Libya Foreign reserves plundered stolen
A new intervention Threatens the devastated Libyan patriots after the martyr Gaddafi loyalists take full monitoring of southern Libya
Fighting has broken out again in southern and western Libya clashes as pro-Gaddafi forces Between Rebel Militias have resulted in the seizure of several cities and an air base by loyalist. These events led French Admiral Edouard Guillard to appeal for imperialist intervention in Libya Renewed denying they evolution along the southern border Could lead to a “terrorist threat.” (Washington Post, 27 January)
Guillard said any intervention would require the consent of the neocolonial regime in Tripoli headed by Prime Minister Ali Zeidan and General National Congress (GNC). Yet almost three years ago, the UN Security Council passed two resolutions impose an arms embargo on the Gaddafi government and “authorizes” the “fly zone”, a code word for a massive bombing campaign lasting eight months.
Since mid-January the allied forces REMAIN With the former political and economic system under the rule of Libya Colonel Muammar Gaddafi, who was overthrown and killed brutally in October 2011 amid the Pentagon and NATO bombing campaign monitoring took several cities and towns in the South. Sebha, a town in the area has-been the scene of clashes Between Two ethnic groups Tebu and Awlad Sulaiman.
Other areas include Affected by the fighting south Wirshefana Ajilat, Zawia and territory west of Zahra. Clashes have Also Been Reported around the capital Tripoli, where loyalist forces have Fought pitched battles with Militias and military forces are backed by the regime of GNC. ( Libya Herald, January 20)
The Tebu , are dark-skinned Africans, are in conflict over the monitoring of resources in Awlad Sulaiman. Their withdrawal airbase in Tamenhint created the conditions for taking this important location by pro-Gaddafi forces on January 21.
ACCORDING to a report published by the Saudi Gazette, “The Tamenhint airbase 30 km north-east of Sebha is Reported to be back in the hands of Gaddafi forces guarding after tebu Mourzouk Withdrew. They unilaterally Monday night (January 20), denying that the government was deliberately exploiting clashes between Sebha and Awlad Sulaiman TEBUS in order to divert attention from movements to replace it with a new administration. “(January 22)
These events sent shock waves through the GNC and its weak and vacillating prime minister who is allied With the United States and other imperialist states Were responsible for the installation of the current regime in power. During the counter-revolutionary uprising of 2011. Libya Situation Clearly Demonstrated That the current regime has failed to stabilize the country in the Militias Which Were Involved in criminal activities in defiance Zeidan and other “authorities” in Tripoli.
The oil industry, which is the main export of the state of North Africa, has-been Largely off workers after Militias and various drilling installations and ports have taken Control of the production and threaten to exercise trade with foreign companies without the consent of Tripoli. Zeidan Within the limited support has GNC and the Islamic Justice and Building Party (JCP) recently resigned from the government due to political Differences With the prime minister.
However, the events in the South, where the Green flag of the Jamahiriya is Openly flying in defiance of the regime supported by the West is Causing Panic Within the country. A new law prohibits satellite TV networks to broadcast news and commentary now for Gaddafi is a direct result of the unstable situation of GNC.
Draconian laws Enacted
AllAfrica.com Reported That “ Decree 5/2014, “Regarding cessation and prohibition of the Dissemination of a certain satellite channels, ‘passed by Parliament Libya’s General National Congress (GNC), 22 January instructs ministries of Foreign Affairs, Communications, and [the Mass ] Media to ‘take the Necessary Measures “to stop the transmission of all channels of satellite TV That are” hostile to the revolution February 17 and Whose purpose is to destabilize the country and create divisions Among Libyans. ” It further instructs the government to ” Take All Measures against companies in the states or territories from the Which channels are broadcast if not block the transmission of These stations. ”(January 26)
This legal prohibition Seems destined to block satellite stations that have taken a pro-Gaddafi position in publishing its content. Such stations include channel al-Khadra and al-Jamahiriya.
Discontent is growing Among the Libyan population to the current situation. The most prosperous nation in Africa, with a standard of living That exceed several states in Europe, the conditions inside the country have the counter-revolution Deteriorated Dramatically since 2011.
This decline in living standards, the failure of the regime to reign in the Militias terrorizing the population, the collapse of the oil industry and Widespread corruption has even developed EXTENSIVE reviews Favored Among the elites. Another decree was issued in January, which prohibits scholarship students and employees to speak out against the conditions prevailing in Libya.
In the same article published by AllAfrica.com, notes That “ the Libyan government ADOPTED Resolution 13/2014 of 24 January to suspend scholarships to students studying abroad and salaries and bonuses to employees of Libya, for “participate in activities Contrary to the February 17 revolution of “which is Widely Considered to be comprehensive statements and protests against the current government . The Libyan embassies abroad and others are asked to Develop lists of names and refer to the Attorney General for trial. “
Imperialism in Crisis
These Developments in Libya show That there is no benefit for the masses of oppressed nations, where other U.S. imperialist states have overthrown Governments and installed puppet regimes. The situation in Libya is reflected Also in Iraq, where people die every day of internal conflict and the That horrendous conditions prevail Among the majority of the population.
In Syria, more than 100,000 People Have died in the past three years since the U.S. has supported a counter-assault on the population. Present talks in Geneva Switzerland are ostensibly designed to reach a political solution Despite The U.S. and allies continue to Their finance and coordinate Those seeking to overthrow the government of President Bashar al-Assad.
The anti-war and anti-imperialist groups in Western countries must Oppose this military and political interference in the internal affairs of Asian states: such as Afghanistan, where twelve years after the forces of the Pentagon and NATO is no closer Victory nowadays are Africa, the Middle East and in 2001. The U.S. and NATO Should be forced to withdraw its forces from foreign states and close its military bases.
The resources used to Maintain These occupations Should be redirected to rebuild the cities and towns are facing unprecedented That economic crisis through austerity and mass poverty. Such oppressed nations under imperialist occupation Should be paid compensation for the destruction Carried out by Western military forces.
Any Black-Green alliance in Libya?
“As These two forces begin to fight against racist and imperialist These puppets who rule the country are beginning to see a form of mass resistance. Having finished what form Remains to Be Seen.”
THE EVIL AXIS FORCES which FOUGHT THE GREAT JAMAHIRIYA ARMY in 2011 and are still heavily involved in the “LIBYAN-CONFLICT”:
by: Christian Ella Bern Ardene
THE EVIL AXIS FORCES which FOUGHT THE GREAT JAMAHIRIYA ARMY in 2011 and are still heavily involved in the “LIBYAN-CONFLICT”:
Khashin hell with those of the country and our heads and slug Jardan and God Almighty without NATO Maverm footmen and guide you to this = employees of the armed people was a great army ..Because he fought against NATO and its collaborators:
* the forces involved in the plight of February 17: - 25000 of elite soldiers Arabs (Qatar – UAE – Jordan – Kuwait – Saudi Arabia – Sudan) –12,500 Special Forces soldier belonging to the NATO (Legion African French army – Major Arab Army FA – U.S. Special Forces – Malta – Italy – Turkey) - mercenaries follow-Qaeda and Alakhunjah as follows:
* 1200 Afghan
* 800 Chechen
* 1300 Algerian
* 400 Lebanese
* 2200 Tunisian
* 15000 Egyptian
* 1000 Sudanese
* 3200 Gulf
* 250 Yemeni
* Uribe 400
* 600 Turkish -300 fighter aircraft and bombers – 50 aircraft Arab (Qatar Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates Jordan) – 250 helicopter – 12 AWACS aircraft, including: * 4 * Saudi planes Number 2 nuclear submarine aircraft carriers * 4 * 16 * 12 frigate battleship * 8 * 25 submarines normal Coast Guard ship * 5 supply vessels and Bureau – in addition to the three Arab countries neighboring Libya, and put all its potential military and logistics at the disposal of pawns February 17 and these countries are Tunisia and Sudan Are not we a great army … ?!
It is from the Arab armies fought like all these cosmic force …
— with Christella Bernardene.
***this article has been taken from FB
Lebanon: You wanted answers for the mysterious deaths of two of your people; I might have the answer
I believe we all have our reasonable questions whence it concerns the deaths of two prominent Lebanese originated individuals for which we have only bloody vague answers from either NATO led Corporate Axis of Mainstream Media propagandists to shift our stances against those they want us to loathe, or the so-called ‘answers’, one must come to realise, are commencing to yield more questions than answers, if anything at all. One must thenceforth come to the realisation that if we wish to find the truth, or theorise to at least approach close enough to the truth, we must search deeper, more deeply than we ever tended to do in the past.
Hitherto, whom do I believe murdered Rafik Hariri? Whom do I believe murdered Mousa Sadr? For one, the latter’s death being caused by Abu Nadl was disproved in numerous cases, however the plausible conceptualisation that Mossad may have been behind it, in collusion with these ‘former Qadhafi era officials’ that proudly ‘defected’ to join the new NATO controlled ‘National Transitional Council’ régime now controlling Libya; has materialised even more to me. Whilst for the other, it has become a ritualised ceremony to incessantly blame Syria for the death of Hariri, only to have a DGSE from my country decide to act upon his conscience to expose the truth on Russian television to prevent the NATO deep state infrastructure from following him.
However, why would Syria kill someone that worked closely alongside them? Why would Qadhafi harm someone that has close connections with Iran, his most powerful regional ally, his Comrades in Arms of the Résistance against the NATO neo-colonisation world order mobsters? These questions have no answer, because it’s obvious. There is NO bloody way in hell that these scenarios could even be plausible, whilst the deaths are likely to be part of a much more sinister plot designed to undermine the Middle Eastern resistance whilst splitting it along sectarian lines. Furthermore, as Patrick Seale from the Guardian (whence it used to be there to report nothing more than some sincere news) once pointed out,
“Israel’s ambition has long been to weaken Syria, sever its strategic alliance with Iran and destroy Hezbollah. Israel has great experience at “targeted assassinations” - not only in the Palestinian territories however across the Middle East. Over the years, it has sent hit teams to kill opponents in Beirut, Tunis, Malta, Amman in addition Damascus. Syria, Hezbollah and Iran have stood up against US as well as Israeli hegemony over the region. Syria continues to demand that Israel return the Golan Heights, seized in 1967. Damascus will not allow Lebanon to conclude a separate peace with Israel unless its own claim is also addressed.”
Hence, if we take this point into consideration, as one example, Syria could not possibly be behind the death of someone that worked closely with Dimashq to keep Lebanon from making a separate via Israel, it’s the Premier that kept Lebanon completely aligned to Syria. Its therewith not only outrageous to claim Syria or even Hezbollah could ever be behind the death of Rafik Hariri, it is more likely either Phalangists as Seale points out, or even more bloody likelier, the operatives of Mossad whom seek to obliterate as well as divide the Resistance against NATO-Israel-Gulf Middle Eastern domination. Another important thing to remember is that Syria‘s largest reasons for being in Lebanon to commence with were to help Palestinian groups there, help Lebanese resistance groups such as Hezbollah, the Lebanese Communist Party, Amal, the Nasserist Organisations, against the Zionist entity Israel‘s government, corporate diasporas as well as its Deep State/Military-Industrialised-Complex.
Furthermore, it should be knownst that the moment Syria withdrew from Lebanon, meant the commencement of Israel‘s Zionist régime taking advantage of the situation to initiate numerous transgressions into Lebanon, especially incursions as well as invasions into South Lebanon whilst in addition to countless violations of Lebanese aerospace, something which Michel Sleiman has done nothing to ‘condemn‘, thenceforth further exposing to us his role as a puppet to Zionism, Capitalist-Imperialism in addition to Gulf Monarchism. It hitherto must affirmed that Israel wanted Syria out with all means necessary moreover only a fool could not see this truth. Whilst of course, quite naturally, whence-ever the truth comes close to being unravelled, the rubbish spouting neo-colonisation liars, they will find another way to white wash their crimes, to subdue the truth. Id est, in this case, the post-Syria Lebanon, now commanded by a government whose President, Michel Sleiman, is a flagrant puppet to the neo-colonialist hegemons, attempts to indict several members of Hezbollah for the Hariri death case, whilst Sleiman, Israhell, the Gulf régimes, Western Europe as well as Northern America both attempt to have Hezbollah labelled as a ‘terrorist organisation’.
Hezbollah rightfully counters this whence Comrade Imam Seyyed Hassan Nasrallah, in an interview, re-affirmed the suspicions of what any aware, educated, geo-political TRUTH seeker individual might have thought. It’s quite so to the point. Indeed, Mossad, is quite the organisation of State Sponsored Terrorism, just as the CIA, the DGSE, MI6, MI5, or the Pakistani ISI could have ever been. All of whom are organisations that top the list in acts of subversive terror against nations across the globe, including false flags on themselves on themselves, such as the Boston Bombings, for the bloody matter, as an exempli gratia. Nonetheless, as one must recognise, these are not the mere sources of people commencing to awaken to these truths. We have one, two, three, four,five, moreover also six sources perfectly credible with what brings forth to be beheld before the world into materialisation, some truth on this matter.
Whence one sees the omnipotent capabilities of Western as well as Israeli intelligence services to infiltrating other countries to foment destabilisation or manufacture fabricated evidence, one could understandably see that this makes sense: Syria, Hezbollah, as well as Iran are completely utterly bloody innocent. None of them are responsible for the death of Rafik Hariri. Our NATO led coalition of Neo-Colonisation Dystopian World Order mobsters as well as their intelligence services are the ones responsible for his death. Furthermore, I may have addressed in due honour the case of Rafik Hariri in this article. However, we must hitherto proceed towards debunking another case. Whom is truly responsible for Imam Mousa Sadr’s ‘disappearance’ in 1978, as well as his alleged death? Moreover what are the controversies surrounding it?
Let me first commence with this. The official ‘defected’ ‘affidavit-sworn’ Libyan officials’ ‘testimony’, in addition to the extant supposed ‘evidence’ pertaining to the actus reus Comrade Qadhafi is supposedly accused of is, as I would put for the Hariri case, contradiction in adjective in itself in all aspects. There are numerous reasons for this. The ratio scripta which Qadhafi’s accusers use to justify their accusations, as well as the so-called modus operandi behind it, is that he had an ‘argument concerning theological matters’ with Mousa Sadr, moreover in the ‘heat of the anger in this debate ordered his entourage to have Sadr arrested as well as killed’. This in itself does not make sense. Firstly, Qadhafi is not a sectarian leader, nor was he ever. If this were true, he would have brutalised his Shi’ite minority. Secondly, Qadhafi is allied with Iran’s Shi’ite ruled as well as Shi’ite majority country, whilst is one of the few Sunnah leaders of a Sunnah majority country ever to have done so (I apologise for using sectarian terms, however despite me loathing this bloody much, the context requires me to do so) in contemporary Middle Eastern history besides Algeria, Yemen at one time, Hamas (before it shifted to becoming a complete Qatari-Israeli puppet), Mauritania, Sudan, in addition to Western Sahara’s Polisario Front as well as the Palestinian PFLP.
Thirdly, this fact, combined with the additional fact of which some Libyan ‘defected’ traitorous officials, as with the case we now see in Syria, had some previously secretive connections as well as relations with Western as well as Israeli in addition to Gulf régimes intelligence services in which they colluded to overthrow Qadhafi, fabricate evidence amongstother things to discredit him whilst mobilise an entirely elaborate, exquisite, eloquent, over-the-top potent psyop (psychological operation) against the Libyan Jamahiriya to fomentinternal conflict as wellas to utilise tribalism interests to turncertain ethnic groups of Libya against thegreat Jamahiriya. Furthermore, the prison massacre of Abu Salim prisoners supposedly ‘political dissidents’ turned out to be al-CIA-da operatives of the LIFG as well as al-Qaeda, which, whilst the West in its publicised face (for public relations purposes) sanctioned as a set of “terrorist organisations” in addition to “sanctioning” them, whence in truth the West openly secretly gave these groups the arms they needed to perpetrate their terror.
Fourthly, it is quite so imperative to realise something else: the terrorist assaults allegedly committed by Qadhafi were furthermore in their own false flag operations waged by our own secret intelligence services in the West as well as those in Israel. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (all posts in this forum page, or most – 6) (7) (8) (9) Moreover, it must be recognised that Qadhafi may be a wonderful radicalised, revolutionary, benevolent, cunning, calculating, defiant anti-colonialist, as well as resilient Resistance leader against the neo-colonisation global mafia—all to me being exquisitely perfect qualities—however he is NO brutalising ‘régime leader’, he is NO ‘dictator’, nor is he a ‘murderer of his own people’ as our deliberately hypocritical double-standardised oxymoronic Western, Israeli, Gulf, Ikhwan, South Korean, Taiwanese (remember the KMT’s past White Terrors), Jordanian politicians, in addition to their corporate diaspora as well as military-industrialised-complex deep state sponsors; moreover also the countless other puppet régimes as well as organisations working for them worldwide; would have us believe Qadhafi is.
Indeed, how could the Yankee régime, (whose mass murders of 76 million indigenous peoples, deaths of 1,5 million Filipinos during their régime’s colonisation process, deaths of over 3-8 million Indo-Chinese (Vietnamese, Cambodian, Laotian, Thai, ethnic Chinese) inhabitants of the region, deaths of 1-3 (if not tens of millions) of Indonesians under Suharto (whom the Yanks, the Dutch, the British helped remain in power for ‘Anti-Communist’ purposes), deaths of 1 million Somalis, deaths of 1,5 million Palestinians at the hand of their Zionist ally Israel, deaths of 1-4 million Iraqi civilians from Saddam’s demise to now, deaths of tens of millions by the White Terrors of Chiang Kai Shek as well as the last Tsar of the Russian Empire (both given tonnes of help by the Yanks as well as their ‘allies’, all of whom even invaded the USSR to help the Tsarist régime commit even more atrocities against its lower class populations across the lands, moreover, in forgotten history, Poland-Lithuania’s sacking of Moscow, the Georgian-Cossack led invasions of the USSR; amongst other things that eventually forced Lenin to maintain the Russian Empire’s borders to prevent a repetition of those events)…
… The deaths of 4 million Korean civilians (1,5 million South Koreans murdered by Rhee Sygman as well as Yankee forces; in addition to the 2,5 million North Koreans bombed, massacred on the ground, bio-chemical victimised, violated, pillaged, plundered, gased, napalmed, strategically over-the-top carpet bombed (18 of 22 cities pulverised to the ground) by Yankee, South Korean, as well as other ‘UN’ troops whom committed these punitive atrocities against the Korean people); the deaths of 1-3 million Afghans in the al-CIA-da quagmire that NATO unleashed upon Afghanistan in addition to the initial al-CIA-da terrorist attacks on the Soviet border that NATO white washed from history (which killed hundreds of Soviet border inhabitants) which penultimately was the true reason for the Soviet landing into Afghanistan; the Pol Pot false-’Communist’ government sponsored especially by Thatcher as well as the Yankees whose purpose was to plunder Cambodia so well that it would be a psyops stunt to discredit Communism before world eyes; the dirty wars of right-wing fascistic NATO sponsored régimes murdering a total of hundreds of thousands of people throughout Latin America; whilst up to 4 million deaths (including 220 000 deaths in the civil war mostly fomented by the CIA’s death squads) that continued in Guatemala; the 500 000 Angolans brutalised by Jonas Savimbi’s UNITA forces that NATO sponsored against the Communist-aligned government of Angola; amongst tonnes of other crimes NATO’s Western members have fomented, including the Taiping Crisis before NATO was ever formed; where Christian extremists as well as ensuing chaos that Western governments (especially Yanks, Britain, France) fomented caused 100 million Chinese deaths overall (disproportionately civilians)); or the rest of NATO as well as the international puppets of mass murder as well as death could even dare to make us believe that they are knights in shining ‘humanitarian’ armour that believe that they are in the ‘moral right’ whilst Qadhafi, is in the ‘moral wrong’, whence in fact it is quite the opposite?
Furthermore, knowing Qadhafi’s personality pretty well from my research, how could he be responsible for all that he supposedly alleged of being responsible for? As for Mousa Sadr, numerous controversies surround his whereabouts. For the most part, some claim he was killed by Qadhafi himself, others claim he ordered his security forces to first arrest him thence execute him later, others yet claim he was murdered by Abu Nidal at Qadhafi’s nod, others yet (especially his family, by far the sole bloody credible source we could have that is concrete) claim he is still alive in Libya or somewhere else whilst sightings of his existence have been reported; others yet claim he left Libya in 1978 on a flight to Italy, others yet claim even more bloody outrageous madness. Several things are certain however.
One must come to the realisation that Lebanon’s Sleiman headed coalition government has shown a majority of un-interest in pursuing the case (whilst others rightfully claim they (Sleiman administration) were pressured into not pursuing it until the right time to do so came, id est the time for the West to neo-colonise Libya as well as foment anti-Hezbollah, anti-Syria, anti-Iran sentiments). Indeed, only Hezbollah, the LCP, the Amal movement ever decided to conduct smaller independent investigations. Moreover, some allege that Imam Sadr had connections with the SAVAK as well as Israel’s Mossad; others (the NTC régime of mass murderers, evidence-against-Qadhafi-manufacturers, as well as flagrant PROVEN liars NATO helped bring to power in 2011) claim that Sadr was detained in Abu Salim as well as ’23 000 other individuals that ‘disappeared’ across Libya’, moreover some even allege to have ‘found the body of Sadr’ after the Battle of Tripoli, whilst this lie was long disproved, as well as the aforementioned Abu Salim allegations.
All completely utterly, bloody fabricated rubbish by those whom wanted to neo-colonise Libya with the inside help of traitorous Qadhafi era officials that would proudly betray him for a wealthy reward from the West (its even the case for most ‘high ranking Syrian officials’ that did not have old prior contacts with the West that admitted they were bribed to ‘defect’ to the FSA rats). In addition, according to this pro-West mouthpiece mainstream media in Lebanon called ‘Naharnet’, the passports of Sadr as well as his companions were found in a hotel in Rome in 2004, furthermore raising questions on the entire matter. Kuwait’s régime, puppeted by Capitalist-Imperialist NATO as well as Zionist Israel, attempted to shift the blame from Qadhafi to saying that the Palestinians were responsible, whilst later one saying that Qadhafi ordered the Palestinians to do it? With all these contradicting reports on Imam Sadr’s death, one could only be mind boggled whilst utter in complete, utter bewilderment, Dafuq? Indeed so Comrades, this is the conflagration of rubbish, contradictions, lies, white washing that mainstream media aligned to NATO across the world have been spouting surrounding Mousa Sadr’s death, alive, detained, etcetera status.
Nonetheless, all of this propaganda as well as contradicting asides, whom stands to bloody benefit from this dishonourable spacegoating (scapegoating, I apologise for deliberately twisting the word for laughs) Qadhafi on some days, Palestinians on others, or even Iran or Syria by mind f*cked ‘Safavidist conspiracy’ theorists NATO has worked extremely hard to organise? Do we not see that this death could have been an inside task from the very people that bloody ‘defected’ from Qadhafi’s government to the NTC rats? Could it be that Senussi as well as others had secretive ties with NATO, just as Rifaat Al-Assad, Mustafa Tlass in Syria had secret ties with NATO as well as Israel against the Syrian revolutionary Résistance government to create manners with which to discredit them?
Furthermore, considering Mossad has such impeccable country-penetrating infiltration methods, is it possible that they succeeded in getting into Libya with perfect timing, plotting to kill Mousa Sadr once he left Qadhafi, eliminating him before he ever left the country, whilst commence the white washing, spacegoating tirade against Libya amongst others blamed for Sadr’s death? Yes, I promised I would answer the questions of both murder cases, moreover whilst I answered one, the other is even more eccentric, queer, enigmatic, eloquently mysterious than I thought, except… after spending some additional time researching even as I wrote this article, I found answers that I did not find in the weeks I spent secretly conducting my investigations. Its quite inherent that those responsible for Mousa Sadr’s death would only be people willing to benefit from even sectarianisation of the Middle East for their vile neo-colonisation, avaricious, sadistic agendas. Whom else, other than Israhell, the Gulf monarchs, the Jordanian King, the NATO régimes; the Pakistani ISI, as well as South Korea, all of whom have their vested interests in fomenting a division of the Middle East?
It is not a coincidence that the 1982 Lebanon War commenced at least four years after this episode in history? Whilst furthermore Sadr was a uniting voice in Lebanon, as well as an advocate for respect as well as harmony between the country’s multiple religious sects. It has been said that had he lived, Lebanon would have avoided the bloodiest parts of its Civil War (1975-1990). Even today, the mention of Sadr provokes a strong reaction among Lebanese. In the measure passed by the Capitalist-Imperialist, Zionist, Gulf Monarchs controlled United Nations Security Council regarding Libya, Lebanon was one of the few Arab countries that supported Western intervention. This is still a raw wound for many in Lebanon. As well as it is perhaps coinciding with the aforementioned of what I said.
Is it possible that NATO, willing to restore the old Idris era Libyan puppet régime to power, or something of sorts, has arranged for the death of Mousa Sadr via infiltrators in Libya a while after his meet with Comrade Qadhafi; in order to use this death at a later time to convince Lebanon to join the intervention in Libya, whilst support it at its fullest. Furthermore, it must be remembered that this Sadr case file would be used, as well as bloody dishonourable intensive pressure against Iran by Western, Israeli leaders; combined with omnipotent sectarian threats coming from the NTC rats as well as the Gulf monarchs, forced Iran to switch its support from Comrade Qadhafi to the NTC rats. Iran was under tonnes of pressure during 2011 to end its support for the Green Résistance, for Green Libya, for the Glorious Jamahiriya by the Neo-Colonisation Axis of Mobsters.
Iran, surrounded by these intensive threats as well as pressures, yielded to pressure whilst its media as well as government turned on Qadhafi. Nevertheless, Iran is innocent, moreover this little factor here is being used by numerous persons wanting to turn pro-Qadhafis against Iran to support a neo-colonialist invasion there; completely utterly attempting to white wash the fact of which a NATO led pressuring against Iran had been organised prior. Thenceforth, whom was responsible for Mousa Sadr’s death? Whom was to benefit from his death? NATO, Israel, Sleiman, the Gulf Monarchs, as well as the ‘National Transitional Council’ contra death squads were the ones to penultimately benefit from this. For one, Shimon Peres, as well as other Zionist leaders, as I have read from numerous articles in addition to Israeli government documents, have been known to fear Comrade Imam Mousa Sadr due to his charisma as well as his potential capabilities in being a unifying leader for Lebanese, for Arabs at large, for Palestinian Resistance organisations as well as for perhaps even worse, the potential to Reunite Islam completely.
This the Zionists do so bloody fear. Whilst, another fact which must be noted concerning Comrade Qadhafi, is that he supported the 1979 Iranian Revolution whilst even went onwards to mobilising his country to support Iran against Saddam‘s NATO, Israel, Gulf monarchs directed invasion of Iran. It must be furthermore remembered that during Qadhafi‘s time, most abductions turned out to be committed by Libyan based al-CIA-da destabilisation, Balkanisation, takfiri NATO backed death squad, far right, contra mercenaries whilst so-called ‘executions‘ either never even occurred, or, for those that did, were organised by traitorous Libya officials with previously secretive relations with the neo-colonisers, id est the same officials that would ‘defect‘ later on whilst NATO led corporate mainstream media as well as these vile traitors would white wash the truth of Mousa Sadr amongst other cases whilst spacegoat all the blame upon the innocent glorious Comrade Qadhafi.
In addition to this, NATO led psyops materialising as well as manufacturing false evidence against the Jamahiriya to discredit the Qadhafi utopia for the justification of a neo-colonising invasion of Libya continued even after the war ended in 2011. Why would Qadhafi have Sadr killed? They had much in common. They both professed Islam and socialism, they were natural allies. Whilst it must be remembered, that besides the government officials colluding against Qadhafi alongside NATO (to which Qadhafi had reacted only with apathy as well as silence, fully confident that none of these things could occur in his country) with the help of a ruthless Anglo-American known as Edward Wilson whom was hired to help train these elements of the security apparatus that would in the future be utilised to discredit as well as spacegoat Qadhafi whilst furthermore white washing everything else (or so they bloody thought).
It must furthermore be noted that the ‘Arab Spring‘ spreading into Algeria, Libya as well as Syria were part of a profound Operation of destabilisation fomented by the CIA, MI5, MI6, our DGSE, Mossad, Turkey‘s MÌT, Pakistan‘s ISI, as well as Saudi Arabia‘s GIP, the Ikhwan ruled Mukhabarat, in addition to Qatar‘s State Security (QSS). I thenceforward finalised my investigation here. Who is responsible for Rafik Hariri, Imam Mousa Sadr, as well as Yaccoub‘s deaths? The same neo-colonialists now shredding Syria apart whilst attempting to get to Iran next. In conclusion, we must be careful not to allow the neo-colonisation mobsters to split the Middle East either along sectarian or ethnic lines or, make the world buy the rubbish that NATO led mainstream media spouts concerning certain leaders to procure public opinion in favour of their transgressive wars.
Lastly, I believe the Middle East needs a new Imam Mousa Sadr, one that the West led neo-colonialists bloody fear, as well as a charismatic, compromising figure that could help reunite Sunnis, Shi’its, Alawis, Maronite Christians, Orthodox Christians, Jews, etcetera together to form a powerful Résistance front against the NATO led neo-colonisation mobsters to finally help achieve peace in this messed up world. As for the truth concerning Mousa Sadr as well as Rafik Hariri, the truth is bloody simple: the alleged people responsible are not responsible, their deaths were arranged by NATO led neo-colonisation mobsters as well as their vile Axis of morbid intelligence service conceptualisations, the same intelligence services that have been responsible for tonnes of Cold War as well as even omnipresent transgressions world wide, including as an infamous example, attempting to assassinate Comrade Fidel Castro over-the-top, precisely 638 times.
It is our duty to find the individual persons responsible within the neo-colonialist intelligence services, as well as government officials responsible, whilst take them to justice whence-ever a conclusive, finalised, sweeping close to these case files occur. We have a generalised idea of those responsible, now its a matter of finding the individual persons indeed it is. Moreover perhaps, only perhaps, once I revolutionise my country France, as well as do so for Japan, I shall open such an investigation, including into our own country’s DGSE, to hold the individuals accountable for this mess guilty as well as have them brought to the just wrath of international, non-NATO ‘international community’, REAL ‘International Community’, justice.
Internet Sources concerning Qadhafi being innocent on numerous things; sources concerning Mousa Sadr, as well as some of the remaining sources on NATO led Pressure on Iran concerning Libya:(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18 – Iran being pro-Qadhafi in early March 2011) (19 - Iran provides secret support to Comrade; however do note that the ‘nuclear reasons’ for it as this article cites are nothing more than NATO rubbish) (20 - An Iranian article of truth fully support Comrade Qadhafi’s Resistance) (21 - Al Arabiya article being one of the last few articles of anti-Iran NATO led mainstream media online that were not deleted nor white washed that bring perspective that Iran was a secretly staunch ally of Qadhafi until his death; whilst the large majority of other contents in said article on other matters fomenting anti-Iran, anti-Qadhafi statements are rubbish) – add more later
Other reads: (1 - Telegraph propaganda article back in 2004 that was intended as a #BlameIran conceptualisation in addition to an anti-Libya article in an attempt to divide both allies using psyops)
“Lessons from Libya: How Not to Intervene”
Author: Alan Kuperman, Former Research Fellow,International Security Program, 2000–2001
Belfer Center Programs or Projects: Quarterly Journal: International Security
This policy brief is based on “A Model Humanitarian Intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya Campaign,” which appears in the Summer 2013 issue of International Security.
• The Conventional Wisdom Is Wrong. Libya‘s 2011 uprising was never peaceful, but instead was armed and violent from the start. Muammar al-Qaddafi did not target civilians or resort to indiscriminate force. Although inspired by humanitarian impulse, NATO’s intervention did not aim mainly to protect civilians, but rather to overthrow Qaddafi‘s regime, even at the expense of increasing the harm to Libyans.
• The Intervention Backfired. NATO’s action magnified the conflict’s duration about sixfold and its death toll at least sevenfold, while also exacerbating human rights abuses, humanitarian suffering, Islamic radicalism, and weapons proliferation in Libya and its neighbors. If Libya was a “modelintervention,” then it was a model of failure.
• Three Lessons. First, beware rebel propaganda that seeks intervention by falsely crying genocide. Second, avoid intervening on humanitarian grounds in ways that reward rebels and thus endanger civilians, unless the state is already targeting noncombatants. Third, resist the tendency of humanitarian intervention to morph into regime change, which amplifies the risk to civilians.
A MODEL INTERVENTION?
Many commentators have praised NATO’s 2011 intervention in Libya as a humanitarian success for averting a bloodbath in that country’s second largest city, Benghazi, and helping eliminate the dictatorial regime of Muammar al-Qaddafi. These proponents accordingly claim that the intervention demonstrates how to successfully implement a humanitarian principle known as the responsibility to protect (R2P). Indeed, the top U.S. representatives to the transatlantic alliance declared that “NATO’s operation in Libya has rightly been hailed as a model intervention.” A more rigorous assessment, however, reveals that NATO’s intervention backfired: it increased the duration of Libya’s civil war by about six times and its death toll by at least seven times, while also exacerbating human rights abuses, humanitarian suffering, Islamic radicalism, and weapons proliferation in Libya and its neighbors. If this is a “model intervention,” then it is a model of failure.
The conventional account of Libya’s conflict and NATO’s intervention is misleading in several key aspects. First, contrary to Western media reports, Qaddafi did not initiate Libya’s violence by targeting peaceful protesters. The United Nations and Amnesty International have documented that in all four Libyan cities initially consumed by civil conflict in mid-February 2011—Benghazi, Al Bayda, Tripoli, and Misurata—violence was actually initiated by the protesters. The government responded to the rebels militarily but never intentionally targeted civilians or resorted to “indiscriminate” force, as Western media claimed. Early press accounts exaggerated the death toll by a factor of ten, citing “more than 2,000 deaths” in Benghazi during the initial days of the uprising, whereas Human Rights Watch (HRW) later documented only 233 deaths across all of Libya in that period.
Further evidence that Qaddafi avoided targeting civilians comes from the Libyan city that was most consumed by the early fighting, Misurata. HRW reports that of the 949 people wounded there in the rebellion’s initial seven weeks, only 30 were women or children, meaning that Qaddafi’s forces focused narrowly on combatants. During that same period, only 257 people were killed among the city’s population of 400,000—a fraction less than 0.0006—providing additional proof that the government avoided using force indiscriminately. Moreover, Qaddafi did not perpetrate a “bloodbath” in any of the cities that his forces recaptured from rebels prior to NATO intervention—including Ajdabiya, Bani Walid, Brega, Ras Lanuf, Zawiya, and much of Misurata—so there was virtually no risk of such an outcome if he had been permitted to recapture the last rebel stronghold of Benghazi.
The conventional wisdom is also wrong in asserting that NATO’s main goal in Libya was to protect civilians. Evidence reveals that NATO’s primary aim was to overthrow Qaddafi’s regime, even at the expense of increasing the harm to Libyans. NATO attacked Libyan forces indiscriminately, including some in retreat and others in Qaddafi’s hometown of Sirte, where they posed no threat to civilians. Moreover, NATO continued to aid the rebels even when they repeatedly rejected government cease-fire offers that could have ended the violence and spared civilians. Such military assistance included weapons, training, and covert deployment of hundreds of troops from Qatar, eventually enabling the rebels to capture and summarily execute Qaddafi and seize power in October 2011.
THE INTERVENTION BACKFIRED
The biggest misconception about NATO’s intervention is that it saved lives and benefited Libya and its neighbors. In reality, when NATO intervened in mid-March 2011, Qaddafi already had regained control of most of Libya, while the rebels were retreating rapidly toward Egypt. Thus, the conflict was about to end, barely six weeks after it started, at a toll of about 1,000 dead, including soldiers, rebels, and civilians caught in the crossfire. By intervening, NATO enabled the rebels to resume their attack, which prolonged the war for another seven months and caused at least 7,000 more deaths.
The best development in postwar Libya was the democratic election of July 2012, which brought to office a moderate, secular coalition government—a stark change from Qaddafi’s four-decade dictatorship. Other developments, however, have been less encouraging. The victorious rebels perpetrated scores of reprisal killings and expelled 30,000 mostly black residents of Tawerga on grounds that some had been “mercenaries” for Qaddafi. HRW reported in 2012 that such abuses “appear to be so widespread and systematic that they may amount to crimes against humanity.” Ironically, such racial or ethnic violence had never occurred in Qaddafi’s Libya.
Radical Islamist groups, suppressed under Qaddafi, emerged as the fiercest rebels during the war and refused to disarm or submit to government authority afterward. Their persistent threat was highlighted by the September 2012 attack on U.S. facilities in Benghazi that killed Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three of his colleagues. Even more recently, in April 2013, a vehicle bomb destroyed half of the French embassy in the capital, Tripoli. In light of such insecurity, it is understandable that most Libyans responding to a postwar poll expressed nostalgia for a strong leader such as Qaddafi.
Among neighboring countries, Mali, which previously had been the region’s exceptional example of peace and democracy, has suffered the worst consequences from the intervention. After Qaddafi’s defeat, his ethnic Tuareg soldiers of Malian descent fled home and launched a rebellion in their country’s north, prompting the Malian army to overthrow the president. The rebellion soon was hijacked by local Islamist forces and al-Qaida, which together imposed sharia and declared the vast north an independent country. By December 2012, the northern half of Mali had become “the largest territory controlled by Islamic extremists in the world,” according to the chairman of the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Africa. This chaos also spurred massive displacement of hundreds of thousands of Malian civilians, which Amnesty International characterized as “Mali’s worst human rights situation in 50 years.”
Sophisticated weapons from Qaddafi’s arsenal—including up to 15,000 man-portable, surface-to-air missiles unaccounted for as of 2012—leaked to radical Islamists throughout the region. NATO’s intervention on behalf of Libya’s rebels also encouraged Syria’s formerly peaceful protesters to switch to violence in mid-2011, in hopes of attracting a similar intervention.The resulting escalation in Syria magnified that country’s killing rate by tenfold.
NATO’s intervention in Libya offers at least three important lessons for implementing the responsibility to protect. First, potential interveners should beware both misinformation and rebel propaganda. If Western countries had accurately perceived Libya’s initial civil conflict—as Qaddafi using discriminate force against violent tribal, regional, and radical Islamist rebels—NATO would have been much less likely to launch its counterproductive intervention.
The second lesson is that humanitarian intervention can backfire by escalating rebellion. This is because some substate groups believe that by violently provoking state retaliation, they can attract such intervention to help achieve their political objectives, including regime change. The resulting escalation, however, magnifies the threat to noncombatants before any potential intervention can protect them. Thus, the prospect of humanitarian intervention, which is intended to protect civilians, may instead imperil them via a moral hazard dynamic. To mitigate this pathology, it is essential to avoid intervening on humanitarian grounds in ways that reward rebels, unless the state is targeting noncombatants.
A final lesson is that intervention initially motivated by the desire to protect civilians is prone to expanding its objective to include regime change, even if doing so magnifies the danger to civilians, contrary to the interveners’ original intent. That is partly because intervening states, when justifying their use of force to domestic and international audiences, demonize the regime of the country they are targeting. This demonization later inhibits the interveners from considering a negotiated settlement that would permit the regime or its leaders to retain some power, which typically would be the quickest way to end the violence and protect noncombatants. Such lessons from NATO’s use of force in Libya suggest the need for considerable caution and a comprehensive exploration of alternatives when contemplating if and how to conduct humanitarian military intervention.
Crawford, Timothy W., and Alan J. Kuperman, eds. Gambling on Humanitarian Intervention: Moral Hazard, Rebellion, and Civil War (New York: Routledge, 2006).
Kuperman, Alan J. “The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans,”International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 52, No. 1 (March 2008), pp. 49–80.
Roberts, Hugh. “Who Said Gaddafi Had to Go?” London Review of Books, Vol. 33, No. 22 (November 2011), pp. 8–18.
UN Human Rights Council, nineteenth session, “Report of the International Commission of Inquiry on Libya,” A/HRC/19/68, advance unedited version, March 2, 2012.
Alan J. Kuperman is Associate Professor of Public Affairs in the Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin. During 2013–14, he will be a Jennings Randolph Senior Fellow at the U.S. Institute of Peace, in Washington, D.C.
Statements and views expressed in this policy brief are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, the Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
For more information about this publication please contact the IS Editorial Assistant at 617-495-1914.
For Academic Citation: