Hind(un) and Takfiri Cannibal

By contrast, it was the Muslims’ most fanatical enemy, Hind, who ripped the liver out of the fallen Muslim warrior Hamza and ate it on the battlefield. The Takfiri cannibal who ate the Syrian soldier’s heart was symbolically declaring to the world that he was an enemy of Islam – just like Hind. Most Muslims understand this. But non-Muslims around the world who witness such atrocities are likely to mistakenly attribute them to Islam, or “Islamic extremism.”
The Takfiris are committing more and more atrocities, not only against Syrian government forces, Christians, and moderate Muslims, but also against each other. According to news reports, infighting between the al-Qaida affiliate Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and other Takfiri and anti-government groups in Syria has killed hundreds of people over the past two weeks. The Takfiris make a habit of executing people who do not share their fanatical misinterpretation of Islam. This practice is utterly un-Islamic.

Originally posted on GLOBAL JIHAD FOR PEACE!:


by Syarif Hidayat 

Ironically…, Al Qaeda –the “outside enemy of America” as well as the alleged architect of the 9/11 attacks– is a creation of the CIA.

What are the historical origins of Al Qaeda?

Who is Osama bin Laden?

The alleged mastermind behind the 9/11 terrorists attacks, Saudi-born Osama bin Laden, was recruited during the Soviet-Afghan war, “ironically under the auspices of the CIA, to fight Soviet invaders”.

The CIA’s role in laying the foundations of Al Qaeda is confirmed in an 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, who at the time was National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter: Brzezinski: According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, [on] 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is…

View original 2,739 more words

About these ads



According to a UN report on Tuesday that were being smuggled anti-aircraft missiles that carry on the shoulder from Libya to Chad, Mali, Tunisia, Lebanon, and possibly the Central African Republic and that attempts were being sent to Syrian opposition groups.

She said an independent panel of experts monitoring the sanctions imposed by the United Nations, including the ban on arms since the beginning of the uprising in 2011, it became clear that the weapons known as Mobile Air Defense System found in Mali and Tunisia, “was part of the arsenals of terrorist groups.”

Experts said in its final report submitted to the Security Council of the UN that despite the efforts of Libya and other countries to limit the portable air defense weapon system in Libya and reliable sources indicate Committee that thousands of these weapons are still available in controlled by a large group of players from non-State “arsenals.

The report said, “Libya has been in the past three years, the largest source of illegal weapons. 

The UN experts said that Libya has become a key source of weapons for Syrian opposition groups because of “public sympathy with the Syrian opposition ..”.

The report adds that the Commission sources said that Syria “will itself become a source of proliferation of weapons to countries like Iraq and Iran.”

The committee said the weapons found on board the ship, “the goodness of God 2″ confiscated by the Lebanese authorities in 2012 “to show that there were attempts to divert missiles mobile air defense system to the Syrian opposition in Libya.”

It is noteworthy that the Libyan government is struggling to control militias who aided in the overthrow of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, and now challenging the state’s authority. And it can not control its borders, to try to rebuild the army, which analysts say is representative of the militias that toppled Gaddafi in that season battles during the uprising in Libya for eight months.

Source: Reuters



BBC Caught Fabricating Videos to Push Libya and Syria War Agendas

BBC Caught Fabricating Videos to Push Libya and Syria War Agendas

by Martin Iqbal.

Many find it difficult to believe the sheer boldness of the lies peddled by the British Broadcasting Corporation– the world’s largest and most respected broadcasting organisation. Nevertheless, the BBC’s nefarious agenda has come to the fore during the wars on Libya and Syria, where it has taken every opportunity to justify foreign military intervention in both countries. In some cases the BBC has been quite ham-fisted in its attempts to deceive viewers, resulting in its foul play becoming readily apparent.

BBC claims footage of Indian protest is live feed from Green Square, Tripoli

The following video was aired on BBC News on Wednesday 24 August 2011. Watch from the 0:29 mark – the BBC airs footage that they purport to be live, from Green Square in Tripoli, Libya. The footage shows a crowd of ‘Libyan’ people celebrating and waving their national flag. What is so incredibly shocking about this report, is that the footage is not live, nor is it from Libya. It actually shows Indian protesters waving the Indian flag.

This unbelievable dishonesty on the part of the BBC was not an error. Such a first rate global broadcaster does not make such mistakes. It is simply not plausible that the BBC accidentally substituted a live video feed with an archive clip that, coincidentally, shows an identical scene to the one that the ‘live feed’ purports to show – jubilant protesters waving flags.

Not an error – BBC chose Indian footage due to similarities between flags

The truth of the matter is: jubilant crowds were simply not present in Tripoli, so the BBC had to use fake footage to convince its viewers of the Libyan ‘revolution’ myth.

Footage of Indian protesters waving the Indian flag was selected by the BBC because of the visual similarity between the two flags in question. Below I have juxtaposed the Indian flag (left), with the flag of the counter-revolution that took place in Libya.

Indian flag and the New Free Libya Flag on the right

As you can see, the flags are composed of similar colours; the Indian flag is green, white, and orange, whilst the flag of the ‘Libyan’ counter-revolution is green, black, and red.

Both flags are tricolour flags with horizontally orientated stripes, and both flags contain a circular emblem in the centre. The BBC chose to show the Indian footage because that footage provided the best opportunity to deceive unwitting viewers. To the untrained eye watching a fleeting video, these two flags are virtually indistinguishable.

BBC caught faking Syria ‘chemical weapons’ footage

Credit goes to Craig Murray for being the first to spot(1) this shocking example of deception from the BBC.

This BBC video report(2) was published on 29 August 2013 – the eve of the UK’s parliamentary vote for war on Syria to deter the use of chemical weapons(3). The section of the video that we are concerned with begins on the two minute mark.

The British doctor who is speaking to the camera says, “seems like it must be some sort of, I’m not
really sure, maybe napalm“.

Compare this video with the following one, also published by the BBC.(4) As before, view the video from the two minute mark.

Listen closely to the audio track of both videos. You will notice that the female doctor’s words and intonation are exactly the same in both videos, however the background noise in the second video is completely different. In addition, in the second video (contrary to the first video), the doctor can be heard to say: “seems like it must be some sort of chemical weapon I’m not really sure..

The BBC has manipulated the audio track of this video report to characterise the event as a chemical weapon attack. Because the doctor’s mouth is covered by a mask, the dubbing is impossible to detect.

What is even more concerning is that there are serious questions about the authenticity of the event itself. At the beginning of the first video, Dr. Rola Hallam can be heard to say, “I need a pause, because it’s just absolute chaos and carnage here“. Now despite this seemingly impromptu plea to the cameraman from Hallam, there is convincing evidence(5) to suggest that the video was not in fact live footage of the wounded being rushed in to a makeshift hospital. It is clear that Hallam actually did multiple takes of the video interview, whereby the movements of others were choreographed in line with her own movements. I highly recommend reading this analysis,(5) paying particularly close attention to the movement of the man in the high-visibility vest.

Notice how in one video, his hands are behind his back as he approaches Hallam, and in the other video, his hands are by his side. Furthermore, at this moment in one of the videos, a man can be seen looking through the fence above Hallam’s left shoulder, yet in the other video, he is not there. We are supposed to believe that this video sequence was filmed in an impromptu manner as victims were being rushed in to a makeshift hospital.

What is clear is that this is not a live sequence – the scene was clearly staged multiple times despite Hallam’s contrived ‘I need a pause here because it’s absolute carnage‘ opening gambit.

Dr. Rola Hallam has familial links to anti-Assad opposition groups

Dr. Rola Hallam’s maiden name is Al Kurdi. She retains her maiden name on her public Facebook profile:(6)

Dr. Rola Hallam's Facebook profile.

Below is her profile for ‘Atfal’,(7) ostensibly a charity set up to help Syrian children. She uses the same photograph, but goes merely by the name “Hallam”.

Her father – Dr. Mousa Al Kurdi – is also a doctor. Two months before the BBC’s apparently contrived chemical weapons report, Mousa Al Kurdi, was publicly kvetching about chemical weapons being used in Syria(8) in an attempt to expedite a larger-scale foreign intervention.

In the following clip, Dr. Mousa Al Kurdi talks to Al Jazeera about how he addressed the Friends of Syria summit, where he called for foreign intervention and arming of the Free Syrian Army.

Dr. Rola ‘Al Kurdi’ Hallam is also related to Colonel Malek Al Kurdi, who is deputy leader of the ‘Free Syrian Army’.(9)

Keeping in mind Dr. Rola Hallam’s background and family links to the anti-Assad opposition, the BBC’s apparent staging of propaganda and usage of Hallam in particular becomes all the more sinister.

Examples such as these are the reasons why no well-informed person takes the BBC seriously any longer.


(1) Fake BBC Video – – 7 October 2013.
(2) Syria crisis: Incendiary bomb victims ‘like the walking dead’ – BBC News, 29 August 2013.
(3) Syria crisis: Cameron loses Commons vote on Syria action – BBC News, 30 August 2013.
(4) Syria: Agony of victims of ‘napalm-like’ school bombing – BBC News, 30 September 2013.
(5) Dr Rola –
(6) Facebook profile page of Rola Alkurdi Hallam – – 4 January 2014.
(7) About Atfal –
(8) Video: Doctors record ‘chemical attacks’ in Syria – Al Arabiya News, 2 June 2013.
(9) Divisions, lack of arms underscore weakness of Free Syrian Army – The National, 3 March 2012.


How the Muslim Brotherhood leaders masked their Qutbian origins?

How the Muslim Brotherhood leaders masked their Qutbian origins?

by Hany Ghoraba

The author believes

The author believes that Qutb‘s teachings are the root cause of extremism.

Throughout five decades Muslim Brotherhood members have been working on masking their real ideology and beliefs from the Egyptian and Arab public in general. 

This dates back since the  famous crackdown on the Islamist organization in 1965 during Nasser’s regime. The very crackdown that eventually led to the trial of the godfather of modern terrorism Sayyed Qutb, which resulted in his execution.  

They managed throughout the years to downplay their Qutbian leniency and their extremist ideologies. 

The execution of the author of the infamous “Signs  on the Road” book which is considered by many to be the manual or bible of modern Islamist terrorism came as a turning point in the history of Islamists who rendered him as a “martyr.”

It is a fact that without the extremist teachings of Qutb, the world would have been a much better place today. His books and teachings have inspired almost every Islamist radical group and jihadists from Indonesia to Morocco.  

Accordingly, the question that poses itself; how did the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood managed to distance themselves from the teachings of Qutb throughout the years that followed his execution up to the elections that took place in Egypt and Tunisia post the Arab Spring revolutions? The answers can be numerous elements but the most common can be the following:

A- Al Taqiyya principle: 

Despite being a presumably Sunni  Muslim organization in principle, Muslim Brotherhood members have adopted a Shia principle. This principle is called Al Taqqiya. It is mainly a deniability tactic used by the Muslim Brotherhood to conceal the real motives and beliefs of the group. This tactic has provided them with an effective shield against the accusations of endorsing the extremist and terrorist beliefs of Qutb.  

But the truth remains is that the majority of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood today in Egypt and worldwide are loyal advocates to the beliefs of the terrorism godfather especially the likes of the two former supreme guides Mohamed Badiea and Mahdy Akef, who are the most extremist and overzealous leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood in their 85 years’ history.

B- Establishing franchises for the mother group: 

These franchises  have appeared since the 1970s and on-wards and violently and explicitly adopted Qutb doctrine. Examples for these notorious terrorists organizations that jumped in the cloack of the Brothers are Al Gamaa Al Islamiya, Al Takfeer Wal Higra , Hamas and many others.  These organizations served as militant arms to expand the Qutbism by force throughout the region, yet the main group can always maintain deniability. 

Also, occasionally they would denounce the other groups terrorist actions for more dramatic effect and to distance themselves from the very discourse most of them adopt.

That is how the Brotherhood have managed to distinguish themselves from other Islamist and jihadi groups even when they are simply franchises for them. That gimmick worked like a charm in the past two decades especially with the infiltration of western societies by the Brotherhood.  

The evidence can be easily shown after the June 30th Revolution in Egypt which was denounced as a coup by many western countries. This simply reflects the influence and the great manipulation of this organization of western politicians who believed that the Brotherhood is actually a moderate Islamic organization and not an extremist Jihadist administrator for all the jihadists in the world which is the truth.

C- Planting Trojan writers and anchors in Media and press:

This was the trick that fooled most people including western regimes into believing that the Brotherhood are an actual moderate group that seeks peace and prosperity. For at least the past 40 years, countless writers and anchors have been handpicked by the group to be cast as propagandists. There are three types of these media players, either actual secret members, apologists to the brotherhood discourse or those who directly on their payroll.  

Egyptian history revisionists surfaced in the past few years in favour of the Muslim brotherhood.

These historians-for-hire have done for the Muslim Brotherhood image what money launderers do for drug cartels. They can actually be called “History Launders” because they clean up the history of violent groups and proving them with a clean slate.   

The truth is always masked in their books about the involvement of the Brotherhood in terrorist and violent activities through an intricate web of twisted facts. In fact some of such historians like Mohamed El Gawadi, a regular face on the pro-Islamists Qatari Al-jazeera, granted the Brotherhood members a fictitious heroic  status that totally contradicts with the actual historical events. 

That propagandist has made up a fictional image of the Brotherhood for at least a decade before their ascension to power. The full support continued after the Brotherhood rise to power. Spreading lies about their opponents is what Al-jazeera has excelled in for the past three years since the start of the Arab Spring.

The Brotherhood was also helped by a group of well known as well as  lesser known journalists, anchors and media players in Egypt and Tunisia.  

The victims in this pro-Brotherhood media circus are the Egyptian and Tunisian masses as the truth about them were nowhere to be found till months after the Brotherhood were in power. Accordingly, the world has fallen in the trap of fake moderate stances exhibited by the Muslim Brotherhood leaders while at core they remain as extremist Qutbian as they ever were.

However, after waves of terrorism that claimed hundreds of lives in Egypt following the fall of the Islamist regime led by Mohamed Morsi, there are not any further excuses for the world to be fooled again by false acts of piety and moderation.

The Muslim Brotherhood has once and for all unmasked the truth behind their overzealous and extremist Qutbian attitudes towards Egyptians in general and all minorities in particular. including Christians, Shiites, women, etc. Let everyone be reminded of the famous saying “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice , shame on me.” 

Syrian Girl Forced Into Sex Jihad – Must Show The World – [English Subs]

Syrian Girl Forced Into Sex Jihad – Must Show The World – [English Subs]


Syrian Girl Forced Into Sex Jihad Testifies


A Syrian girl who escaped from being forced into ‘Sex jihad’ with rebel forces in Syria testifies about her horrific experience.


by: SyrianPerspective