United Nations attract “terrorists” to the Libyan dialogue table


United Nations attract “terrorists” to the Libyan dialogue table

The continuance of the  Libyan dialogue tours in neighboring Morocco and Algeria, aimed at ending the country’s war, the United Nations faces, dialogue sponsor, severe criticism from inside and outside Libya, due to the inclusion of some characters is accepted in the negotiations.

By regional observers believe that one of the aims of the United Nations envoy to Libya Bernardino Leon, next to the imposing on the Libyan authority, figures have terrorist records, or supporting armed groups it considers the Libyan government internationally recognized “terrorist groups.”

Highlights among these names Abdelhakim Belhadj is currently Chairman of National Party, Amir LIFG previously, which has a history full of links with terrorist groups and now sworn allegiance to Isis/Daesh.

UN REPRESENTATIVE LYON TOGETHER WITH THE MOST WANTED TERRORIST ABDULHAKIM BELHAJ

UN REPRESENTATIVE LYON TOGETHER WITH THE MOST WANTED TERRORIST ABDULHAKIM BELHAJ

RESPONSIBLE FOR: THE GARGOUR MASSACRE, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OF TRIPOLI, THE USE OF WHITE PHOSPHORUS IN BAN WALID, TAWERGHA GENOCIDE AND MISPLACEMENT, RAPES, KIDNAPPING, TARGET KILLING WHO EVER DISAGREES WITH THEM, EXPLOSIONS OF OIL FIELDS, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, ORGAN TRAFFICKING, ORPHAN CHILDREN TRAFFICKING. THEY ARE A GREAT BUNCH THE MOST HATED LIBYANS IN LIBYA

RESPONSIBLE FOR: THE GARGOUR MASSACRE, INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT OF TRIPOLI, THE USE OF WHITE PHOSPHORUS IN BAN WALID, TAWERGHA GENOCIDE AND MISPLACEMENT, RAPES, KIDNAPPING, TARGET KILLING WHO EVER DISAGREES WITH THEM, EXPLOSIONS OF OIL FIELDS, HUMAN TRAFFICKING, ORGAN TRAFFICKING, ORPHAN CHILDREN TRAFFICKING. THEY ARE A GREAT BUNCH THE MOST HATED LIBYANS IN LIBYA

belhaj_mccain_libya_terrorists_

LEADER OF LIFG, RIGHT HAND OF BIN LADEN, CIA & MI6 AGENT, & Sworn allegiance to Isis which make him the LEADER OF DAESH, LEADER OF LIBYAN DAWN, NOW LEADER OF ISIS/DAESH IN LIBYA, GOVERNOR OF TRIPOLI WAS PUT THERE BY NATO, OWNS HIS OWN MILITARY AIRPORT IN TRIPOLI THE METIGA AIRPORT, HAS BILLIONS STASHED AWAY IN FOREIGN BANKS IS THE BEST FRIEND WITH THE IDIOTIC SENATOR McCain & HILLARY CLINTON. THE GO TO MAN FROM AMBASSADOR STEVENS, DEBORAH JONES, ENGLISH AMBASSADOR MICHAEL AARON  AND HE IS THE MOST HATED MAN IN LIBYA.

LEADER OF LIFG, RIGHT HAND OF BIN LADEN, CIA & MI6 AGENT, & Sworn allegiance to Isis which make him the LEADER OF DAESH, LEADER OF LIBYAN DAWN, NOW LEADER OF ISIS/DAESH IN LIBYA, GOVERNOR OF TRIPOLI WAS PUT THERE BY NATO, OWNS HIS OWN MILITARY AIRPORT IN TRIPOLI THE METIGA AIRPORT, HAS BILLIONS STASHED AWAY IN FOREIGN BANKS IS THE BEST FRIEND WITH THE IDIOTIC SENATOR McCain & HILLARY CLINTON. THE GO TO MAN FROM AMBASSADOR STEVENS, DEBORAH JONES, ENGLISH AMBASSADOR MICHAEL AARON AND HE IS THE MOST HATED MAN IN LIBYA.

Belhadj  participated in the fighting in Afghanistan in 1988, and in 1994 he returned to Libya to re-establish the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group(LIFG) assisted by MI6 within its ranks the training and financing of its members to prepare for “jihad against the Gaddafi regime”, in the first waves of the return of what was known as the “Arab mujahideen.” However, the Libyan authorities raided the training centers in 1995, and killed one of the leaders Abdul Rahman Hattab, while Belhadj with the help of MI6 was able to flee to Afghanistan, and there he was named the new leader of the Libyan Fighting Group, which rearranged its ranks in Afghanistan.

In 2004, Belhadj was arrested in Malaysia intervention of the US and British intelligence, and was deported to Libya on March 8, 2004, by the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood to mediate for his release and was released for one year in-house arrest after Belhaj betrayed all his comrades when they were captured he was a free citizen to travel as he pleases so he was a free man since 2005 and not as the western media says that he was released in 2010.

Mohammed Sawan Chairman of Justice and Construction Party(Brotherhood) between sitting at the table of dialogue, to raise the controversy at the United Nations on the intentions of the Libyan government and its image to be formed.

He insists the AKP and construction to support the rebels Benghazi Shura Council, which implements the attacks against army troops in the eastern city that was the cradle of the Libyan revolution against the late Colonel system, note that the Board has classified the legitimate government as a terrorist group.

In spite of the Justice and Development Party in spinning Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries data, the latter insists that he “would not accept the project of democracy or democratic parties (…) This includes parties that claim to represent Islam.”

There are several clues about the link between the Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries leaders, organizing “Isis/Daash” who took advantage of the chaos in Libya and began publishing their influence in several cities, including near Benghazi, Derna.

The presence of the President of the party of change Juma Aalghemati between negotiators Libyans, indicating the inclusion of weak political parties.  Aalghemati was dismissed from the party leadership, and thus has NO qualifications that led him to represent the Libyan political bloc in the dialogue.

Aalghemati also supports the rebels Benghazi Shura Council, which seeks to rule the Benghazi based on strict interpretations of Islamic law, and he wants free of any political parties or democratic appearances.

Africom’s War on Libya


Africom’s War on Libya

In this excerpt from Bob Coen and Eric Nadler’s film “Shadow War of the Sahara”, broadcast on the Franco-German channel ARTE charts the rise of the U.S.military’s AFRICA COMAND (AFRICOM). This excerpt reveals why AFRICOM’s chief critic, Libya’s Mohammar Gaddafi, had to be removed from power for the project to succeed.

NATO is Building Up for War


NATO is Building Up for War

undefined

The German city of Frankfurt is continental Europe’s largest financial center and host to the country’s Stock Exchange, countless other financial institutions, and the headquarters of the European Central Bank (ECB) which is responsible for administering the monetary policy of the 18-nation Eurozone. The place is awash with money, as demonstrated by the plush new ECB office building which is costing a fortune.

The original price of the bank’s enormous palace was supposed to be 500 million euros, about 550 million dollars, but the bill has now been admitted as €1.3 billion (£930 m; $1.4 bn). This absurdly over-expensive fiasco was directed by the people who are supposed to steer the financial courses of 18 nations and their half billion unfortunate citizens. If the ECB displays similar skill sets in looking after Europe’s money as it has in controlling the cost of constructing its huge twin-tower headquarters, then Europe is in for a rocky time.

Intriguingly, the Bank isn’t alone in contributing to Europe’s bureaucratic building boom. There is another Europe-based organization of equal ambition, pomposity and incompetence which is building a majestically expensive and luxurious headquarters with a mammoth cost overrun about which it is keeping very quiet indeed.

The perpetrator of this embarrassing farce is NATO, the US-Canada-European North Atlantic Treaty Organization which is limping out of Afghanistan licking its wounds, having been fighting a bunch of sandal-wearing rag-clad amateur irregulars who gave the hi-tech forces of the West a very hard time in a war whose outcome was predictable. But the debacle hasn’t dimmed the vision of the zealous leaders of NATO who are confronting Russia in order to justify the existence of their creaking, leaking, defeated dinosaur. Their problem is not only do they lose wars, but they then look for another one to fight — to be directed from a glittery new and vastly expensive building whose cost has soared above all estimates.

Just like NATO’s wars.

NATO’s operation “Unified Protector” to overthrow Libyan leader Muammar Gadhafi involved a massive aerial blitz of 9,658 airstrikes which ended with the gruesome murder of Gadhafi — and caused collapse of Libya into an omnishambles where fanatics of the barbarous Islamic State are now establishing themselves.

In spite of the horror of NATO’s Libyan catastrophe one does have to have a quiet smile about Ivo H. Daalder and James G Stavridis whose deeply researched analysis in the journal Foreign Affairs in 2012 was titled “NATO’s Victory in Libya.” These sages declared that “NATO’s operation in Libya has rightly been hailed as a model intervention . . . NATO’s involvement in Libya demonstrated that the alliance remains an essential source of stability . . . NATO may not be able to replicate its success in Libya in another decade. NATO members must therefore use the Chicago summit to strengthen the alliance by ensuring that the burden sharing that worked so well in Libya — and continues in Afghanistan today — becomes the rule, not the exception.”

Not much is working well in either Libya or Afghanistan two years after the Daalder-Stavridis advocacy of “burden sharing” and it is obvious that NATO has been the opposite of a “source of stability” in both unfortunate countries.

In October 2005 I wrote that “NATO is to increase its troop numbers in Afghanistan to 15,000 and its secretary-general states that instead of acting as a peacekeeping force it will assume the combat role of US troops, which is insane . . .  The insurgency in Afghanistan will continue until foreign troops leave, whenever that might be. After a while, the government in Kabul will collapse and there will be anarchy until a brutal, ruthless, drug-rich warlord achieves power. He will rule the country as it has always been ruled by Afghans: by threats, religious ferocity, deceit, bribery, and outright savagery when the latter can be practiced without retribution. And the latest foreign occupation will become just another memory.”

The number of US-NATO troops in Afghanistan has been reduced from a high of 130,000 to 13,000, of which some 10,000 are US, but NATO’s new headquarters building in Brussels is expanding in both size and cost. The budget for the immense complex was approved at 460 million Euros (500 million US dollars) in 2010 but has now surged to over 1.25 billion Euros, about 1.4 billion dollars.

Germany’s Der Spiegel reported in January that the scandal of the cost overrun was being kept secret by all governments contributing to this redundant organization. A leaked cable from Germany’s ambassador explained that at a meeting of NATO representatives last December they “pointed to the disastrous effect on the image of the alliance if construction were to stop and if NATO appeared to be incapable of punctually completing a construction project that was decided at the NATO summit of government leaders in April 1999 in Washington. The risk of a further cost increase is already palpable.”

The solution to NATO’s self-imposed image problem was simple : the people responsible for managing the affairs of a military alliance involving 28 countries, 3.5 million combatants and 5,000 nuclear weapons decided, as asked by the staff of its Secretary General, to deal with the matter “confidentially.” In other words, the cost overruns and delays in construction are being deliberately concealed from the public in the hope that NATO’s executives will not appear incompetent.

Meantime, while trying to conceal their flaws, faults and failings in management of basic administrative affairs, NATO’s chiefs are squaring up to Russia in an attempt to persuade the world that President Putin is about to mount an invasion from the east. The focal point of NATO’s contrived alarm is the corrupt and chaotic regime in power in Ukraine, which has serious disagreements with Russia and is therefore energetically supported by the United States to the point of distortion, menace, and mendacity.

As reported in the UK’s Daily Telegraph on March 4, the commander of US troops in Europe, General Frederick “Ben” Hodges, has accused Russia of having 12,000 troops inside eastern Ukraine, which was irresponsible nonsense.

Hodges was formerly the army’s Congressional Liaison Officer in Washington where he obviously acquired a taste for political grandstanding, as in a political speech of the sort that generals have no right to make he declared that “We have to raise the cost for Putin. Right now he has 85 per cent domestic support. But when mothers start seeing their sons come home dead, when the price goes up, domestic support goes down,” which was as offensive as it was hostile.

In February the Wall Street Journal reported Hodges as saying “I believe the Russians are mobilizing right now for a war that they think is going to happen in five or six years—not that they’re going to start a war in five or six years, but I think they are anticipating that things are going to happen, and that they will be in a war of some sort, of some scale, with somebody within the next five or six years.” Just what President Putin was supposed to make of that is anyone’s guess — but it is certain that Hodges’ bellicose meanderings did nothing to persuade Moscow that there would be any attempt by the US-NATO coalition to modify its policy of uncompromising enmity.

Other pronouncements by NATO leaders have been equally threatening and intended to convince the public of western Europe that Russia attacked Ukraine.

But even if Russia had indeed invaded Ukraine, it would have had nothing whatever to do with anyone else.

The US-NATO coalition willfully ignores the fact that Ukraine is not a member of either the European Union or NATO and has no treaty of any sort with any nation in the world that would require provision of political, economic or military support in the event of a bilateral dispute with any other country. Yet NATO has seized upon the Ukraine-Russia discord to justify its policy of unrelenting hostility to Moscow.

NATO should have been disbanded at the time of the collapse of the Soviet Union because that threat was the sole reason for its existence; but it decided to multiply membership and extend its military presence closer and closer to Russia’s borders. There is little wonder that Russia is apprehensive about NATO’s intentions, as the muscle-flexing coalition lurches towards conflict.

NATO’S Supreme Commander, US General Breedlove, has also contributed greatly to tension and fear in Europe by issuing dire warnings about Russia’s supposed maneuvers. On March 5 he indulged in fantasy by claiming, without a shred of evidence and no subsequent proof, that Russia had deployed “well over a thousand combat vehicles” along with “combat forces, some of their most sophisticated air defense, battalions of artillery” within Ukraine. This pronouncement was similar to his downright lie of November 18, 2014, when he told the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung that there were “regular Russian army units in eastern Ukraine.”

The swell of anti-Russian propaganda, confrontation and attempted intimidation by NATO has increased, and if it continues to do so it is likely that Moscow will take action, thereby upping the stakes and the danger even more. It is time that NATO’s nations came to terms with the reality that Russia is a major international power with legitimate interests in its own region. Moscow is not going to bow the knee in the face of immature threats by sabre-rattling US generals and their swaggering acolytes. It is time for NATO to forge ties rather than destroy them — and to build bridges rather than glitzy office blocks.

Green resistance News Libya 7 April, 2015


Green resistance News Libya 7 April, 2015

SO HASSI THE TAXI DRIVER FROM THE USA & LATER CIA ASSET WAS FIRED!!! Head of Islamist Tripoli government fired


SO HASSI THE TAXI DRIVER FROM THE USA & LATER CIA ASSET WAS FIRED!!! Head of Islamist Tripoli government fired

I am so sad, crying my eyes out for this great loss. How could the Islamist assholes fire the false prime minister Hassi at the age of 66 what will he do now? Does anyone know who the blip Hassi is? Let me inform you before I post the article from BBC a significant article while they were his backers for a long time. So Mr. Hassi claims that he was a political science lecturer at the University of Benghazi but does not explain when was that, when he was in exile for over 25 years in the United States and working as a TAXI DRIVER it seems his education wasn’t good enough to work in a University in the United States… So this NOTORIUS so-called Islamist who drinks alcohol decided along with Abdulhakem Belhaj, another “world renowned” terrorist and Al Qaeda leader, were the founders of the Islamic Armed Movement in 1993, better known as H.M.S.  This man Al Hassi is a known terrorist and yet the western allies and the US continue to speak with him like he deserves some kind of respect. You can see that from all western newspapers acknowledging him as a Prime Minister of Tripoli, really!!! How grand is that?

This man together with Belhaj are responsible for all the disasters that have happened in Tripoli since August 2014, they are holding hostage the capital of Libya just because the can and its done with the blessings of the UN/USA and the American Safira Deborah Jones.

So here is what I think has happened, Obama, Leon, Cameron and Hollande are exhausted in waiting for him to control the whole of Libya and especially the oil fields… most probably they have realized that the MB and its fraction does not have the power to take over and control the tribes like the Late Qaddafi. Europe is in a distress call over the Isis/Daesh gang taking a more important role in Libya which means that it is very easy to slip into Europe something England and France do not want although together with their counterpart Obama have financed it. So while reading all the articles about the sacking of Hassi the conclusion was that the islamic salvation shit came under pressure to fire Hassi and they presented with “the allegations he misled parliament about government finances.” This is not an allegation it is a known fact, all these so-called islamists have become multimillionaires all their money has been transferred abroad. Actually Abdulhakim Belhaj is the richest of them all he owns an airport, a small island, owns a liar jet, has his own security, finances a few militias these are the few things I can remember for this terrorist who is also in the Islamic salvation shit and has brought Libya on to its knees….. The allies(colonizers) are seeing that their dream is going up on flames and they are nowhere near their goal so they have to shuffle the cards and put new puppets who have the balls to extinguish every single Libyan citizen to their graves so that they can control an empty country. Enough with my ranting, despair of the loss of such a great man and on with the article.

Omar al-Hassi speaks during the funeral for slain Fajr Libya leader Saleh Al-Baraki at Martyrs" Square in Tripoli , Libya, 22 March 2015.

Omar al-Hassi was appointed head of Libya’s alternative government in August

 


The leader of one of Libya’s rival governments – backed by Islamists and based in Tripoli – has been sacked by its parliament, officials say.

Omar al-Hassi was appointed in August to lead an alternative government after Islamist militia seized the capital.

MPs voted to oust him on Tuesday following allegations he misled parliament about government finances.

Libya has been in turmoil since the Nato-backed removal of former leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011.

The country has had two governments and parliaments since Islamist militia seized Tripoli in August and established the General National Congress (GNC) that was led by Mr al-Hassi. (At one point it say’s the recognized government and then goes on blabbing about 2 governments)

The seizure of Tripoli forced Libya’s existing and internationally recognised government to flee to the eastern city of Tobruk.

The rival parliaments have been holding UN-sponsored talks in Morocco in an attempt to end a period of lawlessness which many fear could strengthen militants allied to Islamic State.

GNC spokesman Omar Humeidan told reporters Mr al-Hassi was removed after an investigation revealed he had exaggerated the government’s revenues, amid complaints it could not afford to pay salaries.

“The head of the government was dismissed by the parliament in a vote on Tuesday that was backed by the rest of the ministers,” a member of the parliament told AFP.

One of his Mr al-Hassi’s aides, Khalifa Ghweil, has reportedly taken over as interim leader.