S.O.S BEWARE OF KHALIFA HAFTAR WHO IS A CIA AGENT AND A TRAITOR TO LIBYA AND TO THE LIBYAN INTERESTS.


S.O.S BEWARE OF KHALIFA HAFTAR WHO IS A CIA AGENT AND A TRAITOR TO LIBYA AND TO THE LIBYAN INTERESTS.

 

TO ALL LIBYAN READERS WHO READ MY BLOG PLEASE PLEASE BEWARE OF THE WESTERN PROPAGANDA WHO ARE PUSHING KHALIFA HAFTAR TO BECOME THE NEW LEADER OF LIBYA DO NOT BE FOOLED. IN THIS ARTICLE I WILL PROVE TO YOU THAT THIS MAN AND HIS FAMILY DO NOT WANT LIBYA TO BE FREE FROM COLONIZERS NOR DOES HE CARE ABOUT THE INTERESTS OF THE LIBYAN PEOPLE.

He who has lost his dignity in Chad is not going to regain it back in Libya

So I will begin with some clippings of Western Media what they say about him:

A TRAITOR RISEN FROM THE DEAD A CIA/MOSSAD AGENT WHO COLLABORATED WITH THE WEST FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF LIBYA AND TO BECOME THE NEW LEADER.

A TRAITOR RISEN FROM THE DEAD A CIA/MOSSAD AGENT WHO COLLABORATED WITH THE WEST FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF LIBYA AND TO BECOME THE NEW LEADER.

A year before Reagan’s election a Libyan mob, imitating Iranian revolutionaries, burned down the US embassy in Tripoli and diplomatic relations were suspended. Two years later the Libyan embassy in Washington was closed down while US and Libyan jets skirmished over the Gulf of Sidra, which Gaddafi claimed to be part of Libya’s territorial waters.

Later in 1981 American press reports claimed that Libyan hit squads had been sent to the US to assassinate Reagan, shots were fired at the US ambassador to France while the ambassador to Italy was withdrawn after a plot to kidnap him was uncovered. After explosives were found in musical equipment at a US embassy sponsored dance in Khartoum, Sudan, Reagan ordered a travel ban and ordered all Americans out of Libya. ****(only to allow them in again with Canadian, British, French passports. THIS I SAW IT WITH MY OWN EYES WHEN TRAVELLING TO GERMANY FROM LIBYA A PLANE FULL OF AMERICANS BUT THEIR PASSPORTS WHERE CANADIAN, FRENCH, ENGLISH. When I asked why they said the American government had to re enter Libya but while there was a ban order they used the back door with other national passports.)

In 1983 there were more air skirmishes off the Libyan coast; two years later five US citizens were killed by bombs planted at Rome and Vienna airports and US officials blamed Libya. The worst clashes came in 1986, beginning with more air skirmishes over the Gulf of Sidra and the destruction of Libyan SAM sites by American missiles. In April a bomb exploded at the LaBelle nightclub in Berlin, a bar frequented by off-duty American servicemen. ***(although Mossad/Stazi/KGB stated otherwise America wanted to blame Libya)Three people were killed, two of whom were US soldiers and of the 200 wounded, sixty were American citizens. President Reagan blamed Libya and on April 15th, some 100 US aircraft, many flying out of bases in the UK, bombed Libyan bases and military complexes. The Libyans said that 70 people were killed in the attacks which also targeted Gaddafi’s compound in Tripoli, killing his adopted infant daughter, Hana. One ACCOUNT claimed that nine of the jets had been directed to blast Gaddafi’s compound in a clear attempt to kill him.

By the mid-1980’s, the Reagan administration and the CIA believed that Gaddafi was supporting terrorist groups or helping fellow radical states throughout the globe. In a November 3rd, 1985 article for the Washington Post, Bob Woodward listed the countries where Gaddafi was said by the White House to be active. They included Chad, Tunisia, Sudan, Iran, Syria, Ethiopia, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Guatemala, El Salvador, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Lebanon and Iraq. Gaddafi was also supporting the IRA in Northern Ireland and significantly stepped up supplies of arms and CASH to the group after a British policewoman was shot dead and diplomats expelled following a confrontation and lengthy siege at the Libyan embassy in London in 1984.

In May 1984, less than a month after the London embassy siege, gunmen launched rocket and gun attacks against the Tripoli army barracks where Gaddafi’s family compound was located. The initial assault was repulsed and most of the insurgents killed when Libyan tanks shelled the building overlooking the barracks where the gunmen had taken refuge. It was though the most serious challenge to Gaddafi’s hold on power in Libya, made all the more threatening by the fact that it had happened on his doorstep.

The attack was claimed by a group calling itself the National Front for the Salvation of Libya (NFSL), composed of anti-Gaddafi exiles, some of them supporters of the Idris monarchy overthrown in the 1969 revolution. Claims that the NFSL was at that time supported by US intelligence derive some support from a leak to American newspapers a few days before the attack in Tripoli that President Reagan had recently signed a new directive authorizing US agencies to “take the offensive” against international terrorism by mounting retaliatory or pre-emptive attacks. But the Americans were, at this stage, not directly involved in supporting the exile group’s activities.

The NFSL was getting aid mostly from Saudi Arabia whose ruling family despised Gaddafi after he had accused them of defiling holy Islamic sites in their country but also from Egypt and Tunisia in whose internal affairs Gaddafi had meddled. Sudan was another sponsor. Gaddafi had tried to foment an uprising against its pro-Western leadership and in response Sudan supplied the NFSL with bases from which the May 1984 attack was planned.

The Sudanese, according to one ACCOUNT, kept the CIA informed of the plot. CIA Director, William Casey, was heartened by the attack even though it had failed and renewed his efforts to persuade Reagan to authorize specific covert action against the Libyan leader. Casey is said to have remarked: “It proves for the first time that Libyans are willing to die to get rid of that bastard” (p. 85). From thereon the NFSL was put on the CIA’s payroll.

It was after the unsuccessful effort to kill Gaddafi in his Tripoli compound that Reagan took the intelligence offensive. Bob Woodward revealed Reagan’s move, first in the Washington Post (November 3rd, 1985) and then in his ACCOUNT of Reagan’s secret wars in his book Veil, published in 1987. A secret presidential directive, which Woodward was able to quote, signaled that the exile groups like NFSL would be an important weapon wielded in this campaign against the Libyan leader: “…the exile groups, if supported to a substantial degree, could soon begin an intermittent campaign of sabotage and violence which could prompt further challenges to Qaddafi’s authority.”

The Reagan directive had listed ten options for action against Gaddafi, which ranged from regime change to economic sanctions, although it was obvious that the operation could only be judged a success if Gaddafi was dislodged: “…no course of action short of stimulating Qaddafi’s fall will bring any significant and enduring change in Libyan policies”, the document read.

The former French colony of Chad on Libya’s southern border had already been a major battleground in the war between Reagan and Gaddafi and after the 1984 bid to kill the Libyan dictator it assumed even greater importance. Chad had gained independence from France in 1960 but its history for many years thereafter has been one of coups and civil wars, often sponsored by foreign powers using Chad as an arena for their rivalry.

Libyan interest and activity in Chad pre-dated Gaddafi’s 1969 revolution and centered on a piece of land in Northern Chad called the Aouzou Strip which is rich in uranium and other rare minerals. Gaddafi formed an alliance with the government of Goukouni Wedeye who allowed the Libyans to occupy the strip but in 1982 Wedeye was overthrown by Hissene Habre who was backed by the CIA and by French troops.

Hebre’s was a brutal regime. During the eight years of his leadership some 40,000 people were estimated to have died in detention or executed. Human Rights Watch observed: “Under President Reagan, the United States gave covert CIA paramilitary support to help install Habre in order, according to secretary of state, Alexander Haig, to ‘bloody Gadafi’s nose’”. Bob Woodward wrote in Veil that the Chadian coup was William Casey’s first covert operation as head of the CIA.

During the years following Habre’s coup, Gaddafi’s army and the forces of the Chad government, the CIA and French intelligence clashed repeatedly. In March 1987 a force of some 600-700 Libyan soldiers under the command of General Khalifa Haftir was captured and imprisoned. Gaddafi disowned Heftir, presumably in anger at his capture, and the former Libyan General then defected to the major Libyan opposition group, the NFSL.

A Congressional Research Service report of December 1996 named Heftir as the head of the NFSL’s military wing, the Libyan National Army. After he joined the exile group, the CRS report added, Heftir began “preparing an army to march on Libya”. The NFSL, the CSR said, is in exile “with many of its members in the United States.”

In 1990 French troops helped to oust Habre and installed Idriss Debry to replace him. According to one ACCOUNT the French had grown weary of Habre’s genocidal policies while the new resident in the White House, George H W Bush did not have the same interest as Reagan had in using Chad as a proxy to damage Gaddafi even though the Libyan leader formed an alliance with Debry.

A New York Times report of May 1991 shed more light on the CIA’s sponsorship of Heftir’s men. “They were trained” it said, “by American intelligence officials in sabotage and other guerilla skills, officials said, at a base near Ndjamena, the Chadian capital. The plan to use the exiles fit neatly into the Reagan administration’s eagerness to topple Colonel Qaddafi”.

Following the fall of Habre, Gaddafi demanded that the new government hand over Heftir’s men but instead Debry allowed the Americans to fly them to Zaire. There Libyan officials were given access to the men and about half agreed to return to Libya. The remainder refused, saying they feared for their lives if they went back home. When US financial aid offered to Zaire for giving the rebels refuge failed to materialise they were expelled and sent to Kenya.

Eventually the Kenyans said the men were no longer welcome and the United States agreed to bring them to America where they were admitted to the US refugee programme. A State Department spokesman said the men would have “access to normal resettlement assistance, including English-language and vocational training and, if necessary, financial and medical assistance.” According to one report the remnants of Heftir’s army were dispersed to all fifty states.

That was not, however, the end of the Libyan National Army. In March 1996, Heftir returned to Libya and took part in an uprising against Gaddafi. Details of what happened are scant but the Washington Post reported from Egypt on March 26th that travelers from Libya had spoken of “unrest today in Jabal Akhdar mountains of eastern Libya and said armed rebels may have joined escaped prisoners in an uprising against the government….and that its leader is Col. Khalifa Haftar, of a contra-style group based in the United States called the Libyan National Army, the travelers said.”

The report continued: “The travelers, whose ACCOUNTS could not be confirmed independently, said they heard that the death toll had risen to 23 in five days of fighting between security forces and rebels, including men who escaped from Benghazi prison thursday and then fled into the eastern mountains.”

What part the CIA played in the failed uprising and whether the then US president, Bill Clinton had given the operation his approval are not known. By coincidence or not, three months later, Gaddafi’s forces killed some 1200 political prisoners being held in Benghazi’s Abu Simal jail. It was the arrest of the lawyer representing many of the prisoners’ families that sparked the February 17th uprising against Gaddafi and with it, the return of Khalifa Heftir.

As usual, the back story is complex. Valuable strategic resources abound. There are no good guys. And, as usual, the reporting that commands most of our attention just isn’t very good at helping us understand what is really going on.

Here is another link:

Khalifa Hifter was once a top military officer for Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, but after a disastrous military adventure in Chad in the late 1980s, Hifter switched to the anti-Gadhafi opposition. In the early 1990s, he moved to suburban Virginia, where he established a life but maintained ties to anti-Gadhafi groups.

Late last week, Hifter was appointed to lead the rebel army, which has been in chaos for weeks. He is the third such leader in less than a month, and rebels interviewed in Libya openly voiced distrust for the most recent leader, Abdel Fatah Younes, who had been at Gadhafi’s side until just a month ago. ****( Haftar had Abdel Fatah Younes murdered, although never proven not for lack of evidence but the CIA covered it up and pointing to the direction to a fanatic Islamist militia of committing this murder. Its a well known fact that Haftar never liked Abdel Fatah Younes the feelings were mutual but Younes had more experience than Haftar and Younis did not allow Haftar to be chief of military operations. Haftar complained to his daddy =>CIA and the CIA took care of Younes as their asset was very unhappy and going into depression in having Younes as his boss! Younis’s defection emboldened the rebels like no other, before or since. He was instrumental in the liberation of Benghazi from 18-20 February when he helped negotiate a ceasefire at the besieged main military base in the centre of town, allowing loyalist forces to flee. Of course CIA realised that Younes had found out about the big conspiracy done over the Libyan people and he was in secret talks with the Jamahirya which meant that had Younes returned to the Jamahirya he would have also taken his battalion which was very well-trained and one of the best in Libya, they also knew that Younes was very popular with the Libyan people and he was from a big tribe in Benghazi).

The New York Times  always in touch with the CIA/Mossad say this about Haftar:

General Hifter has cast himself in the role of strongman and national protector, the man who will “correct” Libya’s faltering revolution and purge the country of extremists. But he is a polarizing figure, as notorious for his ambition as for his shifting allegiances, and many people here wonder whether he will amount to more than a warlord, advancing his own narrow interests.

He has gathered a corps of soldiers, air force units and militiamen that he has declared to be the Libyan national army, ****(the LIBYAN ARMY ARE FROM THE HONORABLE TRIBES AND HAS NO CONNECTIONS TO HAFTAR) and has used it to mount assaults on the bases of powerful Islamist militias in the east, including several airstrikes on Wednesday. Libya’s multitude of militias have been a major focus of public anger, not least for repeatedly refusing to disarm.

For the moment, the front lines are in Benghazi. General Hifter’s troops operate from several bases, *****(one base) including one outside the city, while the militias have generally retreated to the farmland on the outskirts of town. Fighting flares nightly around the city’s edge, with heavy weapons deployed in some areas emptied of residents.

“They have declared war on each other,” Anas Toweir, a radiologist from Benghazi, said of General Hifter and the local militias. “No one is quite sure what’s going on. Everyone is hiding in their homes.”

General Hifter already has a controversial history in Libya. He was part of the team that carried out the 1969 coup, and later led a controversial war against Chad from 1978 to 1987. After Libya’s defeat in the war, General Hifter defected to the United States, where he became an American citizen and devoted himself to toppling the Qaddafi regime.

When the 2011 uprising began, General Hifter came back to Libya and fought side by side with the Islamists he has now condemned. While he presents himself as the unifier of Libya, some view his movement as a reaction to Libya’s controversial banning of all high-ranking members of Colonel Qaddafi’s government from holding public office, including General Hifter.

Washington Post:

Dressed in military uniform, Haftar, whom the speaker of parliament accused of plotting a coup, said his troops had temporarily withdrawn from Benghazi for tactical reasons. ***(Yes he lost as he is NO leader and stayed outside Benghazi till the HONORABLE TRIBES clean the place and then Haftar together with the western Media proclaimed that he did it… I will say it again he is a wimp has no leadership skills and he has his own agenda together with the CIA/MOSSAD corporation.)

Hifter said that he began planning his offensive around a month ago ****(his financiers have been planning it from 2013, he is not capable of planning or even executing anything, his bakers are France, America (playing with both sides) Israel, Canada and Britain (also playing with both sides) but that there had been discontent among former military officers for more than a year and a half. “We planned it after we saw people being slaughtered in the streets,” he said, referring to the slayings of police officers, judges, lawyers and others in Benghazi. *****(lets not forget who started the slaughtering; Hafter was first in line when he sided with the mercenaries that his second country gave him so that he could topple Qaddafi. There is a saying that a leopard can not change his spots neither Hafter, he is a TRAITOR TO LIBYA, A CIA/MOSSAD AGENT AND IS WORKING AGAINST LIBYA AND ITS INTERESTS.)

He said that he saw no quick end to the fighting.

“Operation Dignity is multiple battles; it’s not just one battle,” Hifter said. *****(What dignity? Hafter lost his dignity in Chad will not regain it in Libya)

Haftar’s offensive ultimately stalled, however, in part due to suspicions about his political ambitions and unconfirmed links to the CIA, as well as his aggressive stance against even moderate Islamist groups. His relationship to the government in Tobruk is ambiguous.

KEY PLAYERS IN LIBYA FROM THE ABOVE ARTICLE:

Qatar

The small Gulf state signaled its outsized geopolitical ambition in 2011 when it played an overt role in aiding the rebellion against Gaddafi. Reports at the time indicated Qatari special forces were operating inside Libya and that Qatari fighter jets may have run sorties in the country. Since 2011, the Qataris have emerged as one of the key backers of political Islamin the Middle East and North Africa, supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and a range of Islamist outfits from Tunisia to Syria. As The Washington Post reported Tuesday, Qatar’s connections to an al-Qaeda-linked Salafist militia in Syria were instrumental in WINNING the release of a kidnapped American journalist this weekend.

This conspicuous footprint has made Qatar — as well as the government of Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a moderate Islamist —  the target of criticism from Arab autocrats and secularists elsewhere.

Egypt

On Monday, U.S. officials speaking on condition of anonymity said that Egypt had been involved in two airstrikes on Islamist forces in Libya. Fighter planes from the United Arab Emirates were believed to have used Egyptian bases as a launch pad for the attacks (Washington was not informed of the raids and Egypt has officially denied military operations in Libya).

If true, this intervention would appear to be driven by a broader policy against Islamist movements led by President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi.

The United Arab Emirates

While airstrikes were believed to have been conducted from Egypt, U.S. officials say that the planes flown had come from the UAE, the small country that sits on the Persian Gulf, more than 2,500 miles from Tripoli. The country’s air force is well-regarded and helped in the fight against Qaddafi’s government during the 2011 civil war.

The UAE is a military ally for the United States and a militia commander told The Washington Post that whoever launched the airstrikes had used munitions manufactured by the United States. “The bombs were American-made, and as far as our information goes regarding that ammunition, it is only used by Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Israel in the Middle East,” Abubaker al-Huta, a militia commander, said.

Saudi Arabia

Egypt and the UAE may have taken the lead this week in striking against Islamist targets in Libya, but behind the scenes, the Saudis are playing a concerted role. The kingdom looked on with horror at the 2011 Arab Spring uprisings, as a series of Arab autocrats backed by Riyadh were replaced by chaotic, fledgling democracies that reshaped the geopolitical map of the Middle East. Now, it’s striking back with the UAE, a perennial sidekick, in tow alongside Sissi’s Egypt, to which it has already extended billions of dollars in aid.

As part of its larger regional chess match with Iran, a Shiite theocracy, the Saudis have at various times enabled the rise of Sunni militancy in corners of the Middle East. The country remains the source of support for some of the most virulent strains of Salafism in the Muslim world.

“Hifter’s military power is actually quite limited,” Abdullah said. “He hasn’t been able to control the situation.”

In addition to the scores of deaths, the fighting over the past couple of months has forced the evacuation of several civilian neighborhoods in Benghazi, government officials say.

Abdullah, who worked with Hifter before the 2011 revolt as part of the U.S.-based opposition to Gaddafi, says he believes the commander is aiming for a senior position in any new government. Elections to choose a new parliament were held June 25.

“He is as power hungry as it gets,” Abdullah said. “A lot of political movements wanted to piggyback on his popularity. But people are starting to take a step back.”

“He won’t stop until he’s the Sissi of Libya,” he said. ***(Pardon my French but Hafter doesn’t have the balls of the late Qaddafi or of Sissi.)

Switched sides in the 1980s

As a young army officer, Hifter took part in the coup that brought Gaddafi to power in 1969. But Hifter switched sides in the late 1980s, after he was captured while fighting for Gaddafi’s army in a war in neighboring Chad.

 He became the leader of a rebel group called the Libyan National Army, which he claimed received U.S. assistance. He later sought refuge in the United States. He apparently became a U.S. citizen — he voted in Virginia in elections in 2008 and 2009, records show.

One member of a prominent Libyan opposition family who knew Hifter when both were living in Northern Virginia noted that he and his family were comfortable. Hifter resided in Falls Church until 2007 and later in a five-bedroom home in a quiet neighborhood in Vienna, near the golf course of the Westwood Country Club. He sold the second home in 2010 for $612,000, according to public records.

“They lived a very good life, and nobody knows what his source for compensation was,” said the acquaintance, who added that Hifter’s family was not originally wealthy.

(The former general spelled his name “Hifter” on legal documents in the United States. It has also been rendered in reports from Libya as “Haftar” and “Hiftar.”)

But some who knew him said he was arrogant and angled for power.

“He was like a little child. He was actually trying to become the chief of staff,” said Jallal Galal, a former spokesman for the rebels. After the rebels chose another former general, Abdul Fattah Younis, to lead them, Hifter was irate, Galal recalled.

TWP: Is there any possibility of negotiation or is armed conflict the only way forward at this point?

KH: We see that confrontation is the solution. What is the discussion? They are armed, I do not think talks will work with them. These are criminals, international criminals from Europe and Asia and Africa. Unfortunately, we are not defending only Libya but we are now defending the entire world in this way because the escapists and killers they move from place to place. If we expel them from Libya they will go to another place, but if we are following them everywhere the situation will be different for all countries who fight terrorism. *****(He does not say that he brought them with him when F.UK.US decided to topple Qaddafi I am sure they promised him a leading role but got tired of waiting. Anyway back to his answer these criminals that he is talking about were his comrades when they entered Libya illegally in 2011, so what is he saying is he a lesser criminal than his comrades? All of them are financed by F.UK.US)

TWP: Are you receiving any support from abroad?

KH: No, there is no foreign support whatsoever given to us, we are fully reliant on ourselves. ***(Yes by France and USA)

TWP: Have you been in contact with the United States government?

KH: Until now, no. ****(Really? So why did he hide at the American Embassy in Tripoli when he did not succeed his coup de tat in February 2014? And let him explain where he gets his finance?)

When speaking to The Post, Hifter denied any intent to assume a permanent leadership position in the country and rejected accusations by opponents that he is a cipher for foreign interests. *****(we all know for a fact that he is a cipher for foreign interests) Instead, he frames his campaign, dubbed “Operation Dignity,” as a kind of nationalist crusade.

 

On Wednesday, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Deborah Jones, said at the Stimson Center in Washington: Hifter “has not declared that he wants to be in charge of the state. What he has declared is that he wants the GNC to step aside, because the GNC has thus far failed to take any action to respond to the unhappiness of many Libyans.” She was referring to the parliament *****(Didn’t he say a while ago in an interview that he is not assisted by the USA? In the link of US ambassador Deborah Jones you will hear her interview and who ever has followed her with her statements will know she is lying but that is for another article)

Here is a link from Pravda.ru

Haftar betrayed the revolution in the 1980s, when he cut a deal with anti-Gaddafi forces in the neighbouring country of Chad during the Chadian-Libyan conflict. In exchange for being freed from the Chadian prison that kept him locked up with about 600 other Libyan fighters, he vowed to set up the anti-Gaddafi Libyan National Army (LNA). This army was founded on June 21, 1988 – but not without the vast support of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), under the approval of then president Ronald Reagan, who had bombed the Libyan capital of Tripoli two years earlier in an attempt to kill the Gaddafi family.

U.S. by then offered a home to 350 Libyan soldiers who plotted to overthrow Gaddafi. Haftar is believed to be one of them. The Benghazi native started to live with his family in the town of Falls Church in suburban Virginia – just a few miles away from the CIA’s headquarters in Langley - for the next twenty years. In that period Haftar was pursuing LNA activities from the U.S.

In order to understand exactly what is going on with general Haftar and his “Operation Dignity” in relation to colonel Gaddafi and the 1969 Al-Fateh revolution, let’s first of all take a look at what is not going on. Contrary to the events on September 1, 1969 and the days after, Haftar’s operation has been far from bloodless. On May 17 alone, nearly 80 were killed in clashes between Haftar loyalists and a number of the militias that control various parts of Libya. But way more significant is the fact that Gaddafi and the FREE Officers Movement enjoyed the overwhelming support of the Libyan people. The Haftar supporters come from quite a different field. Among them is French philosopher Bernard-Henri Lévy who applauded the NATO bombing of Libya. His main supporters however seem to be the mainstream journalists and their clients who are eager to report on Haftar’s alleged popularity among the Libyan people. “We are now fighting not only on behalf of Libya, but on behalf of the whole world”, the New York Times quotes him saying on May 29. Strangely enough, the Libyan people themselves are remaining silent.

In fact they are not. It is the media that remains silent on the voices of the Libyans regarding Haftar. When current U.S. ambassador to Libya, Mrs Deborah Jones, said in a (mis)statement on May 21 that Libya is a strategic goldmine for the West, and that Libyans are incapable of running their own country, the Great Libyan Tribes, who represent 98% of the Libyans worldwide, thought it was about time to speak out in response. In a three page open letter the Tribes explained that their best days were the 42 years under Gaddafi. As for general Haftar, they declared:

The USA planned to overthrow the legitimate Libyan government in 1980 and hired a traitor Libyan military officer named Khalifa Haftar, trained him and several thousands mercenaries to destroy the Gaddafi government. The change of government in Chad made the USA stop that planned overthrow. Haftar and his band of traitors were moved to the USA near Langley Virginia where Haftar et al worked for the CIA for 20 years.” […] “You [ambassador Jones] talk as if you do not know General Haftar, when in fact he is the selected military front for the USA-CIA military division in Libya. He receives all his orders from Langley Virginia as do you. In fact, Haftar took refuge in the US embassy in February of this year when his first coup attempt failed. Has the USA not done enough damage to our country?

So what are we really dealing with here? Clearly not with a Gaddafi-like figure who aims to FREE his country from foreign occupiers and their mercenary puppets, and make it as prosperous as it was before the 2011 war. General Haftar is nothing but the West’s answer to their self-created chaos. This is a well-known strategy used by the imperialist powers all over the world for years now. Three years after the NATO war, Libya obviously has not become the free democratic state that according to the West would sprout from the destructive bombing raids. In other words, the lofty but naive promises of freedom made by the U.S. and the NATO countries in an attempt to justify their aggression, have failed loud and clear.

And here are some more links written about Hafter:

http://libyaagainstsuperpowermedia.org/2011/12/17/libya-the-second-son-of-general-khalifa-hafter-was-kidnapped-in-tripoli-december-17-2011/

http://libyaagainstsuperpowermedia.org/2013/10/13/sources-warn-of-imminence-of-a-military-coup-detat-in-libya-led-by-france/

http://libyaagainstsuperpowermedia.org/2012/08/09/libya-libya-news-from-occupied-august-8-2012/

http://libyaagainstsuperpowermedia.org/2011/12/13/libya-attempted-assassination-of-general-khalifa-haftar-12122011/

http://www.libyaherald.com/2014/12/09/hafter-lays-out-his-conditions-for-joining-dialogue/

 

 

 

Video: Discovering detention camps and secret prisons belonging to Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi that is what NATO Left Behind


Video: Discovering detention camps and secret prisons belonging to Ansar al-Sharia in Benghazi that is what NATO Left Behind

 

alrseefa: Libyan army forces discovered in the city of Benghazi, detention centers and prisons, a secret organization of Ansar al-Sharia in the city of Benghazi, and shows video circulated by activists communication and social Facebook site it is believed to be one of the prisons under the land that was used by the organization in detention and the abduction of citizens within the city.

Editor’s Note: This is what NATO and F.UK.US left behind the so-called Freedom fighters were nothing but EXTRIMISTS COWARD MERCENARIES but before they did that, they had them well-trained and showed them all the ropes of torture. Everybody knew about it, so my question to F.UK.US AND NATO; Is this how you install democracy? Did you train these extremists in Guantanamo Bay? Reading on the horrific and heinous acts of torture that the CIA and its allies did.  

About these ads

WARNING: Video leaked from inside the detention of Misratah where Humanity does not exist. PLEASE MAKE IT VIRAL WE NEED YOUR HELP TO STOP THE TORTURES AND DEATHS OF POW’s


WARNING: Video leaked from inside the detention of Misratah where Humanity does not exist.

PLEASE MAKE IT VIRAL WE NEED YOUR HELP TO STOP THE TORTURES AND DEATHS OF POW’s

When I was sent this video, I did not know how to react, I have seen so many videos where humanity does not exist. I am wondering with these people how much they enjoy to torture prisoners who cannot defend themselves and endure the torture. What does it say for the torturer’s? They are not brave they are cowards, hiding behind a mask. 

Now back to the Video its vulgar but what do you expect from a tribe which is a mix breed of Turks-mongols and Jews, Misuratah people for a long time they where jews who converted to Islam by the Ottoman Empire so this breed now is trying to control Libya whatever the cost to humanity. They have been trained well by the CIA/MOSSAD/MI6 agents on how to torture they have been trained by the best PSYCHOPATHS. America/Israel with its compatriots the Misurati are trying its damnedest to INSTALL ISIL/MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN LIBYA, just to prove my point yesterday a Turkish ship docked at the port of Misuratah on board was over 1000 mercenaries, guns and ammunition, helicopters and lets not forget money to pay all these mercenaries who do the fighting for America/Israel.

No one not even the governments or the secret agencies have the right to treat so inhumane prisoners what ever their crime. I am sick to my stomach with stories that I have been told about the tortures some detainees that succeeded to escape from their captures, I could not believe my ears what they went through and what it has done to them not only on their bodies but also to their souls. Many times I have lost my faith to God for allowing the destruction of countries, killing innocent children, women and old men. Allowing hunger to half of the world but then I come to my senses and say this is not the work of God but of 10 families who believe they are GOD and we are just worms on the ground causing them a problem to their lifestyle. These families who reproduce like rabbits need more space on earth so that they can live in it and they must extinguish the worms because we steal their oxygen, food and resources. I apologise for my rumbling but enough is enough, PEOPLE must WAKE UP from this lethargic sleep, WE THE PEOPLE HAVE TO PUT ASIDE OUR DIFFERENCES AND JOIN FORCES to get rid of these cowards who hide behind the scenes, or they cover their faces for fear of recognition. WE HAVE THE POWER BUT HAVE NOT REALISED THAT WE HAVE, WE ARE STRONGER THAN THE 10 FAMILIES, IF WE JOIN ALL TOGETHER WE CAN GET RID OF THEM ONCE AND FOR ALL.

 

 

OUR FRIENDS THE TUAREGS – RAPED BY FRANCE’S GREED FOR URANIUM


OUR FRIENDS THE TUAREGS – RAPED BY FRANCE’S GREED FOR URANIUM

AND VICTIMS OF THE WEST’S FALSE FLAG 2013 WAR ON MALI: ARMY TOLD TO “LEAVE AL-QAEDA ALONE”

BY LADY KHAMIS

France tested its first nuclear bomb on the land of the Tuareg people in the Sahara Desert in 1960 – it was four times more powerful than the one America had inflicted on Hiroshima…

It was also in 1960 that Niger and Mali both became independent countries from their colonial master – but, in truth, France never did let go. It has cruelly continued to use Niger and Mali – both containing the Tuaregs unofficially recognised homeland of Azawad – as their playgrounds ever since.

Al-Jazeera UK has done a largely excellent three-part series titled ‘The Orphans of the Sahara’. Its three one-hour programmes tell the harrowing suffering of the Tuareg people of North Africa following the removal of Muammar Gaddafi from power in Libya.

They show the brutal life that France has inflicted upon these people – in Niger, by stealing the wealth of the rich uranium mines for themselves, and in Mali, where an army general startling reveals how the government told the army to “leave al-Qaeda alone”… The war of ‘intervention’ by the West in 2013 was just another false flag operation.

Despite a little anti-Gaddafi propaganda from the documentary makers, the films tell the story of how much the Tuaregs miss him and how life has changed for them now that he can no longer protect them – they have the lowest quality of life of any people on earth.

The Tuaregs are the indigenous people of the world’s largest desert – the Sahara. Their land of Azawad was divided by colonial history. Gaddafi opened up his borders to them so that the herds of these pastoral people could flourish in Libya.

After Nato’s destruction of Libya in 2011, an act in which France played a huge part, a quarter of a million Tuareg workers and fighters were forced to leave the country and return to Niger – the poorest country on the planet.

They had been arrested, tortured and robbed of their money by Libyan rebels – and thrown out of their adopted home of Libya. They are now homeless and penniless. With no passports or papers, some risk their lives trying to return to the rebel-held country.

One brigade leader tells how most of his fighters were killed in the war, as well as his father. He grew up in Libya and speaks of his continual sadness that he does not know what to do with his life anymore.

All the Tuaregs benefited from Gaddafi. They tell of how everything they built was because of him and that “we are crying for his loss”, says one.

But after the war, they found upon returning to Niger that climate change had made the area even more arid and lifeless, adding to the misery of the people and the starvation of their animals.

Despite being in an area of astounding natural resources – one of the most prosperous in the world – they are living in a “dying world of drought”. For Niger has one of the richest uranium mines ever found – but few benefits ever reach the people. So the Tuaregs remain poor and isolated.

They found there were no schools and no hospitals. For those lucky enough to discover water and pastures, some find that even the water-well is a four-hour walk away from their pastures. Makeshift wells are dangerous – with lethal sand collapses an ever-present threat.

For those who have to continue their search for water and pastures, distressing footage of their animals that have either starved to death or are on the brink of doing so is shown in graphic detail. Hundreds of thousands have already met this fate.

The north of Niger is where the country’s most precious resources are found – and the French ensure they have them.

The French took the uranium from the Tuaregs’ land here – and it made France strong and prosperous. It gave the French light – and for decades now, they have been dependent on Niger to continue this. But the Tuaregs see nothing of this prosperity…

“It makes our hearts burn that we don’t see even a little bit of this wealth”, says one.

The French nuclear company Areva works the mine, in the Arlit area of the Agadez region in northern Niger, 24 hours a day – 7 days a week. Shockingly, Areva even refuses to hire any Tuaregs to work for them. Instead, most of its workers are brought up from southern Niger – hundreds of kilometres away. This is how France regards the Tuaregs…

The mine produces millions of tons of radioactive waste – and it makes the Tuaregs sick with illness. It also causes nerve disorders.

   One couple featured in the programme live near the mine. They feed their animals only on dry food – as the pasture makes their herds ill; when their precious livestock eat it, they die. A nearby well is so contaminated that nearly every animal that drank from it perished. Children drinking from it also became sick.

The factory is right in the middle of the Tuaregs’ pastureland. The nuclear materials kill animals that are exposed to them or cause others to become handicapped. One camel is shown barely able to stand after she drank water from the well near the mine – she then gave birth to a dead calf…

The man and his wife also had a baby of their own – but it was born with a deformity. They took it to the Somair Mining Company Hospital – convinced it was malformed due to the radioactive waste. Somair is the name of the mine and the company that Areva uses.

The doctors told them: “The radiation came out in your child”. The baby then died…

Disturbingly, the couple could not get a document about this event. After continuing to campaign, the hospital eventually agreed to issue a death certificate – but when they collected it, the pair was stunned to see that the cause of death – radiation – had been completely omitted…

Shortly afterwards, speaking on the telephone to the doctor, he told them: “That is something I cannot write down on paper. It is true the baby is dead from radiation – but I cannot write that. We cannot write the word radiation on anything”.

The medic added that the couple had not originally been given a death certificate “because no-one gets one if you mention verbally the word radiation”.

Following the loss of the child, the wife found she was experiencing pain in the womb. The Somair Mining Company Hospital refused to treat her – dozens of sick local Tuaregs are regularly turned away by them. They told her to go to the city hospital - but treatment there costs money. Money the Tuareg people, thanks to France, do not have.

Another woman in the same situation is paralysed from the chest down – but no one will tell her why. She died shortly after filming…

No full environmental study has ever been authorised for this area. No proper independent medical study has ever been done. No investigation into the nervous system disorders or premature deaths.

Areva did its own study and, of course, gave themselves a clear conscience, denying everything and absolving itself of any blame.

Horrifically, France is now set to DOUBLE its mining production in northern Niger – with another new mine planned for the French and their clients.

The Imouraren Mine, named after the company that Areva is using for it, will make this an even more poisoned and waterless land – as millions more tons of radioactive waste will be produced…    

When suspected local al-Qaeda rebels kidnapped some Areva workers in 2010 – with some suspected Tuareg involvement – this was portrayed in Western media as some kind of terrorist act. The truth of why it happened was utterly covered up. The kidnappers only wanted 20-30% of the mining profits (the least they deserve)…

You can bet that none of the huge profits that will come from Imouraren will be going to the locals.

Precious resources are also why the French have control of Mali – the mineral rich northern region here is the least explored of the Tuaregs’ traditional homeland areas.

As well as being forced out of Libya in 2011 and into Niger, many Tuaregs also had no choice but to return to Mali – taking with them the weapons that they had used to try and defend Libya.

They went to the northern desert, another part of their desired Azawad state. They too, found it another isolated place, remote from any normal services. Their animals also starved to death and this situation continues. There is no development and no aid assistance from the Mali government.

The Tuaregs have not controlled Azawad since the old, French colonialist war, when France gave Tuareg land to Mali – without the consent of the Tuaregs.

The French slaughtered all their animals. They then paraded the severed human heads of Tuareg leaders…

Decades later, in 2012, the Tuaregs launched the biggest uprising seen in the Mali area in over a century. It was a renewed bid to establish their beloved homeland of Azawad – a fight that has been going on against Malian rule since 1957. But their forces, the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad (MNLA), found their revolution hijacked by al-Qaeda in the Islamic Magreb (AQIM) and another rebel group, Ansar al-Dine.

Thanks to the war on Libya, Mali had become a powder keg in 2012.

The ensuing ‘intervention’ in Mali, by Britain and France in January 2013, was stated by Western politicians as a ‘necessary’ war to deal with the ‘threat of al-Qaeda’.

But, in truth, the Mali government lets al-Qaeda flourish in Mali.

The authorities even told an army general to “leave al-Qaeda alone”…

This is because the Mali government uses al-Qaeda as a bulwark against the Tuareg people and Azawad.

Drug smuggling is rife in Mali as the government secretly supports it – they use the profits from it to pay ethnic militias to keep on suppressing the Tuareg rebellion for Azawad.

(Although the programme does not mention it, the ‘intervention’ by the West was just another false flag operation – a covert war on the Tuaregs and Azawad – to keep them down and make sure France continues their colonial control. Due to the Islamists advance though, it has to be pointed out that some Tuaregs did briefly ‘side’ with the French. When Western media showed locals cheering the French, there were, in fact, not a Tuareg or an Arab amongst them)…

Paradoxically though, part of al-Qaeda is welcomed by some people – as they do provide clothes, charity provision etc. –including to those Tuaregs who want it. The recipients of this aid also say that it helps to strengthen their Islamic faith.

But many people here see the country of Mali as just another extension of France…

The Tuaregs feel that the only way out for them and their animals is for Libya to be returned to Gaddafi’s people.

