Post activists on the social networking site Facebook video showing the leader of the Muslim Brotherhood movement in Zawiya, Osama Kaabar preaching at a group belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood in Libya their defeat in the parliamentary elections, it induced them to go to war. They have waged war on the city of Tripoli, and explains
“democracy we are the losers and will not let them build their state (meaning Tripoli), we set the country free now we are escalating in any form, we have sacrificed and still sacrifice, and I swear to God that we will not allow them to build the country only over our dead bodies, those of our state we are. “
Editors comment: the man has gone crazy his ranting talking about democracy which they lost but still insists that they have to take over Tripoli, he wants an Islamic extremist state…. well in truth its not him he is just a puppet but his buddies the CIA, MI6 & MOSSAD who are his masters. It seems to me he can not comprehend the word “DEMOCRACY” he thinks it means “Dictatorial Democracy of the West” the same way the Western World can not comprehend the word “Anti – Semite” which means hating All ARABS, JEWS, ASIANS AND AFRICANS.
ROME, SEPTEMBER 29 – LUG Western diplomats continue to flee Libya collapsing into uncontrollable spiral of chaos while in the area of Tripoli is a risk of catastrophe due to fires in the chain of fuel depots affected by a rocket during clashes between rival factions.
After the Americans – who left the Libyan capital three days ago – to get a message to leave yesterday were German and Austrian diplomats. It remains to Tripoli Italian Ambassador Giuseppe Buccino, unique among Westerners. Foreign Minister Federica Mogherini asked to “bring back international efforts in Libya to coordinate the UN to stop the violence,”while Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, in a letter to Senate Majority recalls that Libya among other things “for us Italian is the closest problem “among the many fronts of international crisis.
Barack Obama convened a conference call yesterday on the theaters of war – Ukraine, the Middle East and Libya – which was attended by Angela Merkel, Francois Hollande, David Cameron and the same Renzi. And ‘necessary immediate ceasefire between the militias in Tripoli have pointed out the five leaders, condemning any use of violence to attack civilians, intimidate officials, or stop the political process in the country. Shortly after Renzi had a meeting with Ban Ki-moon to which “in line with the outcomes of the conference call,” he asked, “play an active role to encourage the cessation of hostilities and the start of a political dialogue between the different parties. After that the other day 100 Italians had left Libya, both Berlin and London were both invited its citizens to leave, even among 3,000 Filipino doctors and nurses have left the country, causing the reaction of the Ministry of Health, concerned about the shortage of health carepersonnel.
Meanwhile, in the area around Tripoli, ***(where Misurata militias favored by the west and Qatar are) fighting for control of the airport, a deposit of oil caught fire and may explode after a rocket hit a tank. flames have spread to a second tank and the fire department, said the spokesman of the National Oil Company, Mohamed al-Hrari, they “finally left the area because of the fighting” in the last two weeks have made nearly a hundred dead and 400 injured. Libyan government warns that there will be likely a “humanitarian catastrophe and environmental consequences are difficult to predict” because the fire is “out of control”, and invites people to leave the area because there is a risk of a “big explosion” within a few kilometers.And there are many who hope that the new Libyan Parliament elected on June 25, and that should start working on August 4, is able to stop the violence ***(keep on dreaming they will do nothing). Also the new headquarters in Benghazi where only yesterday there were 38 deaths in clashes between Libyan special forces and armed Islamist groups.
After our repeated appeals on the page and the efforts of Jurists Libyans and political activists announce you that the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has opened the file of crimes against humanity in Libya so please from anyone who has information about the
Gharghour massacre in Tripoli
or Alkwyfah in Benghazi
or Tripoli airport and the destruction of the bombing of Qasr Ben Ghashir
or other crimes against humanity
for them to provide the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court on the following email
WHEN THE JAMAHIRYIA WAS IN POWER WE NEVER HAD INCIDENTS LIKE THESE SHOWN IN PICTURES
The Globalists and its allies wanted to change the Jamahirya government because 1. They could. 2. Qaddafi was a thorn in their eyes. 3. Africom could not persuade the Jamahirya government to abide with Africom’s destruction and enslavement of the African nations. 4. Libyan resources such as oil, water, uranium,gold can not be ruled by a handful of six and a half million Libyans. 5. To the majority of Western Countries Libyans are primitive and stupid.
So when the PRIMITIVE & STUPID Libyans together with the Jamahirya came up with the idea of the GOLD DINAR in selling our resources for Libya and the whole African Continent it was a BIG NO! NO! FOR THE GLOBALISTS who control most of the continents. The Globalists need their slaves and no one defies them, if that was going to happen: that meant that the petrodollar would seize to exist which meant that America & Israel would go bankrupt. Thus the illegal war in Libya and installing imported JIHADISTS LIKE AL QAEDA, LIFG, ANSAR ALSHARAIA IN Governmental posts. I could write a book for the million reasons that the Globalists do not want that. I am sure that my readers are intelligent enough to read between the lines. So I will stop writing and let you see in pictures the destruction the Misurati militias have done in Tripoli and Zanzur.
Before I post the pictures of the mass destruction done in Zanzur and in the international airport of Tripoli by the Misurata Militia “Another NATO revolutionaries. scandals. The shame give orders to the Central Bank of Libya granted 55 million dinars, of the Misurata militia expenses in its war on the inhabitants of Tripoli.
The U.S. capture of an alleged al-Qaeda terror leader in Libya underscores the failure of the major news media to give the public the full story during the military intervention that led to Muammar Gaddafi’s ouster and murder. Mainstream journalists behaved more like propagandists, as Robert Parry reported in 2011.
By Robert Parry (Published on Sept. 15, 2011)
During the six-month uprising against Muammar Gaddafi, major U.S. news outlets repeated again and again that the Libyan dictator was behind the 1988 bombing of Pan Am 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, and they ignored warnings that militant Islamists were at the core of the anti-Gaddafi rebel army.
Indeed, for Americans to get alternative views on these points, they had to search out Web sites, like Consortiumnews.com, which had the audacity not to march in lockstep with the rest of the Western media. Only outside the mainstream press would you find significant questions asked about the certainty over Libya’s guilt in the Pan Am bombing and about the makeup of the rebels.
Libyan Ali al-Megrahi, whose conviction as the “Lockerbie bomber” remains a point of historical dispute.
Now, after the United States and its NATO allies have engineered the desired “regime change” in Libya – under the pretext of “protecting civilians” – those two points are coming more into focus. The New York Times and the Washington Post finally acknowledged that radical Islamists, including some with links to al-Qaeda, are consolidating their power inside the new regime in Tripoli.
And, the proverbial dog not barking – even as Libya’s secret intelligence files have been exposed to the eyes of Western journalists – is the absence of any incriminating evidence regarding Libya’s role in the Lockerbie case. Earlier interrogations of Libya’s ex-intelligence chief Moussa Koussa by Scottish authorities also apparently came up empty,as he was allowed to leave London for Qatar.
Since Gaddafi’s fall, news outlets also have reported that Libyan intelligence agent, Ali al-Megrahi, who was convicted of the Lockerbie bombing by a Scottish court and was later released on humanitarian grounds because of terminal prostate cancer, is indeed gravely ill, bedridden and seemingly near death. [He died May 20, 2012.]
Megrahi’s trial in 2001 before a panel of Scottish judges was more a kangaroo court than any serious effort to determine guilt – even a Scottish appeals court expressed concern about a grave miscarriage of justice– but the Western press continues to describe Megrahi, without qualification, as the “Lockerbie bomber.”
It also was common in the West’s news media to smirk at the notion that Megrahi was truly suffering from advanced prostate cancer since he hadn’t died as quickly as some doctors thought he might. After Gaddafi’s regime fell, Megrahi’s family invited BBC and other news organizations to see Megrahi struggling to breathe in his sick bed.
His son, Khaled al-Megrahi, also continued to insist on his father’s innocence. “He believes and we know that everybody will see the truth,” the younger Megrahi told the BBC. “I know my father is innocent and one day his innocence will come out.”
Asked about the people who died in the bombing, the son said: “We feel sorry about all the people who died. We want to know who did this bad thing. We want to know the truth as well.”
Convicted or Railroaded?
As more information becomes available inside Libya, the facts may finally be clarified about whether Gaddafi’s government did or did not have a hand in the bombing over Lockerbie. However, so far, the indications are that Megrahi may well have been railroaded by the Scottish judges who found a second Libyan defendant innocent and were under political pressure to convict someone for the crime.
After Megrahi’s curious conviction, the West imposed harsh economic sanctions on Libya, agreeing to lift them only if Libya accepted “responsibility” for the bombing and paid restitution to the families of the 270 victims. To get rid of the punishing sanctions, Libya accepted the deal although its officials continued to insist that Libya had nothing to do with the Lockerbie bombing.
However, amid the 2011 propaganda campaign in support of the Libyan rebels, none of this uncertainty was mentioned in the New York Times, the Washington Post or other leading U.S. news outlets. Gaddafi’s guilt for Lockerbie was simply stated as flat fact, much as the same news organizations endorsed false claims about Iraq’s WMD in the run-up to the 2003 invasion of that Arab country.
Similarly, there was scant U.S. media attention given to evidence that eastern Libya, the heart of the anti-Gaddafi rebellion, was a hotbed for Islamic militancy with that region supplying the most per-capita militants fighting U.S. troops in Iraq, often under the banner of al-Qaeda.
Instead, Gaddafi’s claims that he was battling Islamic terrorists in the Benghazi region were widely mocked or ignored in the West. Even a report by analysts Joseph Felter and Brian Fishman for West Point’s Combating Terrorism Center got short-shrift.
In their report, “Al-Qaeda’s Foreign Fighters in Iraq,” Felter and Fishman analyzed al-Qaeda documents captured in 2007 showing personnel records of militants who flocked to Iraq for the war. The documents showed eastern Libya providing a surprising number of suicide bombers who traveled to Iraq to kill American troops.
Felter and Fishman wrote that these so-called Sinjar Records disclosed that while Saudis comprised the largest number of foreign fighters in Iraq, Libyans represented the largest per-capita contingent by far. Those Libyans came overwhelmingly from towns and cities in the east.
“The vast majority of Libyan fighters that included their hometown in the Sinjar Records resided in the country’s Northeast, particularly the coastal cities of Darnah 60.2% (53) and Benghazi 23.9% (21),” Felter and Fishman wrote.
The authors added that Abu Layth al‐Libi, Emir of Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), “reinforced Benghazi and Darnah’s importance to Libyan jihadis in his announcement that LIFG had joined al‐Qa’ida.”
Top Libyan Terrorists
Some important al-Qaeda leaders operating in Pakistan’s tribal regions also are believed to have come from Libya. For instance, “Atiyah,” who was guiding the anti-U.S. war strategy in Iraq, was identified as a Libyannamed Atiyah Abd al-Rahman.
It was Atiyah who urged a strategy of creating a quagmire for U.S. forces in Iraq, buying time for al-Qaeda headquarters to rebuild its strength in Pakistan. “Prolonging the war [in Iraq] is in our interest,” Atiyah said in a letter that upbraided Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi for his hasty and reckless actions in Iraq.
After U.S. Special Forces killed al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden on May 2, 2011, in Pakistan, Atiyah became al-Qaeda’s second in command until he himself was reportedly killed in a U.S. drone strike in August. [See Consortiumnews.com “Time Finally Ran Out for Atiyah.”] ***(Unfortunately Bin Laden had died of natural causes in 2002 or 2005 this has been proven, what they killed in May 1st 2011 is an unfortunate person who was not Bin Laden. Do a research and find out what happened to the CREW and SPECIAL FORCES who were involved in this escapade, If I am not mistaken they are all dead)
However, to most Americans relying on the major U.S. news media, little of this was known, as the Washington Post itself acknowledged in an article on Sept. 12, 2011. In an article on the rise of Islamists inside the new power structure in Libya, the Post wrote:
“Although it went largely unnoticed during the uprising that toppled Gaddafi last month, Islamists were at the heart of the fight, many as rebel commanders. Now some are clashing with secularists within the rebels’ Transitional National Council, prompting worries among some liberals that the Islamists — who still command the bulk of fighters and weapons — could use their strength to assert an even more dominant role.”
“In the emerging post-Qaddafi Libya, the most influential politician may well be Ali Sallabi, who has no formal title but commands broad respect as an Islamic scholar and populist orator who was instrumental in leading the mass uprising. The most powerful military leader is nowAbdel Hakim Belhaj, the former leader of a hard-line group once believed to be aligned with Al Qaeda.”
Belhajwas previously the commander of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which was associated with al-Qaeda in the past, maintained training bases in Afghanistan before the 9/11 attacks, and was listed as a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department.
Though Belhaj and the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group deny current allegiance to al-Qaeda, Belhaj was captured during George W. Bush’s post-9/11 “war on terror” and was harshly interrogated by the CIA at a “black site” prison in Thailand before being handed over to Gaddafi’s government which imprisoned and – Belhaj claims – tortured him. ****(he was not tortured stayed in prison only a year and then was on a house arrest)
The Times reported that “Belhaj has become so much an insider lately that he is seeking to unseatMahmoud Jibril, the American-trained economist who is the nominal prime minister of the interim government, after Mr. Jibril obliquely criticized the Islamists.”
The Times article by correspondents Rod Nordland and David D. Kirkpatrick also cited other recent developments of growing Islamist influence inside the Libyan rebel movement:
“Islamist militias in Libya receive weapons and financing directly from foreign benefactors like Qatar; a Muslim Brotherhood figure, Abel al-Rajazk Abu Hajar, leads the Tripoli Municipal Governing Council, where Islamists are reportedly in the majority; in eastern Libya, there has been no resolution of the assassination in July of the leader of the rebel military, Gen. Abdul Fattah Younes, suspected by some to be the work of Islamists.”
It may be commendable that the Post and Times finally gave serious attention to this unintended consequence of the NATO-backed “regime change” in Libya, but the fact that these premier American newspapers ignored the Islamist issue as well as doubts about Libya’s Lockerbie guilt – while the U.S. government was whipping up public support for another war in the Muslim world– raises questions about whether any lessons were learned from Iraq.
Do these prestige news outlets continue to see their role in such cases as simply getting the American people to line up behind the latest war against a Mideast “bad guy” – or will they ever take seriously their journalistic duty to arm the public with as much information as possible?
On A Constitutionalist Note....“The time is now near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves.” Father of Our Country - George Washington 1776..............................................................................In Memoriam: "War" - Andrew Breitbart - Father of Our New Media (1969-2012)
End Times Bible Prophecy and News, End Times Deception, Societal Collapse, Apostasy, False Teachers, whore of Babylon Church, Demonic Attacks, War, Rumors of War, Famine, Pestilence, Salvation in Jesus Christ, NWO, UFOs, Earthquakes, IHOP, False Christs, All Roads Lead to Rome, New World Order, Conspiracies, Nephilim, Giants, New Apostolic Reformation, heresies, Signs and Lying Wonders
Turning and turning in the widening gyre | The falcon cannot hear the falconer | Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold | Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world | The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere | The ceremony of innocence is drowned | The best lack all conviction, while the worst | Are full of passionate intensity. -- W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming