A Timeline: Where did the Paris Shooters Get Their Weapons?
Editors note: I really can’t understand why the Western Mass Media is making such a fuss over this terror attack? Although I condemn it, I will not cry over it because France is responsible for so many genocides done in Africa, Middle East, Canada just a few out of my head, so why the outcry? Did France, Britain and the USA think are invisible? Did they think that their little pets (jihadists groups, al qaeda, Isis, Nusra, Daash and whatever other name of these groups they have groomed to perfection their financing could feed all of the starving children in Africa, homeless all over Europe and America and they have armed to the teeth….. so please could one sane person explain to me what these three mongrel nations were thinking at the time? That these little monsters will not outgrow their benefactors? If so then these nations and the Elite who are controlling them are not very bright; on the other hand I am wondering who benefits of this tragedy? Surely not the civilians they are going to lose more freedom rights under the boogie man called terrorism which the right words would be OPERATION GLADIO SPONSORED TERRORISM IN EUROPE remember in the 70’s, 80’s the white cells etc… yes my friends the operation Gladio is coming back. SO LETS CRY A RIVER FOR FRANCE ONCE THAT WE DO NOT CRY ANY RIVERS FOR LIBYA, SYRIA, PALESTINE, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN, BAHRAIN, YEMEN, PAKISTAN, SOMALIA, and wherever else there is a PROXY WAR costing millions of innocent people’s deaths. Yes my friends we do not take any notice of these people who die for nothing just because the Elite and their mongrels want to steal their resources.
Heavily armed, well-trained gunmen executed what appears to be a well-planned attack in Paris, France, killing 12, including 2 police officers. Where did these terrorists get their weapons, training, political backing, funds, and inspiration? A short timeline featuring news stories from 2011 to 2014 helps explain how France’s recent national tragedy could have been the direct result of its own insidious, callous, terroristic foreign policy that has visited this very same carnage seen in Paris, upon the people of Libya and Syria, a thousand fold.
2011 – France supplying weapons to Libyan rebels, London Telegraph:
A French military spokesman, Colonel Thierry Burkhard, said it had provided “light arms such as assault rifles” for civilian communities to “protect themselves against Col Gaddafi”.
But the decision to arm the rebels is a further move towards direct involvement in the land war on top of the air war against Col Muammar Gaddafi. The Nafusa rebels have come closest to breaking through to Tripoli itself of any of the front lines of the conflict, while three months of Nato bombing have failed to dislodge Col Gaddafi from power.
Le Figaro, the French newspaper which first reported the air drops, said the shipment included rifles, machine guns and rocket-propelled grenades, along with Milan anti-tank missiles.
2011 – Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links, London Telegraph:
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.
2012 – France to push for arming Syria’s opposition coalition, the BBC:
France’s foreign minister has said he will discuss supplying arms to the Syrian opposition coalition with European partners.
The government plans to push for a relaxation of the EU arms embargo to Syria to enable “defensive arms” to reach opposition fighters.
2013 – Syria crisis: France and Britain move a step closer to arming rebels, the London Guardian:
France and Britain have moved a step closer to arming the opposition to the Assad regime in a radical move aimed at tipping the balance in the two-year civil war while also ignoring European policy on Syria.
The French president, François Hollande, went into an EU summit in Brussels with a dramatic appeal for Europe to join Paris and London in lifting a European arms embargo, but the sudden policy shift was certain to run into stiff German opposition.
2013 – Syrian rebels pledge loyalty to al-Qaeda, USA Today:
A Syrian rebel group’s April pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda’s replacement for Osama bin Laden suggests that the terrorist group’s influence is not waning and that it may take a greater role in the Western-backed fight to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad.
The pledge of allegiance by Syrian Jabhat al Nusra Front chief Abou Mohamad al-Joulani to al-Qaeda leader Sheik Ayman al-Zawahri was coupled with an announcement by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Iraq, the Islamic State of Iraq, that it would work with al Nusra as well.
2014 – France delivered arms to Syrian rebels, Hollande confirms, France 24:
President Francois Hollande said on Thursday that France had delivered weapons to rebels battling the Syrian regime of Bashar al-Assad “a few months ago.”
France Isn’t the Only One
The cartoonish nature of France first being reported to give weapons to “rebels” before these “rebels” are reported to be, in fact, Al Qaeda is not simply France’s bad luck. It is part of NATO’s very intentional, vast network of global state-sponsored terrorism. It would be reported that terrorists armed by the US in Syria with antitank missiles sided with Al Qaeda franchise and US State Department listed foreign terrorist organization, Al Nusra.
The Daily Beast would report in its September 2014 article, “Al Qaeda Plotters in Syria ‘Went Dark,’ U.S. Spies Say,” that:
One Syrian rebel group supported in the past by the United States condemned the air strikes on Tuesday. Harakat Hazm, a rebel group that received a shipment of U.S. anti-tank weapons in the spring, called the airstrikes “an attack on national sovereignty” and charged that foreign led attacks only strengthen the Assad regime.The statement comes from a document, purportedly from the group, that has circulated online and was posted in English translation from a Twitter ACCOUNT called Syria Conflict Monitor. Several Syria experts, including the Brookings Doha Center’s Charles Lister, believe the document to be authentic.
Before the official statement, there were signs that Harakat Hazm was making alliances in Syria that could conflict with its role as a U.S. partner. In early Septemeber a Harakat Hazm official told a reporter for the L.A. Times: “Inside Syria, we became labeled as secularists and feared Nusra Front was going to battle us…But Nusra doesn’t fight us, we actually fight alongside them. We like Nusra.”
This group would later be reported by the Western press as having “surrendered” to Al Qaeda. The International Business Times would claim in its article, “Syria: Al-Nusra Jihadists ‘Capture US TOW Anti-Tank Missiles’ from Moderate Rebels,” that:
Weaponry supplied by the US to moderate Syrian rebels was feared to have fallen into the hands of jihadist militants affiliated to al-Qaida after clashes between rival groups.
Islamist fighters with Jabhat al-Nusra seized control of large swathes of land in Jabal al-Zawiya, Idlib province, at the weekend, routing the US-backed groups the Syrian Revolutionaries Front (SFR) and Harakat Hazm, activists said.
Washington relied on SFR and Harakat Hazm to counter Isis (Islamic State) militants on the ground in Syria, complementing its air strikes.
Clearly, Harakat Hazm willingly pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda, bringing with them Western armament. Much of Al Qaeda’s weapons, CASH, training, and backing has been supplied by the West through similar “laundering” arrangements – intentionally – with plans to arm Al Qaeda and use it as a mercenary force against Western enemies in the Middle East laid as early as 2007.
Al Qaeda was intentionally organized and directed by the US, Saudi Arabia, and Israel to engage in a regional confrontation aimed at Iran and its powerful arc of influence including Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and now apparently Iraq. A similar gambit played out in North Africa during NATO’s war with Libya. Before that, in the 1980′s, the US CIA notoriously created Al Qaeda in the first place to fight a proxy war against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.
This most recent use of Al Qaeda was exposed by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 2007 article, ”The Redirection: Is the Administration’s new policy benefiting our enemies in the war on terrorism?” it which it was stated explicitly that (emphasis added):
To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda.
Now these “extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam” and who are “sympathetic to Al Qaeda” are running loose in France spilling French blood, with and inexhaustible supply of weapons and CASH courtesy in part of the French government itself, and with years of combat experience fighting Paris and the rest of NATO’s proxy wars for them everywhere from Libya to Syria.
Libya: rewiring a country’s brain
by Linda Housman
Just prior to the NATO invasion in Libya, an international delegation of medical professionals reported that few nations lived in the comfort that the Libyan people enjoyed. Meanwhile the United Nations was preparing to bestow an award on Colonel Muammar Gaddafi and the Libyan Jamahiriya for their achievements in the area of human rights.
As we all know, things have changed since then. After the Western “humanitarian war” replaced the Jamahiriya leadership that was responsible for the country’s prosperity with a puppet regime, Libya more and more has become a Somali-like failed state and a safe haven for terrorists. Currently human rights organizations around the world are sounding the alarm over rampant human rights abuses and war crimes in Libya. One of them is Dignity, the Danish Institute against Torture, which ironically carries the same name as the military operation led by LibyanGeneral Khalifa Haftar – a CIA stooge jointly responsible for the ongoing chaos in the country, as well as for the 2012 war on the heroic city of Bani Walid whose people refused to bow to the Western invaders and their “rebels”. Dignity included 2,692 household interviews in its SURVEY and completed its research in October 2013. The 38 page report called “Consequences of Torture and Organized Violence – Libya Needs Assessment SURVEY“, which was made public only recently, summarizes on page 5:
Every fifth household responded to having a family member disappeared, 11% reported having a household member arrested and 5% reported one killed. Of those arrested, 46% reported beatings, 20% positional torture or suspensions, 16% suffocation and from 3 to 5% reported having suffered sexual, thermal or electrical torture. In short our data support the allegations that widespread human rights violations and gross human rights violations have taken place in Libya.
The consequences at the level of the population are massive: 29% of individuals report anxiety and 30% report depression, while PTSD symptoms were reported by 6%. These results indicate that the respondents at the time of interview could still be in an acute or post-acute stage and have yet to reach the post-trauma stage, hence we predict that the prevalence of post-traumatic stress reactions will increase over time, if or when the internal conflict subsides.
Furthermore, our data show that internal displacement is major concern in Libya. A total of 18% of the respondents reported being internally displaced during the internal conflict, and 16% remains so at the time of the interview, indicating a major source of long-term human suffering and political instability.
In these times of distress and crisis respondents have had almost no access to international humanitarian assistance. Only 2% report having been helped by NGOs. Libyans overwhelmingly have resorted to local resources for social support: 72% indicate they used family networks and 48% friends, 43% Libyan medical doctors, 24% used religious leaders and 18% used traditional healers. In order to deal with life stress, 59% indicated they needed assistance in terms of justice, legal remedy and compensation, while 44% indicated they needed health and medical assistance.
One should keep in mind that the SURVEY was conducted in 2013, a relatively calm year in Libya. With the increase and spread of violent conflict in 2014, the experience and effect of violence can be foreseen to be much higher and deeper. Libya’s situation prompted U.S. president Obama last August to proclaim that he “had to learn a lesson that still has ramifications to this day”, and that from now on he will ask the question, “Should we intervene, militarily? Do we have an answer for the day after?” With those words Obama most likely managed to make the thoughtless and ignorant feel sorry for the man who “naively believed that bombing Libya was the absolute right thing to do”, and who therefore deserves CREDIT for admitting his faults and for learning from his mistakes. But is the current chaos and distress the result of something initially good, or at least something well-intended, gone terribly wrong, or was it planned all along? Numerous signs indicate that the latter is the case. As global events unfold, it becomes clear that every war is accompanied by another, invisible, war: the war that rewires people’s brains.
There was a time when it was believed that the brain would not change. Now it is known that the brain is sculpted by a lifetime of experiences that alter brain activity, which changes gene expression. It is possibly to manipulate the brain of individuals as well as collectively, so that it decodes reality in a way others want it to decode. All the time as we are having experiences, the brain is DOWNLOADING data and from that data it is changing the way it communicates. Who gains control over the data can dictate the behaviour. Susan Greenfield writes in her new book Mind Change, “The internal processing of the brain will determine how you see the world. Whatever external inputs are being fed into your brain, the experience of that very moment will simultaneously change the organization of brain cells, and hence your thinking.” So anything that changes your brain, changes who you will be. Any behaviour changes reflect alterations in the brain. The opposite is also true: behaviour can change the brain.
When applying this to the situation the Libyan people are facing since the 2011 invasion, there is no doubt that both the individuals’ brains and the collective brain of the country have been altered by the violent conflict. The “peaceful pro-democracy protesters” of the February 17 movement – in fact heavily armed, western-backed insurgents who were bribed to assassinate Gaddafi – quickly became the uncontrollable terrorists that currently fight each other to gain control over the country and its resources, while wreaking enormous havoc among the civilian population. Youngsters who were brought into the street by misleading promises of freedom became disillusioned and depressed. Many war-hardened youths have joined one of the rival militias. Many others started to denounce the so-called revolution. Meanwhile the daily experience of the NATO-rebels’ violence has molded people’s brains and has numbed many Libyan civilians into hopelessness or lethargy. All of these aspects indicate brain alterations as a result of violent behaviour or as a result of suffering from violent behaviour – or both.
The war on Libya and the war on the Libyan people’s brains thus turned out to be a double-edged sword. Not only did it rid the Western neo-colonialists and imperialists from their biggest threat, Libya also has become a cradle and headquarters of the West’s much needed global enemy: the terrorist group that neither is Islamic nor is a state, but nonetheless calls itself Islamic State. In that light it is totally plausible that Libya as a nation had to be traumatized by the world’s most powerful military alliance and its mercenaries that already had done their dirty job in Iraq and Afghanistan, as it is much harder to change a resilient peoples’ land into a breeding ground for terrorist cells, which also largely exist of traumatized individuals. Amidst the ongoing chaos, one thing is clear: the deceptive agenda of the instigators of the 2011 insurgency that brought about the exact opposite of what was falsely portrayed as a paradise of freedom and democracy.
Axis Of Evil – Documentary Of Zionists, Israel, United States, Canada, Britain
Editor’s note: Here is a video which shows exactly how the masses are manipulated, why the masses can not get organized. Why the 1% governs the masses. This video should go viral so people/masses may wake up from their lethargic sleep and stand up to the 1%.
NEWS FROM OCCUPIED LIBYA
Editor’s note: First let me wish you a Peaceful New Year.
I wish to everybody a Happy New Year,
and as I am dreamer I want to believe that all of us can make a difference either by whistle blowers or by simple people state the injustice done to the world may that be Palestine, Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bahrain, Somalia, Libya and other African states. Stating all criminal acts done to children, homeless, AfroAmericans and any defenceless person, same thing goes for all animals. So please join me and keep fighting to make this earth that we live in a better place for humanity. Lets leave our egos aside and instead of saying I lets say WE. In these cold days lets help as much as we can the homeless, and the homeless animals. Lets try to stop all the wars and aggression against humanity, if we do it together I am sure we could win.
2015 FORECASTING FOR LIBYA: Libya in 2015 .. .. ..
We have been for years to develop outlines expectations for the looming of the events during the year and then march from touching to detail the extent of the rest of the year, the day after we say the name of God Knowing the unseen?.. .. ..
- Despite signs of division and even division in Libya, but we see Libya unified one.
- Battles will move from place to place and from region to region and not an actual deduction or where serious.
- Crises after crises pursuing government bending and bending the governments will come out and Hassi of the Libyan scene altogether.
- See Algerian dialogue initiative looming skyline and failure sued.
- Despite the arrival of the economy to the brink of collapse, but the Libyan dinar will survive and regain its value quickly.
- The emergence of facts about the last days in Sirte battles in 2011 and these facts will increase no more questions.
- Will face Misurata ultimately an inevitable, and will be the city of death and destruction and will be repeated phrase killed identity much.
- The disappearance of a number of characters multiple Militia incidents and the extinction of some of the names and political entities and the military and even religious.
- Focus of many events and news about the Amazigh and Qziahm and their demands and you will hear for the first time the state is a major Amazigh.
- France will have an active role in the large and upcoming events.
- Egypt’s preoccupation with security Coupling and will reduce the significant economic role in Libya.
- News of the death of the Liberal figure in February prisons would be an event of great echoes.
- New old Libyan military forces we will see them extended its control over the whole of Libya cities of conflict enters a new phase.
- February Nakba actually ended and the biggest victory of Independents and only science and did not remain commend them will disappear as well, the next battle will be between Al Nakba battles in preparation for the extension of the control of the people the right to their homeland.
- Will not be for the House of Representatives, and it is a real actor before his election we will come out of the womb of the Nakba dead.
- The emergence of a leaked video of a Libyan influential figures will have a significant impact on a lot of Al Wahemoon reawakening.
- Some of the Libyan border will see a long-term lock-related incidents at airports and filled the horizon.
Astronomical spiritual Libyan
So lets go to the news:
Just came in:
The Supreme Council of the Libyan tribes and cities to announce to all members to attend the meeting which will be held in # Ben Walid City
on Sunday, 04.01.2015 at exactly ten o’clock in the morning of the importance of asking the audience.
Bombardment by air now on the Misrata port complex of iron and steel.
Detention of a Syrian intelligence officer in the city of Ajdabiya Police arrested a former officer in the Syrian intelligence services in the city of Ajdabiya, and was among a group of detainees caught by the security forces entering the Libyan territory illegally from the Sudanese territory said Libyan security sources. According to the same source in Ajdabiya they arrested 51 people from different Arab Nationalities and they were on their way to Benghazi, the interesting point of these arrests is in their capturing these illegals there was a Former Syrian intelligence officer who seems to be working with the militia of Derna
Here is the New Year’s Joke:
The Abolition of the House of Representatives in Tobruk, is Libya’s requirement of “Muslim Brotherhood” for dialogue showed Justice and Construction Party of the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya, while they have the desire to participate in political dialogue under certain conditions.
Said Mohammed Sawan Chairman Justice and Construction Party that “the party does not mind to take part in any political dialogue between the Libyan parties, and that it adheres to several principles of dialogue, which sees them as the basis for any successful dialogue, and most importantly respect for the political process and the Constitutional Declaration and the judgment of the Court judge nullified the election of the House of Representatives, according to the quoted by the state news agency solidarity. *****(The MB did not come up with it on their own accord but with the assistance of the UN and the Zionist Levi the godfather of the Arab spring, they know they are losing so they are doing everything they can to stay in a puppet power so that they will be controlled by the WEST)
The United Nations Libyan conflicting parties last September in an attempt to find a political solution may be collected, but the meeting was postponed more than once, until the announcement of the UN envoy fifth of January date for the start of the talks. ****(To conclude the losing party wants, NO! it demands that the House of Representatives which resides in Tobruk to be abolished and dissolved even though its Internationally recognized; this reminds me at the time of 2011 when the Jamahiryia was winning and NATO/USA/FRANCE/UK was in stalemate it demanded that the Jamahiryia government should surrender… this is a travesty in my opinion never heard in my life when someone is losing the fight to have demands. This is the WEST meddling in my country funding the losers and telling them that they have the right to DEMAND.)
Firefighters in Libya, put out a massive fire, broke out last week in tanks of crude oil, at the port of Sidra east of the country, as much as a researcher at the strategic oil affairs, Fire losses estimated at $ 210 million.
Tariq Ibrahim, a researcher at the strategic oil in the international affairs of Orientalism Institute in Moscow, said that the financial losses due to the outbreak of the fire in the oil tanker port of Sidra oil, estimated at about $ 210 million.
Ibrahim added that “oil tanker port of Sidra was completely burned and destroyed a great loss,” adding that re-work and the creation of “those tanks affected the Libyan state would cost roughly about $ 120 million.”
And inside the burning tanks of crude oil, the strategic researcher said that “the loss of about 1.8 million barrels of crude oil, was in those reservoirs that were burned.”
According to the Libyan researcher, “the loss of truth in this disaster is to stop Sacrifice oil from the fields to the oil port of Sidra, which means stop the export of oil from the largest oil port of Libya, and the loss of what was earned by this port of revenues to the treasury of the Libyan state, in addition to punitive conditions Libya paid by customers contractors; to buy crude oil through the port. “
Erupted on 13 December last year gun battles near the oil Crescent in eastern Libya, after the forces, “the dawn of Libya” an attack on Crescent oil region; to try to control it, in a process dubbed “Sunrise Libya”, and met with those forces resistance of oil installations and al-Guard the other belonging to the Army Chief of Staff appointed by the Parliament. ***(Its evident enough to everybody that the Muslim Brotherhood with its minions which are behind this attack; causing wide world environmental hazard to the earth and people who live in Libya from its toxic fumes.)
So here we have a statement from the youth of Benghazi; the question is who benefits from this statement?
Pool “youth Lethy” Benghazi calling for a comprehensive reconciliation in Libya called 201 young people gathered Lethy Benghazi rejection of the “dignity”, a comprehensive reconciliation, to maintain the social fabric of the city.
The statement, which was posted on the social networking site “Facebook” on Friday, that this call is the last chance to stop the bloodshed and save the property, and to ensure ease of movement between citizens.
The statement continued, saying, “Those who are inspiring with the youth program and areas which used to be named as” the Awakening “, civilians who have no blood on their hands”.
It is noteworthy that the clashes are still continuing between the “Shura Benghazi rebels” and the forces of the Libyan army troops Council Lethy area and other areas in Benghazi. *****(We will have to wait and see what comes of this statement and how many will follow suit with it. It’s a bold statement but I am a little wary as I am wondering “who” put them up to it? I sincerely hope that they came up with this idea all on their own, but there is so much at stake which makes me wonder why now? why not at the end of the war of 2011? You can call me paranoid and maybe you would be right, but since 2011 everything changed; the people I thought were my friends became the betrayers of my country having a placard of Democracy but in reality the only thing they wanted is to sell my country to highest bidder and for themselves to have power and money.)
The President of Niger, Mahamadou Issoufou, said it was “essential” an international response in the country affected by violence. “One outcome is not possible without international intervention in Libya (…) [It] is essential to the reconciliation of all Libyans, including Gaddafi,” he told the press, after an interview with the french Minister of Defence, Jean-Yves Le Drian, on tour in the region.
“I do not see how the terrorists are armed militias that will create the conditions for reconciliation among Libyans. Also I do not see how they can create the conditions for the organization of free and transparent elections in Libya.” *****(To conclude he and the rest of the Western allegiance want to intervene one more time in Libya (so that they can DIVIDE IT INTO THREE PIECES JUST AS THEY DID WITH SUDAN), as they have not caused enough damage in the first place, its their mess we the Green Resistance and the Honourable Tribes try to clean with no assistance whatsoever from the West or East.)
116 violation between the kidnapping and murder and assault against journalists in Libya in 2014 01/03/2015
A recent report on journalists and media workers in Libya, for serious violations occurred in 2014, where he highlighted the annual report of the center “fortress” to defend the freedom of journalists who take from the Libyan capital based, what he described as the great decline in the areas of freedoms and an increase in cases of serious violation among journalists and bloggers as a result of the escalation of the ongoing armed conflict in Libya.
Kidnapping and murder, the report said that 2014 is the fiercest and bloodiest regarding the safety of journalists in Libya, where the center scored 10 deaths and more than 100 cases of kidnapping and torture by armed groups to infringe beaten and expelled journalists while carrying out their work and also the attack on the headquarters of the media institutions and media houses themselves or their families.
He said that this year has seen a surge noticeable in cases of repression and intimidation to affect bloggers and opinion writers on the Internet, pointing to the most prominent cases of bloggers who were kidnapped and threatened their activist Abdel Moez Bannon from the city of Tripoli, which still his whereabouts are unknown for the moment the issue of the assassination of Tawfiq bin Saud and his colleague Sami Alkuafa of the city of Benghazi, where the outcome of the investigation is still unknown, as well as the assassination of journalist Bouzid editor of hippopotamus key in Benghazi.