 

Lady Khamis

For libyaagainstsuperpowermedia.org

Lady Khamis can be contacted at queen.jadis@yahoo.com

Related articles: MALI HORSES SUFFER LIBYA WAR FALL-OUT

2 Parlamente, 2 Regierungen, ein General


2 Parlamente, 2 Regierungen, ein General

Libyen. Die politische Lage in Libyen ist verwirrend. Der nachfolgende Beitrag stellt einen Versuch dar, die Vorgänge seit Mai 2014 darzustellen.

Ein Nutzerbeitrag von Angelika Gutsche

Die Ereignisse:  Im Mai 2014 hatte in Bengasi die gegen islamstische Milizen gerichtete „Operation Karama“ (Operation Dignity/Würde) von General Khalifa Al-Haftar begonnen.  Al-Haftar verfügte über eine kleine Armee, deren Einsätze von den USA mit Hilfe des Franzosen Bernard Levi koordiniert wurden.  Als sich Al-Haftar den  Milizen unterlegen zeigte, intervenierten die Großen Stämme zusammen mit der Zivilbevölkerung und begannen, die Stadt von Extremisten zu säubern.

 Im Juni wurde ein neues, säkular ausgerichtetes Parlament gewählt, das schon im August aus der Hauptstadt Tripolis in das an der Grenze zu Ägypten gelegene Tobruk im Osten des Landes fliehen musste. Denn seit sich viele islamistische Gruppen (von Al-Kaida über Ansar Al-Sharia, die Moslembruderschaft, ISIS und andere) lose unter dem Namen „Dawn of Libya“ („Libysche Morgenröte“) zusammengeschlossen hatten, intensivierten sich die in der Stadt ausgeübten Gewalttaten noch einmal. Dutzende Politiker, Journalisten und Aktivisten wurden in Tripolis gefangengenommen, gekidnappt oder gleich ermordet.

 Anfang Juli hatten alle libyschen Milizen ein Abkommen unterzeichnet, in dem die Grenzen ihrer Einflusssphären festgelegt waren. Danach stand der internationale Flughafen von Tripolis, wie das seit Ende des Krieges 2011 bereits der Fall war, weiterhin unter der Kontrolle der Zintan-Milizen. Doch kaum war das Abkommen getroffen, wurde es von den Misrata-Milizen gebrochen: Sie griffen auf Anraten von Katar, Saudi Arabien und der Türkei den Flughafen an, denn über den Flughafen konnte alles, von Waffen bis Geld, ins Land gebracht werden. Doch die Zintan-Milizen behaupteten sich und Misrata musste sich unter schweren Verlusten zurückziehen. Zintan warf  Misrata vor, die getroffenen Vereinbarungen nicht eingehalten zu haben und so flammten die Kämpfe erneut auf, an denen sich ab August auch die Großen Stämme beteiligten. Im Verlauf der heftigen Auseinandersetzungen zerstörten die Misrata-Brigaden den Flughafen von Tripolis sowie die gesamte Flugzeugflotte und schossen große Öltanks in Brand.

 Das alte libysche Parlament, dessen Mitglieder mit der „Dawn of Libya“ sympathisieren, trat weiterhin in Tripolis zusammen, obwohl dessen Repräsentanten nach den Juni-Wahlen aufgefordert worden waren, zurückzutreten. Von diesem islamistisch ausgerichteten GNC (General National Congress), der sich weigerte, die Legitimität der neuen Versammlung, das Repräsentantenhaus, anzuerkennen, wurde der pro-islamistische Politiker Omar Al-Hasi am 25. August zum Premierminister gewählt. Die „Dawn of Libya“ sicherte ihm die Kontrolle über Tripolis.

 Im neu gewählten Parlament hatten Liberale und Föderalisten die Mehrheit. Die wenigen dort noch vertretenen islamistischen Kräfte boykottierten das jetzt in Tobruk tagende, international anerkannt Parlament. Im September wurde dort Abdullah Al-Thani zum Premierminister gewählt.

 Ab jetzt gab es in Libyen zwei Parlamente, zwei Regierungen und zwei Premierminister.

 Einem Paukenschlag kam die Nachricht vom 6. November gleich, als das Oberste Gericht in Tripolis die Wahl des Tobruk-Parlaments als verfassungswidrig bezeichnete. Das Urteil selbst scheint kaum anfechtbar, allerdings sind die Umstände, unter denen es zustande kam, mehr als dubios. Drei Richter waren zurückgetreten, die damit ihr Leben und das ihrer Familien riskierten. Verbleibende Richter wurden mit auf ihren Kopf zielenden Gewehren zur Zustimmung genötigt. Der Druck durch die in Tripolis herrschende „Dawn of Libya“ war enorm.

 Die Regierung von Tobruk gab dazu keine Stellungnahme ab. Sie hatte General Al-Haftar in die libysche Armee aufgenommen und nachdem sich ein Großteil der pro-libyschen, säkularen Kräfte in den Osten des Landes zurückgezogen hatten, konnte dieser ebenso wie Bengasi weitgehend von islamistischen Milizen befreit werden.

 Bei allen militärischen Aktionen in Libyen taucht immer wieder der Name des Generalmajors Khalifa Al-Haftar auf. Doch wer ist dieser Al-Haftar eigentlich? Wenn man den aus Bengasi stammenden Haftar als eine schillernde Figur bezeichnet, ist dies eine äußerst schmeichelhafte Umschreibung. Bereits 1988 gründete der einstige Mitstreiter Gaddafis mit Unterstützung der CIA die Libyan National Army (LNA), die den Sturz Gaddafis zum Ziel hatte. Nachdem dieses Unterfangen gescheitert war, lebte Haftar die nächsten zwanzig Jahre in der Stadt Falls Church in Virginia/USA. Dieser Ort befindet sich in nächster Nähe von Langley, dem Standort des CIA-Hauptquartiers. Von dort führte Haftar LNA-Aktivitäten durch.http://english.pravda.ru/world/africa/03-06-2014/127716-general_haftar-0/

Anfang 2011 kehrte Haftar, der einen amerikanischen Pass besitzt, nach Libyen zurück. Er wurde am 17. März 2011 zum Oberkommandierenden der „Rebellen“ ernannt und kämpfte mit einer eigenen Miliz auf Seiten der Nato gegen die Jamahirija. Damit zeichnet er mitverantwortlich für all die Leiden, die seitdem über das libysche Volk hereingebrochen sind.

 Der Libyer Al-Fatah schätzt Al-Haftar wie folgt ein: „Als die FUKUS (F/UK/US) erkennen mussten, dass ein libyscher„failed state“ [A.d.Ü: in dem sich die IS auszubreiten anschickte] nicht wirklich in ihrem Sinne war, finanzierten sie Haftar, damit dieser im Februar 2014 einen Staatsstreich organisieren sollte. Haftar wurde von den Libyern nicht anerkannt, sondern allgemein scharf verurteilt. Er musste in Tripolis im Haus der amerikanischen Botschafterin Deborah Jones Zuflucht suchen, bis er von den USA/CIA herausgeholt und mit dem Schiff nach Bengasi gebracht werden konnte. Dort erhielt er jede nur erdenkliche Unterstützung zur Ausrüstung der Armee, Flugzeuge, Militär- und Public-Relation-Berater. Ein Teil der  Nationalarmee schloss sich ihm an und gemeinsam mit ihr führte er im Mai 2014 einen zweiten Staatsstreich durch. Anschließend forderten ihn seine Militär- und PR-Berater zu einer Stellungnahme auf, in der er eingestand, dass nur die Jamahirija-Revolution von 1969 [unter Gaddafi] eine echte Revolution gewesen sei, die außerdem ohne Blutvergießen stattgefunden habe, während es sich bei der „Revolution“ des „17. Februar“ (Gruppierung benannt nach den Vorgängen vom 17. Februar 2011) um keine echte Revolution gehandelt habe, denn sie hätte nur mit Hilfe einer ausländischen Intervention durchgeführt werden können, die mit der Bombardierung des Landes endete. Von dieser Stellungnahme Al-Haftars ließen sich die Libyer einige Wochen täuschen. Doch als Al-Haftar schon bei den ersten Widerständen, die ihm Ansar-Al-Sharia-Brigaden entgegensetzen, aus Bengasi flüchtete und die weiteren Kämpfe den Großen Stämmen und der Zivilbevölkerung überließ, war es schnell mit dem Glauben an Al-Haftar vorbei. Kein einziger Stammesführer traute ihm mehr, ebenso wenig die Regierung in Tobruk. Doch um die sogenannte FUKUS zufriedenzustellen und um endlich den Frieden in Libyen wiederherstellen zu können, wurde Haftar aus diplomatischen Gründen die offizielle Führungsrolle überlassen. Tatsächlich verfügt Haftar nur über einige hundert Soldaten, die seinem Schutz dienen, während die Großen Stämme kämpfen und das Land säubern… Obwohl Haftar über keinerlei Führungsqualitäten verfügt und von den Kämpfen in Bengasi kilometerweit entfernt war, soll er nun von der sogenannten FUKUS zum Helden hochstilisiert werden. Doch Haftar ist und bleibt ein Mann der CIA.“ Soweit Al-Fatah.

 Inzwischen darf die Erwähnung Al-Haftars in kaum einer westlichen Berichterstattung über die Vorgänge in Libyen fehlen, er wird sogar als „moderner Gaddafi“ gepriesen, als starker Mann, der mit seiner „Operation Karama“ (Würde) wieder die Ordnung im Land herstellen soll. Nun will Al-Haftar auf Weisung des Ministerpräsidenten Al-Thani mit der Bodenoffensive zur Befreiung von Tripolis aus den Händen des „Dawn of Libya“ beginnen. Erste Kämpfe sind bereits im Gange.

 Keine Frage, dass der ägyptische Machthaber el-Sisi die Regierung in Tobruk und die Nationalarmee gegen den „Dawn of Libya“ unterstützt, ebenso wie dies die Regierung in Algerien tut, die die Grenze nach Libyen für Hilfslieferungen und den Transport von Verwundeten geöffnet hat. Und auch keine Frage, dass auf der Gegenseite Katar und die Türkei den „Dawn of Libya“ unterstützen.

 Interessant erscheint in diesem Zusammenhang die Nachricht, dass Malta seine Botschafter aus Tripolis vor wenigen Tagen auf Grund der sich verschlechternden Sicherheitslage abgezogen hat. Malta bemühte sich, zwischen den beiden verfeindeten libyschen Regierungen zu vermitteln. Doch nun waren die maltesischen Diplomaten von Premierminister Al-Thani in Tobruk gewarnt worden, sich auf keinerlei Gespräche mit dem GNC in Tripolis mehr einzulassen.

 Welche Rolle spielen die USA? Schon im Juli musste die amerikanische Botschaft aus Tripolis evakuiert werden. Heute residiert Botschafterin Deborah Jones auf Malta. Sie hält gute Kontakte zum islamistischen Parlament in Tripolis und nur vereinzelt welche zur Tobruk-Regierung. Die Unterstützung für die „Dawn of Libya“ wurde nie eingestellt, andererseits wird von den USA auch CIA-Mann Al-Haftar mit Geld, Waffen und auf jede andere erdenkliche Weise unterstützt, genau jener Haftar, der gerade gegen Tripolis und den „Dawn of Libya“ marschiert. Die Sache komplett absurd erscheinen lässt die neueste Nachricht, dass Al-Haftar und die USA angeblich ihre Allianz gelöst hätten.

 Ebenfalls wurde gemeldet, die IS würde laut US-Militärangaben nun Ausbildungslager im Osten Libyens aufbauen. Tatsächlich wird die Stadt Derna vom IS kontrolliert und es befindet sich dort ebenfalls ein Trainingslager. Allerdings gehen die Nationale Libysche Armee und die Großen Stämme davon aus, diese Plätze spätestens im nächsten Jahr zurückerobern zu können. Der Osten Libyens wird ansonsten weitgehend von den säkularen Kräften kontrolliert. Und Ägypten wird an seiner Grenze bestimmt keine IS-Kämpfer dulden.

 Wie wird Libyen aus all diesem Durcheinander hervorgehen? Das libysche Volk hat eine lange Tradition der Resistance. Es widerstand den italienischen Kolonisatoren und dem Ausverkauf durch das Königshaus Idris. So bleibt zu hoffen, dass es auch in dieser schwierigen Lage in der Nachfolge Omar Muktars und Muamar Gaddafis sein Land gegen fremde Mächte und Interessen zu verteidigen weiß.

 

Editor’s Note:

I would like to thank publicly the Internet newspaper Der Freitag Politik and Angelika Gutsche for all the interviews they have done with me and allowed a Libyan voice other than the Libyan Western puppets and without censorship to talk about the truth and what is really happening in Libya. Hoping that other newspapers of the west will follow suit and do the right thing for once and write the truth and not what their governments and corporate organizations tell them too. 

original link: https://www.freitag.de/autoren/gela/2-parlamente-2-regierungen-ein-general/@@view