed Democratic Congressman in September who was even more blunt, insisting that the CIA’s belief in arming rebels was “doomed to failure”:

‘I have heard it expressed, outside of classified contexts, that what you heard from your intelligence sources is correct, because the CIA regards the effort as doomed to failure,’ the congressman said in an email. ‘Specifically (again without referring to classified information), the CIA thinks that it is impossible to train and equip a force of pro-Western Syrian nationals that can fight and defeat Assad, al-Nusra and ISIS, regardless of whatever air support that force may receive.’

The unnamed Congressman added: “The CIA also believes that its previous assignment to accomplish this was basically a fool’s errand, and they are well aware of the fact that many of the arms that they provided ended up in the wrong hands.”

But the information on the secret weapons that were already flowing into Syria has been kept in hiding from most of Congress. John Kerry refused to answer any questions about the CIA’s activities in Syria when asked by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, despite the news of the agency’s involvement in Syria being on the front page of newspapers for years. “I hate to do this,” he said. “But I can’t confirm or deny whatever that’s been written about and I can’t really go into any kind of possible program.

Perhaps the most shocking part is that we know Barack Obama himself has read the CIA study and knows that arming rebels in Syria – or anywhere – was an incredibly dangerous idea. Seemingly referencing the study, Obama told David Remnick of the New Yorker earlier this year:

Very early in this process, I actually asked the C.I.A. to analyze examples of America financing and supplying arms to an insurgency in a country that actually worked out well. And they couldn’t come up with much.

So even though the CIA “couldn’t come up with much” proof of any time when sending tons of weapons into a war zone full of extremists has worked in the past, or that the agency itself has told Congressmen arming the rebels was “doomed to failure,” the Obama administration is ready to do just that.

No one doubts that Isis is a horrific terrorist group that’s terrible for the entire Middle East – as it proved over the weekend by barbarically beheading another innocent aid worker – but further entrenching the CIA and its weapons into an already awful situation can really only make things worse. Much worse.

© 2014 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

 

Libya’s Lesson for Iran: Beware of Rapprochement


Libya’s Lesson for Iran: Beware of Rapprochement

 

By Dan Glazebrook

Britain and the US used the so-called “rapprochement” with Gaddafi’s Libya to cultivate a fifth column and prepare the ground for war

Britain and the US used the so-called “rapprochement” with Gaddafi’s Libya to cultivate a fifth column and prepare the ground for war

Three years ago, in late October 2011, the world witnessed the final defeat of the Libyan Jamahiriya – the name by which the Libyan state was known until overthrown in 2011, meaning literally the “state of the masses” – in the face of a massive onslaught from NATO, its regional allies and local collaborators.

It took seven eight months for the world’s most powerful military alliance – with a combined military spending of just under $1 trillion per year – to fully destroy the Jamahiriya (a state with a population the size of Wales) and it took a joint British-French-Qatari special-forces operation to finally WIN control of the capital. In total, 10,000 strike sorties were rained down on Libya, tens of thousands killed and injured, and the country left a battleground for hundreds of warring factions, armed to the teeth with weapons, either looted from state armouries or provided directly by NATO and its allies. Britain, France and the US had led a war which had effectively transformed a peaceful, prosperous African country into a textbook example of a “failed state.”

Yet the common image of Libya in the months and years leading up to the invasion was that of a state that had “come in from the cold” and was now enjoying friendly relations with the West. Tony Blair’s famous embrace of Gaddafi in his tent in 2004 was said to have ushered in a new period of “rapprochement” with Western companies rushing to do business in the oil-rich African state, and Gaddafi’s abandonment of a nuclear deterrent apparently indicative of the new spirit of trust and cooperation.

Yet this image was largely a myth. Yes, sanctions were lifted and diplomatic relations restored; but this did not represent any newfound trust and friendship. Gaddafi himself never changed his opinion that the forces of old and new colonialism remained bitter enemies of African unity and independence, and for their part, the US, Britain and France continued to resent the assertiveness and independence of Libyan foreign policy under Gaddafi’s leadership. The African Oil Policy Initiative Group (AOPIG) – an elite US think tank comprising congressmen, military officers and energy industry lobbyists – warned in 2002 that the influence of “adversaries such as Libya” would only grow unless the US significantly increased its military presence on the continent. Yet, despite “rapprochement,” Gaddafi remained a staunch opponent of such a presence, as noted with anxiety in frequent diplomatic cables from the US Embassy. One, for example, from 2009, noted that “the presence of non-African military elements in Libya or elsewhere on the continent” was almost a “neuralgic issue” for Gaddafi. Another cable from 2008 quoted a pro-Western Libyan government official as saying that “there will be no real economic or political reform in Libya until al-Gaddafi passes from the political scene” which would “not happen while Gaddafi is alive,” hardly the image of a man bending to the will of the West. Gaddafi had clearly not been moved by the flattery towards Libya (or “appropriate deference” as another US Embassy cable put it) that was much in evidence during the period of “rapprochement.” Indeed, at the Arab League summit in March 2008, he warned the assembled heads of state that, following the execution of Saddam Hussein, a former “close friend” of the US, “in the future, it’s going to be your turn too…Even you, the friends of America – no, I will say we, we the friends of America – America may approve of our hanging one day.”

So much for a new period of trust and co-operation. Whilst business deals were being signed, Gaddafi remained implacably opposed to the US and European military presence on the continent (as well as leading the fight to reduce their economic presence) and understood well that this might cost him his life. The US too understood this, and despite their outward flattery, behind the scenes were worried and resentful.

Thus, the so-called rapprochement period was anything but. The US continued to remain hostile to the independent spirit of Libya – as evidenced most obviously by Gaddafi’s hostility to the presence of US and European military forces in Africa – and it now seems that they and the British used this period to prepare the ground for the war that eventually took place in 2011.

The US, for example, used their newfound access to Libyan officials to cultivate relations with those who would become their key local allies during the war. Leaked diplomatic cables show that pro-Western Libyan Justice Minister Mustafa Abdul-Jalil arranged covert meetings between US and Libyan government officials that bypassed the usual official channels and were therefore “under the radar” of the foreign ministry and central government. He was also able to speed up the prisoner release programme that led to the release of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group insurgents who ultimately acted as NATO’s shock troops during the 2011 war. The head of the LIFG – al-Qaeda’s FRANCHISE in Libya – eventually became head of Tripoli’s military council, whilst Abdul-Jalil himself became head of the “Transitional National Council,” that was installed by NATO following the fall of the Jamahiriya.

Another key figure groomed by the US in the years preceding the invasion, was Mahmoud Jibril, head of the National Economic Development Board from 2007, who arranged six US training programmes for Libyan diplomats, many of whom subsequently resigned and sided with the US and Britain once the rebellion and invasion got underway.

Finally, the security and intelligence co-operation that was an element of the “rapprochement” period was used to provide the CIA and MI6 with an unprecedented level of information about both Libyan security forces and opposition elements they could cultivate that would prove invaluable for the conduct of the war.

Thus rapprochement, whilst appearing to be an improvement in relations, may actually be a “long game” to lay the groundwork for naked aggression, by building up intelligence and sounding out possible collaborators, effectively building up a fifth column within the state itself. This is what the neo-conservatives in the US Congress opposing Obama’s “thaw” in Iranian relations apparently fail to understand. Thankfully, it is likely that the Iranians understand it perfectly well.

 – Dan Glazebrook is a political writer specialising in Western foreign policy. He is author of Divide and Ruin: The West’s Imperial Strategy in an Age of Crisis.

Photo: Moamer Gaddafi addresses delegates during the 12th African Union summit at the United Nations Headquarters in Ethiopia’s capital Addis Ababa on 4 Feb, 2009 (AFP)