SECRET DOCUMENT SHOWING THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE LIBYAN AMBASSADOR IN WASHINGTON(USA) TO DESTROY LIBYA


SECRET DOCUMENT SHOWING THE INVOLVEMENT OF THE LIBYAN AMBASSADOR IN WASHINGTON(USA) TO DESTROY LIBYA

A confidential official secret document surfaced indicating the involvement of the Libyan Ambassador Ali Suleiman Aujali in Washington (USA) dated on 01/01/2012. THE TRUTH WILL COME OUT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER.

 

EMBASSY OF LIBYA WASHINGTON D.C.

EMBASSY OF LIBYA WASHINGTON D.C. by قناة الجماهيرية العظمى

 A confidential document showing the involvement of the Libyan ambassador in Washington (USA), Ali Suleiman Aujali this confidential document (official) dated on 01.01.2012: the sender is: Libyan ambassador in Washington (USA), Ali Suleiman Aujali consignees: the leaders of the military battalions and security leaders and heads of Militias (Twenty-three office), including: (Ghebrel- Ali Mahmoud Abdel-Salam Zeidan- Masmari). The Fax number shown through the document that the message was actually sent from Washington, note that Mr. Ali Suleiman Aujali is close to Mahmoud Jibril, who has been funded by some Gulf countries, notably (UAE) text of the document: By reading the document, we can see that the Libyan Ambassador Ali Suleiman Aujali sent this secret telegram with direct instructions of the leaders of security and military battalion commanders to target sow discord in Libya between armed cells and political currents as ordered. The leaders explicitly military battalions planting horror and growing insecurity in the Libyan street and careful to disrupt the public life and disrupt services to citizens such as(electricity cut-and water-social services and health sectors) the document was also keen to categorize and directing the battalion commanders and security chiefs sowing discord between the Libyan tribes and also arming affiliated categorize the former regime (follow Gaddafi) even enter into a military conflict with their enemies and avenge the purpose behind this scheme already as we mentioned that the Libyan ambassador in Washington (Ali Suleiman Aujali) is very close to Mahmoud Jibril, who received significant funding from the United Arab Emirates (and we have the evidence) and through the document it’s clear to us that the Libyan ambassador in Washington did not give this instruction alone he is simply an intermediary for major powers and are likely to be (USA), which seeks to implement the agenda. Acts are stipend precisely in Libya, the consignment was at the beginning of two thousand and twelve (after toppling the Gaddafi regime) and if we look closely at the content of the document, which urges to plant  lawlessness in Libya and to sow discord, discord among the military battalions and the security cells and between tribes. All of these Libya have become events experienced today in two thousand and fifteen. Where suddenly appeared the splits in the center of the Libyans, fighting between the battalions militia, which was yesterday (allied with each other), and after a period turned miraculously into hostile enemies of the truth behind all of this.

The scheme is: to plunge the Libyan streets in growing lawlessness and defections and disrupt public life and services-all of these things will have repercussions categorize (the Libyan citizen) who lives a great horror.  Only in this in the way its been proposed of foreign military intervention (UN) on the Libyan people would accept the proposal, but they will demand from the gulf because the Libyan people who live this civil war between the battalions and militias and live a hard life (because of disabled public services) will not keep him ill claim intervention Council security international to send foreign military forces to Libya to save them – and that is exactly what the Western powers are behind this scheme and that works for the Ambassador Ali Suleiman Aujali looking through this document and to understand that Western financiers and foreign allies actually plans for military intervention in Libya (by US forces with the participation of NATO) or by their allies (Council GCC – Morocco – Jordan – Egypt) who make up the majority of the Arab League, and this is what is currently happening in Libya. Yemen has the same scenario.

 

 

منقول كما هو
وثيقة سرية جدا (حصلت الطلائع على نسخة منها ) تبين تورط السفير الليبي بواشنطن (الولايات المتحدة الامريكية ) علي سليمان الاوجلي هذه الوثيقة السرية (الرسمية ) مؤرخة بتاريخ1/1/2012: المرسل هو: السفير الليبي بواشنطن (الولايات المتحدة الامريكية ) علي سليمان الاوجلي المرسل اليهم : قادة الكتائب العسكرية و القادة الامنيين ورؤساء الميليشيات ( ثلاثة و عشرون مكتب ) من بينهم : (محمود جبريل- علي زيدان- عبد السلام المسماري) و من خلال تصفح الوثيقة يضهر رقم الفاكس حيث يبين ان الرسالة تم ارسالها فعلا من واشنطن علما ان السيد علي سليمان الاوجلي يعتبر مقرب من محمود جبريل الذي سبق له هو الاخر ان تلقئ تمويلات ضحمة من طرف بعض الدول الخليجية ابرزها (الامارات العربية ) نص الوثيقة : من خلال قراءة الوثيقة , يتبين لنا ان السفير الليبي علي سليمان الاوجلي قام بارسال هذه البرقية السرية لتوجيه تعليمات للقادة الامنيين و قادة الكتائب العسكرية لهدف زرع الفتنة بليبيا بين الخلايا المسلحة و التيارات السياسية حيث امر قادة الكتائب العسكرية صراحة بزرع الرعب والانفلات الامني في الشارع الليبي و الحرص على تعطيل الحياة العامة وتعطيل الخدمات للمواطنيين( قطع الكهرباء-المياه-الخدمات الاجتماعية كالقطاع الصحي ) كما حرص في الوثيقة علئ توجيه قادة الكتائب و القادة الامنيين بزرع الفتنة بين القبائل الليبية و ايضا تسليح المحسوبين علئ النظام السابق ( اتباع القذافي ) حتى يدخلون في صراع عسكري مع اعدائهم و ينتقموا الهدف من وراء هذا المخطط سبق ان ذكرنا ان السفير الليبي بواشنطن (علي سليمان الاوجلي) مقرب من محمود جبريل الذي تلقى تمويل كبير من دولة الامارات العربية (و نحن نملك الادلة ) و من خلال الوثيقة يتبين لنا ان السفير الليبي بواشنطن لم يعطي هذه التعليمات بمفرده بل هو مجرد وسيط لقوى كبرى و من المحتمل ان تكون (الولايات المتحدة الامريكية) التي تسعى لتنفيذ جدول اعمال مرتب بدقة في ليبيا و منطقة شمال افريقيا الارسالية كانت في بداية الفين واثني عشر ( بعد اسقاط نظام القذافي ) و لو ندقق في مضمون الوثيقة التي تحث على زرع الانفلات الامني بليبيا و زرع الفتنة و الشقاق بين الكتائب العسكرية و الخلايا الامنية و بين القبائل كل هذه الاحداث اصبحت ليبيا تعيشها اليوم في الفين و خمسة عشر حيث فجأة ظهرت انقسامات كبرى وسط الليبيين و اقتتال بين الكتائب و الميليشيات التي كانت بالأمس القريب (متحالفة فيما بينها ) و بعد مدة تحولوا بقدرة قادر الئ أعداء حقيقة وراء كل هذا المخطط: بإغراق الشوارع الليبية في الانفلات الامني و الانشقاقات و تعطيل الحياة العامة و الخدمات–كل هذه الأمور ستكون لها تداعيات علئ (المواطن الليبي ) الذي يعيش رعب كبير-فبهذه الطريقة عندما يتم اقتراح التدخل الاجنبي العسكري (الامم المتحدة ) على الشعب الليبي سيقبلون الاقتراح بل هم من سيطالبون بيه لان الشعب الليبي الذي يعيش هذه الحرب الاهلية بين الكتائب و الميليشيات و يعيش حياة صعبة (بسبب تعطيل الخدمات العامة ) لن يبقى له سوئ المطالبة بتدخل مجلس الامن الدولي لإرسال قوات عسكرية اجنبية الى ليبيا لأنقذاهم–و هذا ما تريده القوئ الغربية التي وراء هذا المخطط و التي يعمل لحسابها السفير علي سليمان الاوجلي-لهذا من من خلال هذه الوثيقة نفهم ان القوئ الغربية و الاجنبية تخطط فعلا للتدخل العسكري بليبيا (عن طريق قوات امريكية باشتراك الناتو ) او عن طريق حلفائهم (مجلس التعاون الخليجي– المغرب – الاردن – مصر) الذين يشكلون الاغلبية في الجامعة العربية و هذا ما يحضرون له حاليا في ليبيا ستشهد نفس السيناريو اليمني

Featured Image -- 13906

NWO Regime Change Pamphlets Handed Out For Colored Protests In Ukraine Were The Same Handed Out By The NWO Muslim Brotherhood In Egypt!


Originally posted on Political Vel Craft:

NWO Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood Agitators & NWO Ukraine’s E.U. Agitators
Pamphlets

NWO Egypt “FAILED”, NWO Syria ‘ONGOING’ & NWO Ukraine ‘JUST STARTING’

The same forces that instigated regime demonstrations in 2011 Syria now instigate the same regime change manifestations in Ukraine. The violent demonstrations are just a front, to cover up the NWO E.U. attack against the Ukrainian people. And corrupt politicians and agents of the corporate-press immediately stood by to express “concerns” and to see “serious threat” in the absolutely legal responses by the Ukrainian State. Trash and more trash, everything is being done to mask the NWO CIA Western support of the E.U.’s Neo-Nazi Nationalist protesters to generate ever more violence.

View original 2,953 more words

CNN: Libyan “Rebels” Are Now ISIS


CNN: Libyan “Rebels” Are Now ISIS

(Tony Cartalucci – LD) – The United States has attempted to claim that the only way to stop the so-called “Islamic State” in Syria and Iraq is to first remove the government in Syria. Complicating this plan are developments in Libya, benefactor of NATO’s last successful regime change campaign. In 2011, NATO armed, funded, and backed with a sweeping air campaign militants in Libya centered around the eastern Libyan cities of Tobruk, Derna, and Benghazi. By October 2011, NATO successfully destroyed the Libyan government, effectively handing the nation over to these militants. 

Images: Same convoy, different flag. Even in 2011, it was painfully obvious the so-called “rebels” fighting with NATO assistance in Libya were in fact members of long-standing Al Qaeda franchises including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). Their strongholds in eastern Libya served as the “revolution’s” cradle, meaning the “revolution” was merely cover for a NATO-assisted Al Qaeda uprising. In other words, NATO handed Libya over to Al Qaeda, and is attempting to do likewise with Syria.

 

What ensued was a campaign of barbarism, genocide, and sectarian extremism as brutal in reality as what NATO claimed in fiction was perpetrated by the Libyan government ahead of its intervention. The so-called “rebels” NATO had backed were revealed to be terrorists led by Al Qaeda factions including the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM).

The so-called “pro-democracy protesters” Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi was poised to attack in what NATO claimed was pending “genocide” were in fact heavily armed terrorists that have festered for decades in eastern Libya.

Almost immediately after NATO successfully destroyed Libya’s government, its terrorist proxies were mobilized to take part in NATO’s next campaign against Syria. Libyan terrorists were sent first to NATO-member Turkey were they were staged, armed, trained, and equipped, before crossing the Turkish-Syrian border to take part in the fighting.

CNN Admits ISIS is in Libya  

CNN in an article titled, “ISIS comes to Libya,” claims:

The black flag of ISIS flies over government buildings. Police cars carry the group’s insignia. The local football stadium is used for public executions. A town in Syria or Iraq? No. A city on the coast of the Mediterranean, in Libya. 

Fighters loyal to the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria are now in complete control of the city of Derna, population of about 100,000, not far from the Egyptian border and just about 200 miles from the southern shores of the European Union. 

The fighters are taking advantage of political chaos to rapidly expand their presence westwards along the coast, Libyan sources tell CNN.

Only the black flag of Al Qaeda/ISIS has already long been flying over Libya – even at the height of NATO’s intervention there in 2011.  ISIS didn’t “come to” Libya, it was always there in the form of Al Qaeda’s local franchises LIFG and AQIM – long-term, bitter enemies of the now deposed and assassinated Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi.

Images: While CNN claims the “black flag of ISIS” is just now flying over Libya, in reality, the black flag of Al Qaeda and US-Saudi funded global terrorism has flown over Libya for years. Just weeks after US Senator John McCain was in the terrorist capital of Benghazi pledging funds and weapons to the militants, overt public demonstrations in support for Al Qaeda took place right on the doorsteps of the courthouse McCain appeared at.

CNN’s latest article is merely the veneer finally peeling away from the alleged “revolution” it had attempted to convince readers had taken place in 2011.

ISIS Didn’t “Come to” Libya, It Came From Libya

https://alfatah69.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/bb424-libyan_terrorists_in_syria.jpg?w=640&h=360

Image: Libyan Mahdi al-Harati of the Al Qaeda affiliate LIFG, leading Libyan terrorists in Syria. LIFG terrorists would pass through NATO territory in Turkey on their way to Syria’s border. ISIS “coming to” Libya is simply LIFG terrorists returning from their NATO-backed expeditionary mission.

 

Even amid CNN’s own spin, it admits ISIS’ presence in Libya is not a new phenomenon but rather the above mentioned sectarian extremists who left Libya to fight in Syria simply returning and reasserting themselves in the eastern Cyrenaica region. CNN also admits that these terrorists have existed in Libya for decades and were kept in check primarily by Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi. With Qaddafi eliminated and all semblance of national unity destroyed by NATO’s intervention in 2011, Al Qaeda has been able to not only prosper in Libya but use the decimated nation as a spingboard for invading and destroying other nations.

Worst of all, Al Qaeda’s rise in Libya was not merely the unintended consequence of a poorly conceived plan by NATO for military intervention, but a premeditated regional campaign to first build up then use Al Qaeda as a mercenary force to overthrow and destroy a series of nations, beginning with Libya, moving across North Africa and into nations like Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and eventually Iran. From there, NATO’s mercenary force would be on the borders of Russia and China ready to augment already Western-backed extremists in the Caucasus and Xinjiang regions.

In 2011, geopolitical analyst Dr. Webster Tarpley in his article, “The CIA’s Libya Rebels: The Same Terrorists who Killed US, NATO Troops in Iraq,” noted that the US strategy was to:

…use Al Qaeda to overthrow independent governments, and then either Balkanize and partition the countries in question, or else use them as kamikaze puppets against larger enemies like Russia, China, or Iran.

Dr. Tarpley would also note in 2011 that:

One of the fatal contradictions in the current State Department and CIA policy is that it aims at a cordial alliance with Al Qaeda killers in northeast Libya, at the very moment when the United States and NATO are mercilessly bombing the civilian northwest Pakistan in the name of a total war against Al Qaeda, and US and NATO forces are being killed by Al Qaeda guerrillas in that same Afghanistan-Pakistan theater of war. The force of this glaring contradiction causes the entire edifice of US war propaganda to collapse. The US has long since lost any basis in morality for military force. 

In fact, terrorist fighters from northeast Libya may be killing US and NATO troops in Afghanistan right now, even as the US and NATO protect their home base from the Qaddafi government.

Indeed, the very terrorists NATO handed the entire nation of Libya over to, are now allegedly prime targets in Syria and Iraq. The “pro-democracy rebels” of 2011 are now revealed to be “ISIS terrorists” with long-standing ties to Al Qaeda.

US Long-Planned to use Al Qaeda as Mercenaries 

Not even mentioning the fact that Al Qaeda’s very inception was to serve as a joint US-Saudi mercenary force to fight a proxy war in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union, the terrorist organization has since played a central role in the Balkans to justify NATO intervention there, and as a divisive force in Iraq during the US occupation to blunt what began as a formidable joint Sunni-Shia’a resistance movement.

In 2007, it was revealed by Pulitzer Prize-winning veteran journalist Seymour Hersh that the United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia were conspiring to use Al Qaeda once again, this time to undermine, destabilize, and destroy the governments of Syria and Iran in what would be a regional sectarian bloodbath.

Hersh would report (emphasis added):

To undermine Iran, which is predominantly Shiite, the Bush Administration has decided, in effect, to reconfigure its priorities in the Middle East. In Lebanon, the Administration has coöperated with Saudi Arabia’s government, which is Sunni, in clandestine operations that are intended to weaken Hezbollah, the Shiite organization that is backed by Iran. The U.S. has also taken part in clandestine operations aimed at Iran and its ally Syria. A by-product of these activities has been the bolstering of Sunni extremist groups that espouse a militant vision of Islam and are hostile to America and sympathetic to Al Qaeda

Hersh would note that Iran was perceived to be the greater threat and therefore, despite a constant barrage of propaganda claiming otherwise, Al Qaeda and its various affiliates were “lesser enemies.” Even in 2007, Hersh’s report would predict almost verbatim the cataclysmic regional sectarian bloodbath that would take place, with the West’s extremists waging war not only on Shia’a populations but also on other religious minorities including Christians.

His report would note:

Robert Baer, a former longtime C.I.A. agent in Lebanon, has been a severe critic of Hezbollah and has warned of its links to Iranian-sponsored terrorism. But now, he told me, “we’ve got Sunni Arabs preparing for cataclysmic conflict, and we will need somebody to protect the Christians in Lebanon. It used to be the French and the United States who would do it, and now it’s going to be Nasrallah and the Shiites. 

And this is precisely what is happening, word for word, page by page – everything warned about in Hersh’s report has come to pass. In 2011, geopolitical analyst Dr. Webster Tarpley and others would also reiterate the insidious regional campaign Western policymakers were carrying out with Al Qaeda terrorists disguised as “rebels,” “activists,” and “moderate fighters” for the purpose of arming, funding, and even militarily intervening on their behalf in attempts to effect regime change and tilt the balance in the Middle East and North Africa region against Iran, Russia, and China.

CNN’s attempt to explain why ISIS is “suddenly” in Libya is one of many attempts to explain the regional rise of this organization in every way possible besides in terms of the truth – that ISIS is the result of multinational state sponsored terrorism including the US, UK, EU, Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Israel as its chief backers.

NATO Handed ISIS Libya, Wants to Hand ISIS Syria

Inexplicably, amid allegedly fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria, the United States now claims it must first overthrow the Syrian government, despite it being the only viable, secular force in the region capable of keeping ISIS and its affiliates in check. CNN, in an article titled, “Sources: Obama seeks new Syria strategy review to deal with ISIS, al-Assad,” would report:

President Barack Obama has asked his national security team for another review of the U.S. policy toward Syria after realizing that ISIS may not be defeated without a political transition in Syria and the removal of President Bashar al-Assad, senior U.S. officials and diplomats tell CNN.

Neither CNN, nor the politicians it cited in its article were able to articulate just why removing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from power would somehow diminish the fighting capacity of ISIS. With CNN’s recent article on ISIS’ gains in Libya despite US-led NATO regime change there, after decades of Libyan leader Qaddafi keeping extremists in check, it would appear that NATO is once again attempting not to stop Al Qaeda/ISIS, but rather hand them yet another country to use as a base of operations.

The goal is not to stop ISIS or even effect regime change in Syria alone – but rather hand Syria over as a failed, divided state to terrorists to use as a springboard against Iran, then Russia and China.

Clearly, ISIS’ appearance in Libya negates entirely the already incomprehensible strategy the US has proposed of needing to first depose the Syrian government, then fight ISIS. The Syrian government, like that of Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, is the only effective force currently fighting ISIS and Al Qaeda’s many other franchises operating in the region. Deposing the government in Damascus would compound the fight against sectarian terrorists – and the West is fully aware of that. Therefore, attempts to topple the secular government in Damascus is in every way the intentional aiding and abetting of ISIS and the sharing in complicity of all the horrific daily atrocities ISIS and its affiliates are carrying out.

The morally bankrupt, insidious, dangerous, and very genocidal plans hatched in 2007 and executed in earnest in 2011 illustrate that ISIS alone is not the greatest threat to global peace and stability, but also those that constitute its multinational state sponsors. The very West purportedly defending civilization is the chief protagonist destroying it worldwide.  

MARGALLO CALLS TO ACT “FAST” IN LIBYA


MARGALLO CALLS TO ACT “FAST” IN LIBYA

by: Purification González White
International Collective Eyes Peace

 

BUT NOBODY HAS EVEN GIVEN AN EXPLANATION OF WHY ATTACKED AND DESTROYED THAT COUNTRY

“Spain keeps the international pressure to give an urgent solution to the Libyan crisis” and expressed the Monday, March 23, the Foreign Minister, Jose Manuel Garcia Margallo, in an informative breakfast Houses Network Forum, and publishing various media, adding that “Libya must do something quickly and forcefully.” He also added that it supported the efforts of UN delegate, Bernardino León, to agree on a “unity government”.

At this point, Spain or any other country in the Atlanticist coalition have given explanations of the reasons that led them to attack Libya, a friendly country until then, I had gotten gains unthinkable even for many of the European countries, as a full employment, electricity and water free, interest-free loans, free and universal education (scholarships 1,600 € / month to study in other countries), or € 300 per person per month for sharing oil revenues, etc. Libya had the highest HDI in all of Africa, life expectancy was 78, like that of Germany, and was a dam against the flood of migration to Europe since his full employment totaled 2.5 million posts work for sub-Saharan workers.

Libya was bombed and razed under a lie (if they were weapons of mass destruction in Libya a nonexistent bombing of population in Iraq) and, what is worse, under the mandate of Resolution 1973 of the Security Council, which prohibited expressly give a coup. The category of the attackers was reflected in the brutal lynching and murder of Colonel Gadhafi, Libyans killed in 200,000 and the bombing of ports, airports, schools, hospitals, villages, cities, universities, water supply networks, herds … A dates today gave no explanation of why such atrocity was committed. Neither the ICC has yet claimed any of the leaders of the attacking countries.

Nevertheless, Libyans have been reborn from its ashes and retaking control of their country, have a unity government, which is to Tobruk, and a parliament, in which the tribes involved, the National People’s Libyan Movement , military, social movement … but have been excluded from the negotiating table on the future of Libya.

On February 23, convened by the United States (who insists on appropriate oil) meeting in Morocco attended by the Ambassador of that country Deborah Jones, the British Ambassador Michael Aron, and the French Ambassador in Libya was held on one hand, and representatives of Misrata (Libya Dawn, is pure and simple terrorism that serves Libya) and Abdul Hakim Belhadj (Al Qaeda terrorist recognized, now joined the Islamic Emirate, involved in 11-M) and Libyan Abu Obeida, also belonging to the Islamic Emirate. The conclusions of this meeting were among other supporting militias from Misrata (Libya Dawn) to wage war against al Daesh; apply a military solution to Libya; and boycott the dialogue process with the Libyan people, ie the government of Tobruk, which is agreed to dissolve the House of Representatives, in which the tribes involved, the National People’s Libyan Movement and military, as already stated; and forming terrorist groups in Sinai to thwart Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

This same scheme meeting has been moved to the supposed “peace process” in Geneva, led by a man imposed by the United States, Bernardino León, if anything has characterized has been your preferences in negotiating with armed gangs and left out of the dialogue table Libyans.
They are negotiating with terrorists Libya’s future while ignoring the legitimate representatives of the Libyan people who excluded from the bargaining table.

Libya has been assigned by those who attacked the nursery role of mercenaries and armed gangs, the US uses for export to other countries to repeat the script, such as Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Nigeria. How surprised at the events in Tunisia?

Original article:

Ojos para la Paz

MARGALLO INSTA A ACTUAR “RÁPIDO” EN LIBIA

PERO NADIE HA DADO AÚN EXPLICACIONES DE POR QUÉ ATACARON Y DESTRUYERON ESE PAÍS

“España mantiene viva la presión internacional para dar una solución urgente a la crisis libia”, así lo expresó el lunes, 23 de marzo, el Ministro de Asuntos Exteriores, José Manuel García Margallo, en un desayuno informativo del Foro Red de Casas, y que publican distintos medios, agregando que “en Libia hay que hacer algo rápido y con contundencia”. Añadió asimismo que apoya los esfuerzos de delegado de la ONU, Bernardino León, para consensuar un “gobierno de unidad”.

A estas alturas, España ni ningún otro país de la coalición atlantista han dado explicaciones de los motivos que les llevaron a atacar a Libia, un país amigo hasta ese momento, que había conseguido logros impensables incluso para gran parte de los países europeos, como pleno empleo, luz y agua gratis, préstamos sin interés, enseñanza universal y gratuita (con becas de 1.600 €/mes para estudiar en otros países), o 300 € por persona al mes en concepto de reparto de las rentas de petróleo, etc. Libia tenía el mayor índice de desarrollo humano de toda África, su esperanza de vida era de 78 años, igual que la de Alemania, y constituía un muro de contención contra la avalancha migratoria hacia Europa ya que a su pleno empleo sumaba 2.5 millones de puestos de trabajo para trabajadores subsaharianos.

Libia fue bombardeada y arrasada al amparo de una mentira (si en Iraq fueron las armas de destrucción masiva, en Libia unos inexistentes bombardeos de población) y, lo que es más grave, bajo mandato de la Resolución 1.973 del Consejo de Seguridad, que prohibía expresamente dar un golpe de estado. La categoría de los atacantes quedó reflejada en el brutal linchamiento y asesinato del Coronel Ghadafi, en los 200.000 libios asesinados y en los bombardeos de puertos, aeropuertos, escuelas, hospitales, pueblos, ciudades, universidades, redes de abastecimiento de agua, rebaños… A fechas de hoy nadie dio explicaciones de por qué se cometió tal atrocidad. Ni el TPI ha demandado todavía a ninguno de los mandatarios de los países atacantes.

Pese a todo, los libios han ido renaciendo de sus cenizas y retomando las riendas de su país, se han dado un gobierno de unidad, que es el de Tobruk, y un parlamento, en el que participan las tribus, el Movimiento Nacional Popular Libio, los militares, los movimiento sociales…Pero han sido excluidos de la mesa de negociaciones sobre el futuro de Libia.

Con fecha 23 de febrero, convocada por Estados Unidos (que insiste en apropiarse del petróleo) se celebró una reunión en Marruecos a la que asistieron la embajadora de ese país Deborah Jones, el embajador británico Michael Aron y el embajador de Francia en Libia, por una parte, y representantes de Misrata (Libya Dawn, es decir el terrorismo puro y duro que opera en Libia), así como Abdul Hakim Belhadj (reconocido terrorista de Al- Qaeda, sumado ahora al Emirato Islámico, implicado en el 11-M) y el libio Abu Obeida, perteneciente también al Emirato Islámico. Las conclusiones de esa reunión han sido entre otras apoyar a las milicias de Misrata (Libya Dawn) para librar una guerra contra Al Daesh; aplicar un solución militar a Libia; y boicotear el proceso de dialogo del pueblo libio, es decir: el gobierno de Tobruk, del que se acuerda disolver la cámara de representantes, en el que participan las tribus, el Movimiento Nacional Popular Libio y los militares, como ya se ha expuesto; y formar grupos terroristas en el Sinaí para frustrar los planes del presidente egipcio Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

Este mismo esquema de reunión ha sido trasladado al supuesto “proceso de paz” de Ginebra, dirigido por un hombre impuesto por los Estados Unidos, Bernardino León, que si por algo se ha caracterizado ha sido por sus preferencias en negociar con las bandas armadas y dejar fuera de las mesas de diálogo a los libios.
Están negociando con terroristas el futuro de Libia mientras ignoran a los legítimos representantes del pueblo libio al que excluyen de la mesa de negociaciones.

A Libia se le ha asignado por quienes la atacaron el papel de vivero de mercenarios y bandas armadas, que Estados Unidos Utiliza para su exportación a otros países que repiten el guión, como Iraq, Siria, Egipto, Yemen o Nigeria. ¿Cómo extrañarse de los sucesos de Túnez?

25 de marzo de 2015
Purificación González de la Blanca
Colectivo Internacional Ojos para la Paz

Tribal Leaders Refuse to Acknowledge Decisions from Exclusive Dialogs Taking Place Outside the Country


Tribal Leaders Refuse to Acknowledge Decisions from Exclusive Dialogs Taking Place Outside the Country

Tobruk, 22 March 2015

Libyan tribal leaders have said that although there is a necessity for dialogue it must be held inside Libya and that, contrary to UN plans, they will not meet outside the country.

The United Nations Support Mission in Libya (UNSMIL) has said that the a meeting of tribal leaders would be held in Egypt.

Over the past ten days a number of tribal figures have been firing warning shots across the bows of the UN plan to meet in Egypt. On 12 March, one of the leaders of the Magharba tribe, Salah Al-Otiyush, came out firmly against a meeting abroad. The tribes were planning to meet in Libya and that would be sufficient, he said.

A couple of days later, Mohamed Al-Mubashr, the Chairman of the Libya Council of Elders which comprises the country’s tribal leaders, also said his colleagues had discussed the UN invitation to go to Egypt but that they had rejected it. There would be no meeting there, he said.

While some leaders have insisted that it makes more sense to hold the dialogue at home because they are more comfortable there, others have expressed fear of added pressure, should they meet abroad.

“I refuse dialogue outside Libya because we will be pressured to accept agendas that we ordinarily would not agree to,” Chairman of the Shura Council of Elders of Fezzan Abdul Salam Buhulaiga has said.

“Why wouldn’t we talk inside Libya? We are Libyans and we understand each other,” Buhulaiga added.

He and other have claimed that the meetings in Geneva, Morocco and Algeria have not been a success.

The meeting referred to by Otiyush, and which he implied would equivalent to what was being proposed by UNSMIL, took place in Tobruk this weekend and came out heavily in support of the House of Representatives (HoR). However, it comprised tribes already supporting the HoR. These supporting Libya Dawn were not present.

Political meetings held inside the country involving all sides to the Libyan crisis are seen as impossible in the current climate